The ICF core sets for hearing loss - Researcher perspective. Part I: Systematic review of outcome measures identified in audiological research

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 65-76

  Granberg, Sarah ^a,c   Dahlström, Jennie ^a   Möller, Claes ^a   Kähäri, Kim ^b   Danermark, Berth ^a  

^a ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^c LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Audiology; Hearing loss; ICF; ICF core sets; Outcome assessment; Systematic literature review

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AUDIOLOGY; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLASSIFICATION; DISABILITY; HEALTH STATUS; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; LANGUAGE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; NOISE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT; PERCEPTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECOGNITION; REVIEW; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDIOLOGY; AUDIOMETRY, SPEECH; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DISABILITY EVALUATION; HEALTH STATUS; HEARING; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; LANGUAGE; NOISE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PERSONS WITH HEARING IMPAIRMENTS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 84892578224     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2013.851799     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Abrams H.B., Chisolm T.H. & McArdle R. 2005. Health-related quality of life and hearing aids: A tutorial. Trends Amplif, 9, 99-109.
2. Arlinger S. 2000. Can we establish internationally equivalent outcome mea sures in audiological rehabilitation? Ear Hear, 21 (Suppl. 4), 97-99.
3. Au D.K. 2003. Effects of stimulation rates on Cantonese lexical tone perception by cochlear implant users in Hong Kong. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci, 28, 533-538.
4. Bentler R.A. & Kramer S.E. 2000. Guidelines for choosing a self-report outcome measure. Ear Hear, 21 (Suppl. 4), 37-49.
5. Benton A. 1978. Benton Revised Visual Retention Test (4th ed.). Helsinki: Psykologien Kustannus OY.
6. Berget S. & Karlsson C. 2010. Självskattningsskalor och länkning till ICF: en litteraturstudie [Self-assessment questionnaires and linking to ICF]. Degree project. Örebro: Örebro University, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Sweden.
7. Bess F.H. 2000. The role of generic health-related quality of life measures in establishing audiological rehabilitation outcomes. Ear Hear, 21 (Suppl. 4), 74-79.
8. Besser J., Zekveld A.A., Kramer S.E., Rönnberg J. & Festen J.M. 2012. New measures of masked text recognition in relation to speech-in-noise perception and their associations with age and cognitive abilities. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 55, 194-209.
9. Boothroyd A., Hanin L. & Hnath T. 1985. A Sentence Test of Speech Perception: Reliability, Set Equivalence, and Short-term Learning. New York: City University.
10. Bowman D.M., Brown D.K. & Kimberley B.P. 2000. An examination of gender differences in DPOAE phase delay measurements in normalhearing human adults. Hear Res, 142, 1-11.
11. Brännström K.J. & Wennerström I. 2010. Hearing-aid fitting outcome: Clinical application and psychometric properties of a Swedish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA). J Am Acad Audiol, 21, 512-521.
12. Brockow T., Cieza A., Kuhlow H., Sigl T., Franke T. et al. 2004. Identifying the concepts contained in outcome measures of clinical trials on musculoskeletal disorders and chronic widespread pain using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health as a reference. J Rehabil Med Suppl, 36, 30-36.
13. Brockow T.T., Wohlfahrt K., Hillert A., Geyh S., Weigl M. et al. 2004. Identifying the concepts contained in outcome measures of clinical trials on depressive disorders using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health as a reference. J Rehabil Med Suppl, 36, 49-55.
14. Chisolm T.H., Abrams H.B., McArdle R., Wilson R.H. & Doyle P.J. 2005. The WHO-DAS II: Psychometric properties in the measurement of functional health status in adults with acquired hearing loss. Trends Amplif, 9, 111-126.
15. Connington M. 2005. Hearing aid outcome tools: What are we really measuring? A case study. Semin Hear, 26, 170-175.
16. Cox R.M., Alexander G.C. & Gilmore C. 1987. Development of the connected speech test (CST). Ear Hear, 8 (Suppl. 5), 119-126.
17. Cox R.M. 2005. Evidence-based practice in provision of amplification. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 419-438.
18. Cox R.M. & Alexander G.C. 2002. The international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA): Psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol, 41, 30-35.
19. Cruice M., Worrall L. & Hickson L. 2000. Quality-of-life measurement in speech pathology and audiology. Asia Pac J Speech Lang Hear, 5, 1-20.
20. Danermark B. 2005. A review of the psychosocial effects of hearing impairment in the working-age population. In: Stephens & Jones (eds.), The Impact of Genetic Hearing Impairment. London: Whurr, pp. 106-136.
21. Danermark B., Cieza A., GangéJ., Gimigliano F., Granberg S. et al. 2010. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Core Sets for hearing loss: A discussion paper and invitation. Int J Audiol, 49, 256-262.
22. Don M., Ponton C.W., Eggermont J.J. & Masuda A. 1993. Gender differences in cochlear response time: An explanation for gender amplitude differences in the unmasked auditory brain-stem response. J Acoust Soc Am, 94, 2135-2148.
23. Erber N. 1982. Auditory Training. Washington, USA: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf.
24. Escorpizo R., Finger M., Glässel A., Gradinger F., Lückenkemper M. et al. 2011. A systematic review of functioning in vocational rehabilitation using the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Occup Rehabil, 21, 134-146.
25. Fayers P.M. & Machin D. 2007. Quality of Life. The Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation of Patient-reported Outcomes (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
26. Feeny D., Furlong W., Boyle M. & Torrance G. 1995. Multi-attribute healthstatus classification systems: Health utilities index. Pharmacoeconomics, 7, 490-502.
27. Gagné J.-P. 2003. Treatment effectiveness research in audiological rehabilitation: fundamental issues related to dependent variables. Int J Audiol, 42 (Suppl. 1), 104-111.
28. Garstecki D.C. & Erler S.F. 1999. Older adult performance on the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired: Gender difference. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 42, 785-796.
29. Gasparin M., Menegotto I. H. & Cunha C. S. 2010. Psychometric properties of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, 76, 85-90.
30. Gatehouse S. 1998. Speech tests as measures of outcome. Scand Audiol, 27 (Suppl. 49), 54-60.
31. Granberg S., Möller K., Skagerstrand Å., Möller C. & Danermark B. 2014. The ICF Core Sets for hearing loss: researcher perspective, Part II: Linking outcome measures to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Int J Audiol, 53, 77-87.
32. Hawkins D.B. 2005. Effectiveness of counseling-based adult group aural rehabilitation programs: A systematic review of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 485-493.
33. Hétu R., Getty L., Philibert L., Desilets F., Noble W. et al. 1994. Mise au point d'un outil clinique pour la mesure d incapacités auditives et de handicaps [Development of a clinical tool for the measurement of the severity of hearing disabilities and handicaps]. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol, 18, 83-95.
34. Hickson L. 2009. Evidence-based practice in adult audiologic rehabilitation. In: Montano & Spitzer (eds.), Adult Audiologic Rehabilitation. San Diego: Plural Publisher Inc, pp. 367-380.
35. Hickson L. & Scarinci N. 2007. Older adults with acquired hearing impairment: Applying the ICF in rehabilitation. Semin Speech Lang, 28, 283-290.
36. Humes L.E. & Dubno J.R. 2010. Factors affecting speech understanding in older adults. In: Gordon-Salant, Frisina, Popper & Fay y (eds.), The Aging Auditory System, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research 34. New York: Springer, pp. 211-257.
37. ICF Research Branch. 2012. ICF Core Sets. Manual for Clinical Practice. Göttingen: Hogrefe Publishing.
38. ICF Research Branch. 2013. ICF Research Branch/ICF Core Sets Projects. Retrieved 25 March, 2013, from http://www.icf-research-branch.org/icfcore-sets- projects-sp-1641024398
39. Jerger J. & Johnson K. 1988. Interactions of age, gender, and sensorineural hearing loss on ABR latency. Ear Hear, 9, 168-176.
40. Kiessling J., Pichora-Fuller M.K., Gatehouse S., Stephens D., Arlinger S. et al. 2003. Candidature for and delivery of audiological services: Special needs of older people. Int J Audiol, 42(Suppl. 2), 92-101.
41. Kramer S.E., Goverts S.T., Dreschle, W.A., Boymans M. & Festen J.M. 2002. International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): Results from the Netherlands. Int J Audiol, 41, 36-41.
42. Kramer S.E., Zekveld A.A. & Houtgast T. 2009. Measuring cognitive factors in speech comprehension: The value of using the Text Reception Threshold test as a visual equivalent of the SRT test. Scand J Psychol, 50, 507-515.
43. Levo H., Stephens D., Poe D., Kentala E. & Pyykkö I. 2010. Use of ICF in assessing the effects of Ménière's disorder on life. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 119, 583-589.
44. Liu H., Zhang H., Liu S., Chen X., Han D. et al. 2011. International outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA): Results from the Chinese version. Int J Audiol, 50, 673-678.
45. McArdle R., Chisolm T.H., Abrams H.B., Wilson R.H. & Doyle P.J. 2005. The WHO-DAS II: Measuring outcomes of hearing aid intervention for adults. Trends Amplif, 9, 127-143.
46. Miller J.D. 2007. Sex differences in the length of the organ of Corti in humans. J Acoust Soc Am, 121, 151-155.
47. Möller K. 2003. Deafblindness: A challenge for assessment: Is the ICF a useful tool? Int J Audiol, 42(Suppl. 1), 140-142.
48. Möller K., Eriksson K., Sadeghi A.M., Möller C. & Danermark B. 2009. Long-term ophthalmic health care in Usher syndrome type I from an ICF perspective. Disabil Rehabil, 31, 1283-1292.
49. Morgan A., Hickson L. & Worrall L. 2002. The impact of hearing impairment on quality of life of older people. Asia Pac J Speech Lang Hear, 7, 39-53.
50. Nilsson M., Soli S. & Sullivan J. 1994. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 1085-1099.
51. Noble W. 1998. Self-Assessment of Hearing and Related Functions. London: Whurr.
52. Pichora-Fuller K.M. & Singh G. 2006. Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: Implications for hearing-aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation. Trends Amplif, 10, 29-59.
53. Pichora-Fuller M., Schneider B. & Daneman M. 1995. How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 593-608.
54. Post M.W.M., Kirchberger I., Scheuringer M., Wollaars M.M. & Geyh S. 2010. Outcome parameters in spinal cord injury research: A systematic review using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a reference. Spinal Cord, 48, 522-528.
55. Ramkumar V. & Rangasayee R. 2010. Studying tinnitus in the ICF framework. Int J Audiol, 49, 645-650.
56. Sato H., Sando I. & Takahashi H. 1991. Sexual dimorphism and development of the human cochlea. Computer 3D measurement. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh), 111, 1037-1040.
57. Saunders G.H., Chisolm T.H. & Abrams H.B. 2005. Measuring hearing aid outcomes: Not as easy as it seems. J Rehabil Res Dev, 42, 157-168.
58. Scarinci N., Worrall L. & Hickson L. 2009. The ICF and third-party disability: Its application to spouses of older people with hearing impairment. Disabil Rehabil, 31, 2088-2100.
59. Scheuringer M., Grill E., Boldt C., Mittrach R., Mullner P. et al. 2005. Systematic review of measures and their concepts used in published studies focusing on rehabilitation in the acute hospital and in early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil, 27, 419-429.
60. Schneider B., Pichora-Fuller K.M. & Daneman M. 2010. Effects of senescent changes in audition and cognition on spoken language comprehension. In: Gordon-Salant, Frisina, Popper & Fay (eds.) The Aging Auditory System, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, 34. New York: Springer Science, pp. 167-210.
61. Staehelin K., Bertoli S., Probst R., Schindler C., Dratva J. et al. 2011. Gender and hearing aids: Patterns of use and determinants of nonregular use. Ear Hear, 32, 26-37.
62. Stephens D. 2001. World Health Organization s International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. J Audiol Med, 10, 7-10.
63. Stroop J.R. 1935. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol, 18, 643-662.
64. Stucki G. & Grimby G. 2004. Foreword: Applying the ICF in medicine. J Rehabil Med Suppl, 36, 5-6.
65. Thibodeau L.M. 2007. Speech Audiometry. In: Roeser & Hosford-Dunn (eds.), Audiology: Diagnosis. (2nd ed.). New York: Thieme Publishing Group, pp. 288-313.
66. Ventry I. & Weinstein B. 1982. The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly: A new tool. Ear Hear, 3, 128-134.
67. Vink M. & Jolles J. 1985. A new version of the Trail-Making Test as an information processing task. J Clin Neuropsychol, 7, 162.
68. Ware J.E.J., Snow K.K., Kosinski M. & Gandek B. 1993. SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: New England Medical Centre.
69. World Health Organization. 1999. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule Phase II Field Trial Instrument. Geneva: World Health Organization.
70. World Health Organization. 2001a. Fifty-fourth World Health Assembly, WHA 54.21. Agenda Item 13.9, 22 May 2001. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Retrieved 7 January, 2013, from http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/wha-en.pdf
71. World Health Organization. 2001b. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: WHO.
72. World Health Organization. 2009. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems: ICD-10 (10. rev., 2008 ed.). Geneva: World Health Organization.
73. Vuorialho A., Karinen P. & Sorri M. 2006. Effect of hearing aids on hearing disability and quality of life in the elderly. Int J Audiol, 45, 400-405.
74. Zochling J., Bonjean M., Grill E., Scheuringer M., Stucki G. et al. 2006. Systematic review of measures and their concepts used in published studies focusing on the treatment of acute inflammatory arthritis. Clin Rheumatol, 25, 807-813.