Learning AAM fitting through simulation

Pattern Recognition

Volumn 42, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 2628-2636

  Saragih, Jason ^a,b   Göcke, Roland ^a,c  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Active appearance model; Discriminative; Fitting; Linear model

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE APPEARANCE MODEL; ACTIVE APPEARANCE MODELS; COMPACT REPRESENTATION; CONVERGENCE RATES; DISCRIMINATIVE; FACE DATABASE; FITTING; FITTING PROBLEMS; FITTING PROCEDURE; LINEAR MAPPING; LINEAR METHODS; LINEAR MODEL; LINEAR OBJECT CLASS; NON-LINEAR METHODS; VISUAL OBJECTS;

COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY; EDUCATION; SIMULATORS;

FACE RECOGNITION;

EID: 67649482337     PISSN: 00313203     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2009.04.014     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. G. Edwards, C. Taylor, T. Cootes, Interpreting face images using active appearance models, in: Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG'98), IEEE, Nara, Japan, 1998, pp. 300-305, doi:10.1109/AFGR.1998.670965.
2. T. Lehn-Schiøler, L. Hansen, J. Larsen, Mapping from speech to images using continuous state space models, in: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Machine Learning for Multimodal Interaction (MLMI 2004), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3361, Springer, Martigny, Switzerland, 2004, pp. 136-145.
3. M. Stegmann, H. Larsson, Fast registration of cardiac perfusion MRI, in: International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Toronto, Canada, 2003, p. 702.
4. P. Mittrapiyanuruk, G. DeSouza, A. Kak, Accurate 3D tracking of rigid objects with occlusion using active appearance models, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Motion and Video Computing (WACV/MOTION 2005), vol. 2, Breckenridge, CO, USA, 2005, pp. 90-95, doi:10.1109/ACVMOT.2005.15.
5. T. Cootes, G. Edwards, C. Taylor, H. Burkhardt, B. Neuman, Active appearance models, in: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV'98), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vols. 2, 1406, Springer, Freiburg, Germany, 1998, pp. 484-498.
6. Matthews I., and Baker S. Active appearance models revisited. International Journal of Computer Vision 60 2 (2004) 135-164
7. Donner R., Reiter M., Langs G., Peloschek P., and Bischof H. Fast active appearance model search using canonical correlation analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 28 10 (2006) 1690-1694 10.1109/TPAMI.2006.206
8. X. Hou, S. Li, H. Zhang, Q. Cheng, Direct appearance models, in: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2001), vol. 1, Kauai, HI, USA, 2001, pp. 828-833, doi:10.1109/CVPR.2001.990568.
9. S. Baker, R. Gross, I. Matthews, Lucas-Kanade 20 years on: a unifying framework: Part 3, Technical Report, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2003.
10. Batur A., and Hayes M. Adaptive active appearance models. Transactions on Image Processing 14 11 (2005) 1707-1721 10.1109/TIP.2005.854473
11. J. Saragih, R. Goecke, A nonlinear discriminative approach to AAM fitting, in: Proceedings of the IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV 2007), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2007, doi:10.1109/ICCV.2007.4409106.
12. S. Zhou, D. Comaniciu, Shape regression machine, in: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging (IPMI 2007), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4584, Springer, Kerkrade, The Netherlands, 2007, pp. 13-25.
13. B. Theobald, I. Matthews, S. Baker, Evaluating error functions for robust active appearance models, in: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG'06), Southampton, UK, 2006, pp. 149-154, doi:10.1109/FGR.2006.38.
14. S. Baker, I. Matthews, Equivalence and efficiency of image alignment algorithms, in: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2001), vol. 1, Kauai, HI, USA, 2001, pp. 1090-1097, doi:10.1109/CVPR.2001.990652.
15. Gross R., Matthews I., and Baker S. Generic vs. person specific active appearance models. Image and Vision Computing 23 12 (2005) 1080-1093 10.1016/j.imavis.2005.07.009
16. X. Liu, Generic face alignment using boosted appearance model, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2007), Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2007, doi:10.1109/CVPR.2007.383265.
17. M. Nguyen, F. De la Torre Frade, Local minima free parameterized appearance models, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2008), 2008, doi:10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587524.
18. O. Williams, A. Blake, R. Cipolla, A sparse probabilistic learning algorithm for real-time tracking, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Ninth International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV 2003), vol. 1, Beijing, China, 2003, pp. 353-360.
19. Avidan S. Support vector tracking. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 26 (2004) 1064-1072
20. K. Zimmermann, Fast learnable methods for object tracking, Ph.D. Thesis, Czech Technical University, 2008.
21. Wilson D., and Martinez T. The general inefficiency of batch training for gradient descent learning. Neural Networks 16 10 (2003) 1429-1451 10.1016/S0893-6080(03)00138-2
22. L. Bottou, Stochastic learning, in: Advanced Lectures on Machine Learning, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3176, Springer, Berlin, 2004, pp. 146-168.
23. J. Kivinen, A. Smola, R. Williamson, Online learning with kernels, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14 (NIPS 2001), MIT Press, Vancouver, Canada, 2002, pp. 785-793.
24. Spall J. Stochastic optimization: stochastic approximation and simulated annealing. In: Webster J. (Ed). Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering vol. 20 (1998), Wiley, New York, USA 529-542
25. Spall J. Multivariate stochastic approximation using a simultaneous perturbation gradient approximation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 37 3 (1992) 332-341 10.1109/9.119632
26. Spall J. Implementation of the simultaneous perturbation algorithm for stochastic optimization. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 34 3 (1998) 817-823 10.1109/7.705889
27. T. Cootes, G. Edwards, C. Taylor, A comparative evaluation of active appearance model algorithms, in: Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC'98), Southampton, UK, 1998, pp. 680-689.
28. J. Saragih, R. Goecke, Iterative error bound minimisation for AAM alignment, in: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR 2006), vol. 2, Hong Kong, 2006, pp. 1192-1195, doi:10.1109/ICPR.2006.730.
29. Liu D., and Nocedal J. On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization. Mathematical Programming 45 1-3 (1989) 503-528
30. M. Nordstrøm, M. Larsen, J. Sierakowski, M. Stegmann, The IMM face database-an annotated dataset of 240 face images, Technical Report, Informatics and Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark, May 2004.
31. K. Messer, J. Matas, J. Kittler, J. Lüttin, G. Maitre, XM2VTSDB: the extended M2VTS database, in: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Audio- and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication (AVBPA'99), Washington, DC, USA, 1999, pp. 72-77.
32. 〈http://www.isbe.man.ac.uk/∼bim/data/xm2vts/xm2vts_markup. html〉.