The linkages between deforestation, energy and growth for environmental degradation in Pakistan

Ecological Indicators

Volumn 49, Issue , 2015, Pages 95-103

  Ahmed, Khalid ^a   Shahbaz, Muhammad ^a   Qasim, Ahmer ^a   Long, Wei ^a  

^a WUHAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Cointegration; Deforestation; Energy consumption; Environmental Kuznets curve; Pakistan

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE; DEFORESTATION; ECONOMICS; ENERGY UTILIZATION; POPULATION STATISTICS;

BOUNDS TESTING APPROACHES; COINTEGRATION; DEPENDENT VARIABLES; ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVES; GRANGER CAUSALITY TEST; INDEPENDENT VARIABLES; PAKISTAN; RELIABILITY OF RESULTS;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

DEFORESTATION; ECONOMIC GROWTH; ENERGY USE; ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION; ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR; GRANGER CAUSALITY TEST; KUZNETS CURVE; POPULATION GROWTH; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; TRADE FLOW; TRADE-ENVIRONMENT RELATIONS;

PAKISTAN;

EID: 84908512373     PISSN: 1470160X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.040     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. 2 emission in Mongolia: an empirical analysis. Manage. Environ. Qual.: An Int. J. 25 (4), 505-516.
2. 2 emission in Pakistan using EKC hypothesis. J. Int. Trade Law Policy 12 (2), 188-200.
3. Ahmed, K., Long, W., 2012. Environmental Kuznets curve and Pakistan: an empirical analysis. Procedia Econ. Finance 1, 4-13.
4. Ahmed, K., Long, W., 2013b. Climate change and trade policy: from legal complications to time factor. J. Int. Trade Law. Policy 12 (3), 258-271.
5. Ali, J., Benjaminsen, T.A., Hammad, A.A., Dick, Ø.B., 2005. The road to deforestation: an assessment of forest loss and its causes in Basho Valley, Northern Pakistan. Global Environ. Change 15 (4), 370-380.
6. Ali, T., Ahmad, M., Shahbaz, B., Suleri, A., 2007. Impact of participatory forest management on financial assets of rural communities in Northwest Pakistan. Ecol. Econ. 63 (2), 588-593.
7. Altinaya, G., Karagol, E., 2004. Structural break, unit root, and the causality between energy consumption and GDP in Turkey. Energy Econ. 26, 985-994.
8. Ansuategi, A., Barbier, E., Perrings, C., 1998. The Environmental Kuznets curve. In: van den Bergh, J.C.J.M., Hofkes, M.W. (Eds.), Theory and Implementation of Sustainable Development Modelling. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
9. Bhattarai, M., Hammig, M., 2001. Institutions and the environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation: a crosscountry analysis for Latin America, Africa and Asia. World Dev. 29 (6), 995-1010.
10. Carvalho, T.S., Santiago, F.S., Perobelli, F.S., 2013. International trade and emissions: the case of the Minas Gerais state - 2005. Energy Econ. 40, 383-395.
11. Chiou-Wei, S.Z., Chen, C.F., Zhu, Z., 2008. Economic growth and energy consumption revisited - evidence from linear and nonlinear Granger causality. Energy Econ. 30 (6), 3063-3076.
12. Copeland, B.R., Taylor, M.S., 2003. Trade, growth and the environment(No. w 9823). National Bureau of Economic Research.
13. Culas, R.J., 2007. Deforestation and the environmental Kuznets curve: an institutional perspective. Ecol. Econ. 61 (2), 429-437.
14. DeFries, R.S., Rudel, T., Uriarte, M., Hansen, M., 2010. Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nat. Geosci. 3 (3), 178-181.
15. Dickinson, E., 2003. Hydrocolloids at interfaces and the influence on the properties of dispersed systems. Food Hydrocolloids 17 (1), 25-39.
16. Dinda, S., Coondoo, D., 2006. Income and emission: a panel data-based cointegration analysis. Ecol. Econ. 57, 167-181.
17. Engle, R.F., Granger, C.W., 1987. Co-integration and error correction: representation estimation and testing. Econom.: j. Econom. Soc. 251-276.
18. Fearnside, P.M., 1992. Forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia: comments on the estimate by Brown and Lugo. Interciencia. Caracas 17 (1), 19-27.
19. Fearnside, P.M., 1997. Greenhouse gases from deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: net committed emissions. Clim. Change 35 (3), 321-360.
20. Food Agriculture Organization (FAO), Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) annual report on 1954
21. Frankel, J.A., Rose, A.K., 2005. Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality. Rev. Econ. Stat. 87 (1), 85-91.
22. Goklany, I.M., 1995. Strategies to enhance adaptability: technological change, sustainable growth and free trade. Clim. Change 30 (4), 427-449.
23. Grossman, G., Krueger, A., 1995. Economic environment and the economic growth. Q. J. Econ. 110, 353-377.
24. Harbaugh, W.T., Levinson, A., Wilson, D.M., 2002. Reexamining the empirical evidence for an environmental Kuznets curve. Rev. Econ. Stat. 84 (3), 541-551.
25. Hassan, R.M., Hertzler, G., 1988. Deforestation from the overexploitation of wood resources as a cooking fuel: a dynamic approach to pricing energy resources in Sudan. Energy Econ. 10 (2), 163-168.
26. Heinrichs, H., Mayer, R., 1980. The role of forest vegetation in the biogeochemical cycle of heavy metals. J. Environ. Q. 9 (1), 111-118.
27. Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, N.,1993. Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Syst. J. 32 (1), 4-16.
28. Henderson-Sellers, A., Gornitz, V., 1984. Possible climatic impacts of land cover transformations: with particular emphasis on tropical deforestation. Clim. Change 6 (3), 231-257.
29. Horvath, R.J., 1997. Energy Consumption and the Environmental Kuznets Curve Debate. Department of Geography, University of Sydney, Australia, Mimeo.
30. Jalil, A., Mahmud, S.F., 2009. Environment Kuznets curve for emissions: a Cointegration analysis for china. Energy Policy 37, 5167-5172.
31. Jha, S.K., 1996. The Kuznets Curve: a reassessment. World Dev. 24 (4), 773-780.
32. Johansson, P.-O., Kriström, B., 2007. On a clear day you might see an environmental Kuznets curve. Environ. Resour. Econ. 37, 77-90.
33. Johansen, S., Juselius, K., 1990. Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration - with applications to the demand for money. Oxf. Bulletin Econ. Stat. 52 (2), 169-210.
34. Kaplan, M., Ozturk, I., Kalyoncu, H., 2011. Energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey: cointegration and causality analysis. Rom. J. Econ. Forecasting 2, 31-41.
35. Khan, M.A., Khan, M.Z., Zaman, K., Khan, M.M., Zahoor, H., 2013. Causal links between greenhouse gas emissions: economic growth and energy consumption in Pakistan: a fatal disorder of society. Renew. Sustainable Energy Rev. 25, 166-176.
36. Lettau, H., Lettau, K., Molion, L.C.B., 1979. Amazonia's hydrologic cycle and the role of atmospheric recycling in assessing deforestation effects. Monthly Weather Rev. 107 (3), 227-238.
37. Lucas, A., Morley, R., Cole, T.J., Lister, G., Leeson-Payne, C., 1992. Breast milk and subsequent intelligence quotient in children born preterm. Lancet 339 (8788), 261-264.
38. Mayer, R.E., 1984. Aids to text comprehension. Edu. Psychol. 19 (1), 30-42.
39. Miah, M.D., Masum, M.F.H., Koike, M., Akther, S., 2011. A review of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for deforestation policy in Bangladesh. iForest-Biogeosci. For. 4 (1), 16.
40. Molion, L.C.B., 1975. A climatomic study of the energy and moisture fluxes of the Amazonas basin with consideration of deforestation effects. Doctoral dissertation Tese de Doutoramento.
41. Mudakkar, S.R., Zaman, K., Khan, M.M., Ahmad, M., 2013. Energy for economic growth, industrialization: environment and natural resources: living with just enough. Renew. Sustainable Energy Rev. 25, 580-595.
42. Naito, T., Traesupap, S., 2014. The Relationship Between Mangrove Deforestation and Economic Development in Thailand, In Mangrove Ecosystems of Asia. Springer, New York pp. 273-294.
43. Narayan, P.K., Narayan, S., Prasad, A., 2008. A structural VAR analysis of electricity consumption and real GDP: evidence from the G7 countries. Energy Policy 36, 2765-2769.
44. Narayan, P.K., 2004. Reformulating Critical Values for the Bounds F-statistics Approach to Cointegration: an Application to the Tourism Demand Model for Fiji. Monash University.
45. Narayan, P.K., 2005. The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Appl. econ. 37 (17), 1979-1990.
46. Onafowora, O.A., Owoye, O., 2014. Bounds testing approach to analysis of the environment Kuznets curve hypothesis. Energy Econ. 44, 47-62.
47. Panayotou, T., 2003. Economic growth and the environment. Econ. Surv. Eur. 45-72.
48. Panayotou, T., 1993. Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development (No. 292778). International Labour Organization.
49. Panayotou, T., 1997. Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve: turning a black box into a policy tool. Environ. Dev. Econo. 2 (04), 465-484.
50. Pesaran, M.H., Pesaran, B., 1997. Working with Microfit 4.0: interactive econometric analysis [Windows version]. Oxford University Press.
51. Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y., Smith, R.J., 2001. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J. Appl. Econom. 16 (3), 289-326.
52. Peters, G.P., Minx, J.C., Weber, C.L., Edenhofer, O., 2011. Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 108 (21), 8903-8908.
53. Qazi, A.Q., Ahmed, K., Mudassar, M., 2012. Disaggregate energy consumption and industrial output in Pakistan: an empirical analysis (No. 2012-29). Econ. Discuss. Pap.
54. Roca, J., 2003. Do individual preferences explain Environmental Kuznets Curve? Ecol. Econ. 45 (1), 3-10.
55. Rudel, T.K., 2013. The national determinants of deforestation in sub-Saharan Africa. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 368 (1625) 20120405.
56. Rustad, L.E., Huntington, T.G., Boone, R.D., 2000. Controls on soil respiration: implications for climate change. Biogeochemistry 48 (1), 1-6.
57. Selden, T.M., Song, D., 1994. Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for airpollution emissions? J.Environ. Econ.Manag. 27 (2),147-162.
58. Shafik, N., Bandyopadhyay, S., 1992. Economic growth and environmental quality: time-series and cross-countryevidence (VOL)(Vol. 904). World Bank Publications.
59. Shahbaz, M., Lean, H.H., Shabbir, M.S., 2012a. Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Pakistan: cointegration and Granger causality. Renew. Sustainable Energy Rev. 16 (5), 2947-2953.
60. Shahbaz, M., Zeshan, M., Afza, T., 2012b. Is energy consumption effective to spur economic growth in Pakistan? New evidence from bounds test to level relationships and Granger causality tests. Econ. Modell. 29 (6), 2310-2319.
61. 2 emissions in Indonesia. Renew. Sustainable Energy Rev. 25, 109-121.
62. 2 emissions in South Africa. Energy Policy 61, 1452-1459.
63. Shahbaz, M., Ozturk, I., Afza, T., Ali, A., 2013c. Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve in a global economy. Renew. Sustainable Energy Rev. 25, 494-502.
64. Shahbaz, M., Mutascu, M., Azim, P., 2013d. Environmental Kuznets curve in Romania and the role of energy consumption. Renew. Sustainable Energy Rev. 18, 165-173.
65. Shahiduzzaman, M., Alam, K., 2012. Cointegration and causal relationships between energy consumption and output: Assessing the evidence from Australia. Energy Econ. 34 (6), 2182-2188.
66. Shukla, V., Parikh, K., 1992. The environmental consequences of urban growth: cross-national perspectives on economic development, air pollution, and city size. Urban Geogr. 13 (5), 422-449.
67. Stern, D.I., Common, M.S., 2001. Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for sulphur. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 41, 162-178.
68. Stern, N., 2006. Review on the Economics of Climate Change. London HM Treasury.
69. Suri, V., Chapman, D., 1998a. Economic growth, trade and energy: implications for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol. Econ. 25 (2), 195-208.
70. Suri, V., Chapman, D., 1998b. Economic growth, trade and energy: implications for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol. Econ. 25 (2), 195-208.
71. Taylor, M.S., Copeland, B.R., 2004. Trade growth and the environment. J. Econ. Lit.
72. Vincent, J.R., 1997. Testing for environmental Kuznets curves within a developing country. Environ. Dev. Econ. 2 (04), 417-431.
73. Webster, P.J., Toma, V.E., Kim, H.M., 2011. Were the Pakistan floods predictable? Geophys. Res. Lett. 38 (4).
74. World Wide Fund (WWF). 'Living Planet Report (2010). http://www.footprintnetwork.org/press/LPR2010.pdf.
75. Zaman, K., Khan, M.M., Saleem, Z., 2011. Bivariate cointegration between energy consumption and development factors: a case study of Pakistan. Int. J. Green Energy 8 (8), 820-833.
76. Zaman, K., Khan, M.M., Ahmad, M., Rustam, R., 2012. Determinants of electricity consumption function in Pakistan: old wine in a new bottle. Energy Policy 50, 623-634.
77. Zeb, R., Salar, L., Awan, U., Zaman, K., Shahbaz, M., 2014. Causal links between renewable energy: environmental degradation and economic growth in selected SAARC countries: progress towards green economy. Renew. Energy 71, 123-132.
78. Zeng, N., Dickinson, R.E., Zeng, X., 1996. Climatic impact of Amazon deforestation - A mechanistic model study. J. Clim. 9 (4), 859-883.