Development of a patient-reported measure of function of the knee

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 80, Issue 8, 1998, Pages 1132-1145

  Irrgang, James J ^a   Snyder Mackler, Lynn ^b   Wainner, Robert S ^a   Fu, Freddie H ^a,c   Harner, Christopher D ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE DISEASE; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE LIGAMENT INJURY; KNEE MENISCUS RUPTURE; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; PATELLOFEMORAL JOINT; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF REPORT;

EID: 0031712017     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199808000-00006     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bassiouni, M.; Bassiouni, H.; and el-Feki, M.: Sensitivity versus specificity of phonoarthrography as an indicator for cartilage degeneration. Clin. Rheumatol., 14: 135-142, 1995.
2. Bellamy, N., and Buchanan, W. W.: A preliminary evaluation of the dimensionality and clinical importance of pain and disability in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Clin. Rheumatol., 5: 231-241, 1986.
3. Bellamy, N.; Buchanan, W. W.; Goldsmith, C. H.; Campbell, J.; and Stitt, L. W.: Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J. Rheumatol., 15: 1833-1840, 1988.
4. Bergner, M.; Bobbitt, R. A.; Carter, W. B.; and Gilson, B. S.: The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med. Care, 19: 787-805, 1981.
5. Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, p. 26. New York, Academy Press, 1977.
6. Deyo, R. A.: Comparative validity of the Sickness Impact Profile and shorter scales for functional assessment in low-back pain. Spine, 11: 951-954, 1986.
7. Deyo, R. A., and Diehl, A. K.: Measuring physical and psychosocial function in patients with low-back pain. Spine, 8: 635-642, 1983.
8. Guyatt, G. H.; Feeny, D. H.; and Patrick, D. L.: Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann. Intern. Med., 118: 622-629, 1993.
9. Hefti, F.; Müller, W.; Jakob, R. P.; and Stäubli, H. U.: Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg., Sports Traumat., Arthrosc., 1: 226-234, 1993.
10. Hudak, P. L.; Amadio, P. C.; Bombardier, C.; and the Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG): Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand). Am. J. Indust. Med., 29: 602-608, 1996.
11. Insall, J. N.; Dorr, L. D.; Scott, R. D.; and Scott, W. N.: Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin. Orthop., 248: 13-14, 1989.
12. Kirshner, B., and Guyatt, G.: A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J. Chronic Dis., 38: 27-36, 1985.
13. McHorney, C. A.; Ware, J. E., Jr.; and Raczek, A.: The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med. Care, 31: 247-263, 1993.
14. McHorney, C. A.; Ware, J. E., Jr.; Lu, J. F.; and Sherbourne, C. D.: The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med. Care, 32: 40-66, 1994.
15. McSweeny, A. J., and Creer, T. L.: Health-related quality-of-life assessment in medical care. Disease-a-Month, 41: 1-71, 1995.
16. Martin, D. P.; Engelberg, R.; Agel, J.; Snapp, D.; and Swiontkowski, M. F.: Development of a musculoskeletal extremity health status instrument: the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Instrument. J. Orthop. Res., 14: 173-181, 1996.
17. Nagi, S. Z.: Disability concepts revisited: implications for prevention. In Disability in America: Toward a National Agenda for Prevention, edited by A. M. Pope and A. R. Tarlov. Appendix A, pp. 309-327. Washington, D.C., National Academy Press, 1991.
18. Nitko, A. J.: Educational Tests and Measurement: An Introduction, p. 396. New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1983.
19. Noyes, F. R.; McGinniss, G. H.; and Mooar, L. A.: Functional disability in the anterior cruciate insufficient knee syndrome. Review of knee rating systems and projected risk factors in determining treatment. Sports Med., 1: 278-302, 1984.
20. Shapiro, E. T.; Richmond, J. C.; Rockett, S. E.; McGrath, M. M.; and Donaldson, W. R.: The use of a generic, patient-based health assessment (SF-36) for evaluation of patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am. J. Sports Med., 24: 196-200, 1996.
21. Sharma, S.: Applied Multivariate Techniques, p. 76. New York, John Wiley, 1996.
22. Shrout, P. E., and Fleiss, J. L.: Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psych. Bull., 86: 420-428, 1979.
23. Stratford, P. W.; Binkley, J. M.; and Riddle, D. L.: Health status measures: strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores. Phys. Ther., 76: 1109-1123, 1996.
24. Stratford, P. W.; Binkley, J.; Solomon, P.; Gill, C.; and Finch, E.: Assessing change over time in patients with low back pain. Phys. Ther., 74: 528-533, 1994.
25. Tegner, Y., and Lysholm, J.: Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin. Orthop., 198: 43-49, 1985.
26. Ware, J. E., Jr., and Sherbourne, C. D.: The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med. Care, 30: 473-483, 1992.