A reversal of fortune: Blame games and framing contests after the 3/11 terrorist attacks in Madrid

Governing after Crisis: The Politics of Investigation, Accountability and Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 62-84

  Olmeda, José A ^a  

^a The Spanish Open University   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911051303     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511756122.003     Document Type: Chapter

References (26)

1. Aznar, J. M. 1994. España: La segunda transición. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
2. Aznar, J. M. 2004. Ocho años de gobierno: una visión personal de España. Barcelona: Planeta.
3. Baum, M. A. 2002. The constituent foundations of the rally-’round-the-flag phenomenon. International Studies Quarterly 46:263-98.
4. Baum, M. A. 2004. How public opinion constrains the use of force: the case of Operation Restore Hope. Presidential Studies Quarterly 34:187-226.
5. Baumgartner, F. R., and Jones, B. D. 1993. Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Bennett, W. L. 2003. Communicating global activism: strengths and vulnerabilities of networked politics. Information, Communication & Society 6:143-68.
7. Boin, A., ’t Hart, P., Stern, E. and Sundelius, B. 2005. The politics of crisis management: public leadership under pressure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Brändström, A., and Kuipers, S. L. 2003. From ‘normal incidents’ to political crises: understanding the selective politicization of policy failures. Government and Opposition 38:279-305.
9. Brody, R. A., and Shapiro, C. R. 1989a. A reconsideration of the rally phenomenon in public opinion. In Long, S. (ed.) Political Behavior Annual, vol. 2. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 77-102.
10. Brody, R. A., and Shapiro, C. R. 1989b. Policy failure and public support: the Iran-Contra affair and public assessment of President Reagan. Political Behavior II 4:353-69.
11. Cañada, J. 2004. Pásalo: redes y dispositivos en la víspera electoral. http://www.terremoto.net/x/archivos/000080.html.
12. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS). 2003. Estudio No. 2,481, Barómetro de febrero.
13. Druckman, J. N. 2001. On the limits of framing effects: who can frame? Journal of Politics 63:1041-66.
14. Entman, R. M. 2004. Projections of power: framing news, public opinion, and U. S. foreign policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Gamson, W. A., and Wolfsfeld, G. 1993. Movements and media as interacting systems. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 528:114-25.
16. González, J. J. 2004. Voto y control democrático: las elecciones del 14-M. CPA Estudios/Working Papers 7/2004. http://www.uned.es/dcpa/estudios.html.
17. ’t Hart, P. 1993. Symbols, rituals and power: the lost dimensions of crisis management. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 1(1):36-50.
18. Kingdon, J. W. 1995. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, 2nd edn. New York: Harper Collins.
19. Lamo de Espinosa, E. 2004. Bajo puertas de fuego: el nuevo desorden internacional. Madrid: Taurus.
20. Long, S. (ed.) 1989. Political behavior annual, vol. 2. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
21. Morris, A. D., and Mueller, C. M. (eds.) 1992. Frontiers in social movement theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22. Sádaba Garraza, T. 2004. Enfoques periodísticos y marcos de participación política. Una aproximación conjunta a la teoría del encuadre. Política y Sociedad 41(1):65-76.
23. Sampedro, V. (ed.) 2005. 13-M: Multitudes on line. Madrid: la Catarata.
24. Scheufele, D. A. 1999. Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication 49:103-22.
25. Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E. and Dutton, J. E. 1981. Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: a multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 26:501-24.
26. Tarrow, S. 1994. Power in movement: social movements, collective action and politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.