Bias correction for selecting the minimal-error classifier from many machine learning models

Bioinformatics

Volumn 30, Issue 22, 2014, Pages 3152-3158

  Ding, Ying ^a,b   Tang, Shaowu ^b   Liao, Serena G ^b   Jia, Jia ^b   Oesterreich, Steffi ^c   Lin, Yan ^b   Tseng, George C ^a,b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BREAST TUMOR; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETICS; GENOMICS; HUMAN; PROCEDURES; SAMPLE SIZE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENOMICS; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SAMPLE SIZE;

EID: 84911394994     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu520     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Allison, D.B. et al. (2006) Microarray data analysis: from disarray to consolidation and consensus. Nat. Rev. Genet., 7, 55-65.
2. Bernau, C. et al. (2011) Correcting the optimally selected resampling-based error rate: a smooth analytical alternative to nested cross-validation. In: Technical report. Department of Statistics, University of Munich.
3. Bernau, C. et al. (2013) Correcting the optimal resampling-based error rate by estimating the error rate of wrapper algorithms. Biometrics, 69, 693-702.
4. Berrar, D. et al. (2006) Avoiding model selection bias in small-sample genomic datasets. Bioinformatics, 22, 1245-1250.
5. Boulesteix, A.-L. and Strobl, C. (2009) Optimal classifier selection and negative bias in error rate estimation: an empirical study on high-dimensional prediction. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 9, 85.
6. Curtis, C. et al. (2012) The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2, 000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature, 486, 346-352.
7. Dupuy, A. and Simon, R.M. (2007) Critical review of published microarray studies for cancer outcome and guidelines on statistical analysis and reporting. J. Natl Cancer Inst., 99, 147-157.
8. Efron, B. (2009) Empirical Bayes estimates for large-scale prediction problems. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 104, 1015-1028.
9. Fu, W.J. et al. (2005) Estimating misclassification error with small samples via bootstrap cross-validation. Bioinformatics, 21, 1979-1986.
10. Mukherjee, S. et al. (2003) Estimating dataset size requirements for classifying DNA microarray data. J. Comput. Biol., 10, 119-142.
11. Slawski, M. et al. (2008) CMA: a comprehensive bioconductor package for supervised classification with high dimensional data. BMC Bioinformatics, 9, 439.
12. Tibshirani, R.J. and Tibshirani, R. (2009) A bias correction for the minimum error rate in cross-validation. Ann. Appl. Stat., 3, 822-829.
13. Varma, S. and Simon, R. (2006) Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 91.
14. Wood, I.A. et al. (2007) Classification based upon gene expression data: bias and precision of error rates. Bioinformatics, 23, 1363-1370.
15. Yousefi, M.R. et al. (2010) Reporting bias when using real data sets to analyze classification performance. Bioinformatics, 26, 68-76.