Optimization problems for fast AAM fitting in-the-wild

Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 593-600

  Tzimiropoulos, Georgios ^a,b   Pantic, Maja ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LINCOLN   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

AAMs; Active Appearance Models; Face alignment; In the wild

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; IMAGE RECOGNITION;

AAMS; ACTIVE APPEARANCE MODELS; FACE ALIGNMENT; IMPROVING PERFORMANCE; IN-THE-WILD; INVERSE ALGORITHM; OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; STATE-OF-THE-ART METHODS;

OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 84898806660     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2013.79     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. S. Baker, R. Gross, and I. Matthews. Lucas-kanade 20 years on: Part 3. Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Tech. Rep. CMU-RI-TR-03-35, 2003.
2. A. U. Batur and M. H. Hayes. Adaptive active appearance models. IEEE TIP, 14(11):1707-1721, 2005.
3. P. Belhumeur, D. Jacobs, D. Kriegman, and N. Kumar. Localizing parts of faces using a consensus of exemplars. In CVPR, 2011.
4. S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe. Convex optimization. Cambridge university press, 2004.
5. T. Cootes, G. Edwards, and C. Taylor. Active appearance models. IEEE TPAMI, 23(6):681-685, 2001.
6. D. Cristinacce and T. Cootes. Feature detection and tracking with constrained local models. In BMVC, 2006.
7. R. Gross, I. Matthews, and S. Baker. Generic vs. person specific active appearance models. Image and Vision Computing, 23(12):1080-1093, 2005.
8. R. Gross, I. Matthews, J. Cohn, T. Kanade, and S. Baker. Multi-pie. Image and Vision Computing, 28(5):807-813, 2010.
9. G. D. Hager and P. N. Belhumeur. Efficient region tracking with parametric models of geometry and illumination. IEEE TPAMI, 20(10):1025-1039, 1998.
10. V. Le, J. Brandt, Z. Lin, L. Bourdev, and T. S. Huang. Interactive facial feature localization. In ECCV. 2012.
11. X. Liu. Generic face alignment using boosted appearance model. In CVPR, 2007.
12. D. G. Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. IJCV, 60(2):91-110, 2004.
13. B. D. Lucas, T. Kanade, et al. An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision. In 7th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1981.
14. S. Lucey, R. Navarathna, A. Ashraf, and S. Sridharan. Fourier lucas-kanade algorithm. IEEE TPAMI, 35(6):1383-1396, 2013.
15. P. Martins, R. Caseiro, and J. Batista. Generative face alignment through 2.5 d active appearance models. CVIU, 2012.
16. I. Matthews and S. Baker. Active appearance models revisited. IJCV, 60(2):135-164, 2004.
17. K. Netzell and J. E. Solem. Efficient image inner products applied to active appearance models. In ICPR, 2008.
18. G. Papandreou and P. Maragos. Adaptive and constrained algorithms for inverse compositional active appearance model fitting. In CVPR, 2008.
19. C. Sagonas, G. Tzimiropoulos, S. Zafeiriou, and M. Pantic. A semi-automatic methodology for facial landmark annotation. In CVPR Workshops, 2013.
20. J. Saragih and R. Gocke. Learning aam fitting through simulation. Pattern Recognition, 42(11):2628-2636, 2009.
21. J. Saragih and R. Goecke. A nonlinear discriminative approach to aam fitting. In ICCV, 2007.
22. H. Wu, X. Liu, and G. Doretto. Face alignment via boosted ranking model. In CVPR, 2008.
23. J. Xiao, S. Baker, I. Matthews, and T. Kanade. Real-time combined 2d+3d active appearance models. In CVPR, 2004.
24. X. Zhu and D. Ramanan. Face detection, pose estimation, and landmark estimation in the wild. In CVPR, 2012.