Self-generated explanations on the question demands are not always helpful

Spanish Journal of Psychology

Volumn 16, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Cerdán, Raquel ^a   Gilabert, Ramiro ^a   Vidal Abarca, Eduardo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

comprehension; individual differences; self explanations; task oriented reading

Indexed keywords

EID: 84910038166     PISSN: 11387416     EISSN: 19882904     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/sjp.2013.45     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Best R., Ozuru Y., & McNamara D. S. (2004). Self-explaining science texts: Strategies, knowledge, and reading skill. In Y. B. Kafai, W. A. Sandoval, N. Enyedy, A. S. Nixon, & F. Herrera (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth International Conference of the Learning Sciences: Embracing diversity in the Learning Sciences (pp. 89-96). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Cerdán R., & Vidal-Abarca E. (2008). The effects of tasks on integrating information from multiple documents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 209-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.209.
3. Cerdán R., Vidal-Abarca E., Martínez T., Gilabert R., & Gil L. (2009). Impact of question-answering tasks on search processes and reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 19, 13-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.12.003.
4. Cerdán R., Gilabert R., & Vidal-Abarca E. (2011). Selecting information to answer questions: Strategic individual differences when searching texts. Learning and Iindividual differences, 21, 201-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.007.
5. Chi M., Bassok M., Lewis M. W., Reimann R., & Glaser R. (1989). Self-explanation: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(89)90002-5.
6. Chi M. T. H., de Leeuw N., Chiu M., & LaVancher C. (1994). Eliciting self explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1803-3.
7. Glenberg A. M., Wilkinson A. C., & Epstein W. (1982). The illusion of knowing: Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 10, 597-602. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03202442.
8. Graesser A. C., & Franklin S. P. (1990). QUEST: A model of question-answering. Discourse Processes, 13, 279-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01638539009544760.
9. Graesser A. C., Singer M., & Trabasso T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371-395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.101.3.371.
10. Hannon B., & Daneman M. (2004). Shallow semantic processing of text: An individual-differences account. Discourse Processes, 37, 187-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3703-1.
11. Kintsch W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Magliano J. P., & Millis K. K. (2003). Assessing reading skill with a think-aloud procedure and latent semantic analysis. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 251-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2103-02.
13. McCrudden M. T., & Schraw G. (2007). Relevance and goal-focusing in text processing. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 113-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9010-7.
14. McNamara D. S., O'Reilly T., Best R., & Ozuru Y. (2006). Improving adolescent students' reading comprehension with iSTART. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34, 147-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/1RU5-HDTJ-A5C8-JVWE.
15. McNamara D. S., & Magliano J. P. (2009). Self-explanation and meta cognition: The dynamics of reading. In J. D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of Meta cognition in Education (pp. 60-81). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Oakhill J., Yuill N., & Donaldson M. (1990). Understanding of causal expressions in skilled and less skilled text comprehenders. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 401-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1990.tb00854.x.
17. OECD (2009). PISA 2009: Assessment Framework Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
18. O'Reilly T., Best R., & McNamara D. S. (2004). Self-explanation reading training: Effects for low-knowledge readers. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1053-1058). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Otero J. (2002). Noticing and fixing difficulties in understanding science texts. In J. Otero, J. A. León, & A. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 281-307). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Ozuru Y., Best R., & McNamara D. S. (2004). Contribution of reading skill to learning from expository texts. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1071-1076). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Rouet J. F. (2006). The skills of document use: From text comprehension to web-based learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Rubman C., & Waters H. (2000) A, B Seeing: The role of constructive processes in children's comprehension monitoring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 503-514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.503.
23. van den Broek P., Risdem K., & Husebye-Hatmann E. (1995). The role of readers' standard for coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. In R. F. Lorch & E. J. O'Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in text comprehension (pp. 353-373). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Vidal-Abarca E., Gilabert R., Martínez T., Sellés P., Abad N., & Ferrer C. (2007) TEC. Test de Estrategias de Comprensión. Madrid, Spain: ICCE.
25. Vidal-Abarca E., Mañá A., & Gil L. (2010). Individual differences for self-regulating task-oriented reading activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 817-826. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020062.
26. Vidal-Abarca E., Martinez T., Salmerón L., Cerdán R., Gilabert R., Gil L., Ferris R. (2011). Recording online processes in task-oriented reading with Read&Answer. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers. 43, 179-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-010-0032-1.