Erratum to: Wino-like Minimal Dark Matter and future colliders[JHEP10(2014), DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2014)033];Wino-like minimal dark matter and future colliders

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2014, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1-

  Cirelli, Marco ^a   Sala, Filippo ^a   Taoso, Marco ^a  

^a DIF   (France)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Supersymmetric Standard Model

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908536191     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2015)041     Document Type: Erratum

References (90)

1. [1] G. 't Hooft, Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking, NATO Sci. Ser. B 59 (1980) 135 [inSPIRE].
2. [2] T.L. Yoon and R. Foot, Cosmological implications of low scale quark lepton unification, Acta Phys. Polon. B 34 (2003) 2815 [hep-ph/0208018] [inSPIRE].
3. [3] M. Shaposhnikov, Is there a new physics between electroweak and Planck scales?, arXiv:0708.3550 [inSPIRE].
4. [4] S. Dubovsky, V. Gorbenko and M. Mirbabayi, Natural Tuning: Towards A Proof of Concept, JHEP 09 (2013) 045 [arXiv:1305.6939] [inSPIRE].
5. [5] G.F. Giudice, Naturalness after LHC8, PoS(EPS-HEP 2013)163 [arXiv:1307.7879] [inSPIRE].
6. [6] M. Farina, D. Pappadopulo and A. Strumia, A modified naturalness principle and its experimental tests, JHEP 08 (2013) 022 [arXiv:1303.7244] [inSPIRE].
7. [7] F. Wilczek, Multiversality, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 193001 [arXiv:1307.7376] [inSPIRE].
8. [8] G. Busoni, A. De Simone, E. Morgante and A. Riotto, On the Validity of the Effective Field Theory for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 728 (2014) 412 [arXiv:1307.2253] [inSPIRE].
9. [9] G. Busoni, A. De Simone, J. Gramling, E. Morgante and A. Riotto, On the Validity of the Effective Field Theory for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC, Part II: Complete Analysis for the s-channel, JCAP 06 (2014) 060 [arXiv:1402.1275] [inSPIRE].
10. [10] G. Busoni, A. De Simone, T. Jacques, E. Morgante and A. Riotto, On the Validity of the Effective Field Theory for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC, Part III: Analysis for the t-channel, arXiv:1405.3101 [inSPIRE].
11. [11] O. Buchmueller, M.J. Dolan and C. McCabe, Beyond Effective Field Theory for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC, JHEP 01 (2014) 025 [arXiv:1308.6799] [inSPIRE].
12. [12] I.M. Shoemaker and L. Vecchi, Unitarity and Monojet Bounds on Models for DAMA, CoGeNT and CRESST-II, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 015023 [arXiv:1112.5457] [inSPIRE].
13. [13] H. Dreiner, D. Schmeier and J. Tattersall, Contact Interactions Probe Effective Dark Matter Models at the LHC, Europhys. Lett. 102 (2013) 51001 [arXiv:1303.3348] [inSPIRE].
14. [14] S. Chang, R. Edezhath, J. Hutchinson and M. Luty, Effective WIMPs, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 015011 [arXiv:1307.8120] [inSPIRE].
15. [15] H. An, L.-T. Wang and H. Zhang, Dark matter with t-channel mediator: a simple step beyond contact interaction, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 115014 [arXiv:1308.0592] [inSPIRE].
16. [16] Y. Bai and J. Berger, Fermion Portal Dark Matter, JHEP 11 (2013) 171 [arXiv:1308.0612] [inSPIRE].
17. [17] A. DiFranzo, K.I. Nagao, A. Rajaraman and T.M.P. Tait, Simplified Models for Dark Matter Interacting with Quarks, JHEP 11 (2013) 014 [arXiv:1308.2679] [inSPIRE].
18. [18] M. Papucci, A. Vichi and K.M. Zurek, Monojet versus rest ofthe world I: t-channel Models, arXiv:1402.2285 [inSPIRE].
19. [19] A. De Simone, G.F. Giudice and A. Strumia, Benchmarks for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC, JHEP 06 (2014) 081 [arXiv:1402.6287] [inSPIRE].
20. [20] M. Ibe, S. Matsumoto and R. Sato, Mass Splitting between Charged and Neutral Winos at Two-Loop Level, Phys. Lett. B 721 (2013) 252 [arXiv:1212.5989] [inSPIRE].
21. [21] M. Cirelli, N. Fornengo and A. Strumia, Minimal dark matter, Nucl. Phys. B 753 (2006) 178 [hep-ph/0512090] [inSPIRE].
22. [22] M. Cirelli and A. Strumia, Minimal Dark Matter: Model and results, New J. Phys. 11 (2009) 105005 [arXiv:0903.3381] [inSPIRE].
23. [23] A. Hryczuk, I. Cholis, R. Iengo, M. Tavakoli and P. Ullio, Indirect Detection Analysis: Wino Dark Matter Case Study, JCAP 07 (2014) 031 [arXiv:1401.6212] [inSPIRE].
24. [24] W. Chao, M. Gonderinger and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, Higgs Vacuum Stability, Neutrino Mass and Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 113017 [arXiv:1210.0491] [inSPIRE].
25. [25] BICEP2 collaboration, P.A.R. Ade et al., Detection of B-Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Scales by BICEP2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 241101 [arXiv:1403.3985] [inSPIRE].
26. [26] J.R. Espinosa, G.F. Giudice and A. Riotto, Cosmological implications ofthe Higgs mass measurement, JCAP 05 (2008) 002 [arXiv:0710.2484] [inSPIRE].
27. [27] A. Kobakhidze and A. Spencer-Smith, Electroweak Vacuum (In)Stability in an Inflationary Universe, Phys. Lett. B 722 (2013) 130 [arXiv:1301.2846] [inSPIRE].
28. [28] M. Fairbairn and R. Hogan, Electroweak Vacuum Stability in light ofBICEP2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 201801 [arXiv:1403.6786] [inSPIRE].
29. [29] K. Enqvist, T. Meriniemi and S. Nurmi, Higgs Dynamics during Inflation, JCAP 07 (2014) 025 [arXiv:1404.3699] [inSPIRE].
30. [30] A. Kobakhidze and A. Spencer-Smith, The Higgs vacuum is unstable, arXiv:1404.4709 [inSPIRE].
31. [31] A. Hook, J. Kearney, B. Shakya and K.M. Zurek, Probable or Improbable Universe? Correlating Electroweak Vacuum Instability with the Scale of Inflation, arXiv:1404.5953 [inSPIRE].
32. [32] J. Elias-Miro, J.R. Espinosa, G.F. Giudice, H.M. Lee and A. Strumia, Stabilization ofthe Electroweak Vacuum by a Scalar Threshold Effect, JHEP 06 (2012) 031 [arXiv:1203.0237] [inSPIRE].
33. [33] G.F. Giudice and A. Romanino, Split supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 699 (2004) 65 [Erratum ibid. B 706 (2005) 65-89] [hep-ph/0406088] [inSPIRE].
34. [34] M. Frigerio and T. Hambye, Dark matter stability and unification without supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 075002 [arXiv:0912.1545] [inSPIRE].
35. [35] R. Mahbubani and L. Senatore, The minimal model for dark matter and unification, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 043510 [hep-ph/0510064] [inSPIRE].
36. [36] J.D. Wells, Implications ofsupersymmetry breaking with a little hierarchy between gauginos and scalars, hep-ph/0306127 [inSPIRE].
37. [37] N. Arkani-Hamed and S. Dimopoulos, Supersymmetric unification without low energy supersymmetry and signatures for fine-tuning at the LHC, JHEP 06 (2005) 073
38. [hep-th/0405159] [inSPIRE].
39. [38] A. Arvanitaki, N. Craig, S. Dimopoulos and G. Villadoro, Mini-Split, JHEP 02 (2013) 126 [arXiv:1210.0555] [inSPIRE].
40. [39] L.J. Hall and Y. Nomura, Spread Supersymmetry, JHEP 01 (2012) 082 [arXiv:1111.4519] [inSPIRE].
41. [40] L.J. Hall, Y. Nomura and S. Shirai, Spread Supersymmetry with Wino LSP: Gluino and Dark Matter Signals, JHEP 01 (2013) 036 [arXiv:1210.2395] [inSPIRE].
42. [41] L.J. Hall and Y. Nomura, Grand Unification and Intermediate Scale Supersymmetry, JHEP 02 (2014) 129 [arXiv:1312.6695] [inSPIRE].
43. [42] L.J. Hall, Y. Nomura and S. Shirai, Grand Unification, Axion and Inflation in Intermediate Scale Supersymmetry, JHEP 06 (2014) 137 [arXiv:1403.8138] [inSPIRE].
44. [43] ATLAS collaboration, Search for charginos nearly mass degenerate with the lightest neutralino based on a disappearing-track signature in pp collisions at y/s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 112006 [arXiv:1310.3675] [inSPIRE].
45. [44] T. Cohen, R.T. D'Agnolo, M. Hance, H.K. Lou and J.G. Wacker, Boosting Stop Searches with a 100 TeV Proton Collider, arXiv:1406.4512 [inSPIRE].
46. [45] A. Alloul, N.D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr and B. Fuks, FeynRules 2.0 — A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2250 [arXiv:1310.1921] [inSPIRE].
47. [46] J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5: Going Beyond, JHEP 06 (2011) 128 [arXiv:1106.0522] [inSPIRE].
48. [47] T. Sjôstrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual, JHEP 05 (2006) 026 [hep-ph/0603175] [inSPIRE].
49. [48] A. Hook and A. Katz, Unbroken SU(2) at a 100 TeV collider, arXiv:1407.2607 [inSPIRE].
50. [49] DELPHES 3 collaboration, J. de Favereau et al., DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, JHEP 02 (2014) 057 [arXiv:1307.6346] [inSPIRE].
51. [50] http://www.physics.ucdavis.edu/^conway/research/software/pgs/pgs4-general.htm.
52. [51] CMS collaboration, Search for new physics in monojet events in pp collisions at Vs = 8 TeV, CMS-PAS-EXO-12-048 (2013).
53. [52] ATLAS collaboration, Search for New Phenomena in Monojet plus Missing Transverse Momentum Final States using 10 fb-1 of pp Collisions at ^fs = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, ATLAS-CONF-2012-147 (2012).
54. [53] CMS collaboration, Monophoton search, CMS-PAS-EXO-12-047 (2014).
55. [54] ATLAS collaboration, Search for dark matter candidates and large extra dimensions in events with a photon and missing transverse momentum in pp collision data at -y/s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 011802 [arXiv:1209.4625] [inSPIRE].
56. [55] CMS collaboration, Search for invisible decays ofHiggs bosons in the vector boson fusion and associated ZH production modes, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2980 [arXiv:1404.1344] [inSPIRE].
57. [56] M. Low and L.-T. Wang, Neutralino dark matter at 14 TeV and 100 TeV, JHEP 08 (2014) 161 [arXiv:1404.0682] [inSPIRE].
58. [57] P.J. Fox, R. Harnik, J. Kopp and Y. Tsai, Missing Energy Signatures ofDark Matter at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 056011 [arXiv:1109.4398] [inSPIRE].
59. [58] K. Hagiwara, D. Marfatia and T. Yamada, Isospin-Violating Dark Matter at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 094017 [arXiv:1207.6857] [inSPIRE].
60. [59] A.G. Delannoy et al., Probing Dark Matter at the LHC using Vector Boson Fusion Processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 061801 [arXiv:1304.7779] [inSPIRE].
61. [60] J.L. Feng and M.J. Strassler, Determination offundamental supersymmetry parameters from chargino production at LEP-2, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 4661 [hep-ph/9408359] [inSPIRE].
62. [61] J.L. Feng, T. Moroi, L. Randall, M. Strassler and S.-f. Su, Discovering supersymmetry at the Tevatron in wino LSP scenarios, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 1731 [hep-ph/9904250] [inSPIRE].
63. [62] J.F. Gunion and S. Mrenna, A study ofSUSY signatures at the Tevatron in models with near mass degeneracy ofthe lightest chargino and neutralino, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 015002 [hep-ph/9906270] [inSPIRE].
64. [63] J.F. Gunion and S. Mrenna, Probing models with near degeneracy ofthe chargino and LSP at a linear e+e-collider, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 075002 [hep-ph/0103167] [inSPIRE].
65. [64] A.J. Barr, C.G. Lester, M.A. Parker, B.C. Allanach and P. Richardson, Discovering anomaly mediated supersymmetry at the LHC, JHEP 03 (2003) 045 [hep-ph/0208214] [inSPIRE].
66. [65] M. Ibe, T. Moroi and T.T. Yanagida, Possible Signals of Wino LSP at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Lett. B 644 (2007) 355 [hep-ph/0610277] [inSPIRE].
67. [66] M.R. Buckley, L. Randall and B. Shuve, LHC Searches for Non-Chiral Weakly Charged Multiplets, JHEP 05 (2011) 097 [arXiv:0909.4549] [inSPIRE].
68. [67] G. Kane, R. Lu and B. Zheng, Discovering Gluino Events at LHC-8 via Disappearing Chargino Tracks, arXiv:1202.4448 [inSPIRE].
69. [68] R. Essig, Direct Detection ofNon-Chiral Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 015004 [arXiv:0710.1668] [inSPIRE].
70. [69] J. Hisano, K. Ishiwata and N. Nagata, Gluon contribution to the dark matter direct detection, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 115007 [arXiv:1007.2601] [inSPIRE].
71. [70] J. Hisano, K. Ishiwata, N. Nagata and T. Takesako, Direct Detection of Electroweak-Interacting Dark Matter, JHEP 07 (2011) 005 [arXiv:1104.0228] [inSPIRE].
72. [71] R.J. Hill and M.P. Solon, Universal behavior in the scattering ofheavy, weakly interacting dark matter on nuclear targets, Phys. Lett. B 707 (2012) 539 [arXiv:1111.0016] [inSPIRE].
73. [72] J. Hisano, K. Ishiwata and N. Nagata, Direct Search ofDark Matter in High-Scale Supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 035020 [arXiv:1210.5985] [inSPIRE].
74. [73] M. Cirelli, E. Del Nobile and P. Panci, Tools for model-independent bounds in direct dark matter searches, JCAP 10 (2013) 019 [arXiv:1307.5955] [inSPIRE].
75. [74] R.J. Hill and M.P. Solon, WIMP-nucleon scattering with heavy WIMP effective theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 211602 [arXiv:1309.4092] [inSPIRE].
76. [75] R.J. Hill and M.P. Solon, Standard Model anatomy ofWIMP dark matter direct detection I: weak-scale matching, arXiv:1401.3339 [inSPIRE].
77. [76] P Cushman Working Group Report: WIMP Dark Matter Direct Detection, arXiv:1310.8327 [inSPIRE].
78. [77] T. Cohen, M. Lisanti, A. Pierce and T.R. Slatyer, Wino Dark Matter Under Siege, JCAP 10 (2013) 061 [arXiv:1307.4082] [inSPIRE].
79. [78] J. Fan and M. Reece, In Wino Veritas? Indirect Searches Shed Light on Neutralino Dark Matter, JHEP 10 (2013) 124 [arXiv:1307.4400] [inSPIRE].
80. [79] PAMELA collaboration, O. Adriani et al., PAMELA results on the cosmic-ray antiproton flux from 60MeV to 180 GeV in kinetic energy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 121101 [arXiv:1007.0821] [inSPIRE].
81. [80] O. Adriani et al., Measurement of the flux of primary cosmic ray antiprotons with energies of 60MeV to 350 GeV in the PAMELA experiment, JETP Lett. 96 (2013) 621 [inSPIRE].
82. [81] H.E.S.S. collaboration, A. Abramowski et al., Search for photon line-like signatures from Dark Matter annihilations with H.E.S.S, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 041301 [arXiv:1301.1173] [inSPIRE].
83. [82] CTA collaboration, M. Doro et al., Dark Matter and Fundamental Physics with the Cherenkov Telescope Array, Astropart. Phys. 43 (2013) 189 [arXiv:1208.5356] [inSPIRE].
84. [83] M. Wood et al., Prospects for Indirect Detection ofDark Matter with CTA, arXiv:1305.0302 [inSPIRE].
85. [84] H. Silverwood, C. Weniger, P. Scott and G. Bertone, A realistic assessment ofthe CTA sensitivity to dark matter annihilation, arXiv:1408.4131 [inSPIRE].
86. [85] M. Cirelli and G. Giesen, Antiprotons from Dark Matter: Current constraints and future sensitivities, JCAP 04 (2013) 015 [arXiv:1301.7079] [inSPIRE].
87. [86] B. Bhattacherjee, M. Ibe, K. Ichikawa, S. Matsumoto and K. Nishiyama, Wino Dark Matter and Future dSph Observations, JHEP 07 (2014) 080 [arXiv:1405.4914] [inSPIRE].
88. [87] E. Ma and D. Suematsu, Fermion Triplet Dark Matter and Radiative Neutrino Mass, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 24 (2009) 583 [arXiv:0809.0942] [inSPIRE].
89. [88] M. Hirsch et al., WIMP dark matter as radiative neutrino mass messenger, JHEP 10 (2013) 149 [arXiv:1307.8134] [inSPIRE].
90. [89] A. Anandakrishnan, L.M. Carpenter and S. Raby, Degenerate gaugino mass region and mono-boson collider signatures, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 055004 [arXiv:1407.1833] [inSPIRE].