Long-term results of biopsy-guided selection and allocation of kidneys from older donors in older recipients

American Journal of Transplantation

Volumn 12, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 2781-2788

  Fernandez Lorente L ^a   Riera, L ^b   Bestard, O ^b   Carrera, M ^b   Goma M ^b   Porta, N ^c   Torras, J ^b   Melilli, E ^b   Gil Vernet, S ^b   Grinyo J M ^b   Cruzado, J M ^b  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARI GERMANS TRIAS I PUJOL   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARI DE BELLVITGE   (Spain)

^c BELLVITGE BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE IDIBELL   (Spain)

Author keywords

Extended criteria donors; graft histology; renal transplantation; survival

Indexed keywords

CALCINEURIN INHIBITOR;

AGED; ARTICLE; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; DONOR SELECTION; DUAL KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; FEMALE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KIDNEY BIOPSY; KIDNEY GRAFT REJECTION; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RENAL GRAFT DYSFUNCTION; SENESCENCE; SINGLE KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; BIOPSY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE RATIONING; HUMANS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TISSUE DONORS;

EID: 84867101213     PISSN: 16006135     EISSN: 16006143     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04153.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bommer J,. Prevalence and socio-economic aspects of chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17 (Suppl 11): 8-12.
2. Schieppati A, Remuzzi G,. Chronic renal diseases as a public health problem: Epidemiology, social, and economic implications. Kidney Int Suppl 2005; 98: S7-S10.
3. Matesanz R, Domínguez-Gil B, Coll E, de la Rosa G, Marazuela R,. Spanish experience as a leading country: What kind of measures were taken? Transpl Int 2011; 24: 333-343.
4. Shapiro R, Halloran PF, Delmonico FL, Bromberg JS,. The 'two, one, zero' decision: What to do with suboptimal deceased donor kidneys. Am J Transplant 2010; 10: 1959-1960.
5. Ibernon M, González-Segura C, Moreso F, et al,. Donor structural and functional parameters are independent predictors of renal function at 3 months. Transplant Proc 2007; 39: 2095-2098.
6. Lopes JA, Moreso F, Riera L, et al,. Evaluation of pre-implantation kidney biopsies: Comparison of Banff criteria to a morphometric approach. Kidney Int 2005; 67: 1595-1600.
7. Johnson LB, Kuo PC, Schweitzer EJ, et al,. Double renal allografts successfully increase utilization of kidneys from older donors within a single organ procurement organization. Transplantation 1996; 62: 1581-1583.
8. Remuzzi G, Grinyò J, Ruggenenti P, et al,. Early experience with dual kidney transplantation in adults using expanded donor criteria. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999; 10: 2591-2598.
9. Remuzzi G, Cravedi P, Perna A, et al,. Long-term outcome of renal transplantation from older donors. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 343-352.
10. Lucarelli G, Bettocchi C, Battaglia M, et al,. Extended criteria donor kidney transplantation: Comparative outcome analysis between single versus double kidney transplantation at 5 years. Transplant Proc 2010; 42: 1104-1107.
11. Andrés A, Morales JM, Herrero JC, et al,. Double versus single renal allografts from aged donors. Transplantation 2000; 69: 2060-2066.
12. Gill J, Cho YW, Danovitch GM, et al,. Outcomes of dual adult kidney transplants in the United States: An analysis of the OPTN/UNOS database. Transplantation 2008; 85: 62-68.
13. Snanoudj R, Rabant M, Timsit MO, et al,. Donor-estimated GFR as an appropriate criterion for allocation of ECD kidneys into single or dual kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2009; 9: 2542-2551.
14. Cruzado JM, Bestard O, Riera L, et al,. Immunosuppression for dual kidney transplantation with marginal organs: The old is better yet. Am J Transplant 2007; 7: 639-644.
15. Waiser J, Schreiber M, Budde K, et al,. Age-matching in renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000; 15: 696-700.
16. Lim WH, Chang S, Chadban S, et al,. Donor-recipient age matching improves years of graft function in deceased-donor kidney transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010; 25: 3082-3089.
17. de Fijter JW,. An old virtue to improve senior programs. Transpl Int 2009; 22: 259-268.
18. Cruzado JM, Fernandez L, Riera L, et al,. Revisiting double kidney transplantation: Two kidneys provide better graft survival than one. Transplant Proc 2011; 43: 2165-2167.
19. Du W, Shen H, Galan A, Goldstein DR,. An age-specific CD8+ T cell pathway that impairs the effectiveness of strategies to prolong allograft survival. J Immunol 2011; 187: 3631-3640.
20. de Fijter JW, Mallat MJ, Doxiadis II, et al,. Increased immunogenicity and cause of graft loss of old donor kidneys. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12: 1538-1546.
21. Tullius SG, Tran H, Guleria I, Malek SK, Tilney NL, Milford E,. The combination of donor and recipient age is critical in determining host immunoresponsiveness and renal transplant outcome. Ann Surg 2010; 252: 662-674.
22. Ekser B, Furian L, Broggiato A, et al,. Technical aspects of unilateral dual kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors: Experience of 100 patients. Am J Transplant 2010; 10: 2000-2007.
23. Moreso F, Serõn D, Gil-Vernet S, et al,. Donor age and delayed graft function as predictors of renal allograft survival in rejection-free patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999; 14: 930-935.
24. Sung RS, Christensen LL, Leichtman AB, et al,. Determinants of discard of expanded criteria donor kidneys: Impact of biopsy and machine perfusion. Am J Transplant 2008; 8: 783-792.
25. Moers C, Smits JM, Maathuis MH, et al,. Machine perfusion or cold storage in deceased-donor kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 7-19.
26. Foley RN, Murray AM, Li S, et al,. Chronic kidney disease and the risk for cardiovascular disease, renal replacement, and death in the United States Medicare population, 1998 to 1999. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005; 16: 489-495.
27. Goh CY, Vizzi G, De Cal M, Ronco C,. Cardiorenal syndrome: A complex series of combined heart/kidney disorders. Contrib Nephrol 2011; 174: 33-45.
28. Morling N, Ladefoged J, Lange P, et al,. Kidney transplantation and donor age. Tissue Antigens 1975; 6: 163-166.
29. Moreso F, Serõn D, Anunciada AI, et al,. Recipient body surface area as a predictor of posttransplant renal allograft evolution. Transplantation 1998; 65: 671-676.