A dynamic system analysis of dyadic flexibility and stability across the Face-to-Face Still-Face procedure: Application of the state space grid

Infant Behavior and Development

Volumn 38, Issue , 2015, Pages 1-10

  Provenzi, Livio ^a   Borgatti, Renato ^a   Menozzi, Giorgia ^a   Montirosso, Rosario ^a  

^a SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Dynamic systems; Mother infant interaction; Social stress; State space grid; Still Face paradigm

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFFECT; ARTICLE; CHILD BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPING BEHAVIOR; DYADIC FLEXIBILITY; DYADIC STABILITY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FACE TO FACE STILL FACE; FEMALE; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; INFANT; MALE; MATERNAL BEHAVIOR; MOTHER CHILD RELATION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PLAY; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIAL STRESS; STATE SPACE GRID; STIMULUS RESPONSE; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; COMPLICATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FACIAL EXPRESSION; MENTAL STRESS; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; PSYCHOLOGY; RECREATION; VIDEORECORDING;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; AFFECT; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INFANT; MALE; MOTHER-CHILD RELATIONS; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; PLAY AND PLAYTHINGS; PSYCHOLOGY, CHILD; SOFTWARE; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 84911428465     PISSN: 01636383     EISSN: 19348800     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2014.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Adamson L.B., Frick J.E. The Still-Face: A history of a shared experimental paradigm. Infancy 2003, 4:451-473. 10.1207/S15327078IN0404_01.
2. Beebe B., Jaffe J., Lachmann F. A dyadic systems view of communication. Relational perspectives in psychoanalysis 1992, 61-81. Analytic Press, Hillsdale, NJ. N. Skolnick, S. Warshaw (Eds.).
3. Beebe B., Jaffe J., Markese S., Buck K., Chen H., Cohen P., et al. The origins of 12-month attachment: A microanalysis of 4-month mother-infant interaction. Attachment & Human Development 2010, 12:3-141. 10.1080/14616730903338985.
4. Beebe B., Lachmann F. Mother-infant mutual influence and precursors of psychic structure. Frontiers in self psychology: Progress in self psychology 1988, vol. 3:3-26. The Analytic Press, Hillsdale, NJ.
5. Beebe B., Lachmann F. The relational turn in psychoanalysis: A dyadic systems view from infant research. Contemporary Psychoanalysis 2003, 39:379-409. 10.1080/00107530.2003.10747213.
6. Beebe B., Reuben J., Schiek-Gamble C., Freeman J., Polyak D., Berman J., et al. Fluctuations in infant distress alter mother-infant self & interactive contingency 2012, Poster presented at the XVIII Biennial International Conference on Infant Studies, Minneapolis, MN.
7. Cerezo M.A., Trenado R.M., Pons-Salvador G. Mother-infant interaction and quality of child's attachment: A nonlinear dynamical systems approach. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences 2012, 16:243-267.
8. Chow S.M., Haltigan J.D., Messinger D.S. Dynamic infant-parent affect coupling during the face-to-face/still-face. Emotion 2010, 10:101-114. 10.1037/a0017824.
9. Cohn J.F., Tronick E.Z. Mother-infant face-to-face interaction: Influence is bidirectional and unrelated to periodic cycles in either partner's behavior. Developmental Psychology 1988, 24:386-392. 10.1037/0012-1649.24.3.386.
10. Crandell R.E., Patrick M.P.H., Olson R.P. Still-Face interactions between mothers with borderline disorder and their 2-month-old infants. British Journal of Psychiatry 2003, 183:239-247. 10.1192/03-74.
11. DiCorcia J.A., Tronick E. Quotidian resilience: Exploring mechanisms that drive resilience from a perspective of everyday stress and coping. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 2011, 35:1593-1602. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.04.008.
12. Dishion T.J., Nelson S.E., Winter C.E., Bullock B.M. Adolescent friendship as a dynamic system: Entropy and deviance in the etiology and course of male antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Childhood Psychology 2004, 32:651-663. 10.1023/B:JACP.0000047213.31812.21.
13. Feldman R., Greenbaum C.W., Mayes L.C., Erlich S.H. Change in mother-infant interactive behavior: Relations to change in the mother, the infant, and the social context. Infant Behavior and Development 1997, 20:151-163.
14. Feldman R., Greenbaum C.W., Yirmiya N. Mother-infant affect synchrony as an antecedent of the emergence of self-control. Developmental Psychology 1999, 35:223-231. 10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.223.
15. Fogel A., Hsu H., Shapiro F.A., Nelson-Goens G.C., Secrist C. Effects of normal and perturbed social play on the duration and amplitude of different types of infant smiles. Developmental Psychology 2006, 42:459-473. 10.1037/0012-1649.42.3.459.
16. Fonagy P., Gergely G., Target M. The parent-infant dyad and the construction of the subjective self. Journal of Childhood Psychology and Psychiatry 2007, 48:288-328. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01727.x.
17. Granic I., Lamey A.V. Combining dynamic-systems and multivariate analyses to compare the mother-child interactions of externalizing subtypes. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 2002, 30:265-283.
18. Guastello S., Koopmans M., Pincus D. Chaos and complexity: The theory of nonlinear dynamical systems 2009, Cambridge University Press, New York.
19. Ham J., Tronick E. Infant resilience to the stress of the still-face. Infant and maternal psychophysiology are related. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2006, 1094:297-302. 10.1196/annals.1376.038.
20. Harrist A.W., Waugh R.M. Dyadic synchrony: Its structure and function in children's development. Developmental Review 2002, 22:555-592. 10.1016/S0273-2297(02)00500-2.
21. Hollenstein T. State Space Grid: Analyzing dynamics across development. International Journal of Behavioral Development 2007, 31:384-396. 10.1177/0165025407077765.
22. Hollenstein T. State Space Grid: Depicting dynamics across development 2013, Springer, New York.
23. Hollenstein T., Granic I., Stoolmiller M., Snyder J. Rigidity in parent-child interactions and the development of externalizing and internalizing behavior in early childhood. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 2004, 32:595-607. 10.1023/B:JACP.0000047209.37650.41.
24. Hollingshead A.B. Four factor index of social status 1975, Unpublished manuscript, Department of Sociology, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
25. Hsu H., Fogel A. Stability and transitions of mother-infant face-to-face communication during the first six months: A micro-historical approach. Developmental Psychology 2003, 39:1061-1082. 10.1037/0012-1649.39.6.1061.
26. Lamey A., Hollenstein T., Lewis M.D., Granic I. GridWare (Version 1.1) 2004, Computer Software. http://statespacegrids.org/.
27. Lewis M.D., Lamey A.V., Douglas L. A new dynamic systems method for the analysis of early socioemotional development. Developmental Science 1999, 2:457-475.
28. Lunkenheimer E.S., Dishion T.J. Developmental psychopathology: Maladaptive and adaptive attractors in children's close relationships. Chaos and complexity: The theory of nonlinear dynamical systems 2009, 282-306. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. S. Guastello, M. Koopmans, D. Pincus (Eds.).
29. Lunkenheimer E.S., Hollenstein T., Wang J., Shields A.M. Flexibility and attractors in context: Family emotion socialization patterns and children's emotion regulation in late childhood. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences 2012, 16:269-291.
30. Martin C.L., Fabes R.A., Hanish L.D., Hollenstein T. Social dynamics in the preschool. Developmental Review 2005, 25:299-327. 10.1016/j.dr.2005.10.001.
31. Mesman J., van Ijzendoorn M., Bakermans-Kranenburg M.J. The many faces of the still-face paradigm: A review and meta-analysis. Developmental Review 2009, 29:120-162. 10.1016/j.dr.2009.02.001.
32. Montirosso R., Borgatti R., Trojan S., Zanini R., Tronick E. A comparison of dyadic interactions and coping with still-face in healthy pre-term and full-term infants. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 2010, 28:347-368. 10.1348/026151009X416429.
33. Smith L.B., Thelen E. Development as a dynamic system. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7:343-348. 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00156-6.
34. Sravish A.V., Tronick E., Hollenstein T., Beeghly M. Dyadic flexibility during the Face-to-Face Still-Face paradigm: A dynamic systems analysis of its temporal organization. Infant Behavior and Development 2013, 36:432-437. 10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.03.013.
35. Stanley C., Murray L., Stein A. The effect of postnatal depression on mother-infant interaction, infant response to the still-face perturbation, and performance on an instrumental learning task. Development and Psychopathology 2004, 16:1-18.
36. Thelen E., Smith L.B. Dynamic systems theories. Handbook of child psychology: vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development 1998, 563-634. Wiley, New York. W. Damon, R.M. Lerner (Eds.).
37. Tronick E. Why is connection with others so critical? The formation of dyadic states of consciousness and the expansion of individuals' states of consciousness: Coherence governed selection and the co-creation of meaning out of messy meaning making. Emotional development: Recent research advances 2005, 293-315. Oxford University Press, Oxford. J. Nadel, D. Muir (Eds.).
38. Tronick E., Als H., Adamson L., Wise S., Brazelton T.B. Infants response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to-face interaction. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 1978, 17:1-13. 10.1016/S0002-7138(09)62273-1.
39. Tronick E., Beeghly M. Infants' meaning-making and the development of mental health problems. American Psychologist 2011, 66:107-119. 10.1037/a0021631.
40. Tronick E., Cohn J.F. Infant-mother face-to-face interaction: Age and gender differences in coordination and the occurrence of miscoordination. Child Development 1989, 60:85-92.
41. Van Egeren L.A., Barratt M.S., Roach M.A. Mother-infant responsiveness: Timing, mutual regulation, and interactional context. Developmental Psychology 2001, 37:684-697. 10.1037//0012-1649.37.5.684.
42. Weinberg M.K., Tronick E.Z. Infant and caregiver engagement phases system 1998, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
43. Yoo K., Reeb-Sutherland B.C. Effects of negative temperament on 5-month-old infants' behavior during the still-face paradigm. Infant Behavior and Development 2013, 36:344-348. 10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.03.002.