The kidney donor profile index (KDPI) of marginal donors allocated by standardized pretransplant donor biopsy assessment: Distribution and association with graft outcomes

American Journal of Transplantation

Volumn 14, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 2515-2525

  Gandolfini, I ^a   Buzio, C ^a   Zanelli, P ^a   Palmisano, A ^a   Cremaschi, E ^a   Vaglio, A ^a   Piotti, G ^a   Melfa, L ^a   La Manna, G ^b   Feliciangeli, G ^b   Cappuccilli, M ^b   Scolari, M P ^b   Capelli, I ^b   Panicali, L ^b   Baraldi, O ^b   Stefoni, S ^b   Buscaroli, A ^c   Ridolfi, L ^d   D'Errico, A ^b   Cappelli, G ^e   Bonucchi, D ^e   Rubbiani, E ^e   Albertazzi, A ^e   Mehrotra, A ^f   Cravedi, P ^f   Maggiore, U ^a   more..

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF PARMA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^c Hospital of Ravenna   (Italy)

^d Organ Procurement Organization CRT Emilia Romagna   (Italy)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

^f MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biopsy; clinical research practice; donors and donation: extended criteria; kidney (allograft) function dysfunction; kidney transplantation nephrology; organ acceptance; organ allocation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION; DONOR SELECTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; GRAFT RECIPIENT; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HYPERTENSION; KIDNEY BIOPSY; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY DONOR PROFILE INDEX; KIDNEY FUNCTION TEST; KIDNEY GRAFT; KIDNEY GRAFT REJECTION; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROTEINURIA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SOLITARY KIDNEY; TRANSPLANTATION; BIOPSY; DONOR; KIDNEY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; FEMALE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; KIDNEY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TISSUE DONORS;

EID: 84911361948     PISSN: 16006135     EISSN: 16006143     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12928     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Trends in transplantation: Unadjusted rates, wait list, & total & functioning transplants, Figure 7. 1 (Volume 2). Available at: http://www.usrds.org/adr.aspx. Accessed February 13, 2014.
2. Matas AJ, Smith JM, Skeans MA, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2012 annual data report: Kidney. Am J Transplant 2014; 14 (Suppl 1): 11-44.
3. Chavalitdhamrong D, Gill J, Takemoto S, et al. Patient and graft outcomes from deceased kidney donors age 70 years and older: An analysis of the Organ Procurement Transplant Network/United Network of Organ Sharing database. Transplantation 2008; 85: 1573-1579.
4. Tanriover B, Mohan S, Cohen DJ, et al. Kidneys at higher risk of discard: Expanding the role of dual kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2014; 14: 404-415.
5. Sung RS, Christensen LL, Leichtman AB, et al. Determinants of discard of expanded criteria donor kidneys: Impact of biopsy and machine perfusion. Am J Transplant 2008; 8: 783-792.
6. Tso PL., Access to renal transplantation for the elderly in the face of new allocation policy: A review of contemporary perspectives on "older" issues. Transplant Rev 2014; 28: 6-14.
7. Rao PS, Schaubel DE, Guidinger MK, et al. A comprehensive risk quantification score for deceased donor kidneys: The kidney donor risk index. Transplantation 2009; 88: 231-236.
8. Cravedi P, Ruggenenti P, Remuzzi G., Old donors for kidney transplantation: How old ? Gerontology 2011; 57: 513-520.
9. Remuzzi G, Grinyo J, Ruggenenti P, et al. Early experience with dual kidney transplantation in adults using expanded donor criteria. Double Kidney Transplant Group (DKG). J Am Soc Nephrol 1999; 10: 2591-2598.
10. Shapiro R, Halloran PF, Delmonico FL, Bromberg JS., The 'two, one, zero' decision: What to do with suboptimal deceased donor kidneys. Am J Transplant 2010; 10: 1959-1960.
11. Gill J, Cho YW, Danovitch GM, et al. Outcomes of dual adult kidney transplants in the United States: An analysis of the OPTN/UNOS database. Transplantation 2008; 85: 62-68.
12. European Renal Best Practice Transplantation Guideline Development Group. ERBP guideline on the management and evaluation of the kidney donor and recipient. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2013; 28 (Suppl 2): ii1-ii71.
13. Navarro MD, Lopez-Andreu M, Rodriguez-Benot A, et al. Significance of preimplantation analysis of kidney biopsies from expanded criteria donors in long-term outcome. Transplantation 2011; 91: 432-439.
14. Andres A, Morales JM, Herrero JC, et al. Double versus single renal allografts from aged donors. Transplantation 2000; 69: 2060-2066.
15. De Serres SA, Caumartin Y, Noel R, et al. Dual-kidney transplants as an alternative for very marginal donors: Long-term follow-up in 63 patients. Transplantation 2010; 90: 1125-1130.
16. Palmes D, Wolters HH, Brockmann J, Senninger N, Spiegel HU, Dietl KH., Strategies for compensating for the declining numbers of cadaver donor kidney transplants. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004; 19: 952-962.
17. Snanoudj R, Rabant M, Timsit MO, et al. Donor-estimated GFR as an appropriate criterion for allocation of ECD kidneys into single or dual kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2009; 9: 2542-2551.
18. Maggiore U, Cravedi P., The marginal donor. Current Opin Organ Transplant 2014; 19: 372-380.
19. Bunnapradist S, Gritsch HA, Peng A, Jordan SC, Cho YW., Dual kidneys from marginal adult donors as a source for cadaveric renal transplantation in the United States. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 1031-1036.
20. Tan JC, Alfrey EJ, Dafoe DC, Millan MT, Scandling JD., Dual-kidney transplantation with organs from expanded criteria donors: A long-term follow-up. Transplantation 2004; 78: 692-696.
21. Ojo AO., Expanded criteria donors: Process and outcomes. Semin Dial 2005; 18: 463-468.
22. Organ allocation system in Emilia Romagna. Available at: http://www.saluter.it/trapianti/normativa-regionale. Accessed February 13, 2014.
23. KDPI open source calculator. Available at: http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/resources/allocationcalculators.asp?index=81. Accessed February 13, 2014.
24. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D., A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: A new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1999; 130: 461-470.
25. Solez K, Colvin RB, Racusen LC, et al. Banff '05 meeting report: Differential diagnosis of chronic allograft injury and elimination of chronic allograft nephropathy ('CAN'). Am J Transplant 2007; 7: 518-526.
26. Laird NM, Ware JH., Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 1982; 38: 963-974.
27. Stata longitudinal data/panel data reference manual release 12. College Station, TX: Stata Press, 2011.
28. Diggle PJ, Liang KY, Zeger SL., Marginal models, generalized estimating equation approach. In:, Atkinson AC, Copas JB, Pierce DA, Schervish MJ, Titterington DM, eds. Analysis of longitudinal data. Oxford: Oxford Science Publications, 1994, pp. 146-168.
29. Libri I, Gnappi E, Zanelli P, et al. Trends in immune cell function assay and donor-specific HLA antibodies in kidney transplantation: A 3-year prospective study. Am J Transplant 2013; 13: 3215-3222.
30. Antonieta Azancot M, Moreso F, Salcedo M, et al. The reproducibility and predictive value on outcome of renal biopsies from expanded criteria donors. Kidney Int 2014; 85: 1161-1168.
31. Losappio V, Stallone G, Infante B, et al. A single-center cohort study to define the role of pretransplant biopsy score in the long-term outcome of kidney transplantation. Transplantation 2014; 97: 934-939.
32. Fernandez-Lorente L, Riera L, Bestard O, et al. Long-term results of biopsy-guided selection and allocation of kidneys from older donors in older recipients. Am J Transplant 2012; 12: 2781-2788.
33. Carta P, Zanazzi M, Caroti L, et al. Impact of the pre-transplant histological score on 3-year graft outcomes of kidneys from marginal donors: A single-centre study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2013; 28: 2637-2644.
34. Azancot MA, Moreso F, Salcedo M, et al. The reproducibility and predictive value on outcome of renal biopsies from expanded criteria donors. Kidney Int 2014; 85: 1161-1168.