A single-center cohort study to define the role of pretransplant biopsy score in the long-term outcome of kidney transplantation

Transplantation

Volumn 97, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 934-939

  Losappio, Vincenzo ^a   Stallone, Giovanni ^a   Infante, Barbara ^a   Schena, Antonio ^b   Rossini, Michele ^b   Maiorano, Annamaria ^a   Fiorentino, Marco ^b   Ditonno, Pasquale ^b   Lucarelli, Giuseppe ^b   Battaglia, Michele ^b   Gesualdo, Loreto ^b   Grandaliano, Giuseppe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FOGGIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Expanded criteria donors; Graft outcome; Pretransplant renal biopsy; Renal transplantation

Indexed keywords

METHYLPREDNISOLONE; PREDNISONE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLD ISCHEMIA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION; DRUG DOSE REDUCTION; FEMALE; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; GRAFT RECIPIENT; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; KIDNEY GRAFT; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRETRANSPLANT BIOPSY SCORE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; AGED; BIOPSY; DONOR; GRAFT REJECTION; KIDNEY FAILURE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PREVALENCE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; COHORT STUDIES; DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION; FEMALE; GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; GRAFT REJECTION; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TISSUE DONORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84903772903     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.TP.0000438208.50089.29     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Gridelli B, Remuzzi G. Strategies for making more organs available for transplantation. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 404.
2. Merion RM, Ashby VB, Wolfe RA, et al. Deceased-donor characteristics and the survival benefit of kidney transplantation. JAMA 2005; 294: 2726.
3. Belger MA. Changing donor pattern study of cadaveric kidney donors in the UK and Republic of Ireland, 1985-1994. Transplant Proc 1997; 29: 106.
4. Alexander JW, Vaughn WK. The use of "marginal" donors for organ transplantation. The influence of donor age on outcome. Transplantation 1991; 51: 135.
5. Ojo A, Luan F, Sung RS, et al. The use of expanded criteria donor organs for transplantation. Transplant Rev 2006; 20: 41.
6. Pokorna E, Vitko S, Chadimova M, et al. Proportion of glomeruloscle-rosis in procurement wedge renal biopsy cannot alone discriminate for acceptance of marginal donors. Transplantation 2000; 69: 36.
7. Remuzzi G, Cravedi P, Perna A, et al. Long-term outcome of renal transplantation from older donors. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 343.
8. Ruggenenti P, Perico N, Remuzzi G. Ways to boost kidney transplant viability: a real need for the best use of older donors. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 2543.
9. Andres A, Morales JM, Herrero JC. Double versus single renal allo-grafts from aged donors. Transplantation 2000; 69: 2000.
10. Cecka JM, Cohen B, Rosendale J, et al. Could more effective use of kidneys recovered from older deceased donors result in more kidney transplants for older patients? Transplantation 2006; 81: 966.
11. Nankivell BJ, Borrows RJ, Fung CLS, et al. Natural history, risk factors, and impact of subclinical rejection in kidney transplantation. Transplantation 2004; 78: 242.
12. Cruzado JM, Torras J, Riera M, et al. Influence of nephron mass in development of chronic renal failure after prolonged warm renal ischemia. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2000; 279: F259.
13. Terasaki PI, Koyama H, Cecka JM, et al. The hyperfiltration hypothesis in human renal transplantation. Transplantation 1994; 57: 1450.
14. Seron D, Fulladosa X, Moreso F. Glomerular adaptation after kidney transplantation. Transplant Rev 2007; 21: 119.
15. Karpinski J, Lajoie G, Cattran D, et al. Outcome of kidney transplantation from high-risk donors is determined by both structure and function. Transplantation 1999; 67: 1162.
16. Kayler LK, Mohanka R, Basu A, et al. Single versus dual renal transplantation from donors with significant arteriosclerosis on pre-implant biopsy. Clin Transplant 2009; 23: 525.
17. Leichtman AB, Mc Cullough AP, Wolfe RA. Improving the allocation system for deceased-donor kidneys. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 1287.
18. Frei U, Noeldeke J, Machold-Fabrizii V, et al. Prospective age-matching in elderly kidney transplant recipients: a 5-year analysis of the Eurotransplant Senior Program. Am J Transplant 2008; 8: 50.
19. Waiser J, Schreiber M, Budde K, et al. Age-matching in renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000; 15: 696.
20. Hariharan S, McBride MA, Bennett LE, et al. Risk factors for renal allograft survival from older cadaver donors. Transplantation 1997; 64: 1748.
21. Schold JD, Meier-Kriesche HU. Which renal transplant candidates should accept marginal kidneys in exchange for a shorter waiting time on dialysis? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 1: 532.
22. Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, et al. Using standardized serum cre-atinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145: 247.
23. Mengel M, Sis B, Haas M, et al, and the Banff Meeting Report Writing Committee. Banff 2011 Meeting Report: new concepts in antibody-mediated rejection. Am J Transplant 2012; 12: 563.