The effect of tasting sheet shape on product configurations and panellists' performance in sensory projective mapping of brandy products

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 40, Issue PA, 2015, Pages 132-136

  Louw, Leanie ^a,b   Oelofse, Sulette ^b   Naes, Tormod ^c,d   Lambrechts, Marius ^a,b   van Rensburg, Pierre ^a,b   Nieuwoudt, Hélène ^a  

^a STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

^b Distell Ltd   (South Africa)

^c NOFIMA   (Norway)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Brandy; Panellist performance; Projective mapping; Sheet shape

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908607201     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.09.011     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Abdi H. Rv and congruence coefficients. Encyclopedia of measurement & statistics 2007, 849-853. SAGE Publications Inc. N.J. Salkind (Ed.).
2. Barcenas P., Pérez Elortondo F., Albisu M. Projective mapping in sensory analysis of ewes milk cheeses: A study on consumer and trained panel performance. Food Research International 2004, 37:723-729.
3. Cartier R., Rytz A., Lecomte A., Poblete F., Krystlik J., Belin E., et al. Sorting procedure as an alternative to quantitative descriptive analysis to obtain a product sensory map. Food Quality and Preference 2006, 17:562-571.
4. Dehlholm, C. (2013). Descriptive sensory evaluations: Comparison and applicability of novel rapid methodologies (Ph.D. thesis). ISBN 978-87-7611-592-0.
5. Dehlholm C., Brockhoff P.B., Meinert L., Aaslung M.D., Bredie W.L.P. Rapid descriptive sensory methods - Comparison of Free Multiple Sorting, Partial Napping, Napping, Flash Profiling and conventional profiling. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 26:267-277.
6. Hopfer H., Heymann H. A summary of projective mapping observations - The effect of replicates and shape, and individual performance measurements. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 28:164-181.
7. Kennedy J., Heymann H. Projective mapping and descriptive analysis of milk and dark chocolates. Journal of Sensory Studies 2009, 24:220-233.
8. León K., Mery D., León J. Color measurement in L*a*b*units from RGB digital images. Food Research International 2006, 39(10):1084-1091.
9. Louw L., Malherbe S., Naes T., Lambrechts M., Van Rensburg P., Nieuwoudt H. Validation of two Napping® techniques as rapid sensory screening tools for high alcohol products. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 30:192-201.
10. Louw L., Oelofse S., Næs T., Lambrechts M., Van Rensburg P., Nieuwoudt H. Trained sensory panellists' response to product alcohol content in the projective mapping task: Observations on alcohol content, product complexity and prior knowledge. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 34:37-44.
11. Nestrud M.A., Lawless H.T. Perceptual mapping of apples and cheeses using projective mapping and sorting. Journal of Sensory Studies 2010, 25:390-405.
12. Pagès J. Collection and analysis of perceived product inter-distances using multiple factor analysis: Application to the study of 10 white wines from the Loire valley. Food Quality and Preference 2005, 16(7):642-649.
13. Parr W.V., White K.G., Heatherbell D.A. The nose knows: Influence of colour on perception of wine aroma. Journal of Wine Research 2003, 14:79-101.
14. Perrin L., Symoneaux R., Maitre I., Asselin C., Jourjon F., Pages J. Comparison of three sensory methods for use with the Napping® procedure: Case of wines from Loire valley. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:1-11.
15. Risvik E., McEwan J.A., Colwill J.S., Rogers R., Lyon D.H. Projective mapping: A tool for sensory analysis and consumer research. Food Quality and Preference 1994, 5:263-269.
16. Risvik E., McEwan J.A., Rødbotten M. Evaluation of sensory profiling and projective mapping data. Food Quality and Preference 1997, 8:63-71.
17. Robert P., Escoufier Y. A unifying tool for linear multivariate statistical methods: The RV-coefficient. Applied Statistics 1976, 25:257-265.
18. Sharpe F.R., Garvey T.B., Pyne N.S. The measurement of beer and wort colour - A new approach. Journal of the Institute of Brewers 1992, 98:321-324.
19. Torri L., Dinella C., Recchia A., Næs T., Tuorila H., Monteleone E. Projective mapping for interpreting wine aroma differences as perceived by naïve and experienced assessors. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 29:6-15.
20. Veinand B., Godefroy C., Adam C., Delarue J. Highlight of important product characteristics for consumers. Comparison of three sensory descriptive methods performed by consumers. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 22:474-485.