Individual risk and community benefit in international research

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 38, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 626-629

  Hughes, Robert C ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85027932495     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: 14734257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100171     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Glickman SW, Mchutchinson JG, Peterson ED, et al. Ethical and scientific implications of the globalization of clinical research. N Engl J Med 2009;360:816-23.
2. Petryna A. When Experiments Travel: Clinical Trials and the Global Search for Human Subjects. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009:10-33,89-96.
3. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences in collaboration with the World Health Organization. International Ethical Guidelines For Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva: CIOMS, 2002. http://www.cioms.ch/publications/layout_guide2002.pdf (accessed 26 Apr 2012).
4. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. 2008. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/ (accessed 26 Apr 2012).
5. London AJ. Responsiveness to host community health needs. In: Emanuel EJ, Grady C, Crouch RA, et al, eds. The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2008:737-44.
6. Participants in the 2001 Conference on ethical aspects of research in developing countries. Moral standards for research in developing countries: from"reasonable availability" to "fair benefits". Hastings Cent Rep 2004;34:17-27.
7. Weijer C, Emanuel EJ. Protecting communities in biomedical research. Science 2000;289:1142-4.
8. Hausman D. Group risks, risks to groups, and engagement. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2008;17:351-69.
9. London AJ. Justice and the human development approach to international research. Hastings Cent Rep 2005;35:24-37.
10. Gbadegesin S, Wendler D. Protecting communities in health research from exploitation. Bioethics 2006;20:248-53.
11. Shah S, Wolitz R, Emanuel E. Refocusing the responsiveness requirement. Bioethics. Published Online First: 29 July 2011. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01903.x
12. Wendler D, Miller FG. Assessing research risks systematically: the net risks test. J Med Ethics 2006;33:481-6.
13. Thiers FA, Sinsky AJ, Berndt ER. Trends in the globalization of clinical trials. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2008;7:13-14. Supplementary Information S5.
14. National Council for Science and Technology. Guidelines for Ethical Conduct of Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects in Kenya. Nairobi: National Council for Science and Technology, 2004:6. https://webapps.sph.harvard.edu/live/gremap/files/ke_NCST_guidelines.pdf (accessed 26 Apr 2012).
15. National Institutes of Health Office of Human Subjects Research. Guidelines for Remuneration of Research Subjects in the Intramural Research Program and Registration in the Clinical Research Volunteer Program. http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/info/sheet20.html (accessed 26 Apr 2012).
16. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Payment To Research Subjects. 1998.http://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm126429.htm (accessed 26 Apr 2012).
17. Wertheimer A. Rethinking the Ethics of Clinical Research: Widening the Lens.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010:117-89.
18. Pogge TW. An egalitarian law of peoples. Philos Public Aff 1994;23:195-224.
19. Blake M. Distributive justice, coercion, and autonomy. Philos Public Aff 2002;30:257-96.
20. Nagel T. The problem of global justice. Philos Public Aff 2005;33:113-47.
21. Pogge T. The role of international law in reproducing massive poverty. In: Besson S, Tasioulas T, eds. The Philosophy of International Law. New York: Oxford UniversityPress, 2010.
22. GiveWell. Your Dollar Goes Further Overseas. http://www.givewell.org/giving101/Your-dollar-goes-further-overseas (accessed 26 Apr 2012).