Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form into Turkish

Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy

Volumn 44, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 899-909

  Çelik, Derya ^a   Coşkunsu, Dilber ^b,c   Kiliҫoʇlu, Önder ^d   Ergönül, Önder ^e   Irrgang, James J ^f  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Acibadem Fulya Hospital   (Turkey)

^c HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^d ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^e KOÇ UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^f UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

ACL; IKDC; Reliability; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE INJURY; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; PUBLICATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; TURKEY; VALIDATION STUDY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CULTURE; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE INJURIES; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; TRANSLATIONS; TURKEY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84911487970     PISSN: 01906011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2014.4865     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Anderson AF, Irrgang JJ, Kocher MS, Mann BJ, Harrast JJ. The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form: normative data. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:128-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0363546505280214
2. Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR, McCloskey JW. Rigorous statistical reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing of the Cincinnati knee rating system in 350 subjects with uninjured, injured, or anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27:402-416.
3. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:3186-3191.
4. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833-1840.
5. Çelik D, Coşkunsu D, Kilic¸oʇlu O. Translation and cultural adaptation of the Turkish Lysholm knee scale: ease of use, validity, and reliability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:2602-2610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3046-z
6. Crawford K, Briggs KK, Rodkey WG, Steadman JR. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the IKDC score for meniscus injuries of the knee. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:839-844. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2007.02.005
7. de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Bouter LM. Current challenges in clinimetrics. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:1137-1141.
8. Evcik D, Ay S, Ege A, Turel A, Kavuncu V. Adaptation and validation of Turkish version of the Knee Outcome Survey-Activities for Daily Living Scale. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2077-2082. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0826-6
9. Fu SN, Chan YH. Translation and validation of Chinese version of International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:1186-1189. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2010.524274
10. Greco NJ, Anderson AF, Mann BJ, et al. Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form in comparison to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System, and Short Form 36 in patients with focal articular cartilage defects. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:891-902. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0363546509354163
11. Haverkamp D, Sierevelt IN, Breugem SJ, Lohuis K, Blankevoort L, van Dijk CN. Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1680-1684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0363546506288854
12. Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, et al. Development and validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:600-613.
13. Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, et al. Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1567-1573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0363546506288855
14. Irrgang JJ, Marx RG. Clinical outcomes in sport and exercise physical therapies. In: Kolt G, Snyder-Mackler L, eds. Physical Therapies in Sport and Exercise. Edinburgh, UK: Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone; 2007:206-219.
15. Irrgang JJ, Snyder-Mackler L, Wainner RS, Fu FH, Harner CD. Development of a patient-reported measure of function of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1132-1145.
16. Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17:163-170.
17. Kane RL. Outcome measures. In: Understanding Health Care Outcomes Research. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers; 1997:17-18.
18. Kim JG, Ha JK, Lee JY, Seo SS, Choi CH, Lee MC. Translation and validation of the Korean version of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2013;25:106-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.5792/ksrr.2013.25.3.106
19. Koc¸yiʇit H, Aydemir Ö, Fişek G, Ölmez N, Memiş A. [Reliability and validity of Turkish version of Short Form 36: a study of patients with rheumatoid disorder] J Drug Ther. 1999;12:102-106.
20. Kosinski M, Keller SD, Hatoum HT, Kong SX, Ware JE, Jr. The SF-36 Health Survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: tests of data quality, scaling assumptions and score reliability. Med Care. 1999;37:MS10-MS22.
21. Kujala UM, Jaakkola LH, Koskinen SK, Taimela S, Hurme M, Nelimarkka O. Scoring of patellofemoral disorders. Arthroscopy. 1993;9:159-163.
22. Kuru T, Dereli EE, Yaliman A. Validity of the Turkish version of the Kujala patellofemoral score in patellofemoral pain syndrome. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2010;44:152-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2010.2252
23. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.
24. Lertwanich P, Praphruetkit T, Keyurapan E, Lamsam C, Kulthanan T. Validity and reliability of Thai version of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008;91:1218-1225.
25. Lysholm J, Gillquist J. Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med. 1982;10:150-154.
26. Marx RG, Menezes A, Horovitz L, Jones EC, Warren RF. A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:730-735.
27. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Jr., Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31:247-263.
28. Metsavaht L, Leporace G, Riberto M, de Mello Sposito MM, Batista LA. Translation and crosscultural adaptation of the Brazilian version of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form: validity and reproducibility. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1894-1899. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0363546510365314
29. Metsavaht L, Leporace G, Riberto M, et al. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale into a Brazilian Portuguese version and validation on patients with knee injuries. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42:932-939. http://dx.doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2012.4101
30. Norman GR, Stratford P, Regehr G. Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:869-879.
31. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
32. Padua R, Bondi R, Ceccarelli E, et al. Italian version of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form: crosscultural adaptation and validation. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:819-823. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2004.06.011
33. Paker N, Buʇdayci D, Sabirli F, Özel S, Ersoy S. Diz incinme ve osteoartrit sonuc¸ skoru: Türkc¸e sürümünün güvenilirlik ve gec¸erlilik c¸alişmasi. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci. 2007;27:350-356.
34. Patrick DL, Deyo RA. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care. 1989;27:S217-S232.
35. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;28:88-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1998.28.2.88
36. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
37. Tüzün EH, Eker L, Aytar A, Daskapan A, Bayramoʇlu M. Acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Turkish version of WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005;13:28-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2004.10.010
38. Ware JE, Jr., Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-483.