Assessment of soil sealing management responses, strategies, and targets toward ecologically sustainable Urban land use management

Ambio

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 530-541

  Artmann, Martina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

Author keywords

Ecosystem services; Germany; Soil sealing; Soil sealing management; Urban green; Urban planning

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; GREENSPACE; LAND USE PLANNING; MICROCLIMATE; SEALING; SERVICE PROVISION; SOIL MANAGEMENT; STRATEGIC APPROACH; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN ECOSYSTEM; URBAN PLANNING;

GERMANY;

ARTICLE; CITY; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS AND RELATED PHENOMENA; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GERMANY; SOIL;

CITIES; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESSES; ECOSYSTEM; GERMANY; SOIL;

EID: 84902080934     PISSN: 00447447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13280-014-0511-1     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Artmann, M. 2013a. Spatial dimensions of soil sealing management in growing and shrinking cities - A systemic multi-scale analysis in Germany. Erdkunde 67: 249-264.
2. Artmann, M. 2013b. Response-efficiency-assessment - A conceptual framework for rating policy0s efficiency to meet sustainable development on the example of soil sealing management. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 15: 135002.
3. Artmann, M. 2013c. Driving forces of urban soil sealing and constraints of its management - The cases Leipzig and Munich (Germany). Journal of Settlements and Spatial Planning 4: 143-152.
4. Bendt, P., S. Barthel, and J. Colding. 2013. Civic greening and environmental learning in public-access community gardens in Berlin. Landscape and Urban Planning 101: 18-30.
5. Bolund, P., and S. Hunhammar. 1999. Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics 29: 293-301. (Pubitemid 29303111)
6. Boyd, J., and S. Banzhaf. 2007. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics 63: 616-626. (Pubitemid 46908771)
7. Breitenfeld, J. 2009. Methodology for calculating soil sealing and space productivity and evaluation of federal states environmental economic accounts (UGRdL) (in German). IOR-Workshop Spatial Monitoring. Retrieved January 21, 2009, from http://www.ioermonitor.de/fileadmin/Dokumente/Symposium-2009- Expertenworkshop/breitenfeld.pdf.
8. Breuste, J.H. 2011. Ecology in cities: man-made physical conditions - Summary. In Urban ecology. Patterns, processes, and applications, ed. J. Niemela, 71-72. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Bulkeley, H. 2013. Cities and climate change. Oxon: Routledge.
10. Burghardt, W. 2006. Soil sealing and soil properties related to sealing. In Function of soils for human societies and the environment, ed. E. Frossard, W.E.H. Blum, and B.P. Warkentin, Special Publications 266, 117-124. London: The Geological Society.
11. Chiesura, A. 2004. The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning 68: 129-138. (Pubitemid 38362153)
12. Daily, G.C., S. Polasky, J. Goldstein, P.M. Kareiva, H.A. Mooney, L. Pejchar, T.H. Ricketts, J. Salzman, et al. 2009. Ecosystem services in decision making: Time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7: 21-28.
13. De Ridder, K., F. Lefebre, S. Adriaensen, U. Arnold, W. Beckroege, C. Bronner, O. Damsgaard, I. Dostal, et al. 2008. Simulating the impact of urban sprawl on air quality and population exposure in the German Ruhr area. Part II: Development and evaluation of an urban growth scenario. Atmospheric Environment 42: 7070-7077.
14. Deutscher Bundestag. 2004. Report by the Federal Government on the perspectives for Germany - National strategy for a sustainable development. Printed matter 15/4100, Berlin: German Bundestag (in German).
15. EC (European Commission). 2012. Guidelines on best practice to limit, mitigate or compensate soil sealing. Commission staff working document, Brussels, Belgium, 65 pp.
16. EC (European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy). 2011. Cities of tomorrow - Challenges, visions, ways forward. Publ. Office of the European Office, Luxembourg, 116 pp.
17. EEA (European Environment Agency). 2012. The State of Soil in Europe. A contribution of the JRC to the EEA Environment State and Outlook Report - SOER 2010, European Environment Agency, Joint Research Centre, Luxembourg, 80 pp.
18. Elo, S., and H. Kyngas. 2008. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing 62: 107-115.
19. Gill, S.E., J.F. Handley, A.R. Ennos, and S. Pauleit. 2007. Adapting cities for climate change: The role of the green infrastructure. Built Environment 33: 115-133. (Pubitemid 46421523)
20. Goddard, M.A., A. Dougill, and T.G. Benton. 2010. Scaling up from gardens: Biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25: 90-98.
21. Grimm, N.B., S.H. Faeth, N.E. Golubiewski, C.L. Redman, J. Wu, X. Bai, and J.M. Briggs. 2008. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319: 756-760. (Pubitemid 351225834)
22. Haase, D., and H. Nuissl. 2007. Does urban sprawl drive changes in the water balance and policy? The case of Leipzig (Germany) 1870-2003. Landscape and Urban Planning 80: 1-13. (Pubitemid 46275146)
23. Haase, D., and H. Nuissl. 2010. The urban-to-rural gradient of land use change and impervious cover: A longterm trajectory for the city of Leipzig. Journal of Land Use Science 5: 123-141.
24. Haase, D., N. Kabisch, and A. Haase. 2013. Endless urban growth? On the mismatch of population, household and urban land area growth and its effects on the urban debate. PLoS ONE 8: e66531.
25. Haase, D., N. Larondelle, E. Andersson, M. Artmann, S. Borgstro?m, J. Breuste, E. Gomez-Baggethun, A. Gren, et al. 2014. A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: Concepts, models, and implementation. AMBIO. doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0.
26. Henry, J.A., and S.E. Dicks. 1987. Association of urban temperatures with land use and surface materials. Landscape and Urban Planning 14: 21-29.
27. Herzele, A.V., and T. Wiedemann. 2003. A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban greenspaces. Landscape and Urban Planning 63: 109-126. (Pubitemid 36380489)
28. Jo, H.K., and E.G. McPherson. 2001. Indirect carbon reduction by residential vegetation and planting strategies in Chicago, USA. Journal of Environmental Management 6: 165-177. (Pubitemid 32600696)
29. Kabisch, N., and D. Haase. 2013. Green spaces of European cities revisited for 1990-2006. Landscape and Urban Planning 110: 113-122.
30. Larondelle, N., and D. Haase. 2013. Urban ecosystem services assessment along a rural-urban gradient: A cross-analysis of European cities. Ecological Indicators 29: 179-190.
31. MA (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Biodiversity synthesis. World resources Institute, Washington, DC, U.S., 100 pp.
32. Mendoza, G.A., and R. Prabhu. 2000. Development of a methodology for selecting criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management: A case study on participatory assessment. Environmental Management 26: 659-673.
33. Montanarella, L. 2007. Trends in Land Degradation in Europe. In Climate and land degradation, ed. M.V.K. Sivakumar, and N. Ndianui, 83-104. Berlin: Springer.
34. Niemela, J., R.S. Saarela, T. So?derman, L. Kopperoinen, V. Yli- Pelkonen, S. Va?re, and D.J. Kotze. 2010. Using the ecosystem services approach for better planning and conservation of urban green spaces: A Finland case study. Biodiversity and Conservation 19: 3225-3243.
35. Nuissl, H., and C. Schroeter-Schlaack. 2009. On the economic approach to the containment of land consumption. Environmental Science & Policy 12: 270-280.
36. Osada, D. 2011. Impact of the pH-value on the soil life and nutrient incorporation (in German). Retrieved August 30, 2013, from www.ihr-einkauf.com/ magazin/de/einfluss-des-ph-wertes-aufbodenleben.
37. Prokop, G., H. Jobstmann, and A. Schonbauer. 2011. Report on best practices for limiting soil sealing and mitigating its effects. Study contracted by the European Commission, DG Environment, Technical Report-2011-50, Brussels, Belgium, 231 pp.
38. Pulles, T., and T. van Harmelen. 2004. General policy questions need specific policy effectiveness indicators: An example for emission reduction targets. Environmental Sciences 1: 351-367.
39. Rees, W.E. 1992. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: What urban economics leaves out. Environment and Urbanization 4: 121-130. (Pubitemid 23366213)
40. Saaty, T.L., and L.G. Vargas. 2012. Models, methods, concepts and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. New York: Springer.
41. Seitzinger, S.P., U. Svedin, C. Crumley, W. Steffen, S.A. Abdullah, C. Alfsen, W.J. Broadgate, F.H.B. Biermann, et al. 2012. Planetary stewardship in an urbanising world: beyond city limits. AMBIO 41: 787-794.
42. Selltiz, C., J. Deutsch, and S.W. Cook. 1959. Research methods in social relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
43. Seto, K.C., A. Reenberg, C.G. Boone, M. Fragkias, D. Haase, T. Langanke, P. Marcotullio, D.K. Munroe, et al. 2012. Urban land teleconnections and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109(20): 7687-7692.
44. Statistisches Bundesamt. 2012. Sustainable development in Germany. Indicator report 2012. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt (in German).
45. Turok, I., and V. Mykhnenko. 2007. The trajectories of European cities, 1960-2005. Cities 24: P165-P182.
46. van Oudenhoven, A.P.E., K. Petz, R. Alkemade, L. Hein, and R.S. de Groot. 2012. Framework for systematic indicator selection to assess effects of land management on ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators 21: 110-122.
47. Zanakis, S.H., A. Solomon, N. Wishart, and S. Dublish. 1998. Multiattribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods. European Journal of Operational Research 107: 507-529. (Pubitemid 128388886)