The ICF core sets for hearing loss project: Functioning and disability from the patient perspective

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 53, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 777-786

  Granberg, Sarah ^a,b   Pronk, Marieke ^c   De Swanepoel, Wet ^d,e,f   Kramer, Sophia E ^c   Hagsten, Hanna ^a   Hjaldahl, Jennie ^a   Möller, Claes ^a   Danermark, Berth ^a  

^a ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA   (South Africa)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^f Ear Science Institute Australia   (Australia)

Author keywords

Focus groups; ICF; ICF core sets; Patient perspective; Qualitative study

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HEARING AID; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOUTH AFRICA; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; YOUNG ADULT;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; DISABILITY EVALUATION; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PERSONS WITH HEARING IMPAIRMENTS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOUTH AFRICA; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84911460995     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2014.938370     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Abrams H., Chisolm T.H. & McArdle R. 2002. A cost-utility analysis of adult group audiologic rehabilitation: Are the benefits worth the cost? J Rehabil Res Dev, 39(5), 549-557.
2. Ayres L. 2007. Qualitative research proposals: Part III: Sampling and data collection. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 34(3), 242-244.
3. Bentler R.A. & Chiou L.K. 2006. Digital noise reduction: An overview. Trends Amplif, 10(2), 67-82.
4. Bentler R.A. & Kramer S.E. 2000. Guidelines for choosing a self-report outcome measure. Ear Hear, 21 (Suppl. 4), 37S-49S.
5. Bertoli S., Staehelin K., Zemp E., Schindler C., Bodmer D. et al. 2009. Survey on hearing-aid use and satisfaction in Switzerland and their determinants. Int J Audiol, 48(4), 183-195.
6. Boonen A., van Berkel M., Cieza A., Stucki G. & van der Heijde D. 2009. Which aspects of functioning are relevant for patients with ankylosing spondylitis: Results of focus group interviews. J Rheumatol, 36, 2501-2511.
7. Boothroyd A. 2007. Adult aural rehabilitation: What is it and does it work? Trends Amplif, 11, 63-71.
8. Chang H-P., Ho C-Y. & Chou P. 2009. The factors associated with a self-percieved hearing handicap in elderly people with hearing impairment: Results from a community-based study. Ear Hear, 30, 576-583.
9. Cieza A., Brockow T., Ewert T., Amman E., Kollerits B. et al. 2002. Linking health-status measurements to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. J Rehabil Med, 34, 205-210.
10. Cieza A., Geyh S., Chatterji S., Kostanjsek N., Üstün B. et al. 2005. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med, 37, 212-218.
11. Clark J.G. & English K.M. 2003. Counseling in Audiologic Practice. Helping Patients and Families Adjust to Hearing Loss. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
12. Coenen M., Basedow-Rajwich B., Konig N., Kesselring J. & Cieza A. 2011. Functioning and disability in multiple sclerosis from the patient perspective. Chronic Illn, 7(4), 291-310.
13. Coenen M., Stamm T.A., Stucki G. & Cieza A. 2012. Individual interviews and focus groups in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A comparison of two qualitative methods. Qual Life Res, 21, 359-370.
14. Danermark B., Cieza A., Gange J., Gimigliano F., Granberg S. et al. 2010. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health core sets for hearing loss: A discussion paper and invitation. Int J Audiol, 49(4), 256-262.
15. Danermark B. & Coniavitis Gellerstedt L. 2004. Psychosocial work environment, hearing impairment and health. Int J Audiol, 43(7), 383-389.
16. Danermark B., Granberg S., Kramer S., Möller C. & Selb M. 2013. The creation of a comprehensive and a brief core set for hearing loss using the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Am J Audiol, 22, 323-328.
17. Eurostat. 2013. GDP per capita in PPS. Retrieved 27 October 2013 from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=tec00114&plugin=1
18. Fraser S., Gagné J.-P., Alepins M., & Dubois P. 2010. Evaluating the effort expended to understand speech in noise using a dual-task paradigm: The effects of providing visual speech cues. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 53, 18-33.
19. Garstecki D.C. & Erler S.F. 1999. Older adult performance on the communication profile for the hearing impaired: Gender difference. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 42, 785-796.
20. Gatehouse S. & Noble W. 2004. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol, 43(2), 85-99.
21. Glässel A., Finger M., Cieza A., Treitler C., Coenen M. et al. 2011. Vocational rehabilitation from the client"s perspective using the international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF) as a reference. J Occup Rehabil, 21(2), 167-178.
22. Gopinath B., Schneider J., Hartley D., Teber E., McMahon C. et al. 2011. Incidence and predictors of hearing-aid use and ownership among older adults with hearing loss. Ann Epidemiol, 21(7), 497-506.
23. Gradinger F., Kohler B., Khatami R., Mathis J., Cieza A. et al. 2011. Problems in functioning from the patient perspective using the international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF) as a reference. J Sleep Res, 20 (1 Pt. 2), 171-182.
24. Granberg S., Dahlström J., Möller C., Kähäri K. & Danermark B. 2014a. The ICF core sets for hearing loss: Researcher perspective, Part I: Systematic review of outcome measures identified in audiological research. Int J Audiol, 53(2), 65-76.
25. Granberg S., Möller K., Skagerstrand A˚., Möller C. & Danermark B. 2014b. The ICF core sets for hearing loss - researcher perspective, Part II: Linking outcome measures to the international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF). Int J Audiol, 53(2), 77-87.
26. HEAR. European Concerted Action Project on Genetic Hearing Impairment. 1996. Terminology, Definitions and Hearing Assessments. European Concerted Action: PL950353.
27. Hétu R. 1996. The stigma attached to hearing impairment. Scand Audiol, Suppl. 43, 12-24.
28. Hicks C.B. & Tharpe A.M. 2002. Listening effort and fatigue in school-age children with and without hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 45, 573-584.
29. Hickson L. & Scarinci N. 2007. Older adults with aquired hearing impairment: Applying the ICF in rehabilitation. Semin Speech Lang, 28, 283-290.
30. Hickson L., Worrall L. & Scarinci N. 2007. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the active communication education program for older people with hearing impairment. Ear Hear, 28(2), 212-230.
31. Hsieh H. & Shannon S.E. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res, 15(9), 1277-1288.
32. ICF Research Branch. 2012. ICF Core Sets. Manual for Clinical Practice. Göttingen: Hogrefe Publishing.
33. Kramer S.E. 2005. The psychosocial impact of hearing loss among elderly people. In: Stephens & Jones (eds.), The Impact of Genetic Hearing Impairment. London: Whurr Publications, pp. 137-164.
34. Kramer S.E., Kapteyn T.S., Festen J.M. & Kuik D.J. 1997. Assessing aspects of auditory handicap by means of pupil dilation. Int J Audiol, 36(3), 155-64.
35. Kramer S.E. 2008. Hearing impairment, work, and vocational enablement. Int J Audiol, 47 (Suppl. 2), S124-S130.
36. Kramer S.E., Allessie G.H.M., Dondorp A.W., Zekveld A.A. & Kapteyn T.S. 2005. A home education program for older adults with hearing impairment and their significant others: A randomized trial evaluating short- and long-term effects. Int J Audiol, 44(5), 255-264.
37. Kricos P.B, Holmes A.E. & Doyle D. 1992. Efficacy of a communication training program for hearing-impaired elderly adults. J Acad Rehabil Audiol, 25, 69-80.
38. Kricos P.B. & Holmes A.E. 1996. Efficacy of audiologic rehabilitation for older adults. J Am Acad Audiol, 7(4), 219-229.
39. Kvale S. 1996. Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. California: Sage Publications.
40. Laplante-Lévesque A., Pichora-Fuller K.M. & Gagné J. 2006. Providing an internet-based audiological counselling programme to new hearing aid users: A qualitative study. Int J Audiol, 45(12), 697-706.
41. Liu H., Zhang H., Bentler R.A., Han D. & Zhang L. 2012. Evaluation of a transient noise reduction strategy for hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol, 23(8), 606-615.
42. McCarthy P. & Schau N. 2008. Adult audiologic rehabilitation: A review of contemporary practices. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science & Disorders, 35, 168-177.
43. Morgan D.L. 1998. Planning Focus Groups (Vol. 2). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.
44. Mulrow C.D., Aguilar C., Endicott J.E., Tuley M.R., Velez R. et al. 1990. Quality-of-life changes and hearing impairment. A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med Medicine, 113, 188-194.
45. Noble W. 1998. Self-assessment of Hearing and Related Functions. London: Whurr.
46. Quinn Patton M. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.
47. Sarampalis A., Kalluri S., Edwards B. & Hafter E. 2009. Objective measures of listening effort: Effects of background noise and noise reduction. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 52 (5), 1230-1240.
48. Saunders G.H. & Forsline A. 2012. Hearing-aid counseling: Comparison of single-session informational counseling with single-session performance-perceptual counseling. Int J Audiol, 51(10), 754-764.
49. Statistics South Africa. 2011. Statstical release P0302. Mid-year population estimates 2011. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.
50. Vesterager V. 1990. Hearing-aid benefit related to the POGO amplification formula. Evaluated from insertion gain measurements of two BTE hearing aids. Scand Audiol, 19, 251-256.
51. Wang P.P., Badley E.M. & Gignac M. 2006. Exploring the role of contextual factors in disability models. Disabil Rehab, 28(2), 135-140.
52. Verweij A. (RIVM), Sanderse C. (RIVM), Beer J. de (NIDI). Etniciteit samengevat. In: Volksgezondheid Toekomst Verkenning, Nationaal Kompas Volksgezondheid. Bilthoven: RIVM, 〈http://www.nationaal kompas.nl〉 Nationaal Kompas Volksgezondheid\Bevolking\Etniciteit, 7 December 2012.
53. World Health Organization. 2001. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: WHO.
54. Wouters J., Berghe J. V. & Maj J.B. 2002. Adaptive noise suppression for a dual-microphone hearing aid. Int J Audiol, 41 (7), 401-407.
55. Zekveld A.A:, Kramer S.E. & Festen J.M. 2010. Pupil response and an indication of effortful listening: The influence of sentence intelligibility. Ear Hear, 31(4), 480-90.