Detection of extracolonic pathologic findings with CT colonography: A discrete choice experiment of perceived benefits versus harms

Radiology

Volumn 273, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 144-152

  Plumb, Andrew A ^a   Boone, Darren ^a   Fitzke, Heather ^a   Helbren, Emma ^a   Mallett, Susan ^c   Zhu, Shihua ^d   Yao, Guiqing L ^e   Bell, Nichola ^a   Ghanouni, Alex ^b   Von Wagner, Christian ^b   Taylor, Stuart A ^a   Altman, Douglas G ^c   Lilford, Richard ^d   Halligan, Steve ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; COLORECTAL TUMOR; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; INCIDENTAL FINDING; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIOGRAPHY; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; HUMANS; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84908665504     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14131678     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Wernli KJ, Rutter CM, Dachman AH, Zafar HM. Suspected extracolonic neoplasms detected on CT colonography: Literature review and possible outcomes. Acad Radiol 2013; 20 (6) : 667-674.
2. Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Wilson LA, et al. Extracolonic findings at CT colonography: Evaluation of prevalence and cost in a screening population. Gastroenterology 2003; 124 (4) : 911-916.
3. Yee J, Kumar NN, Godara S, et al. Extracolonic abnormalities discovered incidentally at CT colonography in a male population. Radiology 2005; 236 (2) : 519-526.
4. Chin M, Mendelson R, Edwards J, Foster N, Forbes G. Computed tomographic colonography: Prevalence, nature, and clinical significance of extracolonic findings in a community screening program. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100 (12) : 2771-2776.
5. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2007; 357 (14) : 1403-1412.
6. Pickhardt PJ, Hanson ME, Vanness DJ, et al. Unsuspected extracolonic findings at screening CT colonography: Clinical and economic impact. Radiology 2008; 249 (1) : 151-159.
7. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Hanson ME, Hinshaw JL. CT colonography: Performance and program outcome measures in an older screening population. Radiology 2010; 254 (2) : 493-500.
8. Veerappan GR, Ally MR, Choi JH, Pak JS, Maydonovitch C, Wong RK. Extracolonic findings on CT colonography increases yield of colorectal cancer screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195 (3) : 677-686.
9. Stoop EM, De Haan MC, De Wijkerslooth TR, et al. Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13 (1) : 55-64.
10. Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Meiners RJ, et al. Colorectal and extracolonic cancers detected at screening CT colonography in 10, 286 asymptomatic adults. Radiology 2010; 255 (1) : 83-88.
11. Fletcher RH, Pignone M. Extracolonic findings with computed tomographic colonography: Asset or liability? Arch Intern Med 2008; 168 (7) : 685-686.
12. Rutter CM, Kuntz KM, Zauber AG; Colorectal Cancer Modeling Group in the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network. Extracolonic findings from CTC: Balancing risks and benefits. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193 (5) : W470; author reply W471.
13. Yee J, Sadda S, Aslam R, Yeh B. Extracolonic findings at CT colonography. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2010; 20 (2) : 305-322.
14. Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, Beil TL, Fu R. Screening for colorectal cancer: A targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2008; 149 (9) : 638-658.
15. Ghanouni A, Smith SG, Halligan S, et al. Public perceptions and preferences for CT colonography or colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening. Patient Educ Couns 2012; 89 (1) : 116-121.
16. Ryan M. Discrete choice experiments in health care. BMJ 2004; 328 (7436) : 360-361.
17. Marshall D, Bridges JF, Hauber B, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health -how are studies being designed and reported?: An update on current practice in the published literature between 2005 and 2008. Patient 2010; 3 (4) : 249-256.
18. von Wagner C, Ghanouni A, Halligan S, et al. Patient acceptability and psychologic consequences of CT colonography compared with those of colonoscopy: Results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial of symptomatic patients. Radiology 2012; 263 (3) : 723-731.
19. Boone D, Mallett S, Zhu S, et al. Patients' & healthcare professionals' values regarding true-& false-positive diagnosis when colorectal cancer screening by CT colonography: Discrete choice experiment. PLoS ONE 2013; 8 (12) : E80767.
20. Brenner DJ, Georgsson MA. Mass screening with CT colonography: Should the radiation exposure be of concern? Gastroenterology 2005; 129 (1) : 328-337.
21. Gigerenzer G. What are natural frequencies? BMJ 2011; 343: D6386.
22. Ahmed H, Naik G, Willoughby H, Edwards AGK. Communicating risk. BMJ 2012; 344: E3996.
23. Howlett DC, Drinkwater KJ, Lawrence D, Barter S, Nicholson T. Findings of the UK national audit evaluating image-guided or imageassisted liver biopsy. Part II. Minor and major complications and procedure-related mortality. Radiology 2013; 266 (1) : 226-235.
24. Eng J. Sample size estimation: How many individuals should be studied? Radiology 2003; 227 (2) : 309-313.
25. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.Rproject. org/. Accessed April 23, 2014.
26. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Sox HC, Fischhoff B, Welch HG. US women's attitudes to false positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: Cross sectional survey. BMJ 2000; 320 (7250) : 1635-1640.
27. Song JH, Beland MD, Mayo-Smith WW. Incidental clinically important extraurinary findings at MDCT urography for hematuria evaluation: Prevalence in 1209 consecutive examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199 (3) : 616-622.
28. Johnson KM, Dennis JM, Dowe DA. Extracardiac findings on coronary CT angiograms: Limited versus complete image review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195 (1) : 143-148.
29. Jacobs PCA, Mali WPTM, Grobbee DE, van der Graaf Y. Prevalence of incidental findings in computed tomographic screening of the chest: A systematic review. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2008; 32 (2) : 214-221.
30. Berland LL, Silverman SG, Gore RM, et al. Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT: White paper of the ACR incidental findings committee. J Am Coll Radiol 2010; 7 (10) : 754-773.
31. van De Wiel JC, Wang Y, Xu DM, et al. Neglectable benefit of searching for incidental findings in the Dutch-Belgian lung cancer screening trial (NELSON) using low-dose multidetector CT. Eur Radiol 2007; 17 (6) : 1474-1482.
32. Ryan M, Scott DA, Reeves C, et al. Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: A systematic review of techniques. Health Technol Assess 2001; 5 (5) : 1-186.
33. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science 1974; 185 (4157) : 1124-1131.