Embedded resource accounting for coupled natural-human systems: An application to water resource impacts of the western U.S. electrical energy trade

Water Resources Research

Volumn 50, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 7957-7972

  Ruddell, Benjamin L ^a,b   Adams, Elizabeth A ^a   Rushforth, Richard ^a   Tidwell, Vincent C ^c  

^a Arizona State University   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

economics; networks; virtual water; water and energy; water resources

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE; ECONOMICS; EMBEDDED SYSTEMS; LIFE CYCLE; NETWORKS (CIRCUITS); SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; WATER SUPPLY;

COLORADO RIVER BASIN; DIRECT AND INDIRECT IMPACTS; ELECTRICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS; ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; RESOURCE ACCOUNTINGS; VIRTUAL WATER; WATER AND ENERGIES;

WATER RESOURCES;

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; TRADE-ENVIRONMENT RELATIONS; WATER FOOTPRINT; WATER RESOURCE;

COLORADO BASIN [NORTH AMERICA];

EID: 84911369081     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: 19447973     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/2013WR014531     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Aldaya, M. M., J. A. Allan, and, A. Y. Hoekstra, (2010a), Strategic importance of green water in international crop trade, Ecol. Econ., 69, 887-894.
2. Aldaya, M. M., P. Martinez-Santos, and, M. R. Llamas, (2010b), Incorporating the water footprint and virtual water into policy: Reflections from the Mancha occidental region, Spain, Water Resour. Manage., 24, 941-958.
3. Allan, T., (1993), Fortunately there are substitutes for water: Otherwise our hydropolitical futures would be impossible, paper presented at Conference on Priorities for Water Resources Allocation and Management, Overseas Dev. Admin., London, U. K.
4. Ansink, E., (2010), Refuting two claims about virtual water trade, Ecol. Econ., 69, 2027-2032.
5. Bakken, T. H., A. Killingtveit, K. Engeland, K. Alfredsen, and, A. Harby, (2013), Water consumption from hydropower plants-Review of published estimates and an assessment of the concept, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3983-4000, doi: 10.5194/hess-17-3983-2013.
6. Bastianoni, S., S. N. Nielsen, N. Marchettini, and, S. E. Jorgensen, (2004), Use of thermodynamic functions for expressing some relevant aspects of sustainability, Int. J. Energy Res., 29 (1), 53-64, doi: 10.1002/er.1036.
7. Berger, M., and, M. Finkbeiner, (2012), Methodological challenges in volumetric and impact-oriented water footprints, J. Ind. Ecol., 17 (1), 79-89, doi: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00495.x.
8. Buchanan, J. M., and, W. C. Stubblebine, (1962), Externality, Economica, 29 (116), 371-384.
9. Chapagain, A. K., and, A. Y. Hoekstra, (2008), The global component of freshwater demand and supply: An assessment of virtual water flows between nations as a result of trade in agricultural and industrial products, Water Int., 33 (1), 19-32, doi: 10.1080/02508060801927812.
10. Chapagain, A. K., A. Hoekstra, and, H. Savenije, (2006), Water saving through international trade of agricultural products, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 455-468.
11. Chenoweth, J., M. Hadjikakou, and, C. Zoumides, (2013), Review article: Quantifying the human impact on water resources: A critical review of the water footprint concept, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 10, 9389-9433, doi: 10.5194/hessd-10-9389-2013.
12. City of Peoria, Arizona (2007), Principles of sound water management. [Available at http://www.peoriaaz.gov/uploadedFiles/PrinciplesofSoundWaterManagement11-20-07f.pdf.]
13. Cohen, S., (2013), We need to accelerate the development of sustainability metrics, Huffington Post. [Available at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-cohen/we-need-to-accelerate-the-b-4097023.html.]
14. Collin, P. H., (2006), Dictionary of Economics, A & C Black, London, U. K.
15. Daniels, P. L., M. Lenzen, and, S. J. Kenway, (2011), The ins and outs of water use-A review of multi-region input-output analysis and water footprints for regional sustainability analysis and policy, Econ. Syst. Res., 23 (4), 353-370, doi: 10.1080/09535314.2011.633500.
16. Davis, D. R., and, D. E. Weinstein, (2003), The factor content of trade, in Handbook of International Trade, chapter 5, edited by, E. K. Choi, and, J. Harrigan, Blackwell, Oxford, U. K.
17. 2 emissions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 107 (12), 5687-5692, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906974107.
18. Debare, P., (2014), The global economics of water: Is water a source of comparative advantage, Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ., 6 (2), 32-48, doi: 10.1257/app.6.2.32.
19. D'Odorico, P., F. Laio, and, L. Ridol, (2010), Does globalization of water reduce societal resilience to drought?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L13403, doi: 10.1029/2010GL043167.
20. Ewing, B. R., T. R. Hawkins, T. O. Wiedmann, A. Galli, A. E. Ercin, J. Weinzettel, and, K. Steen-Olsen, (2012), Integrating ecological and water footprint accounting in a multi-regional input-output framework, Ecol. Indicators, 23, 1-8, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.025.
21. Fader, M., D. Gerten, M. Thammer, J. Heinke, H. Lotze-Campen, W. Lucht, and, W. Cramer, (2011), Internal and external green-blue agricultural water footprints of nations, and related water and land savings through trade, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1641-1660.
22. Feng, K., Y. L. Siu, D. Guan, and, K. Hubacek, (2011a), Assessing regional virtual water flows and water footprints in the Yellow River Basin, China: A consumption based approach, Appl. Geogr., 32, 691-701.
23. Feng, K., A. Chapagain, S. Suh, S. Pfister, and, K. Hubacek, (2011b), Comparison of bottom-up and top-down approaches to calculating the water footprint of nations, Econ. Syst. Res., 23 (4), 371-385, doi: 10.1080/09535314.2011.638276.
24. Fiksel, J., R. Bruins, A. Gatchett, A. Gilliland, and, M. ten Brink, (2014), The triple value model: A systems approach to sustainable solutions, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, 16, 691-702, doi: 10.1007/s10098-013-0696-1.
25. Finster, R. D., (1971), Improving water resource allocation through demand-oriented water policy, Water Resour. Bull., 7 (1), 1-25.
26. Fischer-Kowalsi, M., and, W. Huttler, (1999), Society's metabolism: The intellectual history of material flow analysis, Part II, 1970-1998, J. Ind. Ecol., 2 (4), 107-137.
27. Fulton, J., H. Cooley, S. Cardenas, and, F. Shilling, (2013), Trends and variation in California's water footprint, report, pp. 42, Calif. Dep. of Water Resour. and U.S. Environ. Prot. Agency, Pacific Institute, Oakland, Calif.
28. Galli, A., T. Wiedmann, E. Ercin, D. Knoblauch, B. Ewing, and, S. Giljum, (2012), Integrating ecological, carbon and water footprint into a "footprint family" of indicators: Definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet, Ecol. Indicators, 16, 100-112.
29. Gober, P., C. W. Kirkwood, R. C. Balling Jr,., A. W. Ellis, and, S. Deitrick, (2010), Water planning under climatic uncertainty in phoenix: Why we need a new paradigm, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 100 (2), 356-372.
30. Gross, J. L., and, J. Yellen, (1998), Graph Theory and Its Applications, CRC Press, Fla.
31. Hanemann, W. M., (2006), The economic conception of water, in Water Crisis: Myth or Reality?, chap. 4, edited by, P. P. Rogers, M. R. Llamas, and, L. Martinez-Cortina, pp. 61-91, Taylor & Francis, London, U. K.
32. Hester, E. T., and, J. C. Little, (2013), Measuring environmental sustainability of water in watersheds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47 (15), 8083-8090, doi: 10.1021/es400513f.
33. Hoekstra, A. Y., (2006), The global dimension of water governance: Nine reasons for global arrangements in order to cope with local water problems, Value Water Res. Rep. Ser. 20, UNESCO-IHE Inst. of Water Edu., Delft, Netherlands.
34. Hoekstra, A. Y., (2011), The global dimension of water governance: Why the river basin approach is no longer sufficient and why cooperative action at global level is needed, Water, 3, 21-46, doi: 10.3390/w3010021.
35. Hoekstra, A. Y., and, P. Q. Hung, (2002), Virtual water trade: A quantification of virtual water flows between nations in relation to international crop trade, Value Water Res. Rep. Ser. 11, UNESCO-IHE Inst. of Water Edu., Delft, Netherlands. [Available at www.waterfootprint.org/Reports/Report11.pdf.]
36. Hoekstra, A. Y., and, M. M. Mekonnen, (2012), The water footprint of humanity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 109 (9), 3232-3237, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109936109.
37. Hoekstra, A. Y., and, T. O. Wiedmann, (2014), Humanity's unsustainable environmental footprint, Science, 344 (6188), 1114-1117, doi: 10.1126/science.1248365.
38. Hoekstra, A. Y., W. Gerbens-Leenes, and, T. H. van der Meer, (2009), Reply to Pfister and Hellweg: Water footprint accounting, impact assessment, and life-cycle assessment, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 106 (40), E114.
39. Hoekstra, A. Y., A. K. Chapagain, M. M. Aldaya, and, M. M. Mekonnen, (2011), The Water Footprint Assessment Manual: Setting the Global Standard, Earthscan Publ., London and Washington, D. C.
40. ISO (2011), ISO 14046 Working Draft 2, Water Footprint-Principles, Requirements, and Guidance, Int. Organ. for Stand., Geneva.
41. Iyer, R. R., (2012), Virtual water: Some reservations, Global Water Forum, Canberra. [Available at http://www.globalwaterforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Virtual-water-Some-reservations-GWF-1218.pdf, last accessed 31 Jul. 2013.]
42. Jeswani, H. K., and, A. Azapagic, (2011), Water footprint: Methodologies and a case study for assessing the impacts of water use, J. Cleaner Prod., 19, 1288-1299, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.04.003.
43. Kelley, S., and, M. Pasqualetti, (2013), Virtual water from a vanishing river, J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 105 (9), 471-479, doi: 10.5942/jawwa.2013.105.0132.
44. Kenny, J., N. Barber, S. Hutson, K. Linsey, J. Lovelace, and, M. Maupin, (2009), Estimated use of water in the United States in 2005, U.S. Geol. Surv. Circ., 1344, 52 pp.
45. Konar, M., C. Dalin, N. Hanasaki, A. Rinaldo, and, I. Rodriguez-Iturbe, (2012), Temporal dynamics of blue and green virtual water trade networks, Water Resour. Res., 48, W07509, doi: 10.1029/2012WR011959.
46. Kounina, A., et al. (2013), Review of methods addressing freshwater use in life cycle inventory and impact assessment, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 18, 707-721, doi: 10.1007/s11367-012-0519-3.
47. Kumar, M. D., and, O. P. Singh, (2005), Virtual water in global food and water policy: Is there a need for rethinking?, Water Resour. Manage., 19, 759-789, doi: 10.1007//s11269-005-3278-0.
48. Lenzen, M., D. Moran, K. Kanemoto, B. Foran, L. Lobefaro, and, A. Geschke, (2012), International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations, Nature, 486 (7401), 109-112, doi: 10.1038/nature11145.
49. Leontief, W. W., (1986), Input-Output Economics, 2nd ed., Oxford Univ. Press, N. Y.
50. Liu, J., et al. (2007), Coupled human and natural systems, Ambio, 36 (8), 639-649.
51. Luck, M. A., G. D. Jenerette, J. Wu, and, N. B. Grimm, (2001), The urban funnel model and the spatially heterogeneous ecological footprint, Ecosystems, 4 (8), 782-796.
52. Macknick, J., R. Newmark, G. Heath, and, K. C. Hallett, (2011), A review of operational water consumption and withdrawal factors for electricity generating technologies, Rep. NREL/TP-6A20-50900, pp. 29, Natl. Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, Colo.
53. Marriott, J., and, S. Matthews, (2005), Environmental effects of interstate power trading on electricity consumption mixes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 8584-8590.
54. Martin, E. A., and, B. L. Ruddell, (2012), Value intensity of water used for electrical energy generation in the Western U.S.; An application of embedded resource accounting, in IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology, pp. 1-5, IEEE, Boston, Mass.
55. Mekonnen, M. M., and, A. Y. Hoekstra, (2012), The blue water footprint of electricity from hydropower, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 179-187, doi: 10.5194/hess-16-179-2012.
56. Merrett, S., (1997), Introduction to the economics of water resources: An international perspective, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, Md.
57. Metson, G. S., R. L. Hale, D. M. Iwaniec, E. M. Cook, J. R. Corman, C. S. Galletti, and, D. L. Childers, (2012), Phosphorus in Phoenix: a budget and spatial representation of phosphorus in an urban ecosystem. Ecol., Appl., 22 (2), 705-721.
58. Mubako, S., S. Lahiri, and, C. Lant, (2013), Input-output analysis of virtual water transfers: Case study of California and Illinois, Ecol. Econ., 93, 230-238, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.06.005.
59. Mubako, S. T., (2011), Frameworks for estimating virtual water flows among U.S. states, PhD dissertations, South. Ill. Univ., Carbondale, Ill. [Available at http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/dissertations/341.]
60. Mubako, S. T., B. L. Ruddell, and, A. Mayer, (2013), The relationship between water withdrawals and freshwater ecosystem water scarcity quantified at multiple spatio-temporal locations and scales for a Great Lakes watershed, J. Water Resour. Manage., 139 (6), 671-681.
61. Mutel, C. L., S. Pfister, and, S. Hellweg, (2012), GIS-based regionalized life cycle assessment: How big is small enough? Methodology and case study of electricity generation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 1096-1103, doi: 10.1021/es203117z.
62. Novo, P., A. Garrido, and, C. Varela-Ortega, (2009), Are virtual water "flows" in Spanish grain trade consistent with relative water scarcity?, Ecol. Econ., 68 (5), 1454-1464, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.10.013.
63. Odum, H. T., and, E. C. Odum, (1976), Energy Basis for Man and Nature, McGraw-Hill, N. Y.
64. Pfister, S., (2011), Interactive comment on "The water footprint of electricity from hydropower" by M.M. Mekonnen and A.Y. Hoekstra, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 8, C4598-C4600.
65. Pfister, S., A. Koehler, and, S. Hellweg, (2009), Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 4098-4104.
66. Pfister, S., D. Saner, and, A. Koehler, (2011), The environmental relevance of freshwater consumption in global power production, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 16, 580-591, doi: 10.1007/s11367-011-0284-8.
67. Pitzer, G., (2009), The Water-Energy Nexus in the Colorado River Basin, Colorado River Project, Water Education Foundation, River Report 7. [Available at http://www.watereducation.org/userfiles/RiverReport-Summer09-WEB.pdf.]
68. Porkka, M., M. Kummu, S. Siebert, and, M. Floerke, (2012), The role of virtual water flows in physical water scarcity: The case of central Asia, Int. J. Water Resour. Dev., 28 (3), 453-474, doi: 10.1080/07900627.2012.684310.
69. Postel, S. L., (2000), Entering an era of water scarcity: The challenges ahead, Ecol. Appl., 10 (4), 941-948.
70. Reimer, J. J., (2012a), On the economics of virtual water trade, Ecol. Econ., 75, 135-139, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.01.011.
71. Reimer, J. J., (2012b), Virtual water trade means trade in water services, GWF Discuss. Pap. 1299, Global Water Forum, Canberra.
72. Ruddell, B. L., and, P. Kumar, (2009), Ecohydrologic process networks: 1. Identification, Water Resour. Res., 45, W03419, doi: 10.1029/2008WR007279.
73. Rushforth, R. R., E. A. Adams, and, B. L. Ruddell, (2014), Generalizing ecological, water and carbon footprint methods and their worldview assumptions using embedded resource accounting, Water Resour. Ind., 1, 77-90, doi: 10.1016/j.wri.2013.05.001.
74. Samuelson, P., (1947), Foundations of Economic Analysis, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass.
75. Scott, C., and, M. Pasqualetti, (2010), Energy and water resources scarcity: Critical infrastructure for growth and economic development in Arizona and Sonora, Nat. Resour. J., 50, 645-682.
76. Solley, W., R. Pierce, and, H. Perlman, (1995), Estimated use of water in the United States in 1995, U.S. Geol. Surv. Circ., 1200, 71 pp.
77. Taylor, P. J., (2005), Leading world cities: Empirical evaluations of urban nodes in multiple networks, Urban Stud., 42, 1593-1608.
78. Tidwell, V. C., P. H. Kobos, L. A. Malczynski, G. Klise, and, C. R. Castillo, (2012), Exploring the water-thermoelectric power nexus, J. Water Plann. Manage., 138 (5), 491-501.
79. U.N. (United Nations) (2012), System of environmental-economic accounting for water, Dep. of Econ. and Soc. Affairs, Stat. Div, N. Y.
80. U.S. Energy Information Agency (USEIA) (2005), Steam-electric plant operation and design data, EIA-767, Washington, D. C. [Available at http://www.eia.gov/cneaf/electricity/page/eia767/.]
81. U.S. Energy Information Agency (USEIA) (2011a), Sales data tables. Electricity, Washington, D. C. [Available at http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data.cfm#sales.]
82. U.S. Energy Information Agency (USEIA) (2011b), Supply and disposition of electricity. State electricity profiles. Electricity, Washington D. C. [Available at http://www.eia.gov/electricity/state/.]
83. U.S. Energy Information Agency (USEIA) (2011c), Factors affecting electricity prices. Energy explained, Washington, D. C. [Available at http://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/index.cfm?page=electricity-factors-affecting-prices.]
84. U.S. Energy Information Agency (USEIA) (2011d), Power plant operations report-Form 923. OMB no. 1905-0129, U.S. Dep. of Energy, Washington, D. C. [Available at http://www.eia.gov/cneaf/electricity/forms/eia923.pdf.]
85. U.S. Energy Information Agency (USEIA) (2011e), Annual electrical generator report-Form 860. OMB no. 1905-0129, U.S. Dep. of Energy, Washington, D. C. [Available at http://www.eia.gov/cneaf/electricity/forms/eia860.pdf.]
86. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (2010), Emissions and Generation Resource Integrated Database (eGRID), version 1.0. [Available at http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy-resources/egrid/.]
87. Vanek, J., (1968), The factor proportions theory: The n-factor case, Kyklos 21.4, 749-756.
88. Vazquez, A., (2006), Spreading dynamics on heterogeneous populations: Multitype network approach, Phys. Rev. E, 74, 066114, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.066114.
89. Verma, et al. (2009), Going against the flow: a critical analysis of interstate virtual water trade in the context of India's National River Linking Program, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 34.4, 261-269.
90. Vörösmarty, C. J., C. Pahl-Wostl, S. E. Bunn, and, R. Lawford, (2013), Global water, the anthropocene and the transformation of a science, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability, 5 (6), 539-550, doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.10.005.
91. Wackernagel, M., (1997), Can trade promote an ecologically secure world-The global economy from an ecological footprint perspective, Buffalo Environ. Law J., 5, 179.
92. Wackernagel, M., L. Onisto, P. Bello, A. C. Linares, I. S. L. Falfan, J. M. Garcia, A. I. S. Guerro, and, M. G. S. Guerro, (1999), National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept, Ecol. Econ., 29, 375-390.
93. WFN (Water Footprint Network) (2013), Product water footprints. Energy, Netherlands. [Available at http://www.waterfootprint.org/?page=files/Water-energy.]
94. Wichelns, D., (2010), Virtual water: A helpful perspective, but not a sufficient policy criterion, Water Resour. Manage., 24, 2203-2219.
95. Wiedmann, T. O., H. Schandl, M. Lenzen, D. Moran, S. Suh, J. West, and, K. Kanemoto, (2013), The material footprint of nations, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220362110201220362.
96. Wildman, R. A., Jr,., and, N. A. Forde, (2012), Management of water shortage in the Colorado river basin: Evaluating current policy and the viability of interstate water trading, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 48 (3), 411-422, doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00665.x.
97. Wolman, A., (1965), The metabolism of cities, Sci. Am., 213 (3), 179-190.
98. Wright, L. A., S. Kemp, and, I. Williams, (2011), "Carbon footprinting": Towards a universally accepted definition, Carbon Manage., 2 (1), 61-72, doi: 10.4155/CMT.10.39.
99. WWAP (World Water Assessment Programme) (2012), Managing water under uncertainty and risk, U. N. World Water Dev. Rep. 4, U. N. Educ. Sci. and Cult. Organ., Paris.
100. Zetland, D., (2011), The End of Abundance: Economic Solutions to Water Scarcity, Aguanomics.
101. Zhang, Z., H. Yang, and, M. Shi, (2011), Analyses of water footprint of Beijing in an interregional input-output framework, Ecol. Econ., 70, 2494-2502, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.08.011.