Network-based analysis identifies epigenetic biomarkers of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma progression

Bioinformatics

Volumn 30, Issue 21, 2014, Pages 3054-3061

  Cheng, Chun Pei ^a,b   Kuo, I Ying ^a   Alakus, Hakan ^b,c,d   Frazer, Kelly A ^b,c   Harismendy, Olivier ^b,c   Wang, Yi Ching ^a   Tseng, Vincent S ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TUMOR MARKER;

CPG ISLAND; DISEASE COURSE; DNA METHYLATION; ESOPHAGUS TUMOR; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; GENETICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MORTALITY; PROMOTER REGION; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA;

CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; CPG ISLANDS; DISEASE PROGRESSION; DNA METHYLATION; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; HUMANS; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; TUMOR MARKERS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84911435471     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu433     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bibikova, M. et al. (2006) High-throughput DNA methylation profiling using universal bead arrays. Genome Res., 16, 383-393.
2. Bollschweiler, E. et al. (2006) Staging of esophageal carcinoma: length of tumor and number of involved regional lymph nodes. Are these independent prognostic factors? J. Surg. Oncol., 94, 355-363.
3. Carter, S.L. et al. (2004) Gene co-expression network topology provides a framework for molecular characterization of cellular state. Bioinformatics, 20, 2242-2250.
4. Cerami, E.G. et al. (2011) Pathway Commons, a web resource for biological pathway data. Nucleic Acids Res., 39, D685-D690.
5. Chuang, H.Y. et al. (2007) Network-based classification of breast cancer metastasis. Mol. Syst. Biol., 3, 140.
6. Cramer, H. (1946) Mathematical Methods of Statistics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
7. Cui, Q. et al. (2007) A map of human cancer signaling. Mol. Syst. Biol., 3, 152.
8. Dennis, G. Jr et al. (2003) DAVID: Database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery. Genome Biol., 4, P3.
9. Edwards, A.W.F. (1963) The measure of association in a 22 table. J. R. Stat. Soc., 126, 109-114.
10. Fagin, R. et al. (2003) Comparing top k lists. In: Proceedings of the fourteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Baltimore, MD, pp. 28-36.
11. Garcia, M. et al. (2012) Interactome-transcriptome integration for predicting distant metastasis in breast cancer. Bioinformatics, 28, 672-678.
12. Gasche, J.A. et al. (2011) Interleukin-6 promotes tumorigenesis by altering DNA methylation in oral cancer cells. Int. J. Cancer, 129, 1053-1063.
13. Grivennikov, S.I. et al. (2010) Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell, 140, 883-899.
14. Guo, W. et al. (2013) Decreased expression and aberrant methylation of Gadd45G is associated with tumor progression and poor prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Clin. Exp. Metastasis, 30, 977-992.
15. Gyobu, K. et al. (2011) Identification and validation of DNA methylation markers to predict lymph node metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 18, 1185-1194.
16. Hunter, K.W. et al. (2008)Mechanisms of metastasis. Breast Cancer Res., 10 (Suppl. 1), S2.
17. Iwagami, S. et al. (2013) LINE-1 hypomethylation is associated with a poor prognosis among patients with curatively resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann. Surg., 257, 449-455.
18. Ke, X.S. et al. (2010) Global profiling of histone and DNA methylation reveals epigenetic-based regulation of gene expression during epithelial to mesenchymal transition in prostate cells. BMC Genomics, 11, 669.
19. Kim, J. et al. (2012) Multi-analyte network markers for tumor prognosis. PloS One, 7, e52973.
20. Kim, M.S. et al. (2007) A promoter methylation pattern in the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor 2B gene predicts poor prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res., 13, 6658-6665.
21. Klosgen, W. (1992) Problems for knowledge discovery in databases and their treatment in the statistics interpreter explora. Int. J. Intell. Syst., 7, 649-673.
22. Kleinberg, J.M. (1999) Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. J. ACM, 46, 604-632.
23. Krejsgaard, T. et al. (2011) Malignant cutaneous T-cell lymphoma cells express IL-17 utilizing the Jak3/Stat3 signaling pathway. J. Invest. Dermatol., 131, 1331-1338.
24. Laird, P.W. (2003) The power and the promise of DNA methylation markers. Nat. Rev. Cancer, 3, 253-266.
25. Lee, E.J. et al. (2006) Aberrant methylation of fragile histidine triad gene is associated with poor prognosis in early stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Eur. J. Cancer, 42, 972-980.
26. Li, J. et al. (2012) SurvNet: a web server for identifying network-based biomarkers that most correlate with patient survival data. Nucleic Acids Res., 40, W123-W126.
27. Lin, W.W. and Karin, M. (2007) A cytokine-mediated link between innate immunity, inflammation, and cancer. J. Clin. Invest., 117, 1175-1183.
28. Mandelker, D.L. et al. (2005) PGP9.5 promoter methylation is an independent prognostic factor for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res., 65, 4963-4968.
29. McDonald, O.G. et al. (2011) Genome-scale epigenetic reprogramming during epithelial- to-mesenchymal transition. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 18, 867-874.
30. Ogata, H. et al. (1999) KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res., 27, 29-34.
31. Opsahl, T. et al. (2010) Node centrality in weighted networks: generalizing degree and shortest paths. Soc. Netw., 32, 245-251.
32. Ostlund, G. et al. (2010) Network-based Identification of novel cancer genes. Mol. Cell Proteomics, 9, 648-655.
33. Pennathur, A. et al. (2013) Oesophageal carcinoma. Lancet, 381, 400-412.
34. Piatetsky-Shapiro, G. (1991) Discovery, Analysis, and Presentation of Strong Rules. Knowledge Discovery in Databases. AAAI/MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
35. Sahar, S. and Mansour, Y. (1999) An empirical evaluation of interest-level criteria. In: Dasarathy, B.V. (ed.) Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery: Theory, Tools, and Technology. Orlando, FL, USA.
36. Stark, C. et al. (2006) BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res., 34, D535-D539.
37. Sun, H. and Wang, S. (2013) Network-based regularization for matched casecontrol analysis of high-dimensional DNA methylation data. Stat. Med., 32, 2127-2139.
38. Suzuki, M.M. and Bird, A. (2008) DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics. Nat. Rev. Genet., 9, 465-476.
39. Tuffery, S. (2011) Data Mining and Statistics for Decision Making. translated from the French Data Mining et statistique decisionnelle. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, GB.
40. Vaissiere, T. et al. (2009) Quantitative analysis of DNA methylation profiles in lung cancer identifies aberrant DNA methylation of specific genes and its association with gender and cancer risk factors. Cancer Res., 69, 243-252.
41. van Hagen, P. et al. (2012) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N. Engl. J. Med., 366, 2074-2084.
42. Wang, J. et al. (2013) Tumor necrosis factor alpha- and interleukin-1beta-dependent induction of CCL3 expression by nucleus pulposus cells promotes macrophage migration through CCR1. Arthritis Rheum., 65, 832-842.
43. West, J. et al. (2013) Distinctive topology of age-associated epigenetic drift in the human interactome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 14138-14143.
44. White, S. and Smyth, P. (2003) Algorithms for estimating relative importance in networks. In: Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, Washington, DC, pp. 266-275.