Evidence That Gendered Wording in Job Advertisements Exists and Sustains Gender Inequality

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 101, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 109-128

  Gaucher, Danielle ^a   Friesen, Justin ^a   Kay, Aaron C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Belongingness; Gender inequality; Inequality; Intergroup relations; Social dominance

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ADVERTIZING; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CANADA; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMAN; MALE; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLICATION; SEMANTICS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STUDENT; WORK;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ADVERTISING AS TOPIC; CANADA; CAREER CHOICE; CUES; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMANS; JOB DESCRIPTION; MALE; NEWSPAPERS; PERSONNEL SELECTION; PREJUDICE; SEMANTICS; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION; STEREOTYPING; STUDENTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79959846281     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0022530     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Adams G., Biernat M., Branscombe N.R., Crandall C.S., Wrightsman L.S. Beyond prejudice: Toward a sociocultural psychology of racism and oppression. Commemorating Brown: The social psychology of racism and discrimination 2008, 215-246. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, doi: 10.1037/11681-012.
2. Bartz J.A., Lydon J.E. Close relationships and the working self-concept: Implicit and explicit effects of priming attachment on agency and communion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2004, 30:1389-1401. doi: 10.1177/0146167204264245.
3. Baumeister R.F., Leary M.R. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin 1995, 117:497-529. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.
4. Bell A.E., Spencer S.J., Iserman E., Logel C.E.R. The effect of stereotype threat on women's engineering performance. Journal of Engineering Education 2003, 92:307-312.
5. Bem S.L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1974, 42:155-162. doi: 10.1037/h0036215.
6. Bem S.J., Bem D.J. Does sex-biased job advertising "aid and abet" sex discrimination?. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1973, 3:6-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1973.tb01290.x.
7. Biernat M., Kobrynowicz D. Gender- and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1997, 72:544-557. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.544.
8. Boroditsky L. Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology 2001, 43:1-22. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0748.
9. Brownlow S., Rosamond J.A., Parker J.A. Gender-linked linguistic behavior in television interviews. Sex Roles 2003, 49:121-132. doi: 10.1023/A:1024404812972.
10. Carli L.L. Gender, language, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1990, 59:941-951. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.941.
11. U.S. women in business 2008, Catalyst, Retrieved from http://www.catalyst.org/publication/132/us-women-in-business.
12. Women in the sciences 2008, Catalyst, Retrieved from http://www.catalyst.org/file/205/qt_women_in_sciences.pdf.
13. Cheryan S., Plaut V.C., Davis P.G., Steele C.M. Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009, 97:1045-1060. doi: 10.1037/a0016239.
14. Cuddy A.J.C., Fiske S.T., Glick P. When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn't cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues 2004, 60:701-718. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00381.x.
15. Dardenne B., Dumont M., Bollier T. Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: Consequences for women's performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007, 93:764-779. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.764.
16. Davies P.G., Spencer S.J. The gender-gap artifact: Women's underperformance in quantitative domains through the lens of stereotype threat. Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach 2005, 172-188. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. A.M. Gallagher, J.C. Kaufman (Eds.).
17. Davies P.G., Spencer S.J., Quinn D.M., Gerhardstein R. Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2002, 28:1615-1628. doi: 10.1177/014616702237644.
18. Deutsch M. A framework for thinking about oppression and its change. Social Justice Research 2006, 19:7-41. doi: 10.1007/s11211-006-9998-3.
19. Diekman A.B., Eagly A.H. Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2000, 26:1171-1188. doi: 10.1177/0146167200262001.
20. Eagly A.H. Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation 1987, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
21. Eagly A.H., Karau S.J. Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1991, 60:685-710. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.685.
22. Women in engineering 2010, Engineers Canada, Retrieved from http://www.engineerscanada.ca/e/pr_women.cfm.
23. Fiske S.T., Bersoff D.N., Borgida E., Deaux K., Heilman M.E. Social science research on trial: Use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins. American Psychologist 1991, 46:1049-1060. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.46.10.1049.
24. Fiske S.T., Cuddy A.J.C., Glick P., Xu J. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 82:878-902. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878.
25. Fitzsimons G.M., Kay A.C. Language and interpersonal cognition: Causal effects of variations in pronoun usage on perceptions of closeness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2004, 30:547-557. doi: 10.1177/0146167203262852.
26. Glick P., Fiske S.T. The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996, 70:491-512. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491.
27. Glick P., Fiske S.T. An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist 2001, 56:109-118. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109.
28. Glick P., Fiske S.T. Ambivalent stereotypes as legitimizing ideologies: Differentiating paternalistic and envious prejudice. The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations 2001, 278-306. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. J.T. Jost, B. Major (Eds.).
29. Haas A. Male and female spoken language differences: Stereotypes and evidence. Psychological Bulletin 1979, 86:616-626. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.616.
30. Haley H., Sidanius J. Person-organization congruence and the maintenance of group-based social hierarchy: A social dominance perspective. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 2005, 8:187-203. doi: 10.1177/1368430205051067.
31. Heilman M.E. Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior 1983, 5:269-298.
32. Heilman M.E., Haynes M.C. No credit where credit is due: Attributional rationalization of women's success in male-female teams. Journal of Applied Psychology 2005, 90:905-916. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.905.
33. Hoffman C., Hurst N. Gender stereotypes: Perception or rationalization?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1990, 58:197-208. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.197.
34. Hoffman C., Tchir M.A. Interpersonal verbs and dispositional adjectives: The psychology of causality embodied in language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1990, 58:765-778. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.765.
35. Holmes M.A., O'Connell S. Leaks in the pipeline. Nature 2007, 446:346. doi: 10.1038/nj7133-346a.
36. Ibarra H. Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 1992, 37:422-447. doi: 10.2307/2393451.
37. Jost J.T., Banaji M.R. The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology 1994, 33:1-27.
38. Jost J.T., Banaji M.R., Nosek B.A. A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology 2004, 25:881-919. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x.
39. Jost J.T., Hunyady O. Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2005, 14:260-265. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x.
40. Jost J.T., Kay A.C. Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2005, 88:498-509. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498.
41. Judd C.M., Kenny D.A., McClelland G.H. Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. Psychological Methods 2001, 6:115-134. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.6.2.115.
42. Kay A.C., Czapliński S., Jost J.T. Left-right ideological differences in system justification following exposure to complementary versus noncomplementary stereotype exemplars. European Journal of Social Psychology 2009, 39:290-298. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.500.
43. Kay A.C., Gaucher D., Peach J.M., Laurin K., Friesen J., Zanna M.P., Spencer S.J. Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to see the way things are as the way they should be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009, 97:421-434. doi: 10.1037/a0015997.
44. Kay A.C., Jost J.T., Mandisodza A.N., Sherman S.J., Petrocelli J.V., Johnson A.L. Panglossian ideology in the service of system justification: How complementary stereotypes help us to rationalize inequality. Advances in experimental social psychology 2007, 39:305-358. Elsevier, San Diego, CA, doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39006-5. M.P. Zanna (Ed.).
45. Kay A.C., Zanna M.P. A contextual analysis of the system justification motive and its societal consequences. Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification 2009, 158-181. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320916.003.007. J.T. Jost, A.C. Kay, H. Thorisdottir (Eds.).
46. Kervyn N., Yzerbyt V.Y., Judd C.M., Nunes A. A question of compensation: The social life of the fundamental dimensions of social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009, 96:828-842. doi: 10.1037/a0013320.
47. Lakoff R.T. Language and woman's place 1975, Harper & Row, New York, NY.
48. Leaper C., Ayres M.M. A meta-analytic review of gender variations in adults' language use: Talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2007, 11:328-363. doi: 10.1177/1088868307302221.
49. Maass A. Linguistic intergroup bias: Stereotype perpetuation through language. Advances in experimental social psychology 1999, 31:79-121. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60272-5. M.P. Zanna (Ed.).
50. Maass A., Salvi D., Arcuri L., Semin G. Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1989, 57:981-993. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.981.
51. MacKinnon D.P., Lockwood C.M., Williams J. Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2004, 39:99-128. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4.
52. Madera J.M., Hebl M.R., Martin R.C. Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences. Journal of Applied Psychology 2009, 94:1591-1599. doi: 10.1037/a0016539.
53. Murphy M.C., Steele C.M., Gross J.J. Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering. Psychological Science 2007, 18:879-885. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x.
54. Napier J.L., Mandisodza A.N., Andersen S.M., Jost J.T. System justification in responding to the poor and displaced in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 2006, 6:57-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2006.00102.x.
55. Napier J.L., Thorisdottir H., Jost J.T. The joy of sexism? A multinational investigation of hostile and benevolent justifications for gender inequality and their relations to subjective well-being. Sex Roles 2010, 62:405-419. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9712-7.
56. Newcombe N., Arnkoff D.B. Effects of speech style and sex of speaker on person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979, 37:1293-1303. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.8.1293.
57. Newman M.L., Groom C.J., Handelman L.D., Pennebaker J.W. Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples. Discourse Processes 2008, 45:211-236. doi: 10.1080/01638530802073712.
58. Oyserman D., Markus H.R. Self as social representation. The psychology of the social 1998, 107-125. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. U. Flick (Ed.).
59. Pedriana N., Abraham A. Now you see them, now you don't: The legal field and newspaper desegregation of sex-segregated help wanted ads 1965-75. Law & Social Inquiry 2006, 31:905-938. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2006.00039.x.
60. Pennebaker J.W., Booth R.J., Francis M.E. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC 2007 [Computer software] 2007, LIWC, Austin, TX.
61. Pennebaker J.W., Mehl M.R., Niederhoffer K.G. Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology 2003, 54:547-577. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041.
62. Phelan J.E., Moss-Racusin C.A., Rudman L.A. Competent yet out in the cold: Shifting criteria for hiring reflect backlash toward agentic women. Psychology of Women Quarterly 2008, 32:406-413. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00454.x.
63. Pratto F., Espinoza P. Gender, ethnicity, and power. Journal of Social Issues 2001, 57:763-780. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00240.
64. Pratto F., Sidanius J., Levin S. Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology 2006, 17:271-320. doi: 10.1080/10463280601055772.
65. Pratto F., Stallworth L.M., Conway-Lanz S. Social dominance orientation and the ideological legitimization of social policy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1998, 28:1853-1875. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01349.x.
66. Purdie-Vaughns V., Steele C.M., Davies P.G., Ditlmann R., Crosby J.R. Social identity contingencies: How diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2008, 94:615-630. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.615.
67. Reitsma-van Rooijen M., Semin G.R., van Leeuwen E. The effect of linguistic abstraction on interpersonal distance. European Journal of Social Psychology 2007, 37:817-823. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.410.
68. Rudman L.A. Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 74:629-645. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.629.
69. Rudman L.A., Glick P. Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 77:1004-1010. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1004.
70. Rudman L.A., Glick P. Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues 2001, 57:743-762. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00239.
71. Rudman L.A., Kilianski S.T. Implicit and explicit attitudes toward female authority. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2000, 26:1315-1328. doi: 10.1177/0146167200263001.
72. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 2000, 55:68-78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
73. Sadler, P., Ethier, N., & Woody, E. (in press). Tracing the interpersonal web of psychopathology: Dyadic data analysis methods for clinical researchers. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology.
74. Schmader T., Whitehead J., Wysocki V.H. A linguistic comparison of letters of recommendation for male and female chemistry and biochemistry job applicants. Sex Roles 2007, 57:509-514. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9291-4.
75. Schullo S.A., Alperson B.L. Interpersonal phenomenology as a function of sexual orientation, sex, sentiment, and trait categories in long-term dyadic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1984, 47:983-1002. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.47.5.983.
76. Shrout P.E., Bolger N. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods 2002, 7:422-445. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422.
77. Sidanius J., Liu J.H., Shaw J.S., Pratto F. Social dominance orientation, hierarchy attenuators and hierarchy enhancers: Social dominance theory and the criminal justice system. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1994, 24:338-366. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00586.x.
78. Sidanius J., Pratto F. Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression 1999, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
79. Tesch B.J., Wood H.M., Helwig A.L., Nattinger A.B. Promotion of women physicians in academic medicine: Glass ceiling or sticky floor?. Journal of the American Medical Association 1995, 273:1022-1025. doi: 10.1001/jama.273.13.1022.
80. Median weekly earnings of full-time wage and salary workers by detailed occupation and sex 2007, U.S. Department of Labor, Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat39.pdf.
81. Vescio T.K., Gervais S.J., Snyder M., Hoover A. Power and the creation of patronizing environments: The stereotype-based behaviors of the powerful and their effects on female performance in masculine domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2005, 88:658-672. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.658.
82. Walton G.M., Cohen G.L. A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007, 92:82-96. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82.