Effects of neighbourhood identity and diversity on the foliar nutrition of sessile oak and beech

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 335, Issue , 2015, Pages 108-117

  Nickmans, Hans ^a   Verheyen, Kris ^b   Guiz, Jordan ^a   Jonard, Mathieu ^a   Ponette, Quentin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Beech; Diversity effect; Forest nutrition; Identity effect; Mixture; Oak

Indexed keywords

BEECH; DIVERSITY EFFECTS; FOREST NUTRITION; IDENTITY EFFECT; OAK;

MIXTURES;

BASAL AREA; DECIDUOUS FOREST; LITTER; NUTRIENT BUDGET; NUTRITION; SPECIES DIVERSITY; TEMPERATE FOREST;

ARDENNES [WESTERN EUROPE]; BELGIUM;

FAGUS; QUERCUS PETRAEA;

EID: 84908503408     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.09.025     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. 2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant, Cell Environ. 2007, 30:258-270. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01641.x.
2. Assmann E. The Principles of Forest Yield Study: Studies in the Organic Production, Structure, Increment, and Yield of Forest Stands 1970, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
3. Binkley D., Giardina C. Why do tree species affect soils? The warp and woof of tree-soil interactions. Biogeochemistry 1998, 42:89-106.
4. Binkley D., Sollins P., Bell R., Sachs D., Myrold D. Biogeochemistry of adjacent conifer and alder-conifer stands. Ecology 1992, 73:2022-2033.
5. Binkley D., Stape J.L., Ryan M.G. Thinking about efficiency of resource use in forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 2004, 193:5-16. 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.01.019.
6. Bond B.J. Age-related changes of photosynthesis in woody plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2000, 5:349-353.
7. Brandtberg P.-O. Mixing birch in Norway Spruce Stands: Impact on Forest Floor Chemistry and Implications for the Buffering of Acidity and Nutrition of Spruce 2001, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
8. Braun S., Thomas V.F.D., Quiring R., Flückiger W. Does nitrogen deposition increase forest production? The role of phosphorus. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158:2043-2052. 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.11.030.
9. Burkhart H.E., Tham A. Predictions from growth and yield models of the performance of mixed species stands. The Ecology of Mixed-Species Stands of Trees 1992, 21-34. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK. M.G.R. Cannell, D.C. Malcolm, P.A. Robertson (Eds.).
10. Crowley K.F., McNeil B.E., Lovett G.M., Canham C.D., Driscoll C.T., Rustad L.E., Denny E., Hallett R.A., Arthur M.A., Boggs J.L., Goodale C.L., Kahl J.S., McNulty S.G., Ollinger S.V., Pardo L.H., Schaberg P.G., Stoddard J.L., Weand M.P., Weathers K.C. Do nutrient limitation patterns shift from nitrogen toward phosphorus with increasing nitrogen deposition across the Northeastern United States?. Ecosystems 2012, 15:940-957. 10.1007/s10021-012-9550.
11. Dieler J., Pretzsch H. Morphological plasticity of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in pure and mixed-species stands. For. Ecol. Manage. 2013, 295:97-108.
12. Duquesnay A., Dupouey J.L., Clement A., Ulrich E., Le Tacon F. Spatial and temporal variability of foliar mineral concentration in beech (Fagus sylvatica) stands in northeastern France. Tree Physiol. 2000, 20:13-22.
13. 2 enrichment experiments in forest, grassland and desert. Glob. Change Biol. 2004, 10:2121-2138.
14. Ewald J. Ecological background of crown condition, growth and nutritional status of Picea abies (L.) Karst. in the Bavarian Alps. Eur. J. For. Res. 2005, 124:9-18.
15. Fischer, R., Waldner, P., Carnicer, J., Coll, M., Dobbertin, M., Ferretti, M., Hansen, K., Kindermann, G., Lasch-Born, P., Lorenz, M., Marchetto, A., Meining, S., Nieminen, T., Peñuelas, J., Rautio, P., Reyer, C., Roskams, P., Sánchez, G., 2012. The Condition of Forests in Europe. 2012 Executive Report. Hamburg.
16. Flückiger W., Braun S. Nitrogen deposition in Swiss forests and its possible relevance for leaf nutrient status, parasite attacks and soil acidification. Environ. Pollut. 1998, 102:69-76.
17. Forrester D.I., Schortemeyer M., Stock W.D., Bauhus J., Khanna P.K., Cowie A.L. Assessing nitrogen fixation in mixed- and single-species plantations of Eucalyptus globulus and Acacia mearnsii. Tree Physiol. 2007, 27:1319-1328.
18. Frivold L.H., Kolström T. Yield and treatment of mixed stands of boreal tree species in Fennoscandia. Management of Mixed-Species Forest: Silviculture and Economics 1999, 98-117. Institute for Forestry and Nature Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands. A.F.M. Olsthoorn, H.H. Bartelink, J.J. Gardiner, H. Pretzsch, H.J. Hekhuis, A. Franc (Eds.).
19. Heinsdorf M. Soil and nutritional studies in pine and pine-beech mixed stands on different sites in Brandenburg. Beiträge für die Forstwirtschaft Landschaftsökologie 1997, 31:119-124.
20. Horn R., Schulze E.-D., Hantschel R. Nutrient balance and element cycling in healthy and declining Norway spruce stands. Forest Decline and Air Pollution: A Study of Spruce (Picea Abies) on Acid Soils 1989, 444-458. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. E.-D. Schulze, O.L. Lange, R. Oren (Eds.).
21. Houle D., Ouimet R., Paquin R., Laflamme J.G. Interactions of atmospheric depositions with a mixed hardwood and a coniferous forest canopy at the Lake Clair Watershed. Can. J. For. Res. 1999, 29:1944-1957.
22. Jonard M., Andre F., Ponette Q. Tree species mediated effects on leaf litter dynamics in pure and mixed stands of oak and beech. Can. J. For. Res. 2008, 38:528-538.
23. Jonard M., Fürst A., Verstraeten A., Thimonier A., Timmermann V., Potočić N., Waldner P., Benham S., Hansen K., Merilä P., Ponette Q., de la Cruz A.C., Roskams P., Nicolas M., Croisé L., Ingerslev M., Matteucci G., Decinti B., Bascietto M., Rautio P. Tree mineral nutrition is deteriorating in Europe. Glob. Change Biol. 2014, 1-13. 10.1111/gcb.12657.
24. Jones H.E., Mcnamara N., Mason W.L. Functioning of mixed-species stands: evidence from a long-term forest experiment. Forest Diversity and Function: Temperate and Boreal Systems 2005, 111-130. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York. M. Scherer-Lorenzen, C. Körner, E.-D. Schulze (Eds.).
25. Jost L. Entropy and diversity. Oikos 2006, 113:363-375.
26. Kelty M.J. Comparative productivity of monocultures and mixed-species stands. The Ecology and Silviculture of Mixed-Species Forests 1992, 125-142. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London. M.J. Kelty, B.C. Larson, C.D. Oliver (Eds.).
27. Kölling C., Zimmermann L. Die Anfälligkeit der Wälder Deutschlands gegenüber dem Klimawandel. Gefahrst. Reinhal. Luft 2007, 67:259-268.
28. Leuschner C., Hertel D., Coners H., Büttner V. Root competition between beech and oak: a hypothesis. Oecologia 2001, 126:276-284.
29. 2 and human nutrition: toward globally imbalanced plant stoichiometry?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002, 17:457-461. 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02587-9.
30. Lomský B., Šrámek V., Novotný R. Changes in the air pollution load in the Jizera Mts.: effects on the health status and mineral nutrition of the young Norway spruce stands. Eur. J. For. Res. 2011, 131:757-771.
31. Lovett G., Lindberg S.E. Atmospheric deposition and canopy interactions of nitrogen in forests. Can. J. For. Res. 1993, 23:1603-1616.
32. 2 and temperature. Tree Physiol. 2010, 30:1209-1220.
33. Luyssaert S., Sulkava M., Raitio H., Hollmén J. Evaluation of forest nutrition based on large-scale foliar surveys: are nutrition profiles the way of the future?. J. Environ. Monit. 2004, 6:160-167.
34. Manthey M., Leuschner C. Buchenwälder und Klimawandel. Nat. Landschaft 2007, 82:441-445.
35. Marschner H. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants 1995, Academic Press, London. second ed.
36. McLaughlin S.B., Wimmer R. Tansley review no. 104: calcium physiology and terrestrial ecosystem processes. New Phyt. 1999, 142:373-417.
37. McTiernan K.B., Ineson P., Coward P.A. Respiration and nutrient release from tree leaf litter mixtures. Oikos 1997, 78:527-538.
38. Mellert K.H., Göttlein A. Comparison of new foliar nutrient thresholds derived from van den Burg's literature compilation with established central European references. Eur. J. For. Res. 2012, 131:1461-1472.
39. Mellert K.H., Prietzel J., Straussberger R., Rehfuess K.E. Long-term nutritional trends of conifer stands in Europe: results from the RECOGNITION project. Eur. J. For. Res. 2004, 123:305-319.
40. Mellert K.H., Prietzel J., Straussberger R., Rehfuess K.E., Kahle H.P., Perez P., Spiecker H. Relationships between long-term trends of air temperature, precipitation, nitrogen nutrition and growth of coniferous stands in Central Europe and Finland. Eur. J. For. Res. 2008, 127:507-524.
41. Mengel K., Kirkby E.A. Principles of plant nutrition 2001, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. fifth ed.
42. 2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2013, 4:133-142.
43. Neft R., Stangl J. Charakterisierung des Ernährungszustandes der Fichte auf frischen, tiefgründigen Lehmen im Forstamt Schongau 1985, Universitaet München, München, Germany.
44. Niinemets Ü. A review of light interception in plant stands from leaf to canopy in different plant functional types and in species with varying shade tolerance. Ecol. Res. 2010, 25:693-714. 10.1007/s11284-010-0712-4.
45. Oakley B.B., North M.P., Franklin J.F. Facilitative and competitive effects of a N-fixing shrub on white fir saplings. For. Ecol. Manage. 2006, 233:100-107. 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.06.014.
46. Pearson P.N., Palmer M.R. Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations over the past 60 million years. Nature 2000, 406:695-699.
47. Prescott C.E. The influence of the forest canopy on nutrient cycling. Tree Physiol. 2002, 22:1193-1200.
48. Pretzsch H., Bielak K., Block J., Bruchwald A., Dieler J., Ehrhart H.-P., Kohnle U., Nagel J., Spellmann H., Zasada M., Zingg A. Productivity of mixed versus pure stands of oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) along an ecological gradient. Eur. J. For. Res. 2013, 132:263-280.
49. Pretzsch H., Dieler J., Seifert T., Rötzer T. Climate effects on productivity and resource-use efficiency of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica [L.]) in stands with different spatial mixing patterns. Trees 2012, 26:1343-1360.
50. Reich P.B., Frelich L. Temperate deciduous forests. Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Change - Volume 2, The Earth System: Biological and Ecological Dimensions of Global Environmental Change 2002, 565-569. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester. H.A. Mooney, J.G. Canadell, T. Munn (Eds.).
51. Richards A.E., Forrester D.I., Bauhus J., Scherer-Lorenzen M. The influence of mixed tree plantations on the nutrition of individual species: a review. Tree Physiol. 2010, 30:1192-1208. 10.1093/treephys/tpq035.
52. Rothe A., Binkley D. Nutritional interactions in mixed species forests: a synthesis. Can. J. For. Res. 2001, 31:1855-1870.
53. Rothe A., Ewald J., Hibbs D.E. Do admixed broadleaves improve foliar nutrient status of conifer tree crops?. For. Ecol. Manage. 2003, 172:327-338. 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00800-3.
54. Rothe A., Huber C., Kreutzer K., Weis W. Deposition and soil leaching in stands of Norway spruce and European Beech: results from the Höglwald research in comparison with other European case studies. Plant Soil 2002, 240:33-45.
55. Sack L., Melcher P.J., Liu W.H., Middleton E., Pardee T. How strong is intercanopy leaf plasticity in temperate deciduous trees?. Am. J. Bot. 2006, 93:829-839.
56. Sayyad E., Hosseini S.M., Mokhtari J., Mahdavi R., Gholamali S., Akbarinia M., Tabari M. Comparison of growth, nutrition and soil properties of pure and mixed Stands of Populus deltoides and Alnus subcordata. Silva Fenn. 2006, 40:27-35.
57. R Core Team, 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org.
58. Thelin G., Rosengren U., Callesen I., Ingerslev M. The nutrient status of Norway spruce in pure and in mixed-species stands. For. Ecol. Manage. 2002, 160:115-125.
59. Thelin G., Rosengren-Brinck U., Nihlgård B., Barkman A. Trends in needle and soil chemistry of Norway spruce and Scots pine stands in South Sweden 1985-1994. Environ. Pollut. 1998, 99:149-158.
60. Valladares F., Manuel J., Aranda I., Balaguer L., Dizengremel P., Manrique E., Dreyer E. The greater seedling high-light tolerance of Quercus robur over Fagus sylvatica is linked to a greater physiological plasticity. Trees 2002, 16:395-403.
61. Wardle D.A., Bonner K.I., Nicholson K.S. Biodiversity and plant litter: experimental evidence which does not support the view that enhanced species richness improves ecosystem function. Oikos 1997, 79:247-258.