Rescaling Environmental Governance - the Influence of European Transnational Cooperation Initiatives

Environmental Policy and Governance

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 324-337

  Stead, Dominic ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Baltic Sea; Environmental governance; Europe, Europeanization; Rescaling; Transnational cooperation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911471112     PISSN: 1756932X     EISSN: 17569338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eet.1649     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Allmendinger P, Haughton G. 2009. Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries and metagovernance: the new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway. Environment and Planning A 41(3): 617-633.
2. Andonova LB, Mitchell RB. 2010. The rescaling of global environmental politics. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 35(1): 255-282.
3. Baltic Sea Regional Programme Joint Technical Secretariat. 2013. Operational Programme of the Baltic Sea Region Programme 2014-2020. Draft Version as of 12 November 2013. Baltic Sea Region Joint Technical Secretariat: Rostock.
4. Bartolini S. 2005. Restructuring Europe. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
5. Benner T, Reinicke WH, Witte JM. 2003. Global public policy networks: lessons learned and challenges ahead. Brookings Review 21(2): 18-21.
6. Bulkeley H 2005. Reconfiguring environmental governance: towards a politics of scales and networks. Political Geography 24(8): 875-902.
7. Cappellin R. 1998. Transborder co-operation along the EU's external borders and the turnabout of regional development policies: a Mediterranean perspective. In The NEBI Yearbook 1998. North European and Baltic Sea Integration, Hedegaard L, Lindström B, Joenniemi P, Östhol A, Peschel K, Stalvant CE (eds). Springer Verlag: Berlin; 323-335.
8. Clark J, Jones A. 2008. The spatialities of Europeanisation: territory, government and power on 'EUrope'. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 33(3): 300-318.
9. Commission of the European Communities, CEC. 2009a. European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(2009)248 Final. Commission of the European Communities, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg.
10. Commission of the European Communities, CEC. 2009b. European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Action Plan. Commission Staff Working Document Accompanying the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. SEC(2009)712. Commission of the European Communities, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg.
11. Committee on Spatial Development, CSD. 1999. European Spatial Development Perspective. Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the EU. Office for OfficialPublications of the European Community: Luxembourg.
12. Cottey A (ed). 1999. Subregional Cooperation in the New Europe: Building Security, Prosperity, and Solidarity from the Barents to the Black Sea. Macmillan: London.
13. Deas I, Lord A. 2006. From a new regionalism to an unusual regionalism? The emergence of non-standard regional spaces and lessons for the territorial reorganisation of the state. Urban Studies 43(10): 1847-1877.
14. Dühr S. 2006. The Visual Language of Spatial Planning. Exploring Cartographic Representations for Spatial Planning in Europe. Routledge: London.
15. Dühr S, Nadin V. 2007. Europeanization through transnational territorial cooperation? The case of INTERREG IIIB North-West Europe. Planning Practice and Research 22(3): 373-394.
16. European Commission. 2009. Macro-Regional Strategies in the EU. A Discussion Paper Presented by Commissioner Pawel Samecki on 16/09/09. DG Regional Policy European Commission: Brussels. http://www.ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/cooperation/baltic/press_en.htm.
17. European Commission. 2011a. Interreg IIIB: transnational cooperation. http://www.ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/interreg3/abc/voletb_en.htm.
18. European Commission. 2011b. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the Implementation of the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region (EUSBSR). COM(2011) 381 final. European Commission: Brussels. http://www.ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/cooperate/baltic/documents_en.cfm.
19. European Commission. 2012. Regional Government Matters: A Study on Regional Variation in Quality of Government Within the EU Working Paper 01/2012. European Commission Directorate-General for Regional Policy: Brussels.
20. European Commission. 2013. Cohesion Policy 2007-2013: Transnational Programmes Under the European Territorial Cooperation Objective. European Commission: Brussels. http://www.ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/atlas2007/transnational/index_en.htm.
21. Faludi A. 2009. A turning point in the development of European spatial planning? The 'Territorial Agenda of the European Union' and the 'First Action Programme'. Progress in Planning 71(1): 1-42.
22. Friis J. 2012. Danish Presidency of the Council: the European priorities. Newsletter INTERACT, winter 2011/2012: 12-13. http://www.interact-eu.net/interact_newsletter/250.
23. Gänzle S. 2011. Introduction: transnational governance and policy-making in the Baltic Sea Region. Journal of Baltic Studies 42(1): 1-7.
24. Giguère S. (ed). 2007. Baltic Partnerships. Integration, Growth and Local Governance in the Baltic Sea Region. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Paris.
25. Haughton G, Allmendinger P. 2007. Soft spaces in planning. Town and Country Planning 76(9): 306-308.
26. Haughton G, Allmendinger P, Counsell D, Vigar G. 2009. The New Spatial Planning: Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries. Routledge: London.
27. Hermanson AS. 2008. Environmental concerns within the Baltic Sea Region: a Nordic Baltic comparison. In Governing a Common Sea. Environmental Policies in the Baltic Sea Region, Joas M, Jahn D, Kern K (eds). Earthscan Publications: London; 61-82.
28. Herod A, Wright M (eds). 2002. Geographies of Power: Placing Scale. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
29. Hooghe L, Marks G. 2003. Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review 97(2): 233-243.
30. Larsen HG. 2009. Scaling the Baltic Sea environment. Geoforum 39(6): 2000-2008.
31. Kapaciauskaite I. 2011. Environmental governance in the Baltic Sea Region and the role of non-governmental actors. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 14: 90-100.
32. Keating M. 2009. Rescaling Europe. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 10(1): 34-50.
33. Keil R, Mahon R (eds). 2008. Leviathan Undone? The Political Economy of Scale. University of British Columbia Press: Vancouver.
34. Kern K, Löffelsend T. 2004. Sustainable development in the Baltic Sea Region. Governance beyond the nation state. Local Environment 9(5): 451-467.
35. Kern K. 2011. Governance for sustainable development in the Baltic Sea Region. Journal of Baltic Studies 42(1): 21-35.
36. Kettunen P, Kungla T. 2005. Europeanization of sub-national governance in unitary states: Estonia and Finland. Regional and Federal Studies 15(3): 353-378.
37. Lidström A. 2007. Territorial governance in transition. Regional and Federal Studies 17(4): 499-508.
38. Luukkonen J, Moilanen H. 2012. European briefing. Territoriality in the strategies and practices of territorial cohesion policy of the European Union: territorial challenges in implementing 'soft planning'. European Planning Studies 20(3): 481-500.
39. McCann E. 2003. Framing space and time in the city: urban policy and the politics of spatial and temporal scale. Journal of Urban Affairs 25(2): 159-178.
40. Meadowcroft J 2002. Politics and scale: some implications for environmental governance. Landscape and Urban Planning 61(2/4): 169-179.
41. Metzger J, Schmitt P. 2012. When soft spaces harden: the EU strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Environment and Planning A 44(2): 263-280.
42. Miller B 2007. Modes of governance, modes of resistance: contesting neoliberalism in Calgary. In Contesting Neoliberalism: Urban Frontiers, Leitner H, Peck J, Sheppard E (eds). Guilford Press: New York; 223-249.
43. Moss T, Newig J. 2010. Multilevel water governance and problems of scale: setting the stage for a broader debate. Environmental Management 46(1): 1-6.
44. O'Dowd L. 2002. The changing significance of European borders. Regional and Federal Studies 12(4): 13-36.
45. Reed M, Bruyneel S. 2010. Rescaling environmental governance, rethinking the state: a three-dimensional review. Progress in Human Geography 34(5): 646-653.
46. Scott J. 2002. Cross-border governance in the Baltic Sea Region. Regional and Federal Studies 12(4): 135-153.
47. Sheppard E, McMaster RB (eds). 2004. Scale and Geographic Inquiry. Nature, Society, and Method. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
48. Stead D. 2011. Policy and planning brief. European macro-regional strategies: indications of spatial rescaling? Planning Theory and Practice 12(1): 163-167.
49. Taşan-Kok T, Korthals Altes WK. 2012. Rescaling Europe: effects of single European market regulations on localized networks of governance in land development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 36(6): 1268-1287.
50. VanDeveer SD. 2011. Networked Baltic environmental cooperation. Journal of Baltic Studies 42(1): 37-55.
51. Wallis D, Arnold S. 2011. Governing common seas: from a Baltic strategy to an Arctic policy. Journal of Baltic Studies 42(1): 103-107.
52. Waterhout B, Stead D. 2007. Mixed messages: how the ESDP's concepts have been applied in INTERREG IIIB programmes, priorities and projects. Planning Practice and Research 22(3): 395-415.
53. Zonneveld W. 2005. Expansive spatial planning: the new European transnational spatial visions. European Planning Studies 13(1): 137-155.