Critical race theory meets social science

Annual Review of Law and Social Science

Volumn 10, Issue , 2014, Pages 149-167

  Carbado, Devon W ^a   Roithmayr, Daria ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical race theory; Critical social science; Implicit bias; Social science

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908662058     PISSN: 15503585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030928     Document Type: Review

References (114)

1. Adarand v. Pena, 515 U.S. 200 (1995).
2. Armour J. 1994. Race ipsa loquitor: of reasonable racists, intelligent Bayesians, and involuntary negrophobes. Stanford Law Rev. 46:781-816.
3. Banaji MR, Nosek BA, Greenwald AG. 2004. No place for nostalgia in science: A response to Arkes and Tetlock. Psychol. Inq. 15:279-89.
4. Barnes M, Chang R. 2012. Analyzing stops, citations, and searches in Washington and beyond. Seattle Univ. Law Rev. 35:673-93.
5. Barnes M, Onwuachi-Willig A. 2005. By any other name? On being regarded as black, and why Title VII should apply even if Lakisha and Jamal are white. Wis. Law Rev. 2005:1283-343.
6. Blumenbach JF. 1795 (1865). On the natural variety of mankind. In The Anthropological Treatises of Johann Friedrich Blumenbach, ed. and transl. T Bendyshe, pp. 145-276. London: Longman. 3rd ed.
7. Bridges K. 2011. Reproducing Race: An Ethnography of Pregnancy as a Site of Racialization. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press.
8. Bridges K. 2013. The dangerous law of biological race. Fordham Law Rev. 82:21-80.
9. Brooks RL. 2008. Conley and Twombly: A critical race theory perspective. Howard Law J. 52:31-72.
10. Brown D. 2004. Fighting racism in the twenty-first century. Washington Lee Law Rev. 61:1485-99.
11. Butler P. 2010. The white Fourth Amendment. Tex. Tech Law Rev. 43:245-54.
12. Carbado D. 2002. (E)Racing the Fourth Amendment. Mich. Law Rev. 100:946-1043.
13. Carbado D. 2009. Yellow by law. Calif. Law Rev. 97:633-92.
14. Carbado D. 2011. Critical what what? Conn. Law Rev. 43:1593-643.
15. Carbado D. 2013. Discrimination on the basis of racial orientation. Presented at Divers. Incl. All Work. Group Meet., June 21-22, Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. Cent. Leadersh. Ethics, Columbia Bus. Sch., New York.
16. Carbado D, Gulati M. 2000. Working identity. Cornell Law Rev. 85:1259-308.
17. Carbado D, Gulati M. 2003. The law and economics of critical race theory. Yale Law J. 112:1157-828.
18. Carbado D, Gulati M. 2009. Race to the top of the corporate ladder: what minorities do when they get there. Res. Law Econ. 24:237-70.
19. Carbado D, Gulati M. 2013. Acting White: Rethinking Race in Post-Racial America. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
20. Carbado D, Harris C. 2008. The new racial preferences. Calif. Law Rev. 96:1139-214.
21. Cho S. 2008. Embedded whiteness: Theorizing exclusion in public contracting. Berkeley Raza Law J. 19:5-26.
22. Cho S. 2009. Post-racialism. Iowa Law Rev. 95:1589-645.
23. Coase R. 1960. The problem of social cost. J. Law Econ. 3:1-44.
24. Correll J, Wittenbrink B, Park B, Judd CM, Sadler MS, Keesee T. 2007. Across the thin blue line: police officers and racial bias in the decision to shoot. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 92:1006-23.
25. Crenshaw K. 1988. Race, reform, and retrenchment: Transformation and legitimation in antidiscrimination law. Harvard Law Rev. 101:1331-87.
26. Crenshaw K. 1996. Introduction. In Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings That Formed the Movement, ed. K Crenshaw, N Gotanda, G Peller, K Thomas, pp. xiii-xxxii. New York: New Press.
27. Crenshaw K. 2011. Twenty years of critical race theory: looking back to move forward. Conn. Law Rev. 43:1253-352.
28. Crenshaw K, Peller G. 1993. Reel time/real justice. Denver Univ. Law Rev. 70:283-96.
29. Culp JM Jr, Harris A, Valdes M. 2003. Subject unrest. Stanford Law Rev. 55:2435-52.
30. Delgado R. 1984. Commentary: The imperial scholar: reflections on a review of civil rights literature. Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 132:561-78.
31. Delgado R. 1992. The imperial scholar revisited: how to marginalize outsider writing, ten years later. Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 140:1349-72.
32. Delgado R, Stefancic J. 1994. Failed Revolutions: Social Reform and the Limits of Legal Imagination. Boulder, CO: Westview.
33. Eberhardt J, Purdie V, Goff P, Davies P. 2004. Seeing black: race, crime, and visual processing. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 87:876-93.
34. Ellickson R. 1991. Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
35. Farber D, Sherry S. 1997. Beyond All Reason: The Radical Assault on Truth in American Law. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
36. Finneran L, Kelly M. 2003. Social networks and inequality. J. Urban Econ. 53:282-99.
37. Freeman A. 1988. Racism, rights and the quest for equality of opportunity: A critical legal essay. Harvard Civ. Rights-Civ. Lib. Law Rev. 23:295-392.
38. Gilliam F, Iyengar S. 2000. Prime suspects: The influence of local television news on the viewing public. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 44:560-73.
39. Gómez L. 2004. A tale of two genres: on the real and ideal links between law and society and critical race theory. In The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society, ed. A Sarat, pp. 453-70. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
40. Gómez L. 2008. Manifest Destinies: The Making of the Mexican American Race. New York: NYU Press.
41. Gómez L. 2012. Looking for race in all the wrong places. Law Soc. Rev. 46:221-45.
42. Gómez L. 2013. Taking the social construction of race seriously in health disparities research. See Gómez & Lopez 2013, pp. 1-22.
43. Gómez L, Lopez N, eds. 2013. Mapping Race: Critical Approaches to Health Disparities. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press.
44. Gould SJ. 1981. Evolution as fact and theory. Discover 2:34-37.
45. Gouldner A. 1975. The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. New York: Basic Books.
46. Guthrie R. 1998. Even the Rat Was White: A Historical View of Psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. 2nd ed.
47. Haney-López IF. 2000. Institutional racism: judicial conduct and a new theory of racial discrimination. Yale Law J. 109:1717-884.
48. Harris A. 1994. Foreword: The jurisprudence of reconstruction. Calif. Law Rev. 82:741-85.
49. Harris C, Kidder W. 2004. The black student mismatchmyth in legal education: The systemic flaws in Richard Sander's affirmative action study. J. Blacks High. Educ. 46:102-5.
50. Harvey H. 2012. Race, markets, and Hollywood's perpetual antitrust dilemma. Mich. J. Race Law 18:1-61.
51. Herrnstein RJ, Murray C. 1994. The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. New York: Free Press.
52. Horkheimer M. 1937 (1972). Traditional and critical theory. In Critical Theory: Selected Essays, transl. MJ O'Connell, pp. 188-243. New York: Continuum.
53. Houh E. 2006. Still, at the margins. Law Soc. Rev. 40:481-91.
54. Ioannides S, Nielsen K. 2007. Economics and the social sciences: synergies and trade-offs. In Economics and the Social Sciences: Boundaries, Interaction and Integration, ed. S Ioannides, K Nielsen, pp. 1-30. Northampton, MA: Elgar.
55. Johnson K, Onwuachi-Willig A. 2005. Cry me a river: The limits of a systemic analysis of affirmative action in American law schools. Afr.-Am. Law Policy Rep. 17:1-28.
56. Kang J. 2005. Trojan horses of race. Harvard Law Rev. 118:1489-593.
57. Kang J. 2010. Implicit bias and the pushback from the left. St. Louis Univ. Law J. 54:1139-49.
58. Kang J. 2012. Bits of bias. In Implicit Racial Bias Across the Law, ed. J Levinson, RJ Smith, pp. 132-45. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
59. Kang J, Bennet M, Carbado D, Casey P, Dasgupta N, et al. 2012. Implicit bias in the courtroom. UCLA Law Rev. 59:1124-86.
60. Krieger LH. 1995. The content of our categories: A cognitive bias approach to discrimination and equal employment opportunity. Stanford Law Rev. 47:1161-248.
61. Lane KA, Kang J, Banaji MR. 2007. Implicit social cognition and law. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 3:427-51.
62. Lawrence C III. 1987. The id, the ego, and equal protection: reckoning with unconscious racism. Stanford Law Rev. 39:317-88.
63. Lawrence C III. 2012. Listening for stories in all the right places: narrative and racial formation theory. Law Soc. Rev. 46:247-57.
64. Lee C. 2012. Reasonableness with teeth: The future of Fourth Amendment reasonableness analysis. Miss. Law J. 81:1133-82.
65. Matsuda M. 1987. Looking to the bottom: critical legal studies and reparations. Harvard Civ. Rights-Civ. Lib. Law Rev. 22:323-400.
66. Mills CW. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press.
67. Obasogie OK. 2006. Race in law and society: A critique. In Race, Law, and Society, ed. I Haney-López, pp. 445- 64. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
68. Obasogie OK. 2008. Beyond best practices: strict scrutiny as a regulatory model for race-specific remedies. J. Law Med. Ethics 36:491-96.
69. Obasogie OK. 2011. Race, genetics, and the regulatory need for race impact assessments. In Race and the Genetic Revolution: Science, Myth, and Culture, ed. S Krimsky, K Sloan, pp. 255-70. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
70. Obasogie OK. 2013. Foreword: critical race theory and empirical methods. UC Irvine Law Rev. 3:183-86.
71. Obasogie OK. 2014. Blinded by Sight: Seeing Through the Eyes of the Blind. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
72. Onwuachi-Willig A, Houh E, Campbell M. 2008. Cracking the egg: Which came first-stigma or affirmative action? Calif. Law Rev. 96:1299-352.
73. Parks GS. 2008a. Introduction. In Critical Race Realism: Intersections of Psychology, Race, and Law, ed. GS Parks, SE Jones, WJ Cardi, pp. xv-xvi. New York: New Press.
74. Parks GS. 2008b. Toward a critical race realism. Cornell J. Law Public Policy 17:683-745.
75. Parks GS. 2012. Judging racism. Cardozo Law Rev. De Novo 2012:238-47.
76. Parks GS, Rachlinski JJ. 2010. Implicit bias, election '08, and the myth of a post-racial America. Fla. St. Univ. Law Rev. 37:659-715.
77. Parks GS, Roberson Q. 2011. "18 million cracks": gender's role in the 2008 presidential campaign. William Mary J. Women Law 17:321-45.
78. Paul-Emile K. 2012. The regulation of race in science. George Washington Law Rev. 80:1115-73.
79. Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256 (1979).
80. Posner RA. 1997. The skin trade. New Repub. 217(15):40-43.
81. Quintanilla V. 2011. Beyond common sense: A social psychological study of Iqbal's effect on claims of race discrimination. Mich. J. Race Law 17:1-61.
82. Quintanilla V. 2012. Judicial mindsets: The social psychology of implicit theories of the law. Neb. Law Rev. 90:611-46.
83. Raghunandan D. 1989. Walking on three legs: science, common sense, and ideology. Soc. Sci. 17:92-100.
84. Richardson LS, Goff P. 2012. Self-defense and suspicion heuristic. Iowa Law Rev. 98:293-334.
85. Roberts DE. 1991. Punishing drug addicts who have babies: women of color, equality, and the right of privacy. Harvard Law Rev. 104:1419-82.
86. Roberts DE. 1995. The genetic tie. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 62:209-74.
87. Roberts DE. 1997. Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction and the Meaning of Liberty. New York: Pantheon.
88. Roberts DE. 2001. Shattered Bonds: The Color of Child Welfare. New York: Basic Books.
89. Roberts DE. 2004. The social andmoral cost of mass incarceration in African American communities. Stanford Law Rev. 56:1271-305.
90. Roberts DE. 2008. The racial geography of child welfare: Toward a new research paradigm. Child Welf. 87:125- 50.
91. Roberts DE. 2011a. Fatal Invention: How Science, Politics, and Big Business Re-create Race in the Twenty-First Century. New York: New Press.
92. Roberts DE. 2011b. What's wrong with race-based medicine? Genes, drugs, and health disparities. Minn. J. Law Sci. Technol. 12:1-21.
93. Roberts DE. 2012a. Debating the cause of health disparities: implications for bioethics and racial equality. Cambridge Q. Healthc. Ethics 21:332-41.
94. Roberts DE. 2012b. Prison, foster care, and the systematic punishment of black mothers. UCLA Law Rev. 59:1474-500.
95. Robinson R. 2008a. Perceptual segregation. Columbia Law Rev. 108:1-89.
96. Robinson R. 2008b. Structural dimensions of romantic preferences. Fordham Law Rev. 76:2787-819.
97. Roithmayr D. 2000. Barriers to entry: A market lock-in model of discrimination. Va. Law Rev. 86:727-99.
98. Roithmayr D. 2003. Locked in inequality: The persistence of discrimination. Mich. J. Race Law 9:31-74.
99. Roithmayr D. 2004. Locked in segregation. Va. J. Soc. Policy Law 12:197-259.
100. Roithmayr D. 2008. Them that has, gets. Miss. Coll. Law Rev. 27:373-406.
101. Roithmayr D. 2010. Racial cartels. Mich. J. Race Law 16:45-79.
102. Roithmayr D. 2014. Reproducing Racism: How Everyday Choices Lock InWhite Advantage. New York: NYU Press.
103. Rosen J. 1996. The Bloods and the Crits. New Repub. 215(24):27-42.
104. Ross D. 1992. The Origins of American Social Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
105. Rudy-Cooper F. 2006. Against bipolar black masculinity: intersectionality, assimilation, identity performance, and hierarchy. UC Davis Law Rev. 39:853-903.
106. Sander R. 2004.Asystemic analysis of affirmative action in American law schools. Stanford Law Rev. 57:367-483.
107. Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985).
108. Tushnet M. 1984. An essay on rights. Tex. Law Rev. 62:1363-404.
109. Valdes F, Culp J, Harris A, eds. 2002. Crossroads, Directions, and a New Critical Race Theory. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.
110. Wallerstein I. 2003. Anthropology, sociology, and other dubious disciplines. Curr. Anthropol. 44:453-65.
111. Washington v. Davis, 426 U.S. 229 (1976).
112. Williams P. 1992. The Alchemy of Race and Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
113. Wilson HT. 1986. Critical theory's critique of social science: episodes in a changing problematic from Adorno to Habermas, part II.Hist. Eur. Ideas 7:287-302.
114. Zuberi T, Bonilla-Silva E. 2008. Telling the real tale of the hunt: Toward a race conscious sociology of racial stratification. In White Logic, White Methods: Racism and Methodology, ed. T Zuberi, E Bonilla-Silva, pp. 3- 30. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.