Self-Reported Grades and GPA

International Guide to Student Achievement

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 49-50

  Credé, Marcus ^a   Kuncel, Nathan R ^b  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911170844     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203850398-17     Document Type: Chapter

References (7)

1. Barritt, L. S. (1966). Note: The consistency of first-semester college grade point average. Journal of Educational Measurement, 3, 261-262.
2. Berry, C. M., & Sackett, P. R. (2009). Individual differences in course choice result in underestimation of the validity of college admission systems. Psychological Science, 20, 822-830.
3. Hezlett, S. A., Kuncel, N. R., Vey, M. A., Ahart, A., Ones, D. S., Campbell, J. P., & Camara, W. (2001, April). The predictive validity of the SAT: A comprehensive meta-analysis. In D. S. Ones & S. A. Hezlett (Chairs), Predicting performance: The interface of I/O psychology and educational research. Symposia presented at the annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.
4. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Kuncel, N. R., Credé, M., & Thomas, L. L. (2005). The reliability of selfreported grade point averages: A meta-analysis and summary of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75, 63-82.
6. McCornack, R. L. (1956). A criticism of studies comparing weighting methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 40, 343-345.
7. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741-749.