Social Context and Information Seeking: Examining the Effects of Network Attitudinal Composition on Engagement with Political Information

Political Behavior

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 793-816

  Levitan, Lindsey ^a   Wronski, Julie ^b  

^a SHEPHERD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Political cognition; Social networks

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911996637     PISSN: 01909320     EISSN: 15736687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11109-013-9247-z     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Bello, J., & Rolfe, M. (in press). Is influence mightier than selection? Forging agreement in discussion networks during a campaign. Social Networks.
2. Ben-Nun Bloom, P., & Levitan, L. C. (2011). We’re closer than I thought: Social network heterogeneity, morality, and political persuasion. Political Psychology,32(4), 643–665.
3. Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1954). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Burt, R. S. (1985). General social survey network items. Connections,8(1), 19–23.
5. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,42(1), 116–131.
6. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.
7. Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73–96). New York: Guilford.
8. Converse, P. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 260–261). New York: Free Press.
9. Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
10. DeWall, C. N., Visser, P. S., & Levitan, L. C. (2006). Openness to attitude change as a function of temporal perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,32(8), 1010–1023.
11. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
12. Fishkin, J. S. (1991). Democracy and deliberation: New directions for democratic reform. New Haven: Cambridge University Press.
13. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York: Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.
14. Goel, S., Mason, W., & Watts, D. J. (2010). Real and perceived attitude agreement in social networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,99(4), 611–621.
15. Holbrook, A. L., & Krosnick, J. A. (2010). Social desirability bias in voter turnout reports tests using the item count technique. Public Opinion Quarterly,74(1), 37–67.
16. Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1987). Networks in context: The social flow of political information. American Political Science Review,81(4), 1197–1216.
17. Huckfeldt, R. R., & Sprague, J. D. (1995). Citizens, politics, and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M., & Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Political Psychology,25(1), 65–95.
19. Kramer, M. W., Kuo, C. L., & Dailey, J. C. (1997). The impact of brainstorming techniques on subsequent group processes: Beyond generating ideas. Small Group Research,28(2), 218–242.
20. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin,108(3), 480–498.
21. Kunda, Z. (1999). Social cognition: Making sense of people. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
22. Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science,45(4), 951–971.
23. Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2006). How voters decide: Information processing in election campaigns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Lavine, H. G., Johnston, C. D., & Steenbergen, M. R. (2012). The ambivalent partisan: How critical loyalty promotes democracy. USA: Oxford University Press.
25. Lazer, D., Rubineau, B., Chetkovich, C., Katz, N., & Neblo, M. (2010). The coevolution of networks and political attitudes. Political Communication,27(3), 248–274.
26. Levitan, L. C., & Visser, P. S. (2008). The impact of the social context on resistance to persuasion: Effortful versus effortless responses to counter-attitudinal information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,44(3), 640–649.
27. Levitan, L. C., & Visser, P. S. (2009). Social network composition and attitude strength: Exploring the dynamics within newly formed social networks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,45(5), 1057–1067.
28. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
29. Lupia, A. (1994). Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. The American Political Science Review,88(1), 63–76.
30. Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. McClurg, S. D. (2006). The electoral relevance of political talk: Examining disagreement and expertise effects in social networks on political participation. American Journal of Political Science,50(3), 737–754.
32. Mutz, D. C. (2002a). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science,46(4), 838–855.
33. Mutz, D. C. (2002b). Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. American Political Science Review,96(1), 111–126.
34. Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,19, 123–205.
36. Priester, J. R., & Petty, R. E. (2001). Extending the bases of subjective attitudinal ambivalence: Interpersonal and intrapersonal antecedents of evaluative tension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,80(1), 19–34.
37. Ryan, J. B. (2010). The effects of network expertise and biases on vote choice. Political Communication,27(1), 44–58.
38. Simon, H. A. (1979). Information processing models of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology,30, 363–396.
39. Simon, H. A. (1990). Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology,41, 1–20.
40. Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,30(4), 526–537.
41. Taber, C., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science,50(3), 755–769.
42. Tomz, M., Wittenberg, J., & King, G. (2003). CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Journal of Statistical Software,8(1), 1–30.
43. Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. A. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Visser, P. S., & Mirabile, R. R. (2004). Attitudes in the social context: The impact of social network composition on individual-level attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,87(6), 779–795.
45. Welch, M. J. (1974). Infants’ visual attention to varying degrees of novelty. Child Development,45, 344–350.