Gauss-Newton deformable part models for face alignment in-the-wild

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1851-1858

  Tzimiropoulos, Georgios ^a,b   Pantic, Maja ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LINCOLN   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Deformable Part Models; Face Alignment; Gauss Newton; In the wild

Indexed keywords

COST FUNCTIONS; GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION;

APPEARANCE MODELING; COMPUTATIONAL REDUCTION; COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT; DEFORMABLE PART MODELS; FACE ALIGNMENT; GAUSS NEWTON; TRANSLATIONAL MOTIONS; WEIGHTED LEAST SQUARES;

SHAPE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 84911056299     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2014.239     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. T. Baltrušaitis, P. Robinson, and L.-P. Morency. Constrained local neural fields for robust facial landmark detection in the wild. In ICCV-W, 2013.
2. P. Belhumeur, D. Jacobs, D. Kriegman, and N. Kumar. Localizing parts of faces using a consensus of exemplars. In CVPR, 2011.
3. X. Cao, Y. Wei, F. Wen, and J. Sun. Face alignment by explicit shape regression. In CVPR, 2012.
4. T. Cootes, G. Edwards, and C. Taylor. Active appearance models. TPAMI, 23(6):681-685, 2001.
5. T. Cootes, C. Taylor, D. Cooper, and J. Graham. Active shape models-their training and application. CVIU, 61(1):38-59, 1995.
6. D. Cristinacce and T. Cootes. Automatic feature localisation with constrained local models. Pattern Recognition, 41(10):3054-3067, 2008.
7. N. Dalal and B. Triggs. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In CVPR, 2005.
8. P. F. Felzenszwalb, R. B. Girshick, D. McAllester, and D. Ra-manan. Object detection with discriminatively trained part-based models. IEEE TPAMI, 32(9):1627-1645, 2010.
9. L. Gu and T. Kanade. A generative shape regularization model for robust face alignment. In ECCV. 2008.
10. G. D. Hager and P. N. Belhumeur. Efficient region tracking with parametric models of geometry and illumination. IEEE TPAMI, 20(10):1025-1039, 1998.
11. V. Le, J. Brandt, Z. Lin, L. Bourdev, and T. S. Huang. Interactive facial feature localization. In ECCV. 2012.
12. D. G. Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. IJCV, 60(2):91-110, 2004.
13. P. Martins, R. Caseiro, J. F. Henriques, and J. Batista. Discriminative bayesian active shape models. In ECCV. 2012.
14. I. Matthews and S. Baker. Active appearance models revisited. IJCV, 60(2):135-164, 2004.
15. C. Sagonas, G. Tzimiropoulos, S. Zafeiriou, and M. Pantic. A semi-automatic methodology for facial landmark annotation. In CVPR-W, 2013.
16. J. Saragih and R. Gocke. Learning aam fitting through simulation. Pattern Recognition, 42(11):2628-2636, 2009.
17. J. Saragih and R. Goecke. A nonlinear discriminative approach to aam fitting. In ICCV, 2007.
18. J. Saragih, S. Lucey, and J. Cohn. Deformable model fitting by regularized landmark mean-shift. IJCV, 91(2):200-215, 2011.
19. G. Tzimiropoulos, J. Alabort-i Medina, S. Zafeiriou, and M. Pantic. Generic active appearance models revisited. In ACCV 2012. 2013.
20. G. Tzimiropoulos and M. Pantic. Optimization problems for fast aam fitting in-the-wild. In ICCV, 2013.
21. Y. Wang, S. Lucey, and J. Cohn. Enforcing convexity for improved alignment with constrained local models. In CVPR, 2008.
22. X. Xiong and F. De la Torre. Supervised descent method and its applications to face alignment. In CVPR, 2013.
23. X. Zhu and D. Ramanan. Face detection, pose estimation, and landmark estimation in the wild. In CVPR, 2012.