Conclusion: On the possibility of a non- Western international relations theory

Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives On and Beyond Asia

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 221-238

  Acharya, Amitav ^a   Buzan, Barry ^b,c  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

^c Jilin Universities   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911148600     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203861431     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Acharya, Amitav (2000), 'Ethnocentrism and Emancipatory IR Theory', in Samantha Arnold and J. Marshall Bier (eds), (Dis)placing Security: Critical Re-evaluations of the Boundaries of Security Studies, York University, Centre for International and Strategic Studies, Toronto, pp. 1-18.
2. Acharya, Amitav (2003-4), 'Will Asia's Past Be Its Future?', International Security, vol. 28, no. 3 (Winter), pp. 149-64.
3. Acharya, Amitav (2004), 'How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism', International Organization, vol. 58, no. 2 (Spring), pp. 239-75.
4. Acharya, Amitav (2008), 'Theoretical Perspectives on International Relations in Asia', in David Shambaugh and Michael Yahuda (eds), International Relations of Asia, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD.
5. Acharya, Amitav (2009), Whose Ideas Matter: Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
6. Ayoob, Mohammed (1995), The Third World Security Predicament: State Making, Regional Order and the International System, Lynne Rienner, Boulder, CO.
7. Ayoob, Mohammed (1998), 'Subaltern Realism: International Relations Theory Meets the Third World', in Stephanie G. Neuman (ed.), International Relations Theory and the Third World, St Martin's Press, New York, pp. 31-54.
8. Badie, Bertrand (1992), The Imported State: The Westernization of the Political Order, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
9. Buzan, Barry and Richard Little (2000), International Systems in World History, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
10. Buzan, Barry and Richard Little (2001), 'Why International Relations has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to do about It', Millennium, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 19-39.
11. Buzan, Barry and Lene Hansen (2009), The Evolution of International Security Studies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
12. Buzan, Barry and Ole Wæver (2003), Regions and Powers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Callahan, William A. (2004), 'Remembering the Future - Utopia, Empire, and Harmony in 21st Century International Theory', European Journal of International Relations, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 569-601.
14. Callahan, William A. (2008), 'Chinese Visions of World Order: Post-Hegemonic or a New Hegemony?', International Studies Review, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 749-61.
15. Cox, Robert (1986), 'Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory', in Robert O. Keohane (ed.), Neorealism and its Critics, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 204-54.
16. Friedrichs, Jörg (2004), European Approaches to International Relations Theory: A House with Many Mansions, Routledge, London.
17. Green, Martin (1998), The Origins of Nonviolence: Tolstoy and Gandhi in their Historical Setting, HarperCollins Publishers, New Delhi.
18. Kang, David C. (2003), 'Getting Asia Wrong: The Need for New Analytical Frameworks', International Security, vol. 27, no. 4 (Spring), pp. 57-85.
19. Karnad, Bharat (2002), Nuclear Weapons and Indian Security: The Realist Foundations of Strategy, Macmillan, Delhi.
20. Katzenstein, Peter (2005), A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
21. Katzenstein, P. J. and N. Okawara (2001), 'Japan, Asia-Pacific Security, and the Case for Analytical Eclecticism', International Security, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 153-85.
22. Li, Mingjiang (2008), 'China Debates Soft Power', Chinese Journal of International Politics, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 287-308.
23. Song, Xinning (2001), 'Building International Relations Theory with Chinese Characteristics', Journal of Contemporary China, vol. 10, no. 26, pp. 61-74.
24. Spiro, Peter J. (2000), 'The New Sovereigntists: American Exceptionalism and Its False Prophets', Foreign Affairs, vol. 79, no. 6, pp. 9-15.
25. Spivak, Gayatri (1988), 'Can the Subaltern Speak?', in Cary Nelson and Larry Grossberg (eds), Marxism and the interpretation of Culture, University of Illinois Press, Chicago, pp. 271-313.
26. Williams, David (2004), Defending Japan's Pacific War: The Kyoto School of Philosophers and Post-White Power, RoutledgeCurzon, London.
27. Yan, Xuetong (2001), 'The Rise of China in Chinese Eyes', Journal of Contemporary China, vol. 10, no. 26, pp. 33-39.
28. Zhao, Tingyang (2006), 'Rethinking Empire from a Chinese Concept "All-Under Heaven" (Tian-xia)', Social Identities, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 29-41.