Disproportionate awards for women in disciplinary societies

Advances in Gender Research

Volumn 19, Issue , 2014, Pages 243-263

  Cadwalader, Erin L ^a   Herbers, Joan M ^b   Popejoy, Alice B ^c  

^a Lewis Burke Associates   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

AWARDS; Gender equity; Professional societies; Recognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911453686     PISSN: 15292126     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1108/S1529-212620140000019011     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Barsh, J., & Yee, L. (2011). Unlocking the full potential of women in the US economy: McKinsey & Company. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/client-service/organization/latest-thinking/women-at-work
2. Budden, A. E., Tregenza, T., Aarssen, L. W., Koricheva, J., Leimu, R., & Lortie, C. J. (2008). Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23(1), 4-6.
3. Campbell, L. G., Mehtani, S., Dozier, M. E., & Rinehart, J. (2013). Gender-heterogeneous working groups produce higher quality science. Plos One, 8(10), e79147.
4. Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-a-scientist test. Science Education, 67(2), 255-265.
5. Fouad, N. A., & Singh, R. (2011). Stemming the tide: Why women leave engineering. Milwaukee, WI: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Retrieved from http://studyof work.com/files/2011/03/NSF-Women-Full-Report-0314.pdf
6. Frey, B. S. (2007). Awards as compensation. European Management Review, 4(1), 6-14.
7. Gaucher, D., Friesen, J., & Kay, A. C. (2011). Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 109-128.
8. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4-27.
9. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197-216.
10. Hewitt, S. A., Luce, C. B., Servon, L. J., Sherbin, L., Shiller, P., Sosnovich, E., & Sumberg, K. (2008). The Athena factor: Reversing the brain drain in science, engineering, and technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review.
11. Lincoln, A. E., Pincus, S., Koster, J. B., & Leboy, P. S. (2012). The Matilda effect in science: Awards and prizes in the US, 1990s and 2000s. Social Studies of Science, 42(2), 307-320.
12. Madera, J. M., Hebl, M. R., & Martin, R. C. (2009). Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1591-1599.
13. Mason, M. A., Wolfinger, N. H., & Goulden, M. (2013). Do babies matter? Gender and family in the ivory tower. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
14. Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(41), 16474-16479.
15. National Science Foundation/National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NSF/NCSES). (2010). Data from Department of Education/National Center for Education Statistics: Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System Completions Survey and NSF/NCSES. Survey of Earned Doctorates, Arlington, VA.
16. NSF. (2013). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2013. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
17. Schmader, T., Whitehead, J., & Wysocki, V. H. (2007). A linguistic comparison of letters of recommendation for male and female chemistry and biochemistry job applicants. Sex Roles, 57(7-8), 509-514.
18. Schwartz-Ziv, M. (2013). Does the gender of directors matter? Edmond J. Safra. Working Papers No. 8. Social science research network.
19. Steinpreis, R. E., Anders, K. A., & Ritzke, D. (1999). The impact of gender on the review of the curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: A national empirical study. Sex Roles, 41(7-8), 509-528.
20. UN. (2010). The world's women 2010: Trends and statistics. New York, NY: United Nations.
21. Valian, V. (1998). Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.