A turning point in the development of European spatial planning? The 'Territorial Agenda of the European Union' and the 'First Action Programme'

Progress in Planning

Volumn 71, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-42

  Faludi, Andreas ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cohesion policy; European spatial development perspective; European spatial planning; Evidence based planning; Territorial Agenda of the European Union; Territorial cohesion

Indexed keywords

COHESION; EUROPEAN UNION; POLICY MAKING; SPATIAL PLANNING; TERRITORIAL PLANNING;

EID: 60449114158     PISSN: 03059006     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.progress.2008.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (179)

1. Albrechts L. Genesis of a Western European spatial planning policy?. Journal of Planning Education and Research 17 4 (1997) 158-167
2. Alia J. C'est le grand atout de l'Europe de demain: Le trésor de la banana bleue ['The great trump card of tomorrow's Europe: The treasure of the blue banana']. Le Nouvel Observateur (1989, May 18-24) 46-48
3. Amin A. Regions unbound: Towards a new politics of place. Geografiska Annaler, Ser B 86B 1 (2004) 33-44
4. Anderson J. The shifting stage of politics: New medieval and postmodern territorialities?. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 14 2 (1996) 133-153
5. Austrian Federal Chancellery. (2006). Governance of territorial strategies: Going beyond strategy documents, issue paper for the seminar of the Austrian presidency 2006. Baden near Vienna: Austrian Federal Chancellery, Division IV/4 (Co-ordination of Spatial and Regional Policies).
6. Avergne C., and Musso P. Les grands textes de l'aménagement du territoire et de la decentralization ['Great works on aménagement du territoire and decentralisation'] (2003), La documentation française, Paris
7. Axtmann R. State formation and supranationalism in Europe: The case of the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation. In: Berezin M., and Schain M. (Eds). Europe without borders: Remapping territory, citizenship and identity in a transnational age (2003), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD and London 118-137
8. Bachtler, J., Ferry, M., Méndez, C., & McMaster, I. (2007). The 2007-2013 operational programmes: A preliminary assessment. IQ-NET Thematic Papers, 19(2) [Glasgow: European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde].
9. Bailly A. Conclusions: Europe, today tomorrow. In: Bailly A., and Fremont A. (Eds). Europe and its states: A geography (2001), La documentation française, Paris 195-197
10. Balme R., and Jouve B. Building the regional state: Europe and territorial organization in France. In: Hooghe L. (Ed). Cohesion policy and European integration: Building multi-level governance (1996), Oxford University Press, New York 219-255
11. Battis U., and Kersten J. Europäische Politik des territorialen Zusammenhalts: Europäischer Rechtsrahmen und nationale Umstetzung ['The European policy of territorial cohesion: European legal framework and national implementation'] (2008), Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung, Bonn
12. Beck U. Cosmopolitan vision (2006), Polity Press, Cambridge, UK
13. Beck U. Nation-state politics can only fail the problems of the modern world. The Guardian (2008, 15 January)
14. Beck U., and Grande E. Das kosmopolitische Europa ['Cosmpolitan Europe'] (2004), Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main
15. Bengs C. (Ed.). (2002). Facing ESPON (Nordregio Report 2002:1). Stockholm: Nordregio.
16. Bengs C. ESPON in context. European Journal of Spatial Development (2006). http://www.nordregio.se/EJSD/debate061023.pdf http://www.nordregio.se/EJSD/debate061023.pdf Accessed 24 October 2007
17. Böhme, K. (2002). Nordic echoes of European spatial planning: Discursive integration in practice (Nordregio R2002:8). Stockholm: Nordregio.
18. Böhme K., and Eser Th.W. Territorial impact analysis for EU policies. In: Faludi A. (Ed). European spatial research and planning (2008), Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA 43-66
19. Böhme, K., & Schön, P. (2006). From Leipzig to Leipzig: Territorial research delivers evidence for the new Territorial Agenda of the European Union. In: A. Faludi (Ed.), Evidence-based planning [special issue]. disP 165, 42(2), 61-70.
20. Bovar, O., & Peyrony, J. (2006). Le Cas français de l'observatoire des territoires: L'évidence par la prospective ou par l'observation? ['The French case of the 'observatoire des territoires': Evidence by prospective scenarios or by observation?'] In A. Faludi (Ed.), Evidence-based planning [special issue]. disP 165, 42(2), 25-33.
21. Brenner N. Urban governance and the rise of globalizing competition state regimes (GCSRs). In: Berezin M., and Schain M. (Eds). Europe without borders: Remapping territory, citizenship and identity in a transnational age (2003), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD and London 140-166
22. Brunet, R. (1989). Les Villes européennes, rapport pour la DATAR, Délégation à l'Aménagement du Territoire et à l'Action Régionale ['European towns, report for DATA, the delegation for aménagement du territoire and regional action']. Paris: la documentation française.
23. Buunk W. The locus of European spatial planning (2003), Eburon, Delft
24. Camagni R. Territorial impact assessment-TIA: A methodological proposal. Scienze Regionali-Italian Journal of Regional Science 5 2 (2006) 135-146
25. Camagni R. Territorial development policies in the European model of society. In: Faludi A. (Ed). Territorial cohesion and the European model of society (2007), Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA 129-144
26. Caporaso J.A. The European Union and forms of state: Westphalian, regulatory or post-modern?. Journal of Common Market Studies 34 1 (1996) 29-52
27. CEC-Commission of the European Communities. Europe 2000: Outlook for the development of the Community's territory (1991), Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
28. CEC-Commission of the European Communities. Europe 2000+: Cooperation for European territorial development (1994), Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
29. CEC-Commission of the European Communities. The EU compendium of spatial planning systems and policies (regional development studies 28) (1997), Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
30. CEC-Commission of the European Communities. European spatial development perspective: Towards balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the EU (1999), Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
31. CEC-Commission of the European Communities. A sustainable Europe for a better world: A European Union strategy for sustainable development (2001), Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
32. CEC-Commission of the European Communities. European governance: A White Paper (2001), Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
33. CEC-Commission of the European Communities (2004). A new partnership for cohesion: Convergence, competitiveness, cooperation-Third report on economic and social cohesion (Communication from the Commission COM/2004/107). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
34. CEC-Commission of the European Communities (2007a). Fourth report on economic and social cohesion (Communication from the Commission). http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/co hesion4/pdf/com_en.pdf Accessed 5 May 2008.
35. CEC-Commission of the European Communities (2007b). Adapting to climate change in Europe: Options for EU action. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2007:0354:fin:e n:pdf Accessed 5 May 2008.
36. CEC-Commission of the European Communities (2008a). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: Fifth progress report on economic and social cohesion-Growing regions, growing Europe COM (2007) 371 final. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/in terim5_com_2008_371_en.pdf Accessed 13 December 2008.
37. CEC-Commission of the European Communities (2008b). Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Committee of the Regions and the European Economic and Social Committee: Green paper on territorial cohesion-Turning territorial diversity into strength COM (2008) 616 final. Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/consultation/terco/paper_terco_en.pd f Accessed 13 December 2008.
38. Cichowlaz P. France and the ESDP in the context of European integration and Mediterranean cooperation. European Planning Studies 13 2 (2005) 286-295
39. Clarence E. Technocracy reinvented: The new evidence-based policy movement. Public Policy and Administration 17 3 (2002) 1-10
40. Cocossis H., and Nijkamp P. Regional science in perspective. Scienze Regionali-Italian Journal of Regional Science 6 2 (2007) 137-140
41. Conference of the representatives of the governments of the member states (2007, December 3). Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community. CIG 14/07. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/cg00014.en07.pdf Accessed 15 February 2008.
42. Copus A.K. From core-periphery to polycentric development: Concepts of spatial and aspatial peripherality. European Planning Studies 9 4 (2001) 539-552
43. Council of Europe (1984). Recommendation (84 2) on the European Regional/Spatial Planning Charter. https://wcd.coe.int/com.instranet.InstraServlet?Command=com.instranet.Cm dBlobGet&DocId=681644&SecMode=1&Admin=0&Usage=4&Inst ranetImage=45302 Accessed 24 October 2007.
44. Council of the European Union (2006). Community strategic guidelines on cohesion, 2006/0131 of 18 August 2006; approved by the European Parliament on 27 September 2006. http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/06/st11/st11807.en06.pdf Accessed 24 October 2007.
45. Davoudi S. Polycentricity in European spatial planning: From an analytical tool to a normative agenda. European Planning Studies 11 8 (2003) 979-999
46. Davoudi, S. (2006). Evidence-based planning: Rhetoric and reality. In: A. Faludi (Ed.), Evidence-based planning [special issue]. disP 165, 42(2), 14-24.
47. Déjeant-Pons M. The European conference of ministers responsible for regional planning (CEMAT). Informationen zur Raumordnung 7 (2003) 401-410
48. Delanty G., and Rumford C. Rethinking Europe: Social theory and the implications of europeanization (2005), Routledge, London and New York
49. De Michelis N. European cohesion policy: Some issues for debate. Scienze Regionali 7 1 (2008) 123-130
50. de Vries J. Venturing into unknown territory: The preparation and formulation of the Second Benelux Structural Outline. European Planning Studies 16 6 (2008) 853-876
51. Directorate-General Regional Policy (2006). Working Paper No. 1 on ex ante evaluation: The new programming period, 2007-2013-Methodological working papers. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/2007/working/wd1_ex ante_en.pdf Accessed 24 October 2007.
52. Directorate-General Regional Policy (2007). The territorial and urban dimension in the national strategic reference frameworks and operational programmes 2007-2013-A first assessment. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/themes/urban/leipzig_report.pdf Accessed 24 October 2007.
53. Drevet, J.-F. (1993). L'Emergence d'une dimension internationale communautaire dans la politique française d'aménagement du territoire et d'action régionale (Mémoire présenté en vue d'une habilitation à diriger des recherches) ['The emergence of an international community dimension in French policy for aménagement du territoire and regional action']. Paris: Université de Paris I.
54. Drevet J.-F. Aménagement du territoire: Union européenne et développement regionale ['Aménagement du territoire: The European Union and regional development'] (1995), Editions Continent Europe, Paris
55. Drevet J.-F. Histoire de la politique régionale de l'Union européenne ['The history of the European Union's regional policy'] (2008), Edition Belin, Paris
56. Dühr, S. (2007). The visual language of spatial planning: Exploring cartographic representations for spatial planning in Europe (RTPI library series 15). London and New York: Routledge.
57. Dühr, S., Stead, D., & Zonneveld, W. (Eds.) (2007). The europeanization of spatial planning through territorial cooperation [special issue]. Planning Practice and Research, 22(3), 291-471.
58. Dutch Presidency (2004a). Exploiting Europe's territorial diversity for sustainable economic growth-Discussion paper for the EU informal ministerial meeting on territorial cohesion. Rotterdam: Dutch Presidency. http://www.2.vrom.nl/docs/internationaal/discussion paper.pdf Accessed 24 October 2007.
59. Dutch Presidency (2004b). EU informal ministerial meeting on territorial cohesion-Presidency conclusions. http://www.vrom.nl/get.asp?file=docs/291104_presidency_conclusions_EU_in formal_ministrial_meeting_on_territorial_cohesion.pdf Accessed 24 October 2007.
60. EEC Treaty-Treaty establishing the European Economic Community (non-consolidated version) (1957). http://europa.eu/scadplus/treaties/eec_en.htm Accessed 18 November 2008.
61. Eltges M., Hatzfeld U., Schön K.P., and Selke W. Die deutsche Ratspräsidentschaft-Impulse für die Stadt- und Raumentwicklung in Europa ['The German Council presidency-Impulses for urban and regional development in Europe']. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung 7/8 (2007) I-VIII
62. Eppink D.-J. Life of a European mandarin (2007), Lannoo Uitgeverij, Utrecht
63. ESPON (2006a). Territory matters for competitiveness and cohesion: Facets of regional diversity and potentials in Europe-ESPON synthesis report III, results by autumn 2006. Luxembourg: ESPON Coordination Unit.
64. ESPON (2006b). Applied territorial research: Building a scientific platform for competitiveness and cohesion-ESPON scientific report II, autumn 2006. Luxembourg: ESPON Coordination Unit.
65. ESPON (2007). ESPON 2013: European observation network on territorial development and cohesion. http://www.espon.eu/mmp/online/website/content/programme/1455/1470/file_ 3263/espon_2013_op-7-11-2007-approved.pdf Accessed 19 November 2008.
66. European Council (2000). Presidency conclusions-Lisbon European Council, 23 and 24 March. http://ue.eu.int/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/00100-r1.en0.htm Accessed 24 October 2007.
67. European Council (2007). Presidency conclusions-Brussels European Council, 21/22 June. http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=DOC/07/2&for mat=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en Accessed 24 October 2007.
68. European Council (2008). Presidency conclusions-Brussels European Council, 14 March. http://www.eu2008.si/en/News_and_Documents/Council_Conclusions/March/031 4ECpresidency_conclusions.pdf Accessed 6 May 2008.
69. European Economic and Social Committee (2007). Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the fourth report on economic and social cohesion (p. 273). COM. Final. http://eescopinions.eesc.europa.eu/viewdoc.aspx?doc=\\esppub2\esp_public \ces\eco\eco209\en\ces1712-2007_ac_en.doc Accessed 23 August 2008.
70. Expert Document (2003). Managing the territorial dimension of EU policies after enlargement. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/debate/document/futur/member/esdp.pd f Accessed 22 August 2008.
71. Evers D. Reflections on territorial cohesion and European spatial planning. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 99 3 (2008) 303-315
72. Faludi A. European planning doctrine: A bridge too far?. Journal of Planning Education and Research 16 1 (1996) 41-50
73. Faludi, A. (1998). From planning theory mark 1 to planning theory mark 3. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25th Anniversary Issue, 110-117.
74. Faludi A. The performance of spatial planning. Planning Practice and Research 15 4 (2000) 299-318
75. Faludi, A. (2005). Territorial cohesion: An unidentified political objective-Introduction to the special issue. In: A. Faludi (Ed.), Territorial cohesion [special issue]. Town Planning Review, 76(1), 1-13.
76. Faludi A. Evaluating plans: The application of the European spatial development perspective. In: Alexander E.R. (Ed). Evaluation in Planning: Evolution and Prospects (2006), Ashgate, Aldershot, UK 119-143
77. Faludi A. The learning machine: European integration in the planning mirror. Environment and Planning A 40 6 (2008) 1470-1484
78. Faludi, A. (Ed.). (2008b). European territorial cooperation and learning [special issue]. disP 172, 44(1), 3-84.
79. Faludi A., and van der Valk A.J. Rule and order: Dutch planning doctrine in the twentieth century (1994), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
80. Faludi A., and Waterhout B. The making of the European spatial development perspective: No masterplan (RTPI library series) (2002), Routledge, London
81. Faludi A., and Waterhout B. The usual suspects: The Rotterdam informal ministerial meeting on territorial cohesion. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 96 3 (2005) 338-342
82. Faludi, A., & Waterhout, B. (2006). Introducing evidence-based planning. In: A. Faludi (Ed.), Evidence-based planning [special issue]. disP 165, 42(2), 3-13.
83. Ferrera M. The boundaries of welfare: European integration and the new spatial politics of social protection (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford
84. First Action Programme (2007). First action programme for the implementation of the Territorial Agenda of the European Union (agreed 23 November 2007, at Ponta Delgada, Azores). http://www.dgotdu.pt/rimotr/UE-doc/AP1_23NovembroVfinal.pdf Accessed 9 April 2008.
85. In: Fischer F., and Forester J. (Eds). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (1993), Duke University Press/UCL Press, London
86. Gatawis, S. (2000). Grundfragen eines europäischen Raumordnungsrechts (Beiträge zur Raumplanung und zum Siedlungs- und Wohnungswesen (Bd. 196)) ['Basic issues of European planning law (Contributions to planning and settlement and housing policy (Vol. 196))']. Münster: Selbstverlag des Zentralinstituts für Raumplanung und des Instituts für Siedlungs- und Wohungswesen der Universität Münster.
87. Gaubert, N. (2007, July 5-6). Coopération transnationale et aménagement du territoire. Une analyse à partir de l'expérience du programme ORATE (2002-2006) ['Transnational cooperation and. aménagement du territoire. An analysis based on the experience of the ORATE programme, 2002-2006']. Paper presented to the conference 'Frontières et aménagement', Metz.
88. German Presidency (2007a). Conclusions of the German EU Council Presidency on the informal ministerial meeting on urban development and territorial cohesion-24 and 25 May 2007. http://www.bmvbs.de/Anlage/original_1005297/Conclusions-of-the-German-EU -Council-presidency-on-the-Informal-Ministerial-Meeting-accessible.pdf Accessed 15 February 2008.
89. German Presidency (2007b). Map collection: Spatial development in Europe. http://www.bmvbs.de/-,2711.996446/Map-collection-Spatial-develop.htm Accessed 15 February 2008.
90. German Presidency (2007c). Hintergrundpapier zur Territorialen Agenda der EU ['Background paper on the EU Territorial Agenda']. http://www.bmvbs.de/Anlage/original_1003559/Hintergrundpapier-zur-Territ orialen-Agenda-der-EU.pdf Accessed 15 February 2008.
91. Gløersen E., Lähteenmäki-Smith K., and Dubois A. Policentricity in transnational planning initiatives: ESDP applied or ESDP reinvented?. Planning Practice & Research 22 3 (2007) 417-437
92. Gottman J. Megalopolis (1961), The Twentieth Century Fund, New York
93. Graute, U. (2002). Kooperation in der Europäischen Raumentwicklungspolitik: Mehrebenenkooperation in komplexen Politikprozessen analysiert am Beispiel der Formulierung und Implementierung einer Politik zur integrierten Entwicklung des europäischen Raumes (IÖR-Schriften Band 37). Dresden: Institut für ökologische Raumentwicklung e.V.
94. Gravier J.F. Paris et le désert français (1947), Flammarion, Paris
95. Gualini E. Territorial cohesion as a category of agency: The missing dimension in the EU spatial policy debate. European Journal of Spatial Development 28 (2008). http://www.nordregio.se/EJSD/refereed28.pdf
96. Hague C. ESPON and territorial research and practice in Europe. Territorial research in progress: Conference proceedings of the 1st ESPON scientific conference (2006), ESPON Coordination Unit, Luxembourg 23-35
97. Hague C., and Hachmann V. Organization achievements and future of ESPON. In: Faludi A. (Ed). European spatial policy and research (2008), Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA 21-42
98. Hardt M., and Negri A. Empire (2000), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
99. Haseler A. Super-state: The new Europe and its challenge to America (2004), Tauris, London
100. Healey P. Relational complexity and the imaginative power of strategic spatial planning. European Planning Studies 14 4 (2006) 525-546
101. Héritier A. Policy-making and diversity in Europe: Escape from deadlock (1999), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
102. Héritier A., Knill C., and Mingers S. Ringing the changes in Europe: Regulatory competition and the transformation of the state. Britain, France, Germany (1996), Walter de Gruyter, Berlin and New York
103. Hix S. The study of the European Union II: The 'new governance' agenda and its rivals. West European Politics 21 3 (1998) 38-65
104. Hix S. The political system of the European Union. 2nd ed. (2005), Palgrave MacMillan, London
105. Hix S. What's wrong with the European Union and how to fix it (2008), Polity Press, London
106. Hooghe L., and Marks G. Multi-level governance and European integration (2001), Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, Boulder, New York, Oxford
107. Hooghe L., and Marks G. Unravelling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review 97 2 (2003) 233-243
108. Hübner, D. (2007). Speech on territorial cohesion. Informal ministerial meeting on territorial cohesion and regional policy. Portugal: Punta Delgada, Azores, 23 November. http://www.dgotdu.pt/rimotr/intervencoes/Commissioner%20Danuta%20Hubner% 20-%20territorial%20cohesion.pdf Accessed 19 November 2008.
109. Husson C. L'Europe sans territoire: Essay sur le concept de cohésion territoriale ['Europe without territory: Essay on the concept of territorial cohesion'] (2002), DATAR/éditions de l'aube, Paris
110. Innes J.E. Group processes and the social construction of growth management: Florida, Vermont, and New Jersey. Journal of the American Planning Association 58 (1992) 440-453
111. Innes J.E. Consensus building: Clarification for the critics. Planning Theory 3 1 (2004) 5-20
112. Jensen O.B., and Richardson T. Making European space: Mobility, power and territorial identity (2004), Routledge, London and New York
113. Jenkins P., and Hague C. Reconceptualizing the narratives of place identity in planning. In: Hague C., and Jenkins P. (Eds). Place identity. Participation and planning (RTPI library series) (2005), Routledge, London 207-223
114. Kersten J. Mindestgewährleistung im Infrastrukturrecht ['Minimum guarantees in the law of infrastructure provisions']. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung 1-2 (2008) 1-15
115. Kohnstamm M., and Segers M. De Europese dagboeken van Max Kohnstamm Augustus 1953-September 1957 (2008), Boom, Amsterdam
116. Krautzberger M., and Selke W. Perspektiven der bundesstaatlichen Raumplanungspolitik in der Europäischen Union: Das Beispiel Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Schriftenreihe für Städtebau und Raumplanung, Institut zur Erforschung von Methoden und Auswirkungen der Raumplanung der Ludwig Boltzmann-Gesellschaft) (1996), Technische Universität Wien, Vienna
117. Lévy J. Europe: Une géographie (1997), Hachette Livres, Paris
118. Leipzig Charter (2007). Leipzig Charter on sustainable European cities. http://www.bmvbs.de/Anlage/original_998680/Leipzig-Charter-on-Sustainabl e-European-Cities-agreed-on-24-May-2007.pdf Accessed 24 October 2007.
119. Leonard M. Why Europe will run the 21st century (2005), Harper Collins, London
120. Lijphart A. The politics of accommodation: Pluralism and democracy in the Netherlands (1968), University of California Press, Berkeley, CA
121. Luxembourg Presidency (2005a). Conclusions of the informal EU-ministerial meeting on territorial cohesion-20 and 21 May 2005 in Luxembourg. http://www.eu2005.lu/en/actualites/documents_travail/2005/05/20regio/ Min_DOC_2_MinConcl_fin.pdf Accessed 24 October 2007.
122. Luxembourg Presidency (2005b). Scoping document and summary of political messages for an assessment of the territorial state and perspectives of the European Union: Towards a stronger European territorial cohesion in the light of the Lisbon and Gothenburg ambitions. http://international.vrom.nl/docs/internationaal/Scoping.pdf Accessed 24 October 2007.
123. Maréchal, L. (2002). Conseil informel des ministres européens de l'aménagement du territoire. Les Cahier de l'Urbanisme, March, 10-13.
124. Massardier G. Les savants les plus 'demandés'-Expertise, compétence et multipositionalité: Le cas des géographes dans la politique d'aménagement du territoire ['The scholars most in demand-The case of geographers in aménagement du territoire policy']. Politix 9 36 (1996) 163-180
125. Mastop J.M. The performance principle in strategic planning. In: Salet W., and Faludi A. (Eds). The revival of strategic planning (2000), Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam 143-155
126. Meijers E., and Sandberg K. Reducing regional disparities by means of poloycentric development: Panacea or placebo? (Special issue, Regional growth, inequality and integration in the EU). Scienze Regionali-Italian Journal of Regional Development 7 Suppl. 2 (2008) 71-96
127. Molle W. European cohesion policy (2007), Routledge, Abingdon, UK
128. MVA (2003). Mid-term evaluation of ESPON 2006 programme: Final report. http://www.espon.eu/mmp/online/website/content/programme/70/125/file_392 /fr_mid-term_eval-full.pdf Accessed 19 November 2008.
129. MVA (2005). ESPON mid-term evaluation update, final report. http://www.espon.eu/mmp/online/website/content/programme/70/125/file_354 /mte_final-report_26-9-2005.pdf Accessed 19 November 2008.
130. MKRO-Ministerkonferenz für Raumordnung (2007). Raumordnerische Kompetenzen der EU durch die 'territoriale Kohäsion' nach dem Entwurf des EU-Verfassungsvertrages? Positionspapier des Ausschusses 'Recht und Verfahren' der Ministerkonferenz für Raumordnung/Vorsitz: Prof. Dr. Goppel zu 'Legislativen Kompetenzen der EU im Bereich der europäischen Raumentwicklungspolitik im Hinblick auf den territorialen Zusammenhalt nach dem Entwurf des EU-Verfassungsvertrages'. EurUP-Zeitschrift für Europäisches Umwelt- und Planungsrecht, 3, 138-142.
131. Münkler H. Empires: The logic of world domination from ancient Rome to the United States (2007), Polity Press, Cambridge
132. OECD. Territorial outlook (2001), OECD, Paris
133. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2006). UK Presidency-EU ministerial informal on sustainable communities: Policy papers, London. http://www.communities.gov.uk/archived/publications/citiesandregions/pol icypapersuk Accessed 24 October 2007.
134. Official Journal of the European Union (2006). Council regulation (EC) no. 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) no. 1260/1999. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/regulation /pdf/2007/feder/ce_1080(2006)_en.pdf Accessed 24 October 2007.
135. Pallagst K.M. Raumordnung der Tschechischen Republik: Mittel- und Osteuropa vor dem Hintergrund europäischer Raumordnungsbestrebungen (2000), Verlag Arno Spitz GmbH, Berlin
136. Pierret G. Vivre l'europe...autrement: Les régions entrent en scène ['Long live Europe ... with a difference: The regions enter the scene'] (Perspectives 2001) (1984), Éditions Jean Picollec, Paris
137. Pierret G. Régions d'Europe: La face cachée de l'Union-Une aventure vécue ['Regions of Europe: The hidden face of the Union-A lived adventure'] (1997), Éditions Apogée, Rennes
138. Polverari, L., & Bachtler, J. (2005). The contribution of Structural Funds to territorial cohesion. In A. Faludi (Ed.), Territorial cohesion [special issue], Town Planning Review, 76(1), 29-42.
139. Polverari, L., McMaster, I., Gross, F., Bachtler, J., Ferry, M. & Yuill, D. (2006). Strategic planning for Structural Funds in 2007-2013: A review of strategies and programmes. IQ-NET Thematic Papers, 18(2). Glasgow: European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde.
140. Portuguese Presidency (2007). Conclusions of the Portuguese Presidency- Territorial cohesion. Informal ministerial meeting on territorial cohesion and regional policy: Ponta Delgada, Azores, 23-24 November. http://www.dgotdu.pt/rimotr/UE-doc/CONCLUSIONS_23VFfrev.pdf Accessed 9 April 2008.
141. Prezioso M. Why the ESPON programme is concerned more with 'policy implications' than with 'good science'. European Journal of Spatial Development (2007). http://www.nordregio.se/EJSD/debate070312.pdf http://www.nordregio.se/EJSD/debate070312.pdf Accessed 24 October 2007
142. Rambøll Management (2006). Study on 'territorial cohesion, lessons learned from ESPON programme projects and strategy for the future'. http://www.espon.eu/mmp/online/website/content/programme/70/1186/file_23 80/final_ report_espon_study.pdf Accessed 19 November 2008.
143. Rifkin J. The European dream: How Europe's vision of the future is quietly eclipsing the American Dream (2004), Tarcher, New York
144. Robert J., and Lennert M. Figuring out the shape of Europe: Spatial scenarios. In: Faludi A. (Ed). European spatial policy and research (2008), Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA 69-196
145. Robert J., Stumm T., Vet J.M., Reincke G.J., Hollanders M., and Figueiredo M.A. Spatial impacts of Community policies and the costs of non-coordination (2001), European Commission, Brussels
146. Rooney, M. L., & Polverari, L. (2002a). The spatial and urban dimensions in the 2000-06 objective 1 programmes. Strathclyde/Stockholm: Urban Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde/Nordregio.
147. Rooney, M. L., & Polverari, L. (2002b). The spatial and urban dimensions in the 2000-06 objective 2 programmes. Strathclyde/Stockholm: Urban Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde/Nordregio.
148. Rosenau J.N. Toward an ontology for global governance. In: Hewson M., and Sinclair T. (Eds). Approaches to global governance theory (1999), State University of New York Press, Albany, NY 287-301
149. Ross G. Jacques Delors and European integration (1995), Polity Press, Cambridge
150. Ross G. What do 'Europeans' think? Analyses of the European Union's current crisis by European elites. Journal of Common Market Studies 46 2 (2008) 389-412
151. Salet W., and Thornley A. Institutional influences on the integration of multilevel governance and spatial policy in European city-regions. Journal of Planning Education and Research 27 2 (2007) 188-198
152. Sager T. Communicative planning theory (1994), Avebury, Aldershot, UK-Brookfield, WI, USA-Hong Kong-Singapore-Sydney
153. Sapir A., Aghion P., Bertola G., Hellwig M., Pisany-Ferry J., Rosita D., et al. An agenda for a growing Europe: The Sapir report (2004), Oxford University Press, Oxford
154. Sassen S. Territory, authority, rights: From medieval to global assemblages (2006), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ and Oxford
155. Scharpf F.W. Games real actors play: Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research (1997), Westview Press, Boulder, CO
156. Schmidt-Thomé Ph., and Greiving S. Response to natural hazards and climate change in Europe. In: Faludi A. (Ed). European spatial
157. Scholte J.W. Globalization: A critical introduction (2000), Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK
158. Spiekermann K., and Wegener M. Accessibility, competitiveness and cohesion. In: Faludi A. (Ed). European spatial policy and research (2008), Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA 115-140
159. Schindegger F. Die Entdeckung Europas ['The discovery of Europe']. Raum 69 (2008) 44-49
160. Schmidt-Seiwert V., and Porsche L. Kartensammlung zur Europäischen Raumentwicklung-analytische Illustration der Territorialen Agenda der EU ['Map collection on European spatial development-A starting point for a new understanding of planning and development in Europe']. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung 7/8 (2007) 441-448
161. Schön K.P., and Selke W. Territoriale Agenda der EU-ein Ansatz für ein neues Planungs- und Entwicklungsverständnis in Europa ['The Territorial Agenda of the EU-A starting point for a new understanding of planning and development in Europe']. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung 7/8 (2007) 435-440
162. In: Scholich D. (Ed). German annual of spatial research and policy 2007: Territorial cohesion (2007), Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg
163. Schout J.A., and Jordan A. From cohesion to territorial policy integration (TPI): Exploring the governance challenges in the European Union. European Planning Studies 15 6 (2007) 835-851
164. Shaw, D., & Sykes, O. (2003). Investigating the application of the European spatial development perspective (ESDP) to regional planning in the United Kingdom. In: A. Faludi (Ed.), Special issue on the application of the European spatial development perspective. Town Planning Review, 74(1), 31-50.
165. Shetter W.Z. The Netherlands in perspective: The organization of society and environment (1987), Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague
166. In: Shucksmith M., Thomson K., and Roberts K. (Eds). CAP and the regions: The territorial impact of the Common Agricultural Policy (2006), CABI, Wallingford, UK
167. Slovenian Presidency (2008, April 7-8). Presidency conclusions-Conference on the future of cohesion policy. Maribor, Slovenia: Slovenian Presidency. http://www.svlr.gov.si/fileadmin/svlsrp.gov.si/pageuploads/Pre dsedovanje_EU/04_Prihodnost_kohezijske_politike__7._in_8.april_08/Sklepi_CFCP_en.p df Accessed 6 May 2008.
168. Stead, D., & Waterhout, B. (2008). Learning from the application of the ESDP: Influences on European territorial governance. In: A. Faludi (Ed.), European territorial cooperation and learning [special issue]. disP, 44(1), 21-34.
169. Sykes O. The importance of context and comparison in the study of European spatial planning. European Planning Studies 16 4 (2008) 537-555
170. Territorial Agenda (2007). Territorial agenda of the European Union: Towards a more competitive and sustainable Europe of diverse regions-Agreed at the occasion of the informal ministerial meeting on urban development and territorial cohesion on 24/25 May 2007. http://www.bmvbs.de/Anlage/original_1005295/Territorial-Agenda-of-the-Eu ropean-Union-Agreed-on-25-May-2007-accessible.pdf Accessed 15 February 2008.
171. Territorial State (2007). The territorial state and perspectives of the European Union: Towards a stronger European territorial cohesion in the light of the Lisbon and Gothenburg ambitions-A background document to the Territorial Agenda of the European Union. http://www.bmvbs.de/Anlage/original_1005296/The-Territorial-State-and-Pe rspectives-of-the-European-Union.pdf Accessed 15 February 2008.
172. Todd E. After the Empire (2003), Columbia University Press, New York
173. Van Gestel, T., & Faludi, A. (2005). Towards a European territorial cohesion assessment network: A bright future for ESPON? In A. Faludi (Ed.), Territorial cohesion: An unidentified political objective [special issue]. Town Planning Review, 76(1), 69-80.
174. Waterhout B. The institutionalisation of European spatial planning (2008), IOS Press, Amsterdam
175. Williams R.H. European Union spatial policy and planning (1996), Chapman Publishing, London
176. Working Group. (2001). Report by working group on multi-level governance: Linking and networking the various regional and local levels (Group 4c). http://ec.europa.eu/governance/areas/group10/report_en.pdf Accessed 24 January 2007.
177. Zielonka J. Europe as empire: The nature of the enlarged European Union (2006), Oxford University Press, Oxford
178. Zonneveld, W., Meijers, E., & Waterhout, B. (Eds.) (2005). Polycentric development policies across Europe [special issue]. Built Environment, 31(2), 97-173.
179. Zonneveld, W., & Waterhout, B. (2005). Visions on territorial cohesion. In A. Faludi (Ed.), Territorial cohesion [special issue]. Town Planning Review, 76(1), 15-27.