Responsiveness of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form in comparison to the western ontario and mcmaster universities osteoarthritis index, modified cincinnati knee rating system, and short form 36 in patients with focal articular cartilage defects

American Journal of Sports Medicine

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 891-902

  Greco, Nicholas J ^a   Anderson, Allen F ^b   Mann, Barton J ^c   Cole, Brian J ^d   Farr, Jack ^e   Nissen, Carl W ^f   Irrgang, James J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Tennessee Orthopedic Alliance   (United States)

^c American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine   (United States)

^d RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e ORTHOINDY   (United States)

^f Connnecticut Children's Medical Center ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

IKDC Subjective Knee Form; Patient reported outcomes; Reliability; Responsiveness

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISABILITY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INJURY; KNEE; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PLASTIC SURGERY; QUESTIONNAIRE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; COHORT STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77952715766     PISSN: 03635465     EISSN: 15523365     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0363546509354163     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. American Educational Research Association. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing/American Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, 1-194. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association ; 1999.
2. Anderson AA, Irrgang JJ, Kocher MS, Mann BJ, Harrast JJ, International Knee Documentation Committee. The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form: normative data. Am J Sports Med. 2006 ; 34: 128-135.
3. Beaton DE Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness. Spine. 2000 ; 25: 3192-3199.
4. Beaton DE, Bombardier C., Katz JN, et al. Looking for important change/differences in studies of responsiveness. J Rheumatol. 2001 ; 28: 400-405.
5. Beaton DE, Hogg-Johnson S., Bombardier C. Evaluating changes in health status: reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 ; 50: 79-93.
6. Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V., Bombardier C. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther. 2001 ; 14: 128-146.
7. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Academic Press ; 1969.
8. Crocker L., Algina J. Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers ; 1986.
9. Deyo RA, Centor RM Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: An analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis. 1986 ; 39: 897-906.
10. Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Russell IT SF36 health survey questionnaire: II. responsiveness to changes in health status in four common clinical conditions. Qual Health Care. 1994 ; 3: 186-192.
11. Hefti F., Müller W., Jakob RP, Stäubli H-U. Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1993 ; 1: 226-234.
12. Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 ; 53: 459-468.
13. Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, et al. Development and validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med. 2001 ; 29: 600-613.
14. Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, et al. Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med. 2006 ; 34: 1567-1573.
15. Irrgang JJ, Marx RG Clinical outcomes in sport and exercise physical therapies. In: Kolt G, Snyder-Mackler L, eds. Physical Therapies in Sport and Exercise. 2 nd ed. Edinburgh, UK: Elsevier ; 2007: 205-218.
16. Liang MH, Fossel AH, Larson MG Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Medical Care. 1990 ; 28: 632-642.
17. Norman GR Issues in the use of change scores in randomized trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989 ; 11: 1097-1105.
18. Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Riddle DL Health status measures: strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores. Phys Ther. 1996 ; 76: 1109-1123.