Scaling entrepreneurial architecture: The challenge of managing regional technology transfer in Hamburg

Universities and Regional Development: A Critical Assessment of Tensions and Contradictions

Volumn 9780203112298, Issue , 2012, Pages 181-198

  Vorley, Tim ^a   Nelles, Jen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911192172     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203112298     Document Type: Chapter

References (41)

1. Aronowitz, S. L. (2000) The knowledge factory: dismantling the corporate university and creating true higher learning. Boston, MA: Beacon.
2. Bercovitz, J., Feldman, M., Feller, I. and Burton, R. (2001) Organizational structure as a determinant of academic patent and licensing behavior: an exploratory study of Duke, Johns Hopkins, and Pennsylvania State Universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2), 21-35.
3. Bramwell, A. and Wolfe, D. A. (2008) Universities and regional economic development: the entrepreneurial University of Waterloo. Research Policy, 37(8), 1175-87.
4. Braun, B. (2005) Economic restructuring and regional development in Germany. Geographische Rundshaun International Edition, 1(1), 16-22.
5. Burns, P. (2005) Corporate entrepreneurship: building an entrepreneurial organization. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
6. Carayannis, E. G., Alexander, J. and Ioannidis, A. (2000) Leveraging knowledge, learning, and innovation in forming strategic government-university-industry (GUI) RandD partnerships in the US, Germany, and France. Technovation, 20(9), 477-88. Doi: 10.1016/s0166-4972(99)00162-5.
7. Clark, B. R. (1983) The higher education system. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
8. Clark, B. R. (1998) Creating entrepreneurial universities: organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford University Press: New York.
9. Clark, B. R. (2001) The entrepreneurial university: new foundations for collegiality, autonomy and achievement. Higher Education Management, 13(2), 9-24.
10. Clark, B. R. (2004) Sustaining change in universities. Continuities in case studies and concepts. Open University Press: Maidenhead.
11. Cooke, P. (2001) Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945-74. doi: 10.1093/icc/10.4.945.
12. Cooke, P. and Leydesdorff, L. (2006) Regional development in the knowledge-based economy: the construction of advantage. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 5-15. doi: 10.1007/s10961-00-5009-3.
13. Debackere, K. and Veugelers, R. (2005) The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Research Policy, 34(3), 321-42.
14. Eckstein, H. (2000) The case study and theory in political science. In R. Gomm, M. Hammersley and P. Foster (Eds.) Case study method: key texts, key issues(pp. 119-64). London: Sage.
15. Etzkowitz, H. (1983) Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science. Minerva, 21(2), 198-233. doi: 10.1007/bf01097964.
16. Etzkowitz, H. and Klofsten, M. (2005) The innovating region: toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development. RandD Management, 35(3), 243-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00387.
17. Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., Regina, B. and Terra, B. R. C. (2000) The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313-30.
18. Feldman, M. P., Feller, I., Bercovitz, J. and Burton, R. (2002) Equity and the technology transfer strategies of American research universities. Management Science, 48(1), 105-21.
19. Gibb, A. A. and Hannon P. (2006) Towards the entrepreneurial university, International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 4(1), 73-93.
20. Goldstein, H. (2008) The “entrepreneurial turn” and regional economic development mission of universities. The Annals of Regional Science, 44(1) 83-109.
21. Grossman, I. (2006) Three scenarios for the greater Hamburg region. Futures, 38(1), 31-49.
22. Hamburg Innovation GmbH (2010) Wissenstransfer in tandem. Available at: http://hamburg-innovation.de/index.php/page/Wissenstransfer-im-Tandem-2010-10-19 (retrieved February 15, 2011).
23. Hornbostel, S. (2001) Third party funding of German universities. An indicator of research activity? Scientometrics, 50(3), 523-37. doi: 10.1023/A:1010566916697.
24. HWF (2010) Industry is the indispensable basis for prosperity and employment. Available at: http://english.hamburg.de/business-location/425436/industry.html (retrieved February 14, 2011).
25. IKM (2008) Regionales Monitoring 2008: Daten und Karten zu den Europäischen Metropolregionen in Deutschland. Available at: www.m-r-n.com/3330.html (retrieved October 25, 2010).
26. Jacob, M., Lundqvist, M. and Hellsmark, H. (2003) Entrepreneurial transformations in the Swedish university system: the case of Chalmers University of Technology. Research Policy, 32(9), 1555-68.
27. Läpple, D. (1998) The city and port of Hamburg. In T. Kreukels and E. Wever (Eds.) North Sea ports in transition: changing tides(pp. 65-80). Assen: Uitgeverij Van Gorcum.
28. Marginson, S. and Considine, M. (2000) The enterprise university: power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Markman, G. D., Gianiodis, P. T., Phan, P. H. and Balkin, D. B. (2004) Entrepreneurship from the ivory tower: do incentive systems matter? Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3-4), 353-64.
30. Martin, B. R. and Etzkowitz, H. (2000) The origin and evolution of the university species. Journal for Science and Technology Studies, 13(3-4), 9-34.
31. Mueller, P. (2006) Exploring the knowledge filter: how entrepreneurship and university-industry relationships drive economic growth. Research Policy, 35(10), 1499-1508. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.023.
32. Nelles, J. and Vorley, T. (2010) Constructing an entrepreneurial architecture: an emergent framework for studying the contemporary university beyond the entrepreneurial turn. Innovative Higher Education, 35, 161-76. doi 10.1007/s10755-009-9130-3.
33. Nelles, J. and Vorley, T. (2011) Entrepreneurial architecture: a blueprint for entrepreneurial universities. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration,28(3), 341-53. doi: 10.1002/cjas.186.
34. O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Morse, K. P., O’Gorman, C. and Roche, F. (2007) Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: the Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. RandD Management, 37(1), 1-16.
35. Orr, D., Jaeger, M. and Schwarzenberger, A. (2009) Performance-based funding as an instrument of competition in German higher education. In M. Tight, K. H. Mok, J. Huisman and C. C. Morphew (Eds.) The Routledge International Handbook of Higher Education(pp. 297-314). New York: Routledge.
36. Porter, M. (2009) Microeconomics of competitiveness: Hamburg aviation cluster. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.
37. Powers, J. B. (2004) RandD funding sources and university technology transfer: what is stimulating universities to be more entrepreneurial? Research in Higher Education, 45(1), 1-23. doi: 10.1023/B:RIHE.0000010044.41663.a0.
38. Ruddin, L. P. (2006) You can generalize stupid! Social scientists, Bent Flyvbjerg, and case study methodology. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(4), 797-812. doi: 10.1177/1077800406288622.
39. Slaughter, S. and Leslie, G. (1997) Academic capitalism: politics, policies and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
40. Vorley, T. and Nelles, J. (2008) (Re)conceptualising the academy: institutional development of and beyond the Third Mission. Higher Education Management and Policy, 20(3), 109-26.
41. Vorley, T. and Nelles, J. (2010) Innovation policy as industrial policy: some lessons from Hamburg’s regional innovation system. Local Economy, 25(8), 631-49. doi:10.1080/02690942.2010.533422.