Blue genes: Sharing and conserving the world's aquatic biodiversity

Blue Genes: Sharing and Conserving the World's Aquatic Biodiversity

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-231

  Greer, David ^a   Harvey, Brian ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909075108     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781849770606     Document Type: Book

References (159)

1. Aalbersberg, W (1997) ‘Bioprospecting and its regulation by government in Fiji’, Biodiversity Conservation Network, World Wildlife Fund, www.bcnet.org/whatsnew/fijigov.htm
2. Aalbersberg, W, Korovulavula, I, Parks, J and Russell, D (1997) ‘The role of a Fijian community in a bioprospecting project’, Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit-sharing Case Studies, Case Study 20, Convention on Biological Diversity, www.biodiv.org/doc/case-studies/cs-abs-fj.pdf
3. Abban, E (1999) ‘Considerations for the conservation of African fish genetic resources for their sustainable exploitation’ in R Pullin, Bartley, D and Kooiman, J (eds) Towards Policies for Conservation and Sustainable Use of Aquatic Genetic Resources, ICLARM Conference Proceedings 59, 14–18 April 1998, Manila
4. Abramovitz, J (1995) ‘Freshwater failures: the crises on five continents’, World Watch, September/October 1995, pp 27–35
5. Agbayani, R, Baticados, D and Siar, S (2000) ‘Community fishery resources management on Malalison Island, Philippines: R & D framework, interventions, and policy implications’, Coastal Management, vol 28, pp19–27
6. Appleton, C (2001) ‘An African leech for use in microsurgery in Africa!’, Science in Africa: Africa’s First On-line Science Magazine, Archives page, Index to September 2001 issue, www.scienceinafrica.co.za/2001/september/leech2.htm
7. ASEAN (Association of South East Asian Nations) (2000) ‘ASEAN framework agreement on access to biological and genetic resources (draft text)’, ASEAN, http://216.15.202/docs/asean-access-2000/en.pdf
8. Axelrod, H (2001) ‘Discovery of the cardinal tetra and beyond’ in N Chao, Petry, P, Prang, G, Sonnieschien, L and Tlusty, M (eds) Conservation and Management of Ornamental Fish Resources of the Rio Negro Basin, Amazonia, Brasil – Project Piaba, Universidade do Amazonas and Bio-Amazonia Conservation International, Manaus, pp302
9. Baquero, J (1999) ‘Marine ornamentals trade: quality and sustainability for the Pacific Region’, Marine Aquarium Council, South Pacific Forum Secretariat and Marine Aquarium Council, www.aquariumcouncil.org
10. Barber, V and La Vina, A (1995) Regulating Access to Genetic Resources: The Philippine Experience, Presentation to the Global Biodiversity Forum, Jakarta, 4–5 November
11. Bardach, J, Ryther, J and McLarney, W (1972) Aquaculture – The Farming and Husbandry of Freshwater and Marine Organisms, John Wiley and Sons, New York, p868
12. Bartley, D (1997) ‘Biodiversity and genetics’ in Review of the State of World Aquaculture, FAO Fisheries Circular No. 886, FAO Fisheries Department, Rome, p163
13. Bartley, D (2000) ‘Responsible ornamental fisheries’, FAO Aquaculture Newsletter, vol 24, p10–14
14. Bartley, D and Pullin, R (1999) ‘Towards policies for aquatic genetic resources’ in R Pullin, Bartley, D and Kooiman, J (eds) Towards Policies for Conservation and Sustainable Use of Aquatic Genetic Resources, ICLARM Conference Proceedings 59, 14–18 April 1998, Manila, pp1–16
15. Barton, J (1991) Relating Scientific and the Commercial Worlds in Genetic Resource Negotiation, Paper presented at the Symposium on Property, Rights, Biotechnology, and Genetic Resources, African Centre for Technology Studies and World Resources Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
16. Baticados, D and Agbayani, R (2000) ‘Co-management in marine fisheries on Malalison Island, central Philippines’, International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, vol 7, pp1–13
17. Batungbacal, E (2000) Marine Bioprospecting in the Philippines, Tambuyog Development Center and Southeast Asia Regional Institute for Community Education, Quezon City, Philippines, p33
18. Bengwayan, M (2001) ‘Companies rush to patent wildlife in the Philippines’, Earth Times, 15 January 2001
19. Bensky, D and Gamble, A (compilers and translators) (1993) Materia Medica: Chinese Herbal Medicine, Eastland Press, Seattle, Washington DC
20. Berlin, S (1997) Ways We Live: Exploring Community, New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, Canada, pp170
21. Bierer, D, Carlson, T and King S (1996) ‘Shaman Pharmaceuticals: integrating indigenous knowledge, tropical medicinal plants, medicine, modern science and reciprocity into a novel drug discovery approach’, The Science Center – Special Topics, Network Science, www.netsci.org/Science/Special/feature11.html
22. Blench, R (1998) ‘Biodiversity conservation and its opponents’, Natural Resource Perspectives, vol 32 (July), pp9
23. Brown, D and Greer, D (2001) Forest Industry Certification in British Columbia: Issues and Options for Government Action, BC Ministry of Forests, Victoria, Canada
24. Brummett, R (ed) (1994) Aquaculture Policy Options for Integrated Resource Management in Subsaharan Africa, International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management, Manila and Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit, Eschborn, Germany, pp38
25. Brush, S and Stabinsky, D (eds) (1996) Valuing Local Knowledge: Indigenous People and Intellectual Property Rights, Island Press, Washington DC
26. Bruton, M (1995) ‘Have fishes had their chips? The dilemma of threatened fishes’, Environmental Biology of Fishes, vol 43, no 1, pp1–27
27. CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2002) ‘Decision VI/24: Bonn Guidelines on access to genetic resources and fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising from their utilization’, COP Decisions – COP 6 – Decision VI/24, CBD, www.biodiv.org/decisions/default.asp?lg=0&m=cop-06&d=24
28. Centeno, J (2000) ‘Pirates plunder the tropics’, Protecting Knowledge: Articles of Interest, 17 March 2000, www.members.home.nl/aeissing/00715.html
29. CGFRA (Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture) (2002) ‘International undertaking on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture’, CGFRA Agriculture Section, United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), http://www.fao.org/ag/cgrfa/IU.htm
30. CGIAR (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research) SGRP (System-wide Genetic Resources Programme) (2001) ‘Booklet of CGIAR centre policy instruments, guidelines and statements on genetic resources, biotechnology and intellectual property rights, version 1’, System-wide Information Network for Genetic Resources website, Rome, http:/singer.cgiar.org/booklet.pdf
31. Chao, N (1998) ‘A draft of Brazilian freshwater fishes for the hobby – a proposal to IBAMA’, Ornamental Fish International Journal, vol 23, pp11–19
32. Chao, N, Prang, G and Petry, P (2001) ‘Project Piaba – maintenance and sustainable development of ornamental fisheries in the Rio Negro basin, Amazonas, Brazil’ in N Chao, Petry, P, Prang, G, Sonnieschien, L and Tlusty, M (eds) (2002) Conservation and Management of Ornamental Fish Resources of the Rio Negro Basin, Amazonia, Brasil – Project Piaba, Universidade do Amazonas and Bio-Amazonia Conservation International, Manaus, pp302
33. Columbia University, School of International and Public Affairs (1999) Access to Genetic Resources: An Evaluation of the Development and Implementation of Recent Regulation and Access Agreements, Environmental Policy Studies, Working Paper #4, The Tides Center – Biodiversity Action Network, Washington, DC, p101
34. Correa, C (1999) ‘Intellectual property rights and aquatic genetic resources’ in R Pullin, Bartley, D and Kooiman, J (eds) Towards Policies for Conservation and Sustainable use of Aquatic Genetic Resources, ICLARM Conference Proceedings 59, 14–18 April 1998, Manila
35. Crucible Group (1994) People, Plants and Patents: The Impact of Intellectual Property on Trade, Plant Biodiversity, and Rural Society, International Research Development Centre, Ottawa, p116
36. Crucible Group (2000) Seeding Solutions, Volume 1: Policy Options for Genetic Resources, IDRC, IPGRI and the Dag Hammarskjold Foundation, Ottawa, p120
37. Crucible Group (2001) Seeding Solutions, Volume 2: Options for National Laws Governing Control Over Genetic Resources and Biological Innovations, IDRC, IPGRI and the Dag Hammarskjold Foundation, Ottawa, p243
38. Dalton, R (2002) ‘Bioprospectors turn their gaze to Canada’, Nature, vol 419, p768
39. Dano, E (2001) ‘Participation in the formulation of the Philippines Executive Order 247 on access to genetic resources, and priorities for implementation’ in K Swiderska (ed) (2001) Stakeholder Participation in Policy on Access to Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Benefit-sharing, International Institute for Environment and Development, London, p32
40. Delgado, C, Wada, M, Rosegrant, N, Meijer, S and Mahfuzuddin, A (2003) Fish to 2020: Supply and Demand in Changing Local Markets, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, and World Fish Center, Penang, Malaysia
41. Dey, M (2000) ‘The impact of genetically improved farmed Nile tilapia in Asia’, Aquaculture Economics and Management, vol 4(1/2), pp109–26
42. Diversa Corporation (2000) ‘Diversa signs first agreement granting legal access to biodiversity in Africa’, www.diversa.com/presrele/2000/view_release.asp?id=20001207
43. Dowd, S (2001) ‘An aquarist’s experience of Amazon River ecotour expeditions and hobbyist involvement in conservation’ in N Chao, Petry, P, Prang, G, Sonnieschien, L and Tlusty, M (eds) (2002) Conservation and Management of Ornamental Fish Resources of the Rio Negro Basin, Amazonia, Brasil – Project Piaba, Universidade do Amazonas and Bio-Amazonia Conservation International, Manaus, p 302
44. Dutfield, G (1999) ‘The public and private domains: intellectual property rights in traditional ecological knowledge’, WP 03/99, OIPRC E-Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, Oxford Intellectual Property Research Centre, www.oiprc.ox.ac.uk/EJWP0399.html
45. Dutfield, G (n.d.) ‘Biopiracy: the slavery of the new millennium? Surely not’, http://users.ox.ac.uk/wgtrr/slavery.htm
46. Ecotrust Canada (1997) Seeing the Ocean Through the Trees: A Conservation-based Development Strategy for Clayoquot Sound, Ecotrust Canada, Vancouver, p105
47. Edwards, P, Hiep, D, Anh P and Mair G (2000) ‘Traditional culture of indigenous common carp in rice fields in northern Vietnam: does it have a future in poverty reduction?’ World Aquaculture, December, pp34–40.
48. Eknath, A, Macaranas, J, Agustin, L, Velasco, R, Ablan, C, Pante, J and Pullin, R (1991) ‘Biochemical and morphometric approaches to characterize farmed tilapias’, Naga, vol 14(2) pp3–6
49. Eknath, A, Tayamen, M, Palada-de Vera, M, Danting, J, Reyes, R, Dionisio, E, Capili, J, Bolivar, H, Abella, T, Circa, A, Bentsen, H, Gjerde, B, Gjedrem, T and Pullin, R (1993) ‘Genetic improvement of farmed tilapias: the growth performance of eight strains of Oreochromis niloticus tested in farmed environments’, Aquaculture, vol 111, pp171–88
50. Environmental News Network (2001) ‘Restaurants and grocers asked to avoid transgenic fish.’ 22 October 2001. www.enn.com/news/enn-stories/2001/10/10222001/fish_45316.asp
51. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (1997) Aquaculture Development, FAO, Rome, pp40
52. FAO (1998) Aquaculture Newsletter, December 1998, FAO, Rome
53. FAO (1999) ‘Ornamental aquatic life: what’s FAO got to do with it?, News & Highlights, 2 September 1999, FAO, www.fao.org/NEWS/1999/990901-e.htm
54. FAO (2000) The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2000, FAO, Rome
55. FAO (2001) Understanding the Cultures of Fishing Communities: A Key to Fishery Management and Food Security, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 401, FAO, Rome, pp304
56. Fletcher, G, Goddard, S and Wu, Y (1999) ‘Antifreeze proteins and their genes: from basic research to business opportunity’, Chemtech, vol 30(6), pp17–28
57. Froese, R and Torres, A (1999) ‘Fishes under threat: an analysis of the fishes in the 1996 IUCN red list’ in R Pullin, Batley, D and Kooiman, J (eds) Towards Policies for Conservation and Sustainable use of Aquatic Genetic Resources, ICLARM Conference Proceedings 59, 14–18 April 1998, Manila
58. Gardner, J and Peterson, D (2003) Making Sense of the Salmon Aquaculture Debate: Analysis of Issues Related to Netcage Salmon Farming and Wild Salmon in British Columbia, Pacific Fisheries Resource Conservation Council, Vancouver, Canada
59. Gjedrem, T (1997) ‘Selective breeding to improve aquaculture production’, World Aquaculture, vol 28, pp12–15
60. Glowka, L (1998a) The Deepest of Ironies: Genetic Resources, Marine Scientific Research and the International Deep Sea-bed Area, International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Bonn, pp22
61. Glowka, L (1998b) A Guide to Designing Legal Frameworks to Determine Access to Genetic Resources, IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature), Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, pp97
62. Glowka, L (2001) Towards a Certification System for Bioprospecting Activities, Switzerland State Secretariat for Economic Affairs, Bern, pp119
63. Glowka, L, Plan, T and Stoll, P (1998) Best Practices for Access to Genetic Resources, Information paper for DG XI, European Commission and the German Federal Ministry of the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, pp63
64. Gomez, E, Alcala, A and San Diego, A (1981) Status of Philippine Coral Reefs, Proceedings of the Fourth International Coral Reef Symposium, Manila
65. Gong, Z, Wan, H, Tay, T, Wang, H, Chen, M and Yan, T (2003) ‘Development of transgenic fish for ornamental and bioreactor by strong expression of fluorescent proteins in the skeletal muscle’, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 308, pp58–63.
66. GRAIN (2002a) ‘Overview of the BRL’, Biodiversity Rights Legislation, GRAIN, www.grain.org/brl/overview-brl.cfm
67. Grajal, A (1999) ‘Biodiversity and the nation state: regulating access to genetic resources limits biodiversity research in developing countries’, Conservation Biology, vol 13(1), pp6–10
68. Grenier, L (1998) Working with Indigenous Knowledge: A Guide for Researchers, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, pp115
69. Gupta, M, Acosta, B, Eknath, A and Dey, M (2000) ‘Breakthrough in genetic improvement of tropical finfish through partnership between ICLARM, ASI and developing country NARS’, Pools of Knowledge and Document Repository, Global Forum on Agricultural Research, www.egfar.org/docu-ments/4_lines/Research_Partnerships/Genetic_Resources_Management/GRM_cases/3_8.PDF
70. Halewood, M (1999) ‘Indigenous and local knowledge in international law: a preface to sui generis intellectual property protection’, McGill Law Journal, vol 44(4), pp953–96
71. Harvey, B (1996) ‘Banking fish genetic resources: the art of the possible’, in F di Castri and Younes, T (eds) Biodiversity, Science and Development: Towards a New Partnership, CAB International, Wallingford
72. Harvey, B (1999) ‘Fish genetic conservation in Canada and Brazil: field programs and policy development’ in R Pullin, Bartley, D and Kooiman, J (eds) Towards Policies for Conservation and Sustainable use of Aquatic Genetic Resources, ICLARM Conference Proceedings 59, 14–18 April 1998, Manila, pp17–22
73. Harvey, B and Carolsfeld, J (1993) Induced Breeding in Tropical Fish Culture, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, pp144
74. Harvey, B and Hoar, WS (1979) The Theory and Practice of Induced Breeding in Tropical Fish Culture, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, pp48
75. Harvey, B and Macduffee, M (2002) Ghost Runs: The Future of Wild Salmon on the North and Central Coasts of British Columbia, Raincoast Conservation Society, Victoria, Canada
76. Harvey, B, Ross, C, Greer, D and Carolsfeld, J (1998) ‘Action Before Extinction: An International Conference on Conservation of Fish Genetic Diversity’, World Fisheries Trust, 16–18 February 1998, Victoria, Canada, pp259
77. Herrin, A and Racelis, R (1992) Monitoring the Coverage of Public Programs on Low-income Families: Philippines 1992, Integrated Development Planning Project, National Economic Development Authority, Manila
78. Hew, C and Fletcher, D (1997) ‘Transgenic fish for aquaculture’, Chemistry & Industry, vol 21 (April), pp311–14
79. Heywood, VH (ed) (1995) Global Biodiversity Assessment, United Nations Environment Programme, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
80. Hobbelink, H (1991) Biotechnology and the Future of World Agriculture, Zed Books, London
81. Hodgkin, T and Ouedraogo, A (1996) ‘Forestry, fish and crop genetic resources: commonalities and differences for effective conservation, sustainable management and use’, in R Pullin and Casal, C (eds) Consultation on Fish Genetic Resources, International Center for Living Aquatic Resources, Makati City, Philippines
82. Holman Hunters and Trappers, Fisheries Joint Management Committee, and Canada Department of Fisheries and Oceans (1994) Plan for Recovery of the Kuujjua River Charr Stock, Brochure
83. ICLARM (International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management) (1992) Recommendations of the Meeting on International Concerns in the use of Aquatic Germplasm, 1–5 June 1992, ICLARM, Manila
84. ICLARM (1996) Draft Policy for Intellectual Property Rights on Fish Genetic Resources, ICLARM, Manila
85. ICLARM (1999) Operational Plan, Biodiversity and Genetic Resources Program, ICLARM, Manila
86. ICLARM (2002) Medium Term Plan 2002–2004, ICLARM, Penang, Malaysia, pp102
87. IFPRI (International Food Policy Research Institute) and World Fish Center (2003) Outlook for Fish to 2020: Meeting Global Demand, IFPRI and WFC, pp36
88. IIFB (International Indigenous Forum on Biodiversity) (2001) ‘Statement of international indigenous forum on biodiversity to the CBD ad-hoc open-ended working group on access and benefit-sharing’, Convention on Biological Diversity, 22–26 October 2001, Bonn, www.nciv.net/engels/IIFB/state-mentengels.htm
89. Illo, J and Polo, J (1990) Fishers, Traders, Farmers, Wives: The Life Stories of Ten Women in a Fishing Village, Institute of Philippine Culture, Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City, Philippines
90. IRRI (International Rice Research Institute) (2004) ‘International rice genebank: Sharing the seeds’, www.irri.org/GRC/irg/biodiv-genebank.htm
91. IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature) (2001) ‘Achieving the benefit-sharing objective of the Convention on Biological Diversity’, Preliminary recommendations to the CBD Ad-Hoc Open-ended Working Group on Access and Benefit-sharing, October 2001, pp7, www.iucn.org/themes/pmns/topics/absmaria.html
92. Jain, H (1994) ‘The biodiversity convention: more losers than winners’, Biotechnology and Development Monitor, vol 21 (December)
93. Johannes, R and Ruddle, K (1993) ‘Human interactions in tropical coastal and marine areas: lessons from traditional resource use’ in A Price and Humphrey, S (eds) Application of the Biosphere Reserve Concept to Coastal Marine Areas, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, pp21–7
94. Khalil, M (1995) ‘Biodiversity and the conservation of medicinal plants: issues from the perspective of the developing world’ in T Swanson, (ed) Intellectual Property Rights and Biodiversity Conservation: An Interdisciplinary Analysis of the Values of Medicinal Plants, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
95. Kneen, B (1999) Farmageddon: Food and the Culture of Biotechnology, New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, BC, Canada
96. Laird, S (ed) (2002) Biodiversity and Traditional Knowledge: Equitable Partnerships in Practice, Earthscan Publications, London, pp504
97. Lewis, D, Wood, G and Gregory, R (1996) Trading the Silver Seed: Local Knowledge and Market Moralities in Aquacultural Development, Intermediate Technology Publications, London
98. Lynch, O and Maggio, G (1997) ‘Human rights, environment and economic development: existing and emerging standards in international law and global society’, Background – Relevant Documents, International Ombudsman Centre for the Environment and Development, www.omced.org/wri/om_wri.htm
99. Madeley, J (2000) ‘Trade and hunger’, Seedling: The Quarterly Newsletter of Genetic Resources Action International, December 2000, GRAIN publications, Seedling in 2000, www.grain.org/publications/dec002-en.cfm
100. Mann, H (1997) Indigenous Peoples and the Use of Intellectual Property Rights in Canada: Case Studies Relating to Intellectual Property Rights and the Protection of Biodiversity, Industry Canada, Ottawa
101. Marine Aquarium Council (2001) ‘Fast Facts, No 1, 22 May 2001, Marine
102. Aquarium Council, www.aquariumcouncil.org
103. Martinez, A (2002) The Impact of TRIPS and the CBD on Coastal Communities, International Collective in Support of Fishworkers, Barcelona
104. May, R (1988) ‘How many species are there on earth?’, Science, vol 241, pp1441–9
105. McAllister, D, Hamilton, A and Harvey, B (1997) ‘Global freshwater biodiversity: striving for the integrity of freshwater systems’, Sea Wind: Bulletin of Ocean Voice International, vol 11(3), Ocean Voice International Inc, Ottawa, pp140
106. McChesney, J (1992) Biological Diversity, Chemical Diversity and the Search for New Pharmaceuticals, Paper presented at the Symposium on Tropical Forest Medical Resources and the Conservation of Biodiversity, January 1992, Rainforest Alliance, New York
107. Moore, R (2000) ‘The spawning of a new era: GM super salmon and the wisdom of tinkering with fish’, University of Minnesota Kiosk Newspaper, December 2000, About U of M – News and Publications – University Newsletters – Kiosk, University of Minnesota, www1.umn.edu/urelate/kiosk/12.00text/salmon.html
108. rd Edition, John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York, pp600
109. Norse, E (1993) Global Marine Biological Biodiversity, Island Press, Washington, DC
110. Nunavut Wildlife Management Board (1998) Minutes: Meeting No. 18, 12–14 May 1998, Broughton Island, Nunavut Territory, Canada
111. Organization of African Unity (2000) African model legislation for the protection of the rights of local communities, farmers and breeders, and for the regulation of access to biological resources’, Geneva, http://r0.unctad.org/trade_env/docs/oaulaw.pdf
112. Pauly, D (2003) ‘The future for fisheries’, Science, vol 241, pp1359–61
113. Penman, D (1999) ‘Biotechnology and aquatic genetic resources: genes and genetically modified organisms’ in R Pullin, Bartley, D and Kooiman, J (eds) Towards Policies for Conservation and Sustainable Use of Aquatic Genetic Resources, ICLARM Conference Proceedings 59, 14–18 April 1998, Manila
114. Peria, E (2002) The Way We Were, as We Are Now: Access and Benefit-sharing in the Philippines, South East Asia Regional Initiatives for Community Empowerment (SEARICE), Quezon City, Philippines
115. Plotkin, M (2000) Medicine Quest, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middlesex
116. Posey, D (1993) ‘Indigenous knowledge in the conservation and use of world forests’ in K Ramakrishna and Woodwell, G (eds) World Forests for the Future: Their Use and Conservation, Yale University Press, New Haven, pp59–77
117. Posey, D (1999) ‘Developing sui generis options for the protection of living aquatic resources of indigenous and local communities’ in R Pullin, Bartley, D and Kooiman, J (eds) Towards Policies for Conservation and Sustainable Use of Aquatic Genetic Resources, ICLARM Conference Proceedings 59, 14–18 April 1998, Manila
118. Posey, D and Dutfield, G (1996) Beyond Intellectual Property: Toward Traditional Resource Rights for Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa
119. Prang, G (2001) Aviamento and the ornamental fishery of the Rio Negro, Brazil: implications for sustainable resource use’ in N Chao, Petry, P, Prang, G, Sonnieschien, L and Tlusty, M (eds) (2002) Conservation and Management of Ornamental Fish Resources of the Rio Negro Basin, Amazonia, Brasil – Project Piaba, Universidade do Amazonas and Bio-Amazonia Conservation International, Manaus, pp302
120. Primavera, J and Agbayani, R (1997) ‘Comparative strategies in community-based mangrove rehabilitation programmes in the Philippines’, in P Hong, Ishwaran, N, San, H, Tri, N and Tuan, M (eds), Proceedings of Ecotone V, Community Participation in Conservation, Sustainable Use and Rehabilitation of Mangroves in Southeast Asia. UNESCO, Japanese Man and the Biosphere National Committee and Mangrove Ecosystem Research Centre, Vietnam, pp229–43
121. Project Seahorse (1998) ‘Managing fisheries and adjusting supply’, About the Project – Programs, Seahorse Project: Advancing Marine Conservation, http://seahorse.fisheries.ubc.ca/programs.html
122. Project Seahorse (2000) ‘Seahorse conservation and management in Bohol, Philippines’, About the Project – Programs, Seahorse Project: Advancing Marine Conservation, http://seahorse.fisheries.ubc.ca/programs.html
123. Pullin, R (1993) ‘Ex-situ conservation of the germplasm of aquatic organisms’, Naga, July, 15–17
124. Pullin, R, Bartley, D and Kooiman, J (eds) (1999) Towards Policies for Conservation and Sustainable Use of Aquatic Genetic Resources, ICLARM Conference Proceedings 59, Manila
125. Pullin, R and Casal, C (eds) (1996) Consultation on Fish Genetic Resources, International Center for Living Aquatic Resources, Makati City, Philippines
126. Pullin, R, Eknath, A, Gjedrem T, Tayamen, M, Macaranas, J and Abella, T (1991) ‘The genetic improvement of farmed tilapias (GIFT) project: the story so far’, Naga, vol 14(2), pp3–6
127. Rajapakse, M (1998) ‘The ornamental aquatic industry in Sri Lanka’, OFI Journal, 24 August
128. Raymond, R (1999) ‘Agricultural research and the art of public awareness’ in R. Pullin, Bartley, D and Kooiman, J (eds) Towards Policies for Conservation and Sustainable Use of Aquatic Genetic Resources, ICLARM Conference Proceedings 59, 14–18 April 1998, Manila
129. Reid, W, Laird, S, Meyer, C, Gamez, R, Sittenfeld, A, Janzen, D, Gollin, M and Juma, C (1993) Biodiversity Prospecting: Using Genetic Resources for Sustainable Development, World Resources Institute, pp341
130. Revenga, C, Brunner, J, Henninger, N, Kassem, K and Payne, R (2000) Pilot Analysis of Global Ecosystems: Freshwater Ecosystems, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, 83pp
131. Ricciardi, A and Rasmussen, J (1999) ‘Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna’, Conservation Biology, vol 13(5), pp1220–2
132. Rifkin, J (1998) The Biotech Century, Penguin Putnam Inc, New York, pp271
133. Roberts, C and Hawkins, J (2001) ‘Fully protected marine reserves’, Worldwide Fund for Nature, www.panda.org/resources/publications/water/mpreserves/mar_index.htm
134. Rohter, L (2001) A collector’s item costs Brazilian divers dearly’, New York Times, 5 November, ppA4
135. Rosendal, K (1992) ‘Blue revolution could avoid failures of green predecessor’, Biotechnology and Development Monitor, vol 12 (September), pp10
136. Ruiz, M (1998) ‘When science, law and politics collide: the inevitable suffering of basic science’, ENVIS Environmental Information System Centre – Biodiversity, Indian Institute of Science Center for Ecological Sciences, www.ces.iisc.ernet.in/hpg/envis/doc98html/biodsc95.html
137. Schumacher, E (1973) Small is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered, Harper and Row, New York
138. SEDA (Department of Economic and Social Affairs), United Nations (2000) World Population Prospects: The 2000 Revision, United Nations, New York, www.un.org/esa/population/publications/wpp2000/highlights.pdf
139. Seiler, A and Dutfield, G (2002) ‘Regulating access and benefit-sharing’, Biotechnology and Development Monitor, vol 49, pp3–7
140. Shiva, V (1997) Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge, Between The Lines, Toronto, Canada, pp148
141. Shiva, V (1999) ‘Who pays the price? The shrimp industry, rich consumers, and poor coastal communities’ in N Svennevig, Reinertsen, H and New, M (eds) Sustainable Aquaculture: Food for the Future?, AA Balkema, Rotterdam
142. Shiva, V (2000) Poverty and Globalisation, British Broadcasting Corporation Reith Lectures 2000, http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/events/reith_2000/lecture5.stm
143. Singh, S (2000a) ‘Indigenous community bans TNC researchers’, South-North Development Monitor, 24 February, www.twnside.org.sg/title/bans.htm
144. Singh, S (2000b) ‘Rampant biopiracy of South’s biodiversity’, Third World Network, 20 July, www.twnside.org.sg/title/rampant.htm
145. Singh Nijar, G (1998) ‘Community intellectual property rights protect indigenous knowledge’. Biotechnology and Development Monitor, no 36, pp11–12
146. Specter, M (2000) ‘The Pharmageddon riddle’, The New Yorker, 10 April, pp58–71, www.michaelspecter.com/ny/2000/2000_04_10_monsanto.html.
147. Swiderska, K (2001) Stakeholder Participation in Policy on Access to Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Benefit-sharing, International Institute for Environment and Development, London, pp32
148. Tauli-Corpuz, V (1999) Impacts of WTO on the Environment, Cultures and Indigenous Peoples, Presentation to workshop on Human Face of Trade: Health and Environment, 27 November, Tebtebba Foundation (Indigenous Peoples’ International Centre for Policy Research and Education), Seattle, www.ratical.org/co-globalize/impactsofWTO.html
149. ten Kate, K and Laird, S (1999) The Commercial Use of Biodiversity, Earthscan Publications, London, pp398
150. Tlusty, M (2002) ‘The benefits and risks of aquacultural production for the aquarium trade’, Aquaculture, vol 205, pp203–19
151. Toledo, V (1991) ‘Patzcuaro’s lesson: nature, production and culture in an indigenous region of Mexico’ in M Oldfield and Alcorn, J (eds) Biodiversity: Culture, Conservation and Ecodevelopment, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado
152. Touch, C and Griffiths, D (2001) ‘Small-scale fish production – a success in Cambodia’, Catch and Culture: Fisheries Research and Development in the Mekong Region, vol 7:2 (December), Mekong River Commission, www.mrcmekong.org
153. Townsend, P (1998) Social Issues in Fisheries, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 375, FAO, Rome, pp93
154. Turner, N (1975) Food Plants of British Columbia Indians: Part 1/Coastal Peoples, British Columbia Provincial Museum, Victoria, Canada, pp264
155. Turner, N (2000) Coastal Peoples and Marine Plants on the Northwest Coast, Presentation to 26th Annual International Association of Marine Science Information Specialists and Librarians Conference
156. Turner, N (2002) The Forest and the Seaweed: Gitga’at Seaweed, Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Community Survival, Presentation to workshop on Local Knowledge, Natural Resources and Community Survival: Charting a Way Forward, 1–2 February, Prince Rupert, BC, Canada
157. UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development) Secretariat (2000) Systems and National Experiences for Protecting Traditional, Knowledge, Innovations and Practices, UNCTAD, Geneva
158. US Department of State (2002) Fact Sheet: Guidelines for Collecting Genetic Materials Abroad, 6 May, US Department of State, Washington, DC
159. Veash, N (2000) ‘Biopiracy – a new threat to Amazon rainforest’s treasures’, The Independent, 16 October, London