Employees' experiences of workplace partnership in the private and public sector

Partnership and Modernisation in Employment Relations

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 184-197

  Richardson, Mike ^a   Stewart, Paul ^a   Danford, Andy ^a   Tailby, Stephanie ^a   Upchurch, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909002973     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203694381     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Ackers, P. and Payne, J. (1998) 'British trade unions and social partnership: rhetoric, reality and strategy', International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(3):529-550.
2. Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P. and Kalleberg, A.L. (2000) Manufacturing Advantage: Why High Performance Work Systems Pay Off. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
3. Burchell, B. (2002) 'The prevalence and redistribution of job insecurity and work intensification', in Burchell, B., Ladipo, D. and Wilkinson, F. (eds) Job Insecurity and Work Intensification. London: Routledge.
4. Cmnd 4014 (1998) Modern Local Government: In Touch with the People. London: The Stationery Office.
5. Geddes, M. (2001) 'What about the workers? Best Value, employment and work in local public services', Policy and Politics, 29(4):497-508.
6. Green, F. (2001) 'It's been a hard day's night: the concentration and intensification of work in late twentieth-century Britain', British Journal of Industrial Relations, 39(1):53-80.
7. Guest, D. and Peccei, R. (2001) 'Partnership at work: mutuality and the balance of advantage', British Journal of Industrial Relations, 39(2):207-236.
8. HMSO (1998) Fairness at Work White Paper: Employment relations Bill, Cm 3863, London:HMSO.
9. Hudson, M. (2002) 'Flexibility and the reorganisation of work', in Burchell, B., Ladipo, D. and Wilkinson, F. (eds) Job Insecurity and Work Intensification. London: Routledge.
10. Huselid, M.A. (1995) 'The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance', Academy of Management Journal, 38:635-672.
11. Kalleberg, A.L. (2001) 'Organising flexibility: the flexible firm in a new century', British Journal of Industrial Relations, 39(4):479-504.
12. Kochan, T. and Osterman, P. (1994) The Mutual Gains Enterprise: Forging a Winning Partnership Among Labor, Management and Government. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
13. Lawler, E., Mohrman, S.A. and Ledford, G.E. Jr (1992) Employee Involvement and Total Quality Management: Practices and Results in Fortune 1000 Companies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Martin, S. (2000) 'Implementing "Best Value": local services in transition', Public Administration, 78(1):209-227.
15. Osterman, P. (2000) 'Work reorganisation in an era of restructuring: trends in diffusion and effects on employee welfare', Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 53(2):179-197.
16. Oxenbridge, S. and Brown, W. (2002) 'Trade union organising, recognition and partnership strategies since 1999', Paper presented at the joint Economic and Social Research Council Future of Work Programme/TUC Seminar held at the TUC, London, 27 May 2002.
17. Ramsay, H., Scolarios, D. and Harley, B. (2000) 'Employees and high-performance work systems:testing inside the black box', British Journal of Industrial Relations, 38(4): 501-531.
18. Sisson, K. (1999) 'The "new" European social model: the end of the search for an orthodoxy or another false dawn?', Employee Relations, 21 (4-5):445-462.
19. Standing, G. (1999) Global Labour Flexibility: Seeking Distributive Justice. London: Macmillan.
20. TUC Partnership Institute (2002) 'Partnership, performance and employment: a review of the evidence', TUC, www.tuc.org.uk/pi/research.htm.
21. Wood, S. (1999) 'Getting the measure of the transformed high-performance organisation', British Journal of Industrial Relations, 37(3):391-417.