Psychophysiological support of increasing attentional reserve during the development of a motor skill

Biological Psychology

Volumn 103, Issue , 2014, Pages 349-356

  Rietschel, Jeremy C ^a,b   McDonald, Craig G ^c   Goodman, Ronald N ^b,e   Miller, Matthew W ^d   Jones Lush, Lauren M ^e   Wittenberg, George F ^b,e   Hatfield, Bradley D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; EEG; Event related potential; Motor learning; Novelty P3

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; ATTENTIONAL RESERVE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINEMATICS; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; N1 COMPONENT; NORMAL HUMAN; NOVELTY P3 COMPONENT; P2 COMPONENT; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL FEEDBACK; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84909647109     PISSN: 03010511     EISSN: 18736246     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.10.008     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aagaard P., Simonsen E.B., Andersen J.L., Magnusson P., Dyhre-Poulsen P. Increased rate of force development and neural drive of human skeletal muscle following resistance training. Journal of Applied Physiology 2002, 93:1318-1326.
2. Allison B.Z., Polich J. Workload assessment of computer gaming using a single-stimulus event-related potential paradigm. Biological Psychology 2008, 77(3):277-283.
3. Beilock S.L., Carr T.H., MacMahon C., Starkes J.L. When paying attention becomes counterproductive: Impact of divided versus skill-focused attention on novice and experienced performance of sensorimotor skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2002, 8:6-16.
4. Beilock S.L., Wierenga S.A., Carr T.A. Expertise, attention, and memory in sensorimotor skill execution: Impact of novel task constraints on dual-task performance and episodic memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2002, 55A(4):1221-1240.
5. Bell M.A., Fox N.A. Crawling experience is related to changes in cortical organization during infancy: Evidence from EEG coherence. Developmental Psychobiology 1996, 29:551-561.
6. Bellenkes A.H., Wickens C.D., Kramer A.F. Visual scanning and pilot expertise: The role of attentional flexibility and mental model development. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine 1997, 48(7):569-579.
7. Busk J., Galbraith G.C. EEG correlates of visual-motor practice in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1975, 38:415-422.
8. Cohen J., Polich J. On the number of trials needed for P300. International Journal of Psychophysiology 1997, 25:249-255.
9. Fabiani M., Kazmerski V.A., Cycowicz Y.M., Friedman D. Naming norms for brief environmental sounds: Effects of age and dementia. Psychophysiology 1996, 33:462-475.
10. Fitts P.M., Posner M.I. Human Performance 1967, Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Belmont, CA.
11. Friedman D., Cycowicz Y.M., Gatea H. The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of brain's evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 2001, 25:355-373.
12. Gentili R.J., Bradberry T.J., Hatfield B.D., Contreras-Vidal J.L. Brain biomarkers of motor adaptation using phase synchronization. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Annual International Conference of the IEEE 2009, 5930-5933.
13. Grafton S.T., Hazeltine E., Ivry R.B. Motor sequence learning with the nondominant left hand: A PET functional imaging study. Experimental Brain Research 2002, 146:369-378.
14. Grey R. Attending to the execution of a complex sensorimotor skill: Expertise difference, choking, and slumps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2004, 10(1):42-54.
15. Haier R.J., Siegel B.V., MacLachlan A., Soderling E., Lottenberg S., Buchsbaum M.S. Regional glucose metabolic changes after learning a complex visuospatial/motor task: A positron emission tomographic study. Brain Research 1992, 570:134-143.
16. Handy T.C. Basic principles of ERP quantification. Event-related Potentials: A Methods Handbook 2005, 33-56. MIT Press, Cambridge. T.C. Handy (Ed.).
17. Hatfield B.D., Haufler A.J., Hung T., Spalding T.W. Electroencephalographic studies of skilled psychomotor performance. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 2004, 21(6):1-13.
18. Hatfield B.D., Hillman C.H. The psychophysiology of sport. The Handbook of Research on Sport Psychology 2001, 319-339. John Wiley, New York. 2nd ed. R.N. Singer, H.A. Hausenblaus, C.M. Janelle (Eds.).
19. Humphrey D.G., Kramer A.F. Toward a psychophysiological assessment of dynamic changes in mental workload. Human Factors 1994, 36:3-26.
20. Jasper H.H. The ten twenty electrode system of the international federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1958, 10:371-375.
21. Kerick S.E., Douglass L., Hatfield B.D. Cerebral cortical adaptations associated with visuomotor practice. Medicine & Science in Sport & Exercise 2004, 36:118-129.
22. Kerick S.E., Hatfield B.D., Allender L.E. Event-related dynamics of soldiers during shooting as a function of varied task demand. Aviation Space & Environmental Medicine 2007, 78(5 Suppl.):B153-B164.
23. King B.R., Kagerer F.A., Contreras-Vidal J.L., Clark J.E. Evidence for multisensory spatial-to-motor transformations in aiming movement of children. Journal of Neurophysiology 2009, 101:315-322.
24. Krakauer J.W. Motor learning and consolidation: The case of visuomotor rotation. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 2009, 629:405-421.
25. Krakauer J.W., Pine Z.M., Ghilardi M.F., Ghez C. Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. Journal of Neuroscience 2000, 20:8916-8924.
26. Kramer A.F., Wickens C.D., Donchin E. Processing of stimulus properties: evidence for dual-task integrality. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 1985, 11:393-408.
27. Lay B.S., Sparrow W.A., Hughes K.M., O'Dwyer N.J. Practice effects on coordination and control, metabolic energy expenditure, and muscle activation. Human Movement Science 2002, 21:807-830.
28. Luck S.J. An introduction to the event-related potential technique 2005, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2005.
29. Maclin E.L., Mathewson K.E., Low K.A., Boot W.R., Kramer A.F., Fabiani M., et al. Learning to multitask: Effects of video game practice on electrophysiological indices of attention and resource allocation. Psychophysiology 2011, 48:1173-1183.
30. Magill R.A. Attention as a limited capacity resource. Motor learning: concepts and applications 2007, 194-220. McGraw-Hill. 8th ed.
31. McDonald C.G., Gabbay F.H., Rietschel J.C., Duncan C.C. Evidence for a new late positive ERP component in an attended novelty oddball task. Psychophysiology 2010, 47(5):809-813.
32. Mertens R., Polich J. P300 from a single-stimulus paradigm: passive versus active tasks and stimulus modality. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology: Evoked Potentials 1997, 104:488-497.
33. Miller M.W., Rietschel J.C., McDonald C.G., Hatfield B.D. A novel approach to the physiological measurement of mental workload. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2011, 80. 75-58.
34. Onton J., Westerfield M., Townsend J., Makeig S. Imaging human EEG dynamics using independent component analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2006, 30:808-822.
35. Parasuraman R. Effects of information processing demands on slow negative shift latencies and N100 amplitude in selective and divided attention. Biological Psychology 1980, 11:217-233.
36. Polich J., Margala C. P300 and probability: comparison of oddball and single-stimulus paradigms. International Journal of Psychophysiology 1997, 25:169-176.
37. SanMiguel I., Morgan H.M., Kiein C., Linden D., Escera C. On the functional significance of Novelty-P3: Facilitation by unexpected novel sounds. Biological Psychology 2010, 83:143-152.
38. Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. A. (2008). Motor learning and performance: A situation-based learning approach (4th ed., pp. 24-58). Human Kinetics.
39. Senkowski D., Herrmann C.S. Effects of task difficulty on evoked gamma activity and ERPs in a visual discrimination task. Clinical Neurophysiology 2002, 113:1742-1753.
40. Smith M.D., Chamberlin C.J. Effect of adding cognitively demanding tasks on soccer skill performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1992, 75:955-961.
41. Strayer D.L., Drews F.A., Johnston W.A. Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal Experimental Psychology: Applied 2003, 9:23-32.
42. Wang J., Sainburg R.L. Adaptation to visuomotor rotations remaps movement vectors, not final positions. Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25(16):4024-4030.
43. Weissman D.H., Roberts K.C., Visscher K.M., Woldorff M.G. The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention. Nature Neuroscience 2006, 9(7):971-978.
44. Wetter S., Polich J., Murphy C. Olfactory, auditory, and visual ERPs from single trials: no evidence for habituation. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2004, 54:263-272.
45. Visual Search behaviors in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences 2002, 20. (special issue).
46. Vuillerme N., Nougier V. Attentional demand for regulating postural sway: The effect of expertise in gymnastics. Brain Research Bulletin 2004, 63:161-165.