Measuring supply chain risk: Predicting motor carriers' ability to withstand disruptive environmental change using conjoint analysis

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Volumn 48, Issue , 2014, Pages 360-378

  Atwater, Craig ^a   Gopalan, Ram ^b   Lancioni, Richard ^a   Hunt, James ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conjoint analysis; Motor carriers; Scoring model; Supply chain risk

Indexed keywords

STATISTICAL METHODS; SUPPLY CHAINS; TRUCKS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CONJOINT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL DISRUPTION; ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS; MOTOR CARRIERS; SCORING MODELS; SUPPLY CHAIN RISK; TYPE I AND TYPE II ERRORS;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; MEASUREMENT METHOD; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRUCKING;

EID: 84908570778     PISSN: 0968090X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2014.09.009     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Altman E.I., Haldeman R.G., Narayanan P. ZETA analysis: a new way to identify bankruptcy risk of corporations. J. Banking Finance 1977, 1(1):29-54.
2. Aziz M.A., Dar H.A. Predicting corporate bankruptcy: Where we stand?. Corporate Governance 2006, 6(1):18-29.
3. Bagheri M., Saccomanno F., Fu L. Modeling hazardous material risks for different train make-up plans. Transp. Res. E 2012, 48:907-918.
4. Balcaen S., Ooghe H. 35years of studies on business failure: an overview of the classic statistical methodologies and their related problems. Br. Acc. Rev. 2006, 38:63-89.
5. Beaver W. Financial ratios as predictors of failure. J. Acc. Res. 1966, 4(3):71-111. 1966 Supplement.
6. Bianco L., Caramia M., Giordani S. A bilevel flow model for hazmat transportation network design. Transp. Res. C 2009, 17:175-196.
7. Blackhurst J., Dunn K.S., Craighead C.W. An empirically derived framework of global supply resiliency. J. Bus. Logistics 2011, 32(4):374-391.
8. Cagliano A.C., De Marco A., Grimaldi S., Rafele C. An integrated approach to supply chain risk analysis. J. Risk Res. 2012, 15(7):817-840.
9. Chen I.J., Paulraj A. Towards a theory of supply chain management: the constructs and measurements. J. Oper. Manage. 2004, 22(2):119-151.
10. Cheng L., Grimm C. The application of empirical strategic management research to supply chain management. J. Bus. Logistics 2006, 27(1):1-17.
11. Corsi, T.M., Infanger, G.B., 2004. Motor Carrier Industry Profile Study, Financial and Operating Performance Profiles by Industry Segment: 2001-2002. Washington, D.C., US Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Office of Information Management.
12. Craighead C., Blackhurst J., Rungtusanatham M.J., Handfield R. The severity of supply chain disruptions: design characteristics and mitigation capabilities. Decis. Sci. 2007, 38(1):131-156.
13. Diamond, H.S., 1976. Pattern Recognition and the Detection of Corporate Failure (Ph.D. Dissertation). New York University.
14. Donath, M., Murray, D., Short, J., 2005. Homeland Security and the Trucking Industry. American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), Alexandria, VA.
15. DRI{dot operator}WEFA, Inc. 2002. Truck Transportation, Industry Yearbook.
16. Ellis S.C., Henry R.M., Shockley J. Buyer perceptions of supply disruption risk: a behavioral view and empirical assessment. J. Oper. Manage. 2011, 28(1):34-46.
17. Frank W.C., Thill J.C., Batta R. Spatial decision support system for hazardous material truck routing. Transp. Res. C 2000, 8:337-359.
18. Glickman T. An expeditious risk assessment of the highway transportation of flammable liquids in bulk. Transp. Sci. 1991, 25(2):115-123.
19. Golob F.T., Regan A.C. Trucking industry adoption of information technology: a multivariate discrete choice model. Transp. Res. C 2002, 10:205-228.
20. Green P.E., Srinivasan V. Conjoint analysis in consumer research. J. Consum. Res. 1978, 5(3):103-123.
21. Green P.E., Krieger A.M., Wind Y. Thirty years of conjoint analysis: reflections and prospects. Interfaces 2001, 31(3):S56-S73.
22. Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L. Multivariate Data Analysis 2006, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. sixth ed.
23. Heal, G., Kunreuther, H., 2010. December. In: A Networked World, No Longer Controlling our Own Destinies. Washington Post. . http://views.washingtonpost.com/leadership/guestinsights/2010/12/in-a-networked-world-no-longer-controlling-our-own-destinies.html.
24. Hendricks K.B., Singhal V.R. The effect of supply chain glitches on shareholder wealth. J. Oper. Manage. 2003, 21(5):501-533.
25. Hendricks K.B., Singhal V.R. An empirical analysis of the effect of supply chain disruptions on long-run stock price performance and equity risk of the firm. Prod. Oper. Manage. 2005, 14(1):35-52.
26. Hill N.T., Perry S.E., Andes S. Evaluating firms in financial distress: an event history analysis. J. Appl. Bus. Res. 1996, 12(3):60-70.
27. Jüttner U., Maklan S. Supply chain resilience in the global financial crisis: an empirical study. Supply Chain Manage. 2011, 16(4):246-259.
28. Kleindorfer P.R., Saad G.H. Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Prod. Oper. Manage. 2005, 14(1):53-68.
29. Lancioni, R., Smith, M., Stein, A., 2005. Supply Chain Security Study. Presentation, Temple University.
30. Liechty J.C., Fong D.K.H., DeSarbo W.S. Dynamic models incorporating individual heterogeneity: utility evolution in conjoint analysis. Marketing Sci. 2005, 24(2):285-293. Spring 2005.
31. List G.F., Mirchandani P.B., Turnquist M., Zografos K.G. Modeling and analysis for hazardous materials transportation: risk analysis, routing/scheduling and facility location. Transp. Sci. 1991, 25(2):100-114.
32. Lohrke F.T., Holloway B.B., Wooley T.W. Conjoint analysis in entrepreneurship research: a review and research agenda. Organiz. Res. Methods 2010, 13(1):16-30.
33. Marcotte P., Mercier A., Savard G., Verter V. Toll policies for mitigating hazardous materials transport risk. Transp. Sci. 2009, 43(2):228-243.
34. Meena P.L., Sarmah S.P., Sarkar A. Sourcing decisions under risk of catastrophic event disruptions. Transp. Res. E 2011, 47:1058-1074.
35. Narasimhan R., Talluri S. Perspectives on risk management in supply chains. J. Oper. Manage. 2009, 27(2):114-118.
36. Natarajarathinam M., Capar I., Arunachalam N. Managing supply chains in times of crisis: a review of the literature and insights. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logistics Manage. 2009, 39(7):535-555.
37. Neiger D., Rotaru K., Churilov L. Supply chain risk identification with value-focused process engineering. J. Oper. Manage. 2009, 27(2):154-168.
38. Ozguven E.E., Ozbay K. A secure and efficient inventory management system for disasters. Transp. Res. C 2011.
39. Pettit T.J., Fiksel J., Croxton K.L. Ensuring supply chain resilience: development of a conceptual framework. J. Bus. Logistics 2010, 31(1):1-21.
40. Platt H.D., Platt M.B. Predicting corporate financial distress: reflections on choice-based sample bias. J. Econ. Finance 2002, 26(2):184-199.
41. Platt H.D., Platt M.B., Pedersen J.G. Bankruptcy discrimination with real variables. J. Bus. Finance Acc. 1994, 21(4):491-510.
42. Qi Y., Zhao X., Chwen S. The impact of competitive strategy and supply chain strategy on business performance: the role of environmental uncertainty. Decis. Sci. 2011, 42(2):371-389.
43. Rao S., Goldsby T. Supply chain risks: a review and typology. Int. J. Logistics Manage. 2009, 20(1):97-123.
44. Rice J.B., Caniato F. Building a secure and resilient supply network. Supply Chain Manage. Rev. 2003, 7(5):22-31.
45. Singhal K., Singhal J. Opportunities for developing the science of operations and supply-chain management. J. Oper. Manage. 2012, 30(3):245-252.
46. Sodhi M.S., Son B., Tang C.S. Researchers' perspectives on supply chain risk management. Prod. Oper. Manage. 2011, 21(1):1-13.
47. Svensson G. A conceptual framework for the analysis of vulnerability in supply chains. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logistics Manage. 2000, 30(9):731-7520.
48. Svensson G. A conceptual framework of vulnerability in firms' inbound and outbound logistics flows. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logistics Manage. 2002, 32(1/2):110-134.
49. Svensson G. Key areas, causes and contingency planning of corporate vulnerability in supply chains: a qualitative approach. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logistics Manage. 2004, 34(9):728-748.
50. Taffler R.J. Forecasting company failure in the UK using discriminant analysis and financial ratio data. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A 1982, 145(3):342-358.
51. Tang O., Musa S.N. Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2011, 133(1):25-34.
52. Toubia O., Simester D., Hauser J., Dahan E. Fast polyhedral adaptive conjoint estimation. Marketing Sci. 2003, 22(3):273-303. Summer 2003.
53. Toubia O., Hauser J., Simester D. Polyhedral methods for adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis. J. Marketing Res. 2004, XLI:116-131.
54. Trkman P., McCormack K. Supply chain risk in turbulent environments - a conceptual model for managing supply chain network risk. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2009, 119(2):247-258.
55. Tsai M.C., Lai K.H., Llyod A.E., Lin H.J. The dark side of logistics outsourcing - unraveling the potential risks leading to failed relationships. Transp. Res. E 2012, 48:178-189.
56. TSI Methodology downloaded on August 1, 2014. http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/press_releases/bts032_14.
57. Verma M. Railroad transportation of dangerous goods: a conditional exposure approach to minimize transport risk. Transp. Res. C 2011, 19:790-802.
58. Verma M., Verter V., Zufferey N. A bi-objective model for planning and managing rail-truck intermodal transportation of hazardous materials. Transp. Res. E 2012, 48:132-149.
59. Wagner S.M., Bode C. An empirical investigation into supply chain vulnerability. J. Purchasing Supply Manage. 2006, 12(6):301-312.
60. Wagner S.M., Bode C. An empirical examination of supply chain performance along several dimensions of risk. J. Bus. Logistics 2008, 29(1):307-325.
61. Wagner S.M., Neshat N. A comparison of supply chain vulnerability indices for different categories of firms. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2012, 50(11):2877-2891.
62. Wagner S.M., Grosse-Ruyken P.T., Erhun F. The link between supply chain fit and financial performance of the firm. J. Oper. Manage. 2012, 30(4):340-353.
63. Wilson M.C. The impact of transportation disruptions on supply chain performance. Transp. Res. E 2007, 43:295-320.
64. Zavgeron C. Assessing the vulnerability to failure of American industrial firms: a logistic analysis. J. Bus. Finance Acc. 1985, 12(1):19-45.
65. Zingales L. Survival of the fittest or the fattest? Exit and financing in the trucking industry. J. Finance 1998, 53(2):905-938.
66. Zmijewsji M.E. Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. J. Acc. Res. 1984, 22:59-82. Supplement.