Institutional efficiency of urban soil sealing management - From raising awareness to better implementation of sustainable development in Germany

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 131, Issue , 2014, Pages 83-95

  Artmann, Martina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

Author keywords

Policy efficiency; Soil sealing; Urban management; Urban sustainable development; Wicked problems

Indexed keywords

EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GREEN MANUFACTURING; LAND USE; PLANNING; SOILS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

COMPLEX CONSTRAINTS; ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES; PLANNING STRATEGIES; RESPONSE EFFICIENCIES; SOIL SEALING; URBAN MANAGEMENT; URBAN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WICKED PROBLEMS;

URBAN TRANSPORTATION;

LAND USE PLANNING; SEALING; SOIL MANAGEMENT; STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN AREA; URBAN PLANNING;

GERMANY;

EID: 84910026878     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.07.015     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Alberti M. The effects of urban patterns on ecosystem function. International Regional Science Review 2005, 28(2):168-199. 10.1177/0160017605275160.
2. Artmann M. Spatial dimensions of soil sealing management in growing and shrinking cities - A systemic multi-scale analysis in Germany. Erdkunde 2013, 67(3):249-264. 10.3112/erdkunde.2013.03.04.
3. Artmann M. Driving forces of urban soil sealing and constraints of its management - The cases of Leipzig and Munich, Germany. Journal of Settlements and Spatial Planning 2013, 4(2):143-152.
4. Artmann M. Response-efficiency-assessment - A conceptual framework for rating policy's efficiency to meet sustainable development on the example of soil sealing management. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 2013, 15(04):1350024. 10.1142/S1464333213500245.
5. Artmann M. Assessment of soil sealing management responses, strategies and targets towards ecologically sustainable urban land use management. Ambio 2014, 43(4):530-541. 10.1007/s13280-014-0511-1.
6. Bavarian State Ministry of the Environment Satellitengestützte Erfassung der Bodenversiegelung in Bayern 2007, Available from: http://www.lfu.bayern.de/themenuebergreifend/fachinformationen/flaechenmanagement/versiegelungsstudie/index.htm.
7. Banuri T. Climate change and sustainable development. Natural Resources Forum 2009, 33(4):257-258. 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2009.01270.x.
8. Bolund P., Hunhammar S. Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics 1999, 29(2):293-301. 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0.
9. Bouma J., Broll G., Crane T.A., Dewitte O., Gardi C., Schulte R., et al. Soil information in support of policy making and awareness raising. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2012, 4(5):552-558. 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.07.001.
10. Breuste J., Haase D., Elmqvist T. Urban landscapes and ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services in Agricultural and Urban Landscapes 2013, 83-104. Wiley & Blackwell, Oxford. S. Wratten, H. Sandhu, R. Cullen, R. Constanza (Eds.).
11. Brombach K., Jessen J., Küchel L., Lang T., Sonntag M. Von England lernen? Vier Fallstudien zum Stadtumbau in englischen Städten. Urban Regeneration in Sheffield, Middelsbrough, St. Helens und Whitehaven 2005.
12. Campbell S. Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association 1996, 62(3):296-312. 10.1080/01944369608975696.
13. Chhabra A., Geist H., Houghton R.A., Haberl H., Braimoh A.K., Vlek P.L.G., et al. Multiple impacts of land-use/cover change. Land-use and land-cover change 2006, 71-116. Springer, Berlin. E.F. Lambin, H. Geist (Eds.).
14. Umweltqualitätsziele und -standards für die Stadt Leipzig 2003, Available from: http://Leipzig.212.122.61.201/leipzig-anwendungen/LIS/statpubl/content/36_amt_fuer_umweltschutz/umweltziele.pdf. City of Leipzig, Department for Environmental Protection (Ed.).
15. Cohen M.A. Monitoring and enforcement of environmental policy. International yearbook of environmental and resource economics 1999/2000 1998, 44-106. Edward Elgar Publisher, Cheltenham. T. Tietenberg, H. Folmer (Eds.).
16. Cornelissen A.M.G.C., van den Berg J., Koops W.J., Grossman M., Udo H.M.J. Assessment of the contribution of sustainability indicators to sustainable development: A novel approach using fuzzy set theory. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 2001, 86(2):173-185. 10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00272-3.
17. Elmqvist T., Fragkias M., Goodness J., Güneralp B., Marcotullio P.J., McDonald R.I., et al. Global urbanisation, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities 2013, Springer, Heidelberg, New York.
18. Elo S., Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2008, 62(1):107-115. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
19. European Commission Guidelines on best practice to limit, mitigate or compensate soil sealing 2012, European Union, Luxembourg.
20. European Environmental Agency The European environment - State and Outlook 2010: Soil 2010, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
21. European Environmental Agency The state of soil in Europe. A contribution of the JRC to the EEA Environment State and Outlook Report - SOER 2010 2012, European Environment Agency, Joint Research Centre, Luxembourg.
22. Federal Capital of Munich Langfristige Siedlungsentwicklung (Kongressinformation), München 2011, Available from: http://www.muenchen.de/rathaus/dms/Home/Stadtverwaltung/Referat-fuer-Stadtplanung-und-Bauordnung/Projekte/LaSie/lasie_beschluss_18012012.pdf.
23. Information 26. Oktober 2010. Zunahme der Siedlungs- und Verkehrsflächen vom Jahr 1993 bis zum Jahr 2009 2010, Available from: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/rup/veroeffentlichungen/zunahme.pdf. Federal Environmental Agency (Ed.).
24. Federal Institute for Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Research Wachsende und schrumpfende Städte und Gemeinden 2008, Available from: http://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/Raumbeobachtung/AktuelleErgebnisse/Stadtentwicklung/Gemeinden/tabelle.xls?__blob=publicationFile&v=2.
25. Federal/State Soil Protection Working Group Reduzierung der Flächeninanspruchnahme 2010, Available from: http://www.labodeutschland.de/documents/UMK-Bericht_98a.pdf.
26. Fischer T.B. Strategic environmental assessment in post-modern times. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2003, 23:155-170. 10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00094-X.
27. Folke C., Hahn Â.T., Olsson P., Norberg Â.J. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2005, 30:441-473. 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511.
28. Gaston K.J. Urban ecology 2010, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
29. German Bundestag Bericht der Bundesregierung über die Perspektiven für Deutschland - Nationale Strategie für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung 2004, German Bundestag, Berlin.
30. Göhler G. Wie verändern sich Institutionen? Revolutionärer und schleichender Institutionenwandel. Leviathan Sonderheft 1997, 16:21-56.
31. Grint K. Wicked problems and clumsy solutions: The role of leadership. The New Public Leadership Challenge 2010, 11:169-186.
32. von Haaren C., Nadin C. Die Flächeninanspruchnahme in Deutschland im Vergleich mit der Situation in England. Raumforschung und Raumordnung 2003, 61(5):345-356.
33. Haase D., Kabisch N., Haase A. Endless urban growth? On the mismatch of population, household and urban land area growth and its effects on the urban debate. PLOS ONE 2013, 8(6):e66531. 10.1371/journal.pone.0066531.t001.
34. Haase D., Nuissl H. Does urban sprawl drive changes in the water balance and policy? The case of Leipzig (Germany) 1870-2003. Landscape and Urban Planning 2007, 80(1-2):1-13. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.03.011.
35. Haase D., Nuissl H. The urban-to-rural gradient of land use change and impervious cover: A longterm trajectory for the city of Leipzig. Journal of Land Use Science 2010, 5(2):123-141. 10.1080/1747423X.2010.481079.
36. Hammond A., Adriaanse A., Rodenburg E., Bryant D., Woodward R. Environmental indicators: A systematic approach to measuring and reporting on environmental policy performance in the context of sustainable development 1995, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
37. Hopwood B., Mellor M., O'Brien G. Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development 2005, 13:38-52. 10.1002/sd.244.
38. Jörissen J., Coenen R. Instrumente zur Steuerung der Flächennutzung. Auswertung einer Befragung der interessierten und betroffenen Akteure 2004, Büro für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag, Berlin, Available from: http://www.itas.kit.edu/pub/v/2004/joco04a.pdf.
39. Kaplowitz M.D., Machemer P., Pruetz R. Planners' experience in managing growth using transferable development rights (TDR) in the United States. Land Use Policy 2008, 25(3):378-387. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.07.004.
40. Lafortezza R., Carrus G., Sanesi G., Davies C. Benefits and well-being perceived by people visiting green spaces in periods of heat stress. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2009, 8(2):97-108. 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.02.003.
41. Larondelle N., Haase D., Kabsich N. Mapping the diversity of regulating ecosystem services in European cities. Global Environmental Change 2014, 26:119-129. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.008.
42. Leipzig-Informations System Bevölkerungsbestand 2014, Available from: http://www.statistik.leipzig.de/statcity/table.aspx?cat=2&rub=1&obj=0.
43. Maas J., Verheij R.A., Groenewegen P.P., de Vries S., Spressuwenberg P. Green space, urbanity, and health: How strong is the relation?. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 2006, 60:587-592. 10.1136/jech.2005.043125.
44. North D.C. Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives 1991, 5(1):97-112. 10.1257/jep.5.1.97.
45. Nuissl H., Schroeter-Schlaack C. On the economic approach to the containment of land consumption. Environmental Science & Policy 2009, 12:270-280. 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.008.
46. Osada D. Einfluss des pH-Wertes auf Bodenleben und Nährstoffaufnahme 2011, Available from: http://www.ihr-einkauf.com/magazin/de/einfluss-des-ph-wertes-auf-bodenleben.
47. Oskam A.J., Feng S. Sustainable land use under different institutional settings. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 2008, 55(4):295-306. 10.1016/S1573-5214(08)80022-X.
48. Pauleit S., Duhme F. Assessing the environmental performance of land cover types for urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 2000, 52:1-20. 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00109-2.
49. Pope J., Annandale D., Morrions-Sauners A. Conceptualising sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2004, 24:595-616. 10.1016/j.eiar.2004.03.001.
50. Prokop G., Jobstmann H., Schönbauer A. Report on best practices for limiting soil sealing and mitigating its effects 2011, European Commission, DG Environment, Brussels.
51. Renard V. Property rights and the 'transfer of development rights'. Questions of efficiency and equity. Town Planning Review 2007, 78(1):103-118. 10.3828/tpr.78.1.4.
52. Rittel H.W.J., Webber M.M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 1973, 4(2):155-169. 10.1007/BF01405730.
53. Roberts N. Wicked problems and network approaches to resolutions. International Public Management Review 2000, 1(1):1-19.
54. Rodríguez P.G., González M.E.P. Changes in soil sealing in Guadalajara (Spain): Cartography with LANDSAT images. Science of the Total Environment 2007, 378(1-2):209-213. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.01.048.
55. Saaty T.L., Vargas L.G. Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process 2012, Springer, New York.
56. Xiang W.N. Working with wicked problems in socio-ecological systems: Awareness, acceptance, and adaptation. Landscape and Urban Planning 2013, 110:1-4.
57. Zanakis S.H., Solomon A., Wishart N., Dublish S. Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods. European Journal of Operational Research 1998, 107:507-529. 10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00147-1.