Detection of infragenual arterial disease using non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography in patients with diabetes

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1422-1429

  Liu, Xin ^a   Zhang, Na ^a   Fan, Zhaoyang ^b   Feng, Fei ^c   Yang, Qi ^d   Zheng, Hairong ^a   Liu, Pengcheng ^c   Li, Debiao ^b  

^a SHENZHEN INSTITUTES OF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d CAPITAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Diabetes; Flow sensitive dephasing; Non contrast enhanced MR angiography; Peripheral vascular disease; Steady state free precession

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY DISEASE; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC PATIENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; FLOW SENSITIVE DEPHASING; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INFRAGENUAL ARTERIAL DISEASE; LEG ARTERY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; NON CONTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STEADY STATE; STEADY STATE FREE PRECESSION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIABETIC ANGIOPATHY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; LEG; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VASCULARIZATION;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIABETIC ANGIOPATHIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LEG; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL DISEASE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84909986701     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24477     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Thomsen HS. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a serious late adverse reaction to gadodiamide. Eur Radiol 2006;16:2619-2621.
2. Marckmann P, Skov L, Rossen K, et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: suspected causative role of gadodiamide used for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006;17:2359-2362.
3. Schiffrin EL, Lipman ML, Mann JF. Chronic kidney disease: effects on the cardiovascular system. Circulation 2007;116:85-97.
4. United States Renal Data System. USRDS 2007 Annual Data Report. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2007.
5. Miyazaki M, Lee VS. Nonenhanced MR angiography. Radiology 2008;248:20-43.
6. Miyazaki M, Sugiura S, Tateishi F, Wada H, Kassai Y, Abe H. Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography using 3D ECG-synchronized half-Fourier fast spin echo. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:776-783.
7. Edelman RR, Sheehan JJ, Dunkle E, Schindler N, Carr J, Koktzoglou I. Quiescent-interval single-shot unenhanced magnetic resonance angiography of peripheral vascular disease: technical considerations and clinical feasibility. Magn Reson Med 2010;63:951-958.
8. Koktzoglou I, Edelman RR. Ghost magnetic resonance angiography. Magn Reson Med 2009;61:1515-1519.
9. Gu T, Korosec FR, Block WF, et al. PC VIPR: a high-speed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and high resolution angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:743-749.
10. Lim RP, Hecht EM, Xu J, et al. 3D nongadolinium-enhanced ECG-gated MRA of the distal lower extremities: preliminary clinical experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:181-189.
11. Haneder S, Attenberger UI, Riffel P, Henzler T, Schoenberg SO, Michaely HJ. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the calf station at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparison of non-enhanced ECG-gated flow-dependent MRA, continuous table movement MRA and time-resolved MRA. Eur Radiol 2011;21:1452-1461.
12. Hodnett PA, Koktzoglou I, Davarpanah AH, et al. Evaluation of peripheral arterial disease with nonenhanced quiescent-interval single-shot MR angiography. Radiology 2011;260:282-293.
13. Wheaton AJ, Miyazaki M. Non-contrast enhanced MR angiography: physical principles. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;36:286-304.
14. Hodnett PA, Ward EV, Davarpanah AH, et al. Peripheral arterial disease in a symptomatic diabetic population: prospective comparison of rapid unenhanced MR Angiography (MRA) with contrast-enhanced MRA. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:1466-1473.
15. Fan Z, Sheehan J, Bi X, Liu X, Carr J, Li D. 3D noncontrast MR angiography of the distal lower extremities using flow-sensitive dephasing (FSD)-prepared balanced SSFP. Magn Reson Med 2009;62:1523-1532.
16. Storey P, Lim RP, Kim S, Stoffel DR, Lee VS. Arterial flow characteristics in the presence of vascular disease and implications for fast spin echo-based noncontrast MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;34:1472-1479.
17. Atanasova I, Lim R, Chandarana H, et al. Clinical validation of non-contrast abdominal MRA with quadruple inversion-recovery prepared 3D b-SSFP. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Melbourne, 2012. (abstract 3874).
18. Sheehan JJ, Fan Z, Davarpanah AH, et al. Nonenhanced MR angiography of the hand with flow-sensitive dephasing-prepared balanced SSFP sequence: initial experience with systemic sclerosis. Radiology 2011;259:248-256.
19. Lim RP, Fan Z, Chatterji M, et al. Comparison of nonenhanced MR angiographic subtraction techniques for infragenual arteries at 1.5 T: a preliminary study. Radiology 2013;267:293-304.
20. Edmonds ME, Roberts VC, Watkins PJ. Blood flow in the diabetic neuropathic foot. Diabetologia 1982;22:9-15.
21. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2006. Diabetes Care 2006;29(Suppl 1):S4-S42.
22. Schaper NC, Nabuurs-Franssen MH, Huijberts MS. Peripheral vascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2000;16(Suppl 1):S11-S15.
23. Fan Z, Zhou X, Bi X, Dharmakumar R, Carr JC, Li D. Determination of the optimal first-order gradient moment for flow-sensitive dephasing magnetization-prepared 3D noncontrast MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 2011;65:964-972.
24. Fan Z, Hodnett PA, Davarpanah AH, et al. Noncontrast magnetic resonance angiography of the hand: improved arterial conspicuity by multidirectional flow-sensitive dephasing magnetization preparation in 3D balanced steady-state free precession imaging. Invest Radiol 2011;46:515-523.
25. Hunold P, Maderwald S, Ladd ME, Jellus V, Barkhausen J. Parallel acquisition techniques in cardiac cine magnetic resonance imaging using TrueFISP sequences: comparison of image quality and artifacts. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:506-511.
26. Dewey M, Teige F, Schnapauff D. Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses with multi-slice computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Intern Med 2006;145:407-415.
27. Ersoy H, Rybicki FJ. MR angiography of the lower extremities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:1675-1684.
28. Andreisek G, Pfammatter T, Goepfert K, et al. Peripheral arteries in diabetic patients: standard bolus-chase and time-resolved MR angiography. Radiology 2007;242:610-620.
29. Wyttenbach R, Braghetti A, Wyss M, et al. Renal artery assessment with nonenhanced steady-state free precession versus contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 2007;245:186-195.
30. Bi X, Deshpande V, Carr J, Li D. Coronary MR angiography: a comparison between the whole-heart and volume-targeted methods using a T2-prepared SSFP sequence. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2006;8:703-707.
31. Pierce IT, Gatehouse PD, Xu XY, Firmin DN. MR phase-contrast velocity mapping methods for measuring venous blood velocity in the deep veins of the calf. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;34:634-644.