Characterization of the transcriptome, nucleotide sequence polymorphism, and natural selection in the desert adapted mouse Peromyscus eremicus

PeerJ

Volumn 2014, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  MacManes, Matthew D ^a   Eisen, Michael B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Desert; Kidney; Peromyscus; Solute carrier protein; Transcriptome

Indexed keywords

MEMBRANE PROTEIN; SOLUTE CARRIER FAMILY 2 MEMBER 9; TRANSCRIPTOME; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BALANCING SELECTION; BRAIN TISSUE; BRANCH SITE TEST; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; FEMALE; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENOMICS; KIDNEY PARENCHYMA; LIVER; MALE; NATURAL SELECTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; OSMOREGULATION; PURIFYING SELECTION; RAT; RNA EXTRACTION; RNA SEQUENCE; TESTIS;

PEROMYSCUS; PEROMYSCUS EREMICUS;

EID: 84910644215     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21678359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.642     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Altschuler EM, Nagle RB, Braun EJ, Lindstedt SL, Krutzsch PH. 1979. Morphological study of the desert heteromyid kidney with emphasis on the genus Perognathus. The Anatomical Record 194(3):461-468 DOI 10.1002/ar.1091940311.
2. Aubry S, Kelly S, Kümpers BMC, Smith-Unna RD, Hibberd JM. 2014. Deep evolutionary comparison of gene expression identifies parallel recruitment of trans-factors in two independent origins of C4 photosynthesis. PLoS Genetics 10(6):e1004365 DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004365.
3. Bedford JJ, Leader JP,Walker RJ. 2003. Aquaporin expression in normal human kidney and in renal disease. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 14(10):2581-2587 DOI 10.1097/01.ASN.0000089566.28106.F6.
4. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30(15):2114-2120 DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170.
5. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V,Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K,Madden TL. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10(1):421 DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421.
6. Chamary JV, Parmley JL, Hurst LD. 2006. Hearing silence: non-neutral evolution at synonymous sites in mammals. Nature Reviews Genetics 7(2):98-108 DOI 10.1038/nrg1770.
7. Feng B-J, Sun L-D, Soltani-Arabshahi R, Bowcock AM, Nair RP, Stuart P, Elder JT, Schrodi SJ, Begovich AB, Abecasis GR, Zhang X-J, Callis-Duffin KP, Krueger GG, Goldgar DE. 2007. Toward a molecular phylogeny for Peromyscus: evidence from mitochondrial cytochrome-b Sequences. Journal of Mammalogy 88(5):1146-1159 DOI 10.1644/06-MAMM-A-342R.1.
8. Gallardo PA, Cortés A, Bozinovic F. 2005. Phenotypic flexibility at the molecular and organismal level allows desert-dwelling rodents to cope with seasonal water availability. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 78(2):145-152 DOI 10.1086/425203.
9. Giorello FM, Feijoo M, D'Elía G, Valdez L, Opazo JC, Varas V, Naya DE, Lessa EP. 2014. Characterization of the kidney transcriptome of the South American olive mouse Abrothrix olivacea. BMC Genomics 15(1):446 DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-446.
10. Haas BJ, Papanicolaou A, Yassour M, Grabherr M, Blood PD, Bowden J, Couger MB, Eccles D, Li B, Lieber M,MacManes MD, Ott M, Orvis J, Pochet N, Strozzi F,Weeks N,Westerman R, William T, Dewey CN, Henschel R, Leduc RD, Friedman N, Regev A. 2013. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nature Protocols 8(8):1494-1512 DOI 10.1038/nprot.2013.084.
11. Heo Y,Wu X-L, Chen D,Ma J, HwuW-M. 2014. BLESS: bloom filter-based error correction solution for high-throughput sequencing reads. Bioinformatics 30(10):1354-1362 DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu030.
12. Kaissling B, De Rouffignac C, Barrett JM, Kriz W. 1975. The structural organization of the kidney of the desert rodent Psammomys obesus. Anatomy and Embryology 148(2):121-143 DOI 10.1007/BF00315265.
13. Korneliussen TS,Moltke I, Albrechtsen A, Nielsen R. 2013. Calculation of Tajima's D and other neutrality test statistics from low depth next-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 14(1):289 DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-14-289.
14. Li H. 2013. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. ArXiv preprint. arXiv:1303.3997[q-bio.GN].
15. Li W, Godzik A. 2006. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22(13):1658-1659 DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158.
16. Li H, Handsaker B,Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N,Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. 2009. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25(16):2078-2079 DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352.
17. Lowe EK, Swalla BJ, Brown CT. 2014. Evaluating a lightweight transcriptome assembly pipeline on two closely related Ascidian species. PeerJ Preprints 2:e505v1 DOI 10.7287/peerj.preprints.505v1.
18. MacManes MD. 2014. On the optimal trimming of high-throughput mRNA sequence data. Frontiers in Genetics 5:1-13 DOI 10.3389/fgene.2014.00013.
19. MacManes MD, Lacey EA. 2012. The social brain: transcriptome assembly and characterization of the hippocampus from a social subterranean rodent, the colonial Tuco-Tuco (Ctenomys sociabilis). PLoS ONE 7(9):e45524 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0045524.
20. Marra NJ, Romero A, DeWoody JA. 2014. Natural selection and the genetic basis of osmoregulation in heteromyid rodents as revealed by RNA-seq. Molecular Ecology 23(11):2699-2711 DOI 10.1111/mec.12764.
21. Mbandi SK, Hesse U, Rees DJG, Christoffels A. 2014. A glance at quality score: implication for de novo transcriptome reconstruction of Illumina reads. Frontiers in Genetics 5:1-17 DOI 10.3389/fgene.2014.00017.
22. Mi H. 2004. The PANTHER database of protein families, subfamilies, functions and pathways. Nucleic Acids Research 33(1):D284-D288 DOI 10.1093/nar/gki078.
23. Mobasheri A,Marples D, Young IS, Floyd RV,Moskaluk CA, Frigeri A. 2007. Distribution of the AQP4 water channel in normal human tissues: protein and tissue microarrays reveal expression in several new anatomical locations, including the prostate gland seminal vesicles. Channels 1(1):30-39 DOI 10.4161/chan.3735.
24. Nielsen S, Chou C,Marples D, Christensen E, Kishore B, Knepper M. 1995. Vasopressin increases water permeability of kidney collecting duct by inducing translocation of Aquaporin-CD water channels to plasma-membrane. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92(4):1013-1017 DOI 10.1073/pnas.92.4.1013.
25. Nielsen S, Kwon TH, Christensen BM, Promeneur D, Frøkiaer J,Marples D. 1999. Physiology and pathophysiology of renal aquaporins. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 10(3):647-663.
26. Panhuis TM, Broitman-Maduro G, Uhrig J,Maduro M, Reznick DN. 2011. Analysis of expressed sequence tags from the placenta of the live-bearing fish Poeciliopsis (Poeciliidae). Journal of Heredity 102(3):352-361 DOI 10.1093/jhered/esr002.
27. Pop M. 2009. Genome assembly reborn: recent computational challenges. Briefings in Bioinformatics 10(4):354-366 DOI 10.1093/bib/bbp026.
28. Punta M, Coggill PC, Eberhardt RY,Mistry J, Tate J, Boursnell C, Pang N, Forslund K, Ceric G, Clements J, Heger A, Holm L, Sonnhammer ELL, Eddy SR, Bateman A, Finn RD. 2012. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Research 40:D290-D301 DOI 10.1093/nar/gkr1065.
29. Ranwez V, Harispe S, Delsuc F, Douzery EJP. 2011. MACSE: multiple alignment of coding sequences accounting for frameshifts and stop codons. PLoS ONE 6(9):e22594 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0022594.
30. Roberts A, Pachter L. 2013. Streaming fragment assignment for real-time analysis of sequencing experiments. Nature Methods 10(1):71-73 DOI 10.1038/nmeth.2251.
31. Rojek A, Fuchtbauer E, Kwon T, Frokiaer J, Nielsen S. 2006. Severe urinary concentrating defect in renal collecting duct-selective AQP2 conditional-knockout mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103(15):6037-6042 DOI 10.1073/pnas.0511324103.
32. Romero DG, Plonczynski MW,Welsh BL, Gomez-Sanchez CE, Zhou MY, Gomez-Sanchez EP. 2007. Gene expression profile in rat adrenal zona glomerulosa cells stimulated with aldosterone secretagogues. Physiological Genomics 32(1):117-127 DOI 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00145.2007.
33. Shorter KR, Crossland JP,Webb D, Szalai G, Felder MR, Vrana PB. 2012. Peromyscus as a mammalian epigenetic model. Genetics Research International 2012:1-11 DOI 10.1155/2012/179159.
34. Shorter KR, Owen A, Anderson V, Hall-South AC, Hayford S, Cakora P, Crossland JP, Georgi VRM, Perkins A, Kelly SJ, Felder MR, Vrana PB. 2014. Natural genetic variationunderlying differences in Peromyscus repetitive and social/aggressive behaviors. Behavior Genetics 44(2):126-135 DOI 10.1007/s10519-013-9640-8.
35. Sikes RS, Gannon WL, Animal Care and Use Committee of the American Society of Mammalogists. 2011. Guidelines of the American society of mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. Journal of Mammalogy 92(1):235-253 DOI 10.1644/10-MAMM-F-355.1.
36. Tatum R, Zhang Y, Salleng K, Lu Z, Lin JJ, Lu Q, Jeansonne BG, Ding L, Chen YH. 2009. Renal salt wasting and chronic dehydration in claudin-7-deficient mice. AJP: Renal Physiology 298(1):F24-F34.
37. Veal R, Caire W. 2001. Peromyscus eremicus. Mammalian Species (118):1-6. Available at http:// www.science.smith.edu/msi/pdf/i0076-3519-118-01-0001.pdf.
38. Vijay N, Poelstra JW, Künstner A,Wolf JBW. 2013. Challenges and strategies in transcriptome assembly and differential gene expression quantification. A comprehensive in silico assessment of RNA-seq experiments. Molecular Ecology 22(3):620-634 DOI 10.1111/mec.12014.
39. Walsberg G. 2000. Small mammals in hot deserts: some generalizations revisited. Bioscience 50(2):109-120 DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0109:SMIHDS]2.3.CO;2.
40. Wheeler TJ, Eddy SR. 2013. nhmmer: DNA homology search with profile HMMs. Bioinformatics 29(19):2487-2489 DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt403.
41. Yang Z. 2007. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24(8):1586-1591 DOI 10.1093/molbev/msm088.
42. Yang Z, dos Reis M. 2011. Statistical properties of the branch-site test of positive selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28(3):1217-1228 DOI 10.1093/molbev/msq303.