Standards of Scientific Conduct: Are There Any?

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 885-896

  Kalichman, Michael ^a   Sweet, Monica ^b   Plemmons, Dena ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Authorship; Collaboration; Data management; Research ethics; Responsible conduct of research; Standards

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; COOPERATION; CURRICULUM; DEMOGRAPHY; EDUCATION; ETHICS; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; LEARNING; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; NEUROSCIENCE; NURSING EDUCATION; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESEARCH ETHICS; SCIENCE; STANDARDS; TEACHING; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY; WRITING;

AUTHORSHIP; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; CURRICULUM; DATA COLLECTION; EDUCATION, GRADUATE; EDUCATION, NURSING, GRADUATE; ETHICS, RESEARCH; FACULTY; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; LEARNING; MICROBIOLOGY; NEUROSCIENCES; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; SCIENCE; TEACHING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84911993806     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: 14715546     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-013-9500-1     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. AAMC. (1982). The maintenance of high ethical standards in the conduct of research, AAMC ad hoc committee on the maintenance of high ethical standards in the conduct of research. Washington, DC: AAMC.
2. AAMC. (2006). Compact between postdoctoral appointees and their mentors. https://members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/CompactBetweenPostdoctorl2006.pdf. Accessed October 25, 2013.
3. AAMC. (2008). Compact between biomedical graduate students and their mentors. https://members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/CompactBetweenBiomedicalGraduate.pdf. Accessed October 25, 2013.
4. Anderson, M. S., Horn, A., Risbey, K. R., Ronning, E. A., De Vries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2007). What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists’ misbehavior? Findings from a national survey of NIH-funded scientists. Academic Medicine,82, 853–860.
5. Antes, A. L., Murphy, S. T., Waples, E. P., Mumford, M. D., Brown, R. P., Connelly, S., et al. (2009). A meta-analysis of ethics instruction effectiveness in the sciences. Ethics and Behavior,19(5), 379–402.
6. DuBois, J. M., & Dueker, J. M. (2009). Teaching and assessing the responsible conduct of research: A Delphi consensus panel report. Journal of Research Administration,40(1), 49–70.
7. Groves, R. M. (2006). Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly,70, 646–675.
8. Groves, R. M., & Peytcheva, E. (2008). The impact of nonresponse rates on nonresponse bias: A meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly,72, 167–189.
9. Heitman, E., & Bulger, R. E. (2005). Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content. Accountability in Research,12(3), 207–224.
10. ICMJE. (2013). 2. Who is an author? Roles and responsibilities of authors, contributors, reviewers, editors, publishers, and owners: Defining the role of authors and contributors, recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals, international committee of medical journal editors. http://icmje.org/roles_a.html. Accessed October 25, 2013.
11. IOM. (1989). The responsible conduct of research in the health sciences. Washington, DC: National Academies of Science. http://books.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=1388. Accessed October 25, 2013.
12. Kalichman, M. W., & Friedman, P. J. (1991). A pilot study of biomedical trainees’ perceptions concerning research ethics. Academic Medicine,67, 769–775.
13. Kalichman, M. W., & Plemmons, D. K. (2007). Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses. Academic Medicine,82(9), 846–852.
14. Keeter, S., Kennedy, C., Dimock, M., Best, J., & Craighill, P. (2006). Gauging the impact of growing nonresponse on estimates from a national RDD telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly,70, 759–779.
15. Keeter, S., Miller, C., Kohut, A., Groves, R. M., & Presser, S. (2000). Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a large national telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly,64, 125–148.
16. Mastroianni, A. C., & Kahn, J. P. (1999). Encouraging accountability in research: A pilot assessment of training efforts. Accountability in Research,7(1), 85–100.
17. NIH. (1989). Requirements for programs on the responsible conduct of research in national research service award institutional training programs. Guide for Grants and Contracts, 18(45), 1. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/historical/1989_12_22_Vol_18_No_45.pdf. Accessed October 25, 2013.
18. NIH. (2009). Update on the requirement for instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Notice Number: NOT-OD-10-019. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not-od-10-019.html. Accessed October 25, 2013.
19. NSF. (2010). B. Responsible conduct of research in grantee standards. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf10_1/aag_4.jsp#IVB. Accessed October 25, 2013.
20. PHS. (2000). Announcement of final PHS policy on instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Notice Number: NOT-OD-01-007. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/Notice-files/NOT-OD-01-007.html. Accessed October 25, 2013.
21. Steneck, N. H., & Bulger, R. E. (2007). The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine,82(9), 829–834.
22. Visser, P. S., Krosnick, J. A., Marquette, J., & Curtin, M. (1996). Mail surveys for election forecasting? An evaluation of the Columbus Dispatch poll. Public Opinion Quarterly,60, 181–227.