The impact of genetically improved farmed Nile tilapia in Asia

Aquaculture Economics and Management

Volumn 4, Issue 1-2, 2000, Pages 107-124

  Dey, Madan M ^a  

^a WORLDFISH   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Fish sector model; Impact assessment; Improved Nile tilapia; Modified balance of trade function

Indexed keywords

EID: 85012485514     PISSN: 13657305     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13657300009380263     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ahmed, M., Dey, M.M. & Williams, M.J. (1999) Assessment of the impact of aquatic resources research by ICLARM: scope and methodologies. Naga, ICLARM Quarterly, 22 (2), 4-10.
2. Alston, J.M., Norton, G.N. & Pardey, P.G. (1995) Science Under Scarcity: Principles and Practice for Agricultural Research Evaluation and Priority Setting. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
3. Bantilan, C.S. & Ryan, J.G. (1996) Using impact assessment in research priority setting: developments at ICRISAT. In: Conference Proceedings of Global Agricultural Science Policy for the Twenty-First Century: Contributed Papers, 26-28 August 1996, pp. 427-456. The Conference Secretariat of Global Agricultural Science Policy for the Twenty-first Century, Melbourne, Australia.
4. Binswanger, H. (1974) A cost function approach to the measurement of elasticities of factor demand and elasticities of substitution. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56, 377-86.
5. Collinson, M.P. & Tolleus, E. (1994) The impact of the international agricultural centers: measurement, quantification and interpretation. Experimental Agriculture, 30, 395-419.
6. Deaton, A. & Muellbauer, J. (1980) An almost ideal demand system. American Economic Review, 70, 312-326.
7. Dey, M. M. (2000 –This issue—) Analysis of demand for fish in Bangladesh. Aquaculture Economics and Management (This issue)
8. Dey, M. M., Bimbao, G. B., Yong, L., Regaspi, P., Kohinoor, A. H. M., Pongthana, N. & Paraguas, F. J. (2000a 'This issue") Current status of production and consumption of tilapia in selected Asian countries. Aquaculture Economics and Management (This issue)
9. Dey, M. M., Eknath, A. E., Li S., Hussain, M.G., Thien, T. M., Hao, N. V., & Pongthana, N. (2000b –This issue—) Performance and nature of genetically improved farmed tilapia: a bioeconomic analysis. Aquaculture Economics and Management (This issue)
10. Dixon, P., Parmenter, B., Sutton, J. & Vincent, D. (1982) ORANI: A Multisectoral Model of the Australian Economy. North Holland, Amsterdam.
11. Duncan, R., & Tisdell, C. (1971) Research and technical progress: the returns to producers. The Economic Record, 47, 124-29.
12. Eknath, A.E., Dey, M.M., Rye, M, Gjerde, B., Abella, T.A., Sevilleja, R.A., Tayamen, M.M., Reyes, R.A. & Bentsen, H.B. (1998) Selective breeding of Nile tilapia for Asia. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 27, 89-96. Armidale, Australia.
13. Fulginiti, L.E., & Perrin, R. K. (1992) Prices and Productivity in Agriculture. Department of Agriculture Economics Journal paper no. J-14462, Iowa State University, Ames.
14. Fulginiti, L.E., & Perrin, R. K. (1993) The theory and measurement of production response under qoutas. Review of Economics and Statistics. 75, 97-106.
15. Griliches, Z. (1958) Research costs and social returns: hybrid corn and related innovations. Journal of Political Economy, 66, 419-431.
16. ICLARM (1998) Dissemination and Evaluation of Genetically Improved Tilapia Species in Asia: Final Report. Asian Development Bank Regional Technical Assistance No. 5558, International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management, Makati City, Philippines.
17. Kohli, U. (1991) Technology, duality and foreign trade: the GNP function approach to modeling imports and exports. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, USA.
18. Under, R. & Jarreth, F. (1978) Supply shifts and the size of research benefits. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60, 48-58.
19. Martin, W.J. & Alston, J.M. (1994) A dual approach to evaluating research benefits in the presence of trade distortions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76, 26-35.
20. Norton, G.W. & Davis, J.S. (1981) Evaluating returns to agricultural research: a review. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63, 685-699.
21. Peterson, W. & Hayami, Y. (1977) Technical change in agriculture. In: A Survey of Agricultural Economics Literature (ed L. R. Martin), v.1, pp. 497-540. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
22. Reich, K. (1975) Multispecies fish culture (polyculture) in Israel. Bamidgeh 27, 85-99.
23. Rose, R. (1980) Supply shifts and the size of research benefits: comment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60, 834-844.
24. Schultz, T.W. (1953) The Economic Organization of Agriculture. McGraw Hill, New York.
25. Stickney, R.R. (1978) The polyculture alternative in aquatic food production. In: Drug and Food from the Sea-Myth or Reality? (eds P.N. Kaul & C.J. Sindermann), pp. 385-392. University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma.
26. Yashouv, A. (1969) The fish pond as an experimental model for study of interactions within and among fish populations. Verhandlungen. Internationale Vereinigung fuer theoretische und angewandte Limnologie, 17, 582-593.