Social Representations of Brain Research: Exploring Public (Dis)engagement With Contemporary Neuroscience

Science Communication

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 617-645

  O’Connor, Cliodhna ^a   Joffe, Helene ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

brain; dys appearance; interviews; neuroscience; social representations; thematic analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908606516     PISSN: 10755470     EISSN: 15528545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1075547014549481     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bauer M. W.The medicalization of science news - from the “rocket-scalpel” to the “gene-meteorite” complex.Social Science Information. 1998;37:731-751
2. Bauer M. W.,Gaskell G.Towards a paradigm for research on social representations.Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 1999;29:163-186
3. Braun V.,Clarke V.Using thematic analysis in psychology.Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3:77-101
4. Breakwell G. M.Representations of the social. Deaux K.Philogène G., ed. Oxford, England: Blackwell; 2001:271-284.
5. Bröer C.,Heerings M.Neurobiology in public and private discourse: the case of adults with ADHD.Sociology of Health & Illness. 2013;35:49-65
6. Buchman D. Z.,Borgelt E. L.,Whiteley L.,Illes J.Neurobiological narratives: Experiences of mood disorder through the lens of neuroimaging.Sociology of Health & Illness. 2013;35:66-81
7. Chan T. W.,Goldthorpe J. H.Social status and newspaper readership.American Journal of Sociology. 2007;112:1095-1134
8. Choudhury S.,McKinney K. A.,Merten M.Rebelling against the brain: Public engagement with the “neurological adolescent.”.Social Science & Medicine. 2012;74:565-573
9. Durant J.,Evans G.,Thomas G.Public understanding of science in Britain: The role of medicine in the popular representation of science.Public Understanding of Science. 1992;1:161-182
10. Farr R. M.Common sense, science and social representations.Public Understanding of Science. 1993;2:189-204
11. Fiske S.,Cuddy A. J. C.,Glick P.,Xu J.A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002;82:878-902
12. Haynes R.From alchemy to artificial intelligence: Stereotypes of the scientist in Western literature.Public Understanding of Science. 2003;12:243-253
13. Herzlich C.Health and illness: A social psychological analysis. London, England: Academic Press; 1973:
14. Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology. Irwin A.Wynne B., ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1996:
15. Jodelet D.Social representations. Farr R. M.Moscovici S., ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984:211-237.
16. Jodelet D.Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context. Kim U.Berry J. W., ed. London, England: Sage; 1993:177-191.
17. Joffe H.Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: An introduction for students and practitioners. Harper D.Thompson A., ed. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012:209-223.
18. Joffe H.,Elsey J.Free association in psychology and the Grid Elaboration Method.Review of General Psychology. in press;:
19. Joffe H.,Farr R. M.Self-proclaimed ignorance about public affairs.Social Science Information. 1996;35:69-92
20. Joffe H.,Haarhoff G.Representations of far-flung illnesses: The case of Ebola in Britain.Social Science & Medicine. 2002;54:955-969
21. Joffe H.,Staerklé C.The centrality of the self-control ethos in Western aspersions regarding outgroups: A social representational approach to stereotype content.Culture & Psychology. 2007;13:395-418
22. Jovchelovitch S.The rehabilitation of common sense: Social representations, science and cognitive polyphasia.Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 2008;38:431-448
23. Jovchelovitch S.,Gervais M.-C.Social representations of health and illness: The case of the Chinese community in England.Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 1999;9:247-260
24. Landis J. R.,Koch G. G.The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174
25. Leder D.The absent body. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1990:
26. Littlejohn S. W.,Foss K. A.Theories of human communication. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press; 2010:
27. Meier B. P.,Schnall S.,Schwarz N.,Bargh J. A.Embodiment in social psychology.Topics in Cognitive Science. 2012;4:705-716
28. Meurk C.,Carter A.,Hall W.,Lucke J.Public understandings of addiction: Where do neurobiological explanations fit?.Neuroethics. 2014;7:51-62
29. Michael M.Publics performing publics: Of PiGs, PiPs and politics.Public Understanding of Science. 2009;18:617-631
30. Moscovici S.Psychoanalysis: Its image and its public. Cambridge, England: Polity Press; 2008:
31. O’Connor C.,Rees G.,Joffe H.Neuroscience in the public sphere.Neuron. 2012;74:220-226
32. O’Connor C.,Joffe H.How has neuroscience affected lay understandings of personhood? A review of the evidence.Public Understanding of Science. 2013;22:254-268
33. Ortega F.The cerebral subject and the challenge of neurodiversity.BioSocieties. 2009;4:425-445
34. Petkova K.,Boyadjieva P.The image of the scientist and its functions.Public Understanding of Science. 1994;3:215-224
35. Pickersgill M.,Cunningham-Burley S.,Martin P.Constituting neurologic subjects: Neuroscience, subjectivity and the mundane significance of the brain.Subjectivity. 2011;4:346-365
36. Racine E.,Waldman S.,Rosenberg J.,Illes J.Contemporary neuroscience in the media.Social Science & Medicine. 2010;71:725-733
37. Rose N.The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2007:
38. Singh I.Brain talk: Power and negotiation in children’s discourse about self, brain and behaviour.Sociology of Health & Illness. 2013a;35:813-827
39. Singh I.Not robots: Children’s perspectives on authenticity, moral agency and stimulant drug treatments.Journal of Medical Ethics. 2013b;39:359-366
40. Smith N.,Joffe H.Climate change in the British press: The role of the visual.Journal of Risk Research. 2009;12:647-663
41. Van Gorp B.,Rommes E.,Emons P.From the wizard to the doubter: Prototypes of scientists and engineers in fiction and non-fiction media aimed at Dutch children and teenagers.Public Understanding of Science. 2014;23:646-659
42. Vidal F.Brainhood, anthropological figure of modernity.History of the Human Sciences. 2009;22:5-36
43. Wagner W.Vernacular science knowledge: Its role in everyday life communication.Public Understanding of Science. 2007;16:7-22
44. Human Functional Brain Imaging 1990–2009. London, England: The Wellcome Trust; 2011: