Modelling the structural response of cotton plants to mepiquat chloride and population density

Annals of Botany

Volumn 114, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 877-887

  Gu, Shenghao ^a   Evers, Jochem B ^b   Zhang, Lizhen ^a,d   Mao, Lili ^a   Zhang, Siping ^c   Zhao, Xinhua ^c   Liu, Shaodong ^c   Van Der Werf, Wopke ^b   Li, Zhaohu ^a,d  

^a CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c CHN and Cotton Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science   (China)

^d Hebei Cotton Seed Engineering Technology Research Centre   (China)

Author keywords

canopy development; Cotton; Gossypium hirsutum; growth regulator; intercropping; MC; mepiquat chloride; morphology; shoot topping; simulation model

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; AGRONOMY; CHLORIDE; COTTON; DATA SET; INTERCROPPING; LEAF AREA INDEX; MORPHOLOGY; NUMERICAL MODEL; POPULATION DENSITY; PREDICTION;

GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM;

MEPIQUAT; PIPERIDINE DERIVATIVE;

ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEMOGRAPHY; DRUG EFFECTS; FLOWER; FRUIT; GOSSYPIUM; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PLANT LEAF; PLANT STEM;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEMOGRAPHY; FLOWERS; FRUIT; GOSSYPIUM; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PIPERIDINES; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT STEMS;

EID: 84909978468     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mct309     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. de Almeida AQ, Rosolem CA. 2012.Cotton root and shoot growth as affected by application of mepiquat chloride to cotton seeds. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy 34: 61-65
2. Buck-Sorlin GH. 2002. L-system model of the vegetative growth of winter barley. In: Polani D, Kim J, Martinez T eds. Fifth German Workshop on Artificial Life. Lübeck: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Aka Gmb H, 53-64
3. Duncan WG. 1972.SIMCOT: a simulator of cotton growth and yield. In: Murphy CM, ed. Proceedings of a Workshop for Modeling Tree Growth. Duke University, Durham, NC, 115-118
4. Evers JB, Vos J, Fournier C, Andrieu B, Chelle M, Struik PC. 2005. Towards a generic architectural model of tillering in Gramineae, as exemplified by spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). New Phytologist 166: 801-812
5. Fernandez CJ, Cothren JT, McInnes KJ. 1991.Partitioning of biomass inwellwatered and water-stressed cotton plants treated with mepiquat chloride. Crop Science 31: 1224-1228
6. Franklin KA, Whitelam GC. 2005. Phytochromes and shade-Avoidance responses in plants. Annals of Botany 96: 169-175
7. Godin C, Sinoquet H. 2005. Functional-structural plant modelling. New Phytologist 166: 705-708
8. Gonias ED, Oosterhuis DM, Bibi AC. 2012. Cotton radiation use efficiency response to plant growth regulators. Journal of Agricultural Science 150: 595-602
9. Gwathmey CO, Clement JD. 2010. Alteration of cotton source-sink relations with plant population density and mepiquat chloride. Field Crops Research 116: 101-107
10. Gwathmey CO, Wassel OM, Michaud C. 1995. Pix effects on canopy light interception by contrasting cotton varieties. In: Richter DA, Armour J eds. Proceedings of Beltwide Cotton Conference. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America, 1153
11. Hanan J, Hearn AB. 2003. Linking physiological and architectural models of cotton. Agricultural Systems 75: 47-77
12. Hanan J, Prusinkiewicz P, 2008. Foreword: studying plants with functional-structural models. Functional Plant Biology 35: i-iii
13. Hemmerling R, Kniemeyer O, Lanwert D, Kurth W, Buck-Sorlin GH. 2008. The rule-based language XL and the modelling environment GroIMP illustrated with simulated tree competition. Functional Plant Biology 35: 739-750
14. Jallas E, Sequeira R, Martin P, Turner S, Papajorgji P. 2009. Mechanistic virtual modelling: coupling a plant simulation model with a threedimensional plant architecture component. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 14: 29-45
15. Leffelaar PA. 1999. Basic elements of dynamic simulation. In: LeffelaarPA. ed. On systems analysis and simulation of ecological processes: with examples in CSMP, FST and FORTRAN. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 11-27
16. Lemmon H, Chuk N. 1997. Object-oriented design of a cotton crop model. Ecological Modelling 94: 45-51
17. Mondino MH, Peterlin OA, Garay F. 2004. Response of late-planted cotton to the application of a growth regulator (chlorocholine chloride, CYCOCEL 75). Experimental Agriculture 40: 381-387
18. Oosterhuis DM, Egilla JN. 1996. Field evaluation of plant growth regulators for effect on the growth and yield of cotton summaryof 1995 results. In: Dugger P, Richter D, eds. Proceedings of Beltwide Cotton Conference. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America, 1213-1215
19. Pettigrew WT, Johnson JT. 2005. Effects of different seeding rates and plant growth regulators on early-planted cotton. Journal of Cotton Science 9: 189-198
20. Reddy AR, Reddy KR, Hodges HF. 1996. Mepiquat chloride (PIX)-induced changes in photosynthesis and growth of cotton. Plant Growth Regulation 20: 179-183
21. Reddy VR, Baker DN, Hodges HF. 1990. Temperature and mepiquat chloride effects on cotton canopy architecture. Agronomy Journal 82: 190-195
22. de Reffye P, Blaise F, Chemouny S, Jaffuel S, Fourcaud T, Houllier F. 1999. Calibration of a hydraulic architecture-based growth model of cotton plants. Agronomie 19: 265-280
23. Ren X, Zhang L, Du M, et al. 2013.Managingmepiquat chloride and plant density for optimal yield and quality of cotton. Field Crops Research 149: 1-10
24. Renton M, Hanan J, Burrage K. 2005. Using the canonical modelling approach to simplify the simulation of function in functional-structural plant models. New Phytologist 166: 845-857
25. Room P, Hanan J, Prusinkiewicz P. 1996. Virtual plants: new perspectives for ecologists, pathologists and agricultural scientists. Trends in Plant Science 1: 33-38
26. Siebert JD, Stewart AM. 2006. Influence of plant density on cotton response to mepiquat chloride application. Agronomy Journal 98: 1634-1639
27. Thornby D, Renton M, Hanan J. 2003. Using computational plant science tools to investigate morphological aspects of compensatory growth. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2660: 708-717
28. Vos J, Evers JB, Buck-Sorlin GH, Andrieu B, Chelle M, de Visser PHB. 2010. Functional-structural plant modelling: a new versatile tool in crop science. Journal of Experimental Botany 61: 2101-2115
29. de Wit CT, Goudriaan J. 1978. Simulation of ecological processes. Wageningen: Pudoc
30. Yang YM, Ouyang Z, Yang YH, Liu XJ. 2008. Simulation of the effect of pruning and topping on cotton growth using COTTON2K model. Field Crop Research 106: 126-137
31. York AC. 1983.Response of cotton to mepiquat chloridewith varyingNrates and plant populations. Agronomy Journal 75: 667-672
32. Zhang L, van derWerf W, Zhang S, Li B, Spiertz JHJ. 2007.Growth, yield and quality of wheat and cotton in relay strip intercropping systems. Field Crops Research 103: 178-188
33. Zhang L, van derWerf W, Bastiaans L, Zhang S, Li B, Spiertz JHJ. 2008a. Light interception and utilization in relay strip intercrops of wheat and cotton. Field Crops Research 107: 29-42
34. Zhang L, vanDer Werf W, Cao W, Li B, Spiertz JHJ.2008b.Development and validation of SUCROS-Cotton: a potential crop growth simulation model for cotton. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 56: 59-83
35. Zhao D, Oosterhuis DM. 2000. Pix plus and mepiquat chloride effects on physiology, growth, and yield of field-grown cotton. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 19: 415-422