Third person view and guidance for more natural motor behaviour in immersive basketball playing

Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 55-64

  Covaci, Alexandra ^a   Olivier, Anne Hélène ^b   Multon, Franck ^b  

^a MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b INRIA   (France)

Author keywords

Basketball training; Immersive room; Perception of distance in VR; Performance; Visual feedback

Indexed keywords

BASKETBALL; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

GUIDANCE FEEDBACKS; GUIDANCE INFORMATION; IMMERSIVE; IMMERSIVE ENVIRONMENT; PERFORMANCE; TRAINING CONDITIONS; USER PERSPECTIVES; VISUAL FEEDBACK;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 84911165254     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2671015.2671023     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. BIDEAU, B., KULPA, R., VIGNAIS, N., BRAULT, S., MULTON, F., AND CRAIG, C. 2010. Using virtual reality to analyze sports performance. IEEE COMPUTER GRAPHICS AND APPLICATIONS 30, 2, 14-21.
2. BRAULT, S., BIDEAU, B., KULPA, R., AND CRAIG, C. 2009. Detecting deceptive movements in rugby: An expert vs. novice player paradigm in an immersive interactive virtual reality environment. EWOMS, Lisbon, Portugal, 4-5.
3. BRAULT, S., BIDEAU, B., CRAIG, C., AND KULPA, R. 2010. Balancing deceit and disguise: How to successfully fool the defender in a 1 vs. 1 situation in rugby. Human Movement Science 29, 3, 412-425.
4. CHIVIACOWSKY, S., AND WULF, G. 2007. Feedback after good trials enhances learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 78, 2, 40-47.
5. EYCK, A., GEERLINGS, K., KARIMOVA, D., MEERBEEK, B., WANG, L., IJSSELSTEIJN, W., DE KORT, Y., ROERSMA, M., AND WESTERINK, J. 2006. Effect of a virtual coach on athletes' motivation. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Persuasive Technology for Human Well-being, Springer- Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, PERSUASIVE'06, 158-161.
6. FINK, P. W., FOO, P. S., AND WARREN, W. H. 2009. Catching fly balls in virtual reality: A critical test of the outfielder problem. Journal of Vision 9, 13.
7. GABLONSKY, J., AND LANG, A. 2005. Modeling basketball free throws. SIAM Review 47, 4, 775-798.
8. GOPHER, D. 2012. Skill Training in Multimodal Virtual Environments. ch. Development of Training Platforms in Multimodal Virtual Reality Environments, 15-30.
9. HAMILTON, G. R., AND REINSCHMIDT, C. 1997. Optimal trajectory for the basketball free throw. Journal of Sports Sciences 15, 5, 491-504.
10. INTERRANTE, V., RIES, B., LINDQUIST, J., KAEDING, M., AND ANDERSON, L. 2008. Elucidating factors that can facilitate veridical spatial perception in immersive virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 17, 2, 176- 198.
11. KALLINEN, K., SALMINEN, M., RAVAJA, N., KEDZIOR, R., AND Sä ä KSJäRVI, M. 2007. Presence and emotion in computer game players during 1st person vs. 3rd person playing view: evidence from self-report, eye-tracking, and facial muscle activity data. In Proceedings of the 10th annual international Workshop on Presence.
12. KNAPP, J. M., AND LOOMIS, J. M. 2004. Limited field of view of head-mounted displays is not the cause of distance underestimation in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 13, 572-577.
13. LOOMIS, J. M., AND KNAPP, J. 2003. Virtual and Adaptive Environments. ch. Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments, 21-46.
14. MILES, H. C., POP, S. R., WATT, S. J., LAWRENCE, G. P., AND JOHN, N. W. 2012. A review of virtual environments for training in ball sports. Computers and Graphics 36, 6, 714-726.
15. MILES, H., POP, S., WATT, S., LAWRENCE, G., JOHN, N., PERROT, V., MALLET, P., AND MESTRE, D. 2013. Investigation of a virtual environment for rugby skills training. In Cyberworlds (CW), 2013 International Conference on, 56-63.
16. MILES, H., POP, S., WATT, S., LAWRENCE, G., JOHN, N., PERROT, V., MALLET, P., MESTRE, D., AND MORGAN, K. 2014. Efficacy of a virtual environment for training ball passing skills in rugby. In Transactions on Computational Science XXIII, M. Gavrilova, C. Tan, X. Mao, and L. Hong, Eds., vol. 8490 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 98-117.
17. OKUBO, H., AND HUBBARD, M. 2006. Dynamics of the basketball shot with application to the free throw. Journal of Sports Sciences 24, 12, 1303-1314.
18. PIRYANKOVA, I. V., DE LA ROSA, S., KLOOS, U., BÜLTHOFF, H. H., AND MOHLER, B. J. 2013. Egocentric distance perception in large screen immersive displays. Displays 34, 2, 153 - 164.
19. PLUMERT, J. M., KEARNEY, J. K., AND CREMER, J. F. 2004. Distance perception in real and virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, ACM, New York, NY, USA, APGV '04, 27-34.
20. RIECKE, B. E., BEHBAHANI, P. A., AND SHAW, C. D. 2009. Display size does not affect egocentric distance perception of naturalistic stimuli. In Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, ACM, New York, NY, USA, APGV '09, 15-18.
21. RUFFALDI, E., FILIPPESCHI, A., VERLET, M., HOFFMANN, C., AND BARDY, B. 2012. The SKILLS Book. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Ltd., ch. Design and Evaluation of a Multimodal VR Platform for Rowing Training.
22. SALAMIN, P., TADI, T., BLANKE, O., VEXO, F., AND THALMANN, D. 2010. Quantifying effects of exposure to the third and first-person perspectives in virtual-reality-based training. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 3, 3, 272-276.
23. SALMONI, A. W., SCHMIDT, R. A., AND WALTER, C. B. 1984. Knowledge of Results and Motor Learning: A Review and Critical Reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin 95, 3, 355-386.
24. SIGRIST, R. 2011. Visual and auditory augmented concurrent feedback in a complex motor task. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 20, 1 (Feb.), 15-32.
25. SLATER, M., LOTTO, B., ARNOLD, M. M., AND SANCHEZVIVES, M. V. 2009. How we experience immersive virtual environments: The concept of presence and its measurement. Anuario de Psicologia 40, 2, 193-210.
26. TRAN, C. M., AND SILVERBERG, L. M. 2008. Optimal release conditions for the free throw in men's basketball. Journal of Sports Sciences 26, 11, 1147-1155.
27. VIGNAIS, N., BIDEAU, B., CRAIG, C., BRAULT, S., MULTON, F., AND KULPA, R. 2009. Virtual Environments for Sport Analysis: Perception-Action Coupling in Handball Goalkeeping. International Journal of Virtual Reality.
28. VIGNAIS, N., KULPA, R., CRAIG, C., AND BIDEAU, B. 2010. Virtual thrower vs. real goalkeeper: influence of different visual conditions on performance. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments/Presence Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.
29. WAXBERG, S. L., GOODELL, K. H., AVGERINOS, D. V., SCHWAITZBERG, S. D., AND CAO, C. G. L. 2004. Evaluation of physical versus virtual surgical training simulators. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 48, 1675-1679.
30. WHITEHEAD, R., BUTZ, J., VAUGHN, R., AND KOZAR, B. 1996. Implications of gray's three factor arousal theory for the practice of basketball free throw shooting. Journal of Sport Behavior 19, 354-362.
31. WITMER, B. G., AND SINGER, M. J. 1998. Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 7, 3 (June), 225-240.
32. XU, S., SONG, P., CHIN, C. L., CHUA, G. G., HUANG, Z., AND RAHARDJA, S. 2009. Tennis space: An interactive and immersive environment for tennis simulation. In Image and Graphics, 2009. ICIG '09. Fifth International Conference on, 652-657.