Why don't poor men eat fruit? Socioeconomic differences in motivations for fruit consumption

Appetite

Volumn 84, Issue , 2015, Pages 271-279

  Pechey, Rachel ^a   Monsivais, Pablo ^b   Ng, Yin Lam ^a   Marteau, Theresa M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Consumption; Fruit; Liking; Motivation; Socioeconomic status

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHEESE; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOOD PREFERENCE; FRUIT; HEALTH FOOD; HUMAN; HUNGER; INCOME; MALE; MOTIVATION; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCUPATION; PERCEPTION; POVERTY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SATIETY; SOCIAL STATUS; WEIGHT CONTROL; ADOLESCENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DIET; MIDDLE AGED; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL CLASS; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DIET; FEMALE; FOOD HABITS; FOOD PREFERENCES; FRUIT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL CLASS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84911382952     PISSN: 01956663     EISSN: 10958304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.022     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Aggarwal A., Monsivais P., Cook A.J., Drewnowski A. Does diet cost mediate the relation between socioeconomic position and diet quality?. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2011, 65(9):1059-1066.
2. Appelhans B.M., Milliron B.-J., Woolf K., Johnson T.J., Pagoto S.L., Schneider K.L., et al. Socioeconomic status, energy cost, and nutrient content of supermarket food purchases. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2012, 42(4):398-402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.12.007.
3. Ball K., Crawford D., Mishra G. Socio-economic inequalities in women's fruit and vegetable intakes. A multilevel study of individual, social and environmental mediators. Public Health Nutrition 2006, 9(5):623-630. 10.1079/PHN2005897.
4. Beydoun M.A., Wang Y. Do nutrition knowledge and beliefs modify the association of socio-economic factors and diet quality among US adults?. Preventive Medicine 2008, 46(2):145-153. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.06.016.
5. Bowman S.A. A comparison of the socioeconomic characteristics, dietary practices, and health status of women food shoppers with different food price attitudes. Nutrition Research 2006, 26(7):318-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2006.06.012.
6. Crandall C.S. The liking of foods as a result of exposure. Eating doughnuts in Alaska. The Journal of Social Psychology 1985, 125(2):187-194. 10.1080/00224545.1985.9922871.
7. Cummins S., Smith D.M., Taylor M., Dawson J., Marshall D., Sparks L., et al. Variations in fresh fruit and vegetable quality by store type, urban-rural setting and neighbourhood deprivation in Scotland. Public Health Nutrition 2009, 12(11):2044-2050. 10.1017/S1368980009004984.
8. Darmon N., Drewnowski A. Does social class predict diet quality?. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2008, 87(5):1107-1117.
9. Fernández-Alvira J.M., Mouratidou T., Bammann K., Hebestreit A., Barba G., Sieri S., et al. Parental education and frequency of food consumption in European children. The IDEFICS study. Public Health Nutrition 2013, 16(03):487-498. 10.1017/S136898001200290X.
10. Friese M., Hofmann W., Wänke M. When impulses take over. Moderated predictive validity of explicit and implicit attitude measures in predicting food choice and consumption behaviour. The British journal of social Psychology / the British Psychological Society 2008, 47(3):397-419. 10.1348/014466607x241540.
11. Fritz M.S., MacKinnon D.P. Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science 2007, 18(3):233-239. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x.
12. Galobardes B., Morabia A., Bernstein M.S. Diet and socioeconomic position. Does the use of different indicators matter?. International Journal of Epidemiology 2001, 30(2):334-340. 10.1093/ije/30.2.334.
13. Giskes K., Avendaňo M., Brug J., Kunst A.E. A systematic review of studies on socioeconomic inequalities in dietary intakes associated with weight gain and overweight/obesity conducted among European adults. Obesity Reviews 2010, 11(6):413-429. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00658.x.
14. Giskes K., Turrell G., Patterson C., Newman B. Socio-economic differences in fruit and vegetable consumption among Australian adolescents and adults. Public Health Nutrition 2002, 5(5):663-669. 10.1079/PHN2002339.
15. Health and Social Care Information Centre Health survey for England, 2009. Health and Lifestyles 2010, Vol. 1. Health and Social Care Information Centre, London, UK.
16. Hetherington M.M., Pirie L.M., Nabb S. Stimulus satiation. Effects of repeated exposure to foods on pleasantness and intake. Appetite 2002, 38(1):19-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/appe.2001.0442.
17. Hofmann W., Rauch W., Gawronski B. And deplete us not into temptation. Automatic attitudes, dietary restraint, and self-regulatory resources as determinants of eating behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2007, 43(3):497-504.
18. Hollands G.J., Prestwich A., Marteau T.M. Using aversive images to enhance healthy food choices and implicit attitudes. An experimental test of evaluative conditioning. Health Psychology 2011, 30(2):195-203. 10.1037/a0022261.
19. Hunt K., Wyke S., Gray C.M., Anderson A.S., Brady A., Bunn C., et al. A gender-sensitised weight loss and healthy living programme for overweight and obese men delivered by Scottish Premier League football clubs (FFIT). A pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2014, 383(9924):1211-1221.
20. Imai K., Keele L., Tingley D. A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychological Methods 2010, 15(4):309.
21. Karpinski A., Steinman R.B. The Single Category Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006, 91(1):16-32. 10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.16.
22. Konttinen H., Sarlio-Lähteenkorva S., Silventoinen K., Männistö S., Haukkala A. Socio-economic disparities in the consumption of vegetables, fruit and energy-dense foods. The role of motive priorities. Public Health Nutrition 2013, 16(05):873-882. 10.1017/S1368980012003540.
23. Le J., Dallongeville J., Wagner A., Arveiler D., Haas B., Cottel D., et al. Attitudes toward healthy eating. A mediator of the educational level-diet relationship. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2013, 67(8):808-814. 10.1038/ejcn.2013.110.
24. Lien N., Jacobs D.R., Klepp K.-I. Exploring predictors of eating behaviour among adolescents by gender and socio-economic status. Public Health Nutrition 2002, 5(5):671-681. 10.1079/PHN2002334.
25. Maguire E., Monsivais P. Socioeconomic dietary inequalities in UK adults. An updated picture of key food groups and nutrients from national surveillance data. The British Journal of Nutrition 2014.
26. Mattes R.D. Influences on acceptance of bitter foods and beverages. Physiology & Behavior 1994, 56(6):1229-1236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(94)90370-0.
27. McLeod E.R., Campbell K.J., Hesketh K.D. Nutrition knowledge. A mediator between socioeconomic position and diet quality in Australian first-time mothers. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2011, 111(5):696-704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2011.02.011.
28. Miura K., Giskes K., Turrell G. Contribution of take-out food consumption to socioeconomic differences in fruit and vegetable intake. A mediation analysis. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2011, 111(10):1556-1562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2011.07.009.
29. Molaodi O., Leyland A., Ellaway A., Kearns A., Harding S. Neighbourhood food and physical activity environments in England, UK. Does ethnic density matter?. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2012, 9(1):75.
30. Monsivais P., Mclain J., Drewnowski A. The rising disparity in the price of healthful foods: 2004-2008. Food Policy 2010, 35(6):514-520.
31. Mulder B., de Bruin M., Schreurs H., van Ameijden E., van Woerkum C. Stressors and resources mediate the association of socioeconomic position with health behaviours. BMC Public Health 2011, 11(1):798.
32. Nederkoorn C., Houben K., Hofmann W., Roefs A., Jansen A. Control yourself or just eat what you like? Weight gain over a year is predicted by an interactive effect of response inhibition and implicit preference for snack foods. Health Psychology 2010, 29(4):389-393.
33. Office for National Statistics Highest levels of qualification across England and Wales infographic http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/census/2011-census-analysis/local-area-analysis-of-qualifications-across-england-and-wales/info-highest-qualifications.html.
34. Pechey R., Jebb S.A., Kelly M.P., Almiron-Roig E., Conde S., Nakamura R., et al. Socioeconomic differences in purchases of more vs. less healthy foods and beverages. Analysis of over 25,000 British households in 2010. Social Science & Medicine 2013, 92:22-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.012.
35. Pliner P. The effects of mere exposure on liking for edible substances. Appetite 1982, 3(3):283-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6663(82)80026-3.
36. Renner B., Sproesser G., Strohbach S., Schupp H.T. Why we eat what we eat. The Eating Motivation Survey (TEMS). Appetite 2012, 59(1):117-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.04.004.
37. Rose, D., & Pevalin, D. J. (2001). The National Statistics Socio-economic Classification. Unifying Official and Sociological Approaches to the Conceptualisation and Measurement of Social Class. ISER Working Papers (Vol. Paper 2001-4). Colchester, UK: University of Essex.
38. Smith D.M., Cummins S., Taylor M., Dawson J., Marshall D., Sparks L., et al. Neighbourhood food environment and area deprivation. Spatial accessibility to grocery stores selling fresh fruit and vegetables in urban and rural settings. International Journal of Epidemiology 2010, 39(1):277-284. 10.1093/ije/dyp221.
39. Stein L.J., Nagai H., Nakagawa M., Beauchamp G.K. Effects of repeated exposure and health-related information on hedonic evaluation and acceptance of a bitter beverage. Appetite 2003, 40(2):119-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6663(02)00173-3.
40. Steptoe A., Pollard T.M., Wardle J. Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food. The food choice questionnaire. Appetite 1995, 25(3):267-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/appe.1995.0061.
41. Steptoe A., Wardle J. Motivational factors as mediators of socioeconomic variations in dietary intake patterns. Psychology & Health 1999, 14(3):391-402. 10.1080/08870449908407336.
42. Turrell G. Socioeconomic differences in food preference and their influence on healthy food purchasing choices. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 1998, 11(2):135-149. 10.1046/j.1365-277X.1998.00084.x.
43. Turrell G., Hewitt B., Patterson C., Oldenburg B. Measuring socio-economic position in dietary research. Is choice of socio-economic indicator important?. Public Health Nutrition 2003, 6(2):191-200. 10.1079/PHN2002416.
44. UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Family food 2010 2011, A National Statistics Publication by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, UK.
45. Vainik U., Dagher A., Dubé L., Fellows L.K. Neurobehavioural correlates of body mass index and eating behaviours in adults. A systematic review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2013, 37(3):279-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.11.008.
46. World Health Organization Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010 2011, World Health Organization, Geneva.
47. Zellner D.A., Garriga-Trillo A., Rohm E., Centeno S., Parker S. Food liking and craving. A cross-cultural approach. Appetite 1999, 33(1):61-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/appe.1999.0234.