Water footprint for energy production and supply in Thailand

Energy

Volumn 77, Issue , 2014, Pages 49-56

  Okadera, Tomohiro ^a   Chontanawat, Jaruwan ^b   Gheewala, Shabbir H ^b,c  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Japan)

^b KING MONGKUT'S UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY THONBURI   (Thailand)

^c THAILAND CENTER OF EXCELLENCE IN PHYSICS   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Bottom up approach; Energy production; Energy supply; Thailand; Water footprint; Water energy nexus

Indexed keywords

COOLING WATER; ENERGY POLICY; ENERGY RESOURCES; PUBLIC POLICY;

BOTTOM UP APPROACH; ENERGY PRODUCTIONS; ENERGY SUPPLIES; THAILAND; WATER ENERGY; WATER FOOTPRINT;

WATER RESOURCES;

BIOMASS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY POLICY; ENERGY RESOURCE; WATER FOOTPRINT;

THAILAND;

EID: 84910005683     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.03.113     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Gerbens-Leenes P.W., Hoekstra A.Y., van der Meer T. The water footprint of energy from biomass: a quantitative assessment and consequences of an increasing share of bio-energy in energy supply. Ecol Econ 2009, 68(4):1052-1060.
2. Gerbens-Leenes W., Hoekstra A.Y., van der Meer T.H. The water footprint of bioenergy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106(25):10219-10223.
3. Gheewala S.H., Berndes G., Jewitt G. The bioenergy and water nexus. Biofuel Bioprod Biorg 2011, 5(4):353-360.
4. DEDE (Department of Altenative Energy Development and Efficiency) Annual report 2010 Thailand alternative energy situation 2010, Department of Altenative Energy Development and Efficiency (DEDE), Ministry of Energy, Bangkok.
5. Pfister S., Hellweg S. The water "shoesize" vs. footprint of bioenergy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106(35):E93-E94.
6. NSO (National Statistical Office) Statistical yearbook Thailand 2009 2009, National Statistical Office, Bangkok.
7. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) AQUASTAT database 2012, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), [accessed 31.12.12]. http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/main/index.stm.
8. EPPO (Energy Policy and Planning Office) Energy statistics of Thailand 2011 2011, EPPO, Bangkok.
9. Gleick P.H. Water and Energy. Annu Rev Energy Environ 1994, 19:267-299.
10. Carrillo A.M.R., Frei C. Water: a key resource in energy production. Energy Policy 2009, 37(11):4303-4312.
11. Berndes G. Bioenergy and water - the implications of large-scale bioenergy production for water use and supply. Glob Environ Change 2002, 12(4):253-271.
12. Sovacool B.K. Running on empty: the electricity-water nexus and the U.S. electric utility sector. Energy Law J 2009, 30(1):11-51.
13. Sovacool B.K., Sovacool K.E. Preventing national electricity-water crisis areas in the UnitedStates. Columbia J Environ Law 2009, 34(2):333-393.
14. Subhadra B.G., Edwards M. Coproduct market analysis and water footprint of simulated commercial algal biorefineries. Appl Energ 2011, 88(10):3515-3523.
15. Harto C., Meyers R., Williams E. Life cycle water use of low-carbon transport fuels. Energ Policy 2010, 38(9):4933-4944.
16. Chiu Y.W., Walseth B., Suh S. Water embodied in bioethanol in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 2009, 43(8):2688-2692.
17. Clarens A.F., Resurreccion E.P., White M.A., Colosi L.M. Environmental life cycle comparison of algae to other bioenergy feedstocks. Environ Sci Technol 2010, 44(5):1813-1819.
18. Mulder K., Hagens N., Fisher B. Burning water: a comparative analysis of the energy return on water invested. Ambio 2010, 39(1):30-39.
19. Gheewala S.H., Silalertruksa T., Nilsalab P., Mungkung R., Perret S.R., Chaiyawannakarn N. Implications of the biofuels policy mandate in Thailand on water: the case of bioethanol. Bioresour Technol 2013, 150:457-465.
20. Miller R.E., Blair P.D. Input-output analysis: foundations and extensions 2009, Cambridge University Press, New York. 2nd ed.
21. Lenzen M. Ageneralized input-output multiplier calculus for Australia. Econ Syst Res 2001, 13(1):65-92.
22. UN (United Nations) Handbook of input-output table compilation and analysis 1999, United Nations, New York.
23. Leontief W. Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: an input-output approach. Rev Econ Stat 1970, 52(3):262-271.
24. King C.W., Webber M.E. Water intensity of transportation. Environ Sci Technol 2008, 42(21):7866-7872.
25. Hoekstra A.Y., Chapagain A.K. Globalization of water: Sharing the planet's freshwater resources 2008, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, United Kingdom.
26. Chapagain A.K., Hoekstra A.Y. The water footprint of coffee and tea consumption in the Netherlands. Ecol Econ 2007, 64(1):109-118.
27. Chapagain A.K., Hoekstra A.Y., Savenije H.H.G., Gautam R. The water footprint of cotton consumption: an assessment of the impact of worldwide consumption of cotton products on the water resources in the cotton producing countries. Ecol Econ 2006, 60(1):186-203.
28. Chapagain A.K., Orr S. An improved water footprint methodology linking global consumption to local water resources: a case of Spanish tomatoes. JEnviron Manage 2009, 90(2):1219-1228.
29. Chapagain A.M., Hoekstra A.Y. The blue, green and grey water footprint of rice from production and consumption perspectives. Ecol Econ 2011, 70(4):749-758.
30. Hoekstra A.Y., Chapagain A.K. Water footprints of nations: water use by people as a function of their consumption pattern. Integrated assessment of water resources and global change 2007, 35-48.
31. Hoekstra A.Y., Chapagain A.K. The water footprints of Morocco and the Netherlands: global water use as a result of domestic consumption of agricultural commodities. Ecol Econ 2007, 64(1):143-151.
32. Hoekstra A.Y., Hung P.Q. Virtual water trade: a quantification of virtual water flows between nations in relation to international crop trade 2002, Value of water research report series 11, UNESCO-IHE Delft, Delft.
33. Hoekstra A.Y., Hung P.Q. Globalisation of water resources: international virtual water flows in relation to crop trade. Glob Environ Change 2005, 15(1):45-56.
34. Ma J., Hoekstra A.Y., Wang H., Chapagain A.K., Wang D. Virtual versus real water transfers within China. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2006, 361(1469):835-842.
35. Oki T., Kanae S. Virtual water trade and world water resources. Water Sci Technol 2004, 49(7):203-209.
36. Feng K.S., Siu Y.L., Guan D.B., Hubacek K. Assessing regional virtual water flows and water footprints in the Yellow River Basin, China: a consumption based approach. Appl Geogr 2012, 32(2):691-701.
37. Guan D., Hubacek K. Assessment of regional trade and virtual water flows in China. Ecol Econ 2007, 61(1):159-170.
38. Hubacek K., Guan D.B., Barrett J., Wiedmann T. Environmental implications of urbanization and lifestyle change in China: ecological and water footprints. JCleaner Prod 2009, 17(14):1241-1248.
39. Hubacek K., Sun L.X. Economic and societal changes in China and their effects on water use - a scenario analysis. JInd Ecol 2005, 9(1-2):187-200.
40. Okadera T., Watanabe M., Xu K.Q. Analysis of water demand and water pollutant discharge using a regional input-output table: an application to the city of Chongqing, upstream of the Three Gorges Dam in China. Ecol Econ 2006, 58(2):221-237.
41. Dong H., Geng Y., Sarkis J., Fujita T., Okadera T., Xue B. Regional water footprint evaluation in China: a case of Liaoning. Sci Total Environ 2013, 442(0):215-224.
42. Zhang Z., Shi M., Yang H., Chapagain A. An input-output analysis of trends in virtual water trade and the impact on water resources and uses in China. Econ Syst Res 2011, 23(4):431-446.
43. López-Morales C., Duchin F. Policies and technologies for a sustainable use of water in Mexico: a scenario analysis. Econ Syst Res 2011, 23(4):387-407.
44. Yu Y., Hubacek K., Feng K.S., Guan D.B. Assessing regional and global water footprints for the UK. Ecol Econ 2010, 69(5):1140-1147.
45. Zhao X., Chen B., Yang Z.F. National water footprint in an input-output framework-a case study of China 2002. Ecol Model 2009, 220(2):245-253.
46. Cazcarro I., Duarte R., Choliz J.S., Sarasa C. Water rates and the responsibilities of direct, indirect and end-users in Spain. Econ Syst Res 2011, 23(4):409-430.
47. Cazcarro I., Pac R.D., Sanchez-Choliz J. Water consumption based on a disaggregated social accounting matrix of Huesca (Spain). JInd Ecol 2010, 14(3):496-511.
48. Lenzen M. Understanding virtual water flows: a multiregion input-output case study of Victoria. Water Resour Res 2009, 45.
49. Lenzen M., Foran B. An input-output analysis of Australian water usage. Water Policy 2001, 3(4):321-340.
50. Feng K., Chapagain A., Suh S., Pfister S., Hubacek K. Comparison of bottom-up and top-down approaches to calculating the water footprints of nations. Econ Syst Res 2011, 23(4):371-385.
51. EGAT (Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand) EGAT annual report 2010 2010, Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT), Bang Kruai.
52. EGAT (Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand) EGAT annual report 2009 2009, Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT), Bang Kruai.
53. EGAT (Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand) EGAT annual report 2008 2008, Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT), Bang Kruai.
54. EGAT (Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand) EGAT annual report 2007 2007, Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT), Bang Kruai.
55. EGAT (Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand) EGAT annual report 2006 2006, Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT), Bang Kruai.
56. EGAT (Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand) EGAT annual report 2005 2005, Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT), Bang Kruai.
57. EGAT (Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand) EGAT annual report 2004 2004, Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT), Bang Kruai.
58. EGAT (Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand) EGAT annual report 2003 2003, Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT), Bang Kruai.
59. EGAT (Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand) EGAT annual report 2002 2002, Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT), Bang Kruai.
60. EGAT (Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand) EGAT annual report 2001 2001, Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT), Bang Kruai.
61. EGAT (Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand) Summary of Thailand power development plan 2010-2030 2010, Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT), Bang Ruan.
62. EIA (Energy Information Administration) Malaysia - analysis - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2013, U.S. Department of Energy, [accessed 28.11.13]. http://www.eia.gov/countries/cab.cfm?fips=MY.
63. HAII (Hydro and Agro Informatics Institute) Thaiwater.net 2013, Hydro and Agro Informatics Institute (HAII), [accessed 08.10.13]. http://www.thaiwater.net/web/.
64. Sovacool B.K., Mukherjee I. Conceptualizing and measuring energy security: a synthesized approach. Energy 2011, 36(8):5343-5355.
65. Sovacool B.K., Mukherjee I., Drupady I.M., D'Agostino A.L. Evaluating energy security performance from 1990 to 2010 for eighteen countries. Energy 2011, 36(10):5846-5853.
66. Johansson B. Abroadened typology on energy and security. Energy 2013, 53:199-205.
67. Liang S., Zhang T. Interactions of energy technology development and new energy exploitation with water technology development in China. Energy 2011, 36(12):6960-6966.
68. Santhosh A., Farid A.M., Youcef-Toumi K. The impact of storage facility capacity and ramping capabilities on the supply side economic dispatch of the energy-water nexus. Energy 2014, 66(1):363-377.