Evaluation of the Bruker Biotyper and VITEK MS MALDI-TOF MS systems for the identification of unusual and/or difficult-to-identify microorganisms isolated from clinical specimens

European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

Volumn 33, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 2163-2171

  McElvania TeKippe, E ^a   Burnham, C A D ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RNA 16S; BACTERIAL DNA;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM CULTURE; BACTERIUM IDENTIFICATION; BACTERIUM ISOLATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENE SEQUENCE; GENUS; GOLD STANDARD; LABORATORY TEST; MATRIX ASSISTED LASER DESORPTION IONIZATION TIME OF FLIGHT MASS SPECTROMETRY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; TURNAROUND TIME; BACTERIAL INFECTION; BACTERIUM; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; HUMAN; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MICROBIOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY;

BACTERIA; BACTERIAL INFECTIONS; BACTERIAL TYPING TECHNIQUES; DNA, BACTERIAL; HUMANS; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPECTROMETRY, MASS, MATRIX-ASSISTED LASER DESORPTION-IONIZATION;

EID: 84911950354     PISSN: 09349723     EISSN: 14354373     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-014-2183-y     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ford BA, Burnham CA (2013) Optimization of routine identification of clinically relevant Gram-negative bacteria by use of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry and the Bruker Biotyper. J Clin Microbiol 51(5):1412–1420. doi:10.1128/JCM.01803-12
2. McElvania Tekippe E, Shuey S, Winkler DW, Butler MA, Burnham CA (2013) Optimizing identification of clinically relevant Gram-positive organisms by use of the Bruker Biotyper matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry system. J Clin Microbiol 51(5):1421–1427. doi:10.1128/JCM.02680-12
3. Bizzini A, Durussel C, Bille J, Greub G, Prod’hom G (2010) Performance of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for identification of bacterial strains routinely isolated in a clinical microbiology laboratory. J Clin Microbiol 48(5):1549–1554. doi:10.1128/JCM.01794-09
4. Eigner U, Holfelder M, Oberdorfer K, Betz-Wild U, Bertsch D, Fahr AM (2009) Performance of a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry system for the identification of bacterial isolates in the clinical routine laboratory. Clin Lab 55(7–8):289–296
5. Neville SA, Lecordier A, Ziochos H, Chater MJ, Gosbell IB, Maley MW, van Hal SJ (2011) Utility of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry following introduction for routine laboratory bacterial identification. J Clin Microbiol 49(8):2980–2984. doi:10.1128/JCM.00431-11
6. van Veen SQ, Claas EC, Kuijper EJ (2010) High-throughput identification of bacteria and yeast by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry in conventional medical microbiology laboratories. J Clin Microbiol 48(3):900–907. doi:10.1128/JCM.02071-09
7. Risch M, Radjenovic D, Han JN, Wydler M, Nydegger U, Risch L (2010) Comparison of MALDI TOF with conventional identification of clinically relevant bacteria. Swiss Med Wkly 140:w13095. doi:10.4414/smw.2010.13095
8. Seng P, Drancourt M, Gouriet F, La Scola B, Fournier PE, Rolain JM, Raoult D (2009) Ongoing revolution in bacteriology: routine identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Clin Infect Dis 49(4):543–551. doi:10.1086/600885
9. Hsu YM, Burnham CA (2014) MALDI-TOF MS identification of anaerobic bacteria: assessment of pre-analytical variables and specimen preparation techniques. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 79(2):144–148. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.02.007
10. Cherkaoui A, Hibbs J, Emonet S, Tangomo M, Girard M, Francois P, Schrenzel J (2010) Comparison of two matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry methods with conventional phenotypic identification for routine identification of bacteria to the species level. J Clin Microbiol 48(4):1169–1175. doi:10.1128/JCM.01881-09
11. Jamal WY, Shahin M, Rotimi VO (2013) Comparison of two matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry methods and API 20AN for identification of clinically relevant anaerobic bacteria. J Med Microbiol 62(Pt 4):540–544. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.053256-0
12. Chen JH, Ho PL, Kwan GS, She KK, Siu GK, Cheng VC, Yuen KY, Yam WC (2013) Direct bacterial identification in positive blood cultures by use of two commercial matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry systems. J Clin Microbiol 51(6):1733–1739. doi:10.1128/JCM.03259-12
13. Mancini N, De Carolis E, Infurnari L, Vella A, Clementi N, Vaccaro L, Ruggeri A, Posteraro B, Burioni R, Clementi M, Sanguinetti M (2013) Comparative evaluation of the Bruker Biotyper and Vitek MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry systems for identification of yeasts of medical importance. J Clin Microbiol 51(7):2453–2457. doi:10.1128/JCM.00841-13
14. Fang H, Ohlsson AK, Ullberg M, Ozenci V (2012) Evaluation of species-specific PCR, Bruker MS, VITEK MS and the VITEK 2 system for the identification of clinical Enterococcus isolates. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31(11):3073–3077. doi:10.1007/s10096-012-1667-x
15. Marko DC, Saffert RT, Cunningham SA, Hyman J, Walsh J, Arbefeville S, Howard W, Pruessner J, Safwat N, Cockerill FR, Bossler AD, Patel R, Richter SS (2012) Evaluation of the Bruker Biotyper and Vitek MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry systems for identification of nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli isolated from cultures from cystic fibrosis patients. J Clin Microbiol 50(6):2034–2039. doi:10.1128/JCM.00330-12
16. Martiny D, Busson L, Wybo I, El Haj RA, Dediste A, Vandenberg O (2012) Comparison of the Microflex LT and Vitek MS systems for routine identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol 50(4):1313–1325. doi:10.1128/JCM.05971-11
17. Pence MA, McElvania Tekippe E, Wallace MA, Burnham CA (2014) Comparison and optimization of two MALDI-TOF MS platforms for the identification of medically relevant yeast species. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis (in press)
18. Perez KK, Olsen RJ, Musick WL, Cernoch PL, Davis JR, Land GA, Peterson LE, Musser JM (2013) Integrating rapid pathogen identification and antimicrobial stewardship significantly decreases hospital costs. Arch Pathol Lab Med 137(9):1247–1254. doi:10.5858/arpa.2012-0651-OA
19. Beekmann SE, Diekema DJ, Chapin KC, Doern GV (2003) Effects of rapid detection of bloodstream infections on length of hospitalization and hospital charges. J Clin Microbiol 41(7):3119–3125
20. Barenfanger J, Drake C, Kacich G (1999) Clinical and financial benefits of rapid bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. J Clin Microbiol 37(5):1415–1418
21. Wolk DM, Dunne WM Jr (2011) New technologies in clinical microbiology. J Clin Microbiol 49(9 Suppl):S62–S67
22. Kang CI, Kim SH, Kim HB, Park SW, Choe YJ, Oh MD, Kim EC, Choe KW (2003) Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia: risk factors for mortality and influence of delayed receipt of effective antimicrobial therapy on clinical outcome. Clin Infect Dis 37(6):745–751. doi:10.1086/377200