Mixed messages: How the ESDP's concepts have been applied in INTERREG IIIB programmes, priorities and projects

Planning Practice and Research

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 395-415

  Waterhout, Bas ^a   Stead, Dominic ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EUROPEAN UNION; REGIONAL PLANNING; SPATIAL PLANNING;

EURASIA; EUROPE;

EID: 36749019144     PISSN: 02697459     EISSN: 13600583     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02697450701775216     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Böhme, K. (2002) Nordic Echoes of European Spatial Planning, Nordregio, Stockholm
2. Böhme, K. (2003) Discursive European integration-The case of Nordic spatial planning. Town Planning Review, 74:1, pp. 11-29.
3. CEC-Commission of the European Communities (2000) Communication from the Commission to the Member States of 28.4.00 laying down guidelines for a Community Initiative concerning trans-European cooperation intended to encourage harmonious and balanced development of the European territory INTERREG III. C(, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
4. CEC-Commission of the European Communities (2003) Communication from the Commission. Second progress report on economic and social cohesion. COM(2003)0034, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
5. Committee on Spatial Development (1999) European Spatial Development Perspective. Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the EU, Office for Official Publications of the European Community, Luxembourg
6. Davoudi, S. (2003) Polycentricity in European spatial planning: From an analytical tool to a normative agenda. European Planning Studies, 11:8, pp. 979-999.
7. Doucet, P. (2002) Transnational planning in the wake of the ESDP: The Northwest Europe experience. European Spatial Planning, pp. 59-79. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA
8. Doucet, P. (2006) Territorial cohesion of tomorrow: A path to cooperation or competition. European Planning Studies, 14:10, pp. 1473-1485.
9. Dühr, S. and Nadin, V. (2007) Europeanization through Transnational Territorial Cooperation? The Case of INTERREG IIIB North-West Europe. Planning Practice and Research, 22:3, pp. 373-393.
10. ECORYS, ECOTEC, Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research & MR Gesellschaft für Regional-beratung (2004) Mid-Term Evaluation of the Interreg IIIB North Sea Region, ECORYS-NEI, Rotterdam
11. ESPON (2002) The ESPON 2006 Programme. Programme on the spatial development of an enlarging European Union. Approved by the European Commission on 3 June 2002, ESPON Coordination Unit, Esch-sur-Alzette, LU
12. Faludi, A. (2000) The performance of spatial planning. Planning Practice & Research, 15:4, pp. 299-318.
13. Faludi, A. (2001) The Application of the European spatial development perspective: Evidence from the North-West metropolitan area. European Planning Studies, 9:5, pp. 663-675.
14. Faludi, A. (2003) The application of the European spatial development perspective-Introduction to the special issue. Town Planning Review, 74:1, pp. 1-9.
15. Faludi, A. (2004) The European spatial development perspective and North-west Europe: Application and the future. European Planning Studies, 12:3, pp. 391-408.
16. Faludi, A. (2006) The European spatial development perspective shaping the agenda. European Journal of Spatial Development
17. Faludi, A. and Waterhout, B. (2002) The Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective, Routledge, London
18. Giannakourou, G. (2005) Transforming spatial planning policy in mediterranean countries: Europeanization and domestic change. European Planning Studies, 13:2, pp. 319-331.
19. Graute, U. (2006) European territorial co-operation to improve competitiveness of the Union. The case of EU funded co-operation in Central and South-eastern Europe. Paper presented at the Regional Studies Association Conference 'Shaping EU Regional Policy' Leuven
20. Jancic, M. (2005) INTERREG IIIB in Slovenia. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung Heft 11/12.2005, pp. 741-748.
21. Rivolin, U. Janin and Faludi, A. (2005) The hidden face of European spatial planning: Innovations in governance. European Planning Studies, 13:2, pp. 195-215.
22. Lähteenmäki-Smith, K., Fuller, S. and Böhme, K. (2005) Integrated Multi-level Analysis of the Governance of European Space, Nordregio, Stockholm
23. Mastop, H. (1997) Performance in Dutch spatial planning: An introduction. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26:4, pp. 807-813.
24. Mastop, H. and Faludi, A. (1997) Evaluation of strategic plans: The performance principle. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24:6, pp. 815-832.
25. Nordregio (2007) Application and effects of the ESDP in Member States. Final Report of ESPON project 2.3.1, Nordregio, Stockholm
26. NWE International Working Party (2001) INTERREG IIIB Community Initiative: Sustainable territorial development in the North West of Europe-Towards long term transnational cooperation. Community Initiative Programme, INTERREG IIIB Secretariat, Lille
27. NWMA Spatial Vision Group (2000) A Spatial Vision for North West Europe: Building Cooperation, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, The Hague
28. Pedrazzini, L. (2005) Applying the ESDP through INTERREG IIIB: A Southern Perspective. European Planning Studies, 13:2, pp. 297-317.
29. Shaw, D. and Sykes, O. (2003) Investigating the application of the European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP) to regional planning in the United Kingdom. Town Planning Review, 74:1, pp. 31-50.
30. Shaw, D. and Sykes, O. (2005) European spatial development policy and evolving forms of territorial mobilisation in the United Kingdom. Planning, Practice & Research, 20:2, pp. 183-199.
31. Sykes, O. (2007) Examining the relationship between transnational and national planning: French and British spatial planning and the European Spatial Development Perspective. Spatial Planning Systems of Britain and France: A comparative analysis, pp. 99-118. Routledge, London
32. Wallagh, G. (2004) Oog voor het onzichtbare: 50 jaar structuurplanning in Amsterdam 1955-2005 [Eye for the invisible: 50 years of structure planning in Amsterdam 1955-2005], Van Gorcum, Assen
33. Waterhout, B. (2002) Polycentric development: What is behind it?. European Spatial Planning, pp. 83-103. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA
34. Zaucha, J. and Szydarowski, W. (2005) Transnational co-operation and its contribution to spatial development and EU enlargment. The Case of INTERREG IIIB in Northern Poland. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung Heft 11/12.2005, pp. 731-740.
35. Zonneveld, W. (2005) Multiple Visioning: New ways of constructing transnational spatial visions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23:1, pp. 41-62.
36. Zonneveld, W., Stead, D., Dubois, A. and Gløersen, E. (2006) Polycentric Urban Development and Rural-Urban Partnership. Thematic Study of INTERREG and ESPON activities, ESPON Coordination Unit/INTERACT Point Qualification and Transfer, Esch-sur-Alzette/Viborg
37. Zonneveld, W. and Stead, D. (2007) Mutual learning between European research and territorial cooperation: The issue of urban-rural relationships. Planning Practice and Research, 22:3, pp. 439-453.