Construction of monomer-free, highly crosslinked, water-compatible polymers

Journal of Dental Research

Volumn 93, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 1326-1331

  Dailing, E A ^a   Lewis, S H ^b   Barros, M D ^b   Stansbury, J W ^a,b  

^a University of Colorado at Boulder   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

adhesive resin; hydrophilic; nanogel; phase separation; photopolymerization; polymer networks

Indexed keywords

2 HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE; 2,2-BIS-(4-(2-METHACRYLOXYETHOXY)PHENYL)PROPANE; 2-ISOCYANATOETHYL METHACRYLATE; ACETONE; ALKANONE; AZOBIS(ISOBUTYRONITRILE); BIOMATERIAL; DENTAL MATERIAL; GEL; ISOCYANIC ACID DERIVATIVE; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE; MERCAPTOETHANOL; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; METHYLETHYL KETONE; NANOMATERIAL; NITRILE; POLYMER; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; TETRAETHYLENEGLYCOL DIMETHACRYLATE; WATER;

CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; CHEMISTRY; GEL; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; PLIABILITY; POLYMERIZATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; SYNTHESIS; YOUNG MODULUS;

ACETONE; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BUTANONES; DENTAL MATERIALS; ELASTIC MODULUS; GELS; HUMANS; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; ISOCYANATES; MATERIALS TESTING; MERCAPTOETHANOL; METHACRYLATES; NANOSTRUCTURES; NITRILES; PLIABILITY; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYMERIZATION; POLYMERS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WATER;

EID: 84911910211     PISSN: 00220345     EISSN: 15440591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022034514552490     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Dahl JE. Potential of dental adhesives to induce mucosal irritation evaluated by the HET-CAM method. Acta Odontol Scand. 2007 ; 65: 275-283
2. Guo X, Spencer P, Wang Y, Ye Q, Yao X, Williams K. Effects of a solubility enhancer on penetration of hydrophobic component in model adhesives into wet demineralized dentin. Dent Mater. 2007 ; 23: 1473-1481
3. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Sano H, Endo K, Oguchi H. The extent to which resin can infiltrate dentin by acetone-based adhesives. J Dent Res. 2002 ; 81: 74-78
4. Hiraishi N, Tochio N, Kigawa T, Otsuki M. Role of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate in the interaction of dental monomers with collagen studied by saturation transfer difference NMR. J Dent. 2014 ; 42: 484-489
5. Holmes RG, Rueggeberg FA, Callan RS, Caughman F, Chan DC, Pashley DH, et al. Effect of solvent type and content on monomer conversion of a model resin system as a thin film. Dent Mater. 2007 ; 23: 1506-1512
6. Lin Y, Stansbury JW. Near-infrared spectroscopy investigation of water effects on cationic photopolymerization of vinyl ether systems. J Polymer Sci: Polymer Chem. 2004 ; 42: 1985-1998
7. Liu J, Howard GD, Lewis SH, Barros MD, Stansbury JW. A study of shrinkage stress reduction and mechanical properties of nanogel-modified resin systems. Eur Polym J. 2012 ; 48: 1819-1828
8. Liu J, Rad I, Sun F, Stansbury JW. Photo-reactive nanogel as a means to tune properties during polymer network formation. Polym Chem. 2014 ; 5: 227-233
9. Lovell LG, Stansbury JW, Syrpes DC, Bowman CN. Effects of composition and reactivity on the reaction kinetics of dimethacrylate/dimethacrylate copolymerizations. Macromolecules. 1999 ; 32: 3913-3921
10. Marshall SJ, Bayne SC, Baier R, Tomsia AP, Marshall GW. A review of adhesion science. Dent Mater. 2010 ; 26: e11 - e16
11. Moraes RR, Garcia JW, Barros MD, Lewis SH, Pfeifer CS, Liu J, et al. Control of polymerization shrinkage and stress in nanogel-modified monomer and composite materials. Dent Mater. 2011 ; 27: 509-519
12. Moraes RR, Garcia JW, Wilson ND, Lewis SH, Barros MD, Yang B, et al. Improved dental adhesive formulations based on reactive nanogel additives. J Dent Res. 2012 ; 91: 179-184
13. Park J, Eslick J, Ye Q, Misra A, Spencer P. The influence of chemical structure on the properties in methacrylate-based dentin adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011 ; 27: 1086-1093
14. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, Tjäderhane L, Carvalho RM, Carrilho M, et al. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011 ; 27: 1-16
15. Spencer P, Wang Y. Adhesive phase separation at the dentin interface under wet bonding conditions. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002 ; 62: 447-456
16. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Have dentin adhesives become too hydrophilic?. J Can Dent Assoc. 2003 ; 69: 726-731
17. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials. 2007 ; 28: 3757-3785
18. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, Peumans M, De Munck J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. The role of HEMA in one-step self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2008 ; 24: 1412-1419
19. Ye Q, Wang Y, Spencer P. Nanophase separation of polymers exposed to simulated bonding conditions. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009 ; 88: 339-348
20. Yiu CK, Pashley EL, Hiraishi N, King NM, Goracci C, Ferrari M, et al. Solvent and water retention in dental adhesive blends after evaporation. Biomaterials. 2005 ; 26: 6863-6872
21. Zanchi CH, Munchow EA, Ogliari FA, de Carvalho RV, Chersoni S, Prati C, et al. A new approach in self-etching adhesive formulations: replacing HEMA for surfactant dimethacrylate monomers. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2011 ; 99: 51-57